1
M ENTOR P OST P ROGRAM A SSESSMENT O BJECTIVE Through the Centers of Excellence (COE) network, the Parkinson’s Foundation (PF) unites a community dedicated to improving clinical care in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Each COE coordinator fulfills the PF mission through the coordination and implementation of quality of care, outreach, and research. PF developed the Mentoring and Networking Program (MNP) with the aim of providing coordinators with support in their role, as well as information on PF's structure, operating procedures, resources, education, and networking opportunities. It is a venue to collaborate and enhance the field of PD. B ACKGROUND PF's structured and formal MNP will play an important role in helping these professionals to acquire skills, gain experience, and increase productivity. This translates into more knowledgeable and proactive PF COE coordinators who will be able to better engage with team members, patients and families. Mentors/mentees are carefully matched by the Task Force based on areas of interest, mentoring goals, characteristics of the population served and clinical setting to ensure that the learning experience is both as focused and as broad as it needs to be. M ETHODS A multi-disciplinary task force of 5-6 COE members and a representative of the PF was established from applications sent out to all US Centers. Guidelines, applications, pre/post evaluations for the mentors and mentees, a global evaluation, and a handbook with important information about the Foundation and resources for the COEs were developed. Mentors and mentees participated in established conference calls with the Task Force to review responsibilities. Mentors and mentees were then introduced to their pairs via telephone. Phase I (four pairs) and Phase II (six pairs) all completed pre- and post-evaluations and changes were applied to Phase III which launched February, 2019. Monthly contact will take place for 12 months, though more frequent contacts can be utilized based on needs and availability of the pairs. Each pair chooses their preferred methods of contact. With Phase III Match completed, introductory calls were held to explain guidelines and timelines. Each mentor-mentee pair then sets their specific goals for the year and establishes call frequency and methods that fit their needs. All pairs completed the pre-evaluation survey. New in this Phase will be onsite Mentee-to-Mentor visits for in-person evaluation of activities at another COE. PF COE M ENTORING AND N ETWORKING P ROGRAM Phase I: Pilot Call for participation 4 mentors & 4 mentees selected from 8 PF Centers Evaluation & Feedback 6 month evaluation July 2016 Phase II: All centers invited 6 mentors & 7 mentees selected from 12 PF Centers Evaluation & Feedback 12 month evaluation 2018 Assessment & Planning Completed Evaluation & Support Ongoing Phase III-Expansion: Launched 2019 8 mentors & 8 mentees selected from 16 PF Centers P ARKINSON S F OUNDATION COE C OORDINATOR J OB D ESCRIPTION The Center of Excellence (COE) Coordinator specializes in PD care and fills a variety of roles in the PF COE setting. The Center Coordinator works with all members on the COE team to ensure that the PF’s resources are available to everybody; health care workers, patients and families are familiar with the resources; programs are active and run smoothly; and the best practice guidelines are properly implemented at the center. The COE Center Coordinator acts as a liaison between the PF, the COE team, and patients and families. Facilitates communication between patients and the other members of the PD care Team. This includes alerting the team about psychological, social, and financial concerns patients or families may be experiencing and developing a plan for meeting these needs. Promotes a multidisciplinary approach and focus within to help patients manage the disease and their quality of life. Helps patients and families navigate a disease treatment plan, promoting empowerment and self -advocacy. Educates family members, friends, the community, and other health care professionals and non -PD specialists. Utilizes and shares PF information and resources with patients and families, COE staff, and the community, ensuring that PF materials are readily accessible. Coordinates the planning and execution of outreach programs and events. Participates in Parkinson’s meetings, taking and sharing information and acting as a resource, presenter, and/or advisor throughout the COE network. Supports the COE network by working closely with the PF and other COE coordinators/professionals providing leadership opportunities, education, and recognition. Provides external healthcare and other relevant professionals with information and resources so as to increase awareness about PD care, the work of the COE, and PF programs and resources. Works with Medical Director to ensure the COE maintains its designation as Center of Excellence. 1. I feel supported by my Medical Director in my role as a Center Coordinator. 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree 2. I feel supported by my co-workers in my role as a Center Coordinator. 3. I feel supported by other Center Coordinators. 4. I am satisfied with my relationship with the PF network. 5. I feel confident in my role as a mentor. 6. I feel confident in my ability to share information about PF’s resources for patients, caregivers, and professionals. 7. I feel confident in my ability to share information about the latest PD research. Please answer the following to assess your compatibility with your mentee. Do you feel your mentee was a good match for you personally and professionally? Please explain Do you feel you were able to provide adequate guidance? Do you feel your mentee now has a better understanding of the available resources and CC responsibilities? What changes would you make if you were a mentor again? A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to the Center Directors for their support of the program. Special thanks to Fernando Cubillos, MD for his support and guidance. Thanks to the Task Force for their hard work and engagement. Very special thank you to all of the past and present Mentors/Mentees, as this program would not exist without your participation. C ONCLUSIONS With Phases I & II complete, Phase III is underway with eight Mentor/Mentee matches. Phase III will also include onsite Mentee-to-Mentor visits to further strengthen the coordinators’ exposure to other COE processes, resources, and structures. Feedback has been positive overall. We are encouraged by the feedback received that this phase of the MNP will help current and future COE coordinators gain the resources needed to confidently interact with the PD community. Several mentees from previous phases have elected to become mentors in Phase III, supporting the sustainability of this intervention. M ENTEE P OST P ROGRAM A SSESSMENT 1. My PF Center Coordinator (CC) responsibilities are clear to me. 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree 2. My PF CC responsibilities are clear to my supervisors and colleagues. 3. I have received sufficient training to do my job as PF CC. 4. I have someone in my institution I can discuss my CC responsibilities with. 5. I have someone outside my institution I can ask about my CC responsibilities. 6. I am aware of PF’s resources for patients and can easily access them. 7. I am aware of PF’s resources for caregivers and can easily access them. 8. I am aware of PF’s resources for professionals and can easily access them. 9. I feel informed about the latest PD research. 10. I feel confident in my role as PF CC. Please answer the following questions to help assess your compatibility with your mentor. Did you feel your mentor was a good match for you personally and professionally? Please explain Did you feel your mentor provided adequate guidance? Was your mentor knowledgeable of the available resources and CC responsibilities? Did you fell comfortable asking your mentor for help or advice? IMPLEMENTATION OF A PEER - TO - PEER MENTORING INTERVENTION FOR CENT ER OF EXCELLENCE COORDINATORS Christine B. Hunter, BSN ; Kelly Arney, MSW; Jori E. Fleisher, MD, MSCE; Pamela R. Palmentera, MSW, LCSW; Jessica Shurer, MSW; Fernando Cubillos, MD Parkinson’s Foundation Centers of Excellence Program, USA MNP O VERALL P ROGRAM E VALUATION 0 1 2 3 4 5 Orientation Components Match Expectations Time Duration Knowledge Base Impact Resources Available Achieved Outcomes Mentors Mentees R EFERENCES Fleming M, House S, Hanson VS, et al. The Mentoring Competency Assessment: Validation of a new instrument to evaluate skills of research mentors. Acad Med. 2013;88(7):1002-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318295e298. Korentager R. Mentoring and modeling professionalism: Clinical care. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(3):e361. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000313. eCollection 2015 Mar. McBride AB, Campbell J, Woods NF, Manson SM. Building a mentoring network. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65(3):305-14. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Mar 23. Altonji SJ, Baños JH, Harada CN. Perceived benefits of a peer mentoring program for first-year medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2019;Feb 18:1-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1574579. Download poster

IMPLEMENTATION OF A PEER-TO-PEER MENTORING … · PF's structured and formal MNP will play an important role in helping these professionals to acquire skills, gain experience, and

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: IMPLEMENTATION OF A PEER-TO-PEER MENTORING … · PF's structured and formal MNP will play an important role in helping these professionals to acquire skills, gain experience, and

MENTOR POST PROGRAM ASSESSMENT

1A 1B

2A

3A

2B

3B

OBJECTIVE

Through the Centers of Excellence (COE) network, the Parkinson’s Foundation (PF) unites a community dedicated to improving clinical care in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Each COE coordinator fulfills the PF mission through the coordination and implementation of quality of care, outreach, and research. PF developed the Mentoring and Networking Program (MNP) with the aim of providing coordinators with support in their role, as well as information on PF's structure, operating procedures, resources, education, and networking opportunities. It is a venue to collaborate and enhance the field of PD.

BACKGROUND

PF's structured and formal MNP will play an important role in helping these professionals to acquire skills, gain experience, and increase productivity. This translates into more knowledgeable and proactive PF COE coordinators who will be able to better engage with team members, patients and families. Mentors/mentees are carefully matched by the Task Force based on areas of interest, mentoring goals, characteristics of the population served and clinical setting to ensure that the learning experience is both as focused and as broad as it needs to be.

METHODS

A multi-disciplinary task force of 5-6 COE members and a representative of the PF was established from applications sent out to all US Centers. Guidelines, applications, pre/post evaluations for the mentors and mentees, a global evaluation, and a handbook with important information about the Foundation and resources for the COEs were developed. Mentors and mentees participated in established conference calls with the Task Force to review responsibilities. Mentors and mentees were then introduced to their pairs via telephone. Phase I (four pairs) and Phase II (six pairs) all completed pre- and post-evaluations and changes were applied to Phase III which launched February, 2019. Monthly contact will take place for 12 months, though more frequent contacts can be utilized based on needs and availability of the pairs. Each pair chooses their preferred methods of contact. With Phase III Match completed, introductory calls were held to explain guidelines and timelines. Each mentor-mentee pair then sets their specific goals for the year and establishes call frequency and methods that fit their needs. All pairs completed the pre-evaluation survey. New in this Phase will be onsite Mentee-to-Mentor visits for in-person evaluation of activities at another COE.

PF COE MENTORING AND NETWORKING PROGRAM

Phase I: PilotCall for participation4 mentors & 4 mentees selected from 8 PF Centers

Evaluation & Feedback6 month evaluationJuly 2016

Phase II: All centers invited6 mentors & 7 mentees selected from 12 PF Centers

Evaluation & Feedback12 month evaluation2018

Assessment & PlanningCompleted

Evaluation & SupportOngoing

Phase III-Expansion: Launched 20198 mentors & 8 mentees selectedfrom 16 PF Centers

PARKINSON’S FOUNDATION COE COORDINATOR JOB DESCRIPTION

The Center of Excellence (COE) Coordinator specializes in PD care and fills a variety of roles in the PF COE setting. The Center Coordinator works with all members on the COE team to ensure that the PF’s resources are available to everybody; health care workers, patients and families are familiar with the resources; programs are active and run smoothly; and the best practice guidelines are properly implemented at the center.

The COE Center Coordinator acts as a liaison between the PF, the COE team, and patients and families.

Facilitates communication between patients and the other members of the PD care Team. This includes alerting the team about psychological, social, and financial concerns patients or families may be experiencing and developing a plan for meeting these needs.

Promotes a multidisciplinary approach and focus within to help patients manage the disease and their quality of life.

Helps patients and families navigate a disease treatment plan, promoting empowerment and self-advocacy.

Educates family members, friends, the community, and other health care professionals and non-PD specialists.

Utilizes and shares PF information and resources with patients and families, COE staff, and the community, ensuring that PF materials are readily accessible.

Coordinates the planning and execution of outreach programs and events.

Participates in Parkinson’s meetings, taking and sharing information and acting as a resource, presenter, and/or advisor throughout the COE network.

Supports the COE network by working closely with the PF and other COE coordinators/professionals providing leadership opportunities, education, and recognition.

Provides external healthcare and other relevant professionals with information and resources so as to increase awareness about PD care, the work of the COE, and PF programs and resources.

Works with Medical Director to ensure the COE maintains its designation as Center of Excellence.

1. I feel supported by my Medical Director in my role as a Center Coordinator.

1 = Strongly Disagree

2 = Disagree

3 = Neutral

4 = Agree

5 = Strongly Agree

2. I feel supported by my co-workers in my role as a Center Coordinator.

3. I feel supported by other Center Coordinators.

4. I am satisfied with my relationship with the PF network.

5. I feel confident in my role as a mentor.

6. I feel confident in my ability to share information about PF’s resources for patients, caregivers, and professionals.

7. I feel confident in my ability to share information about the latest PD research.

Please answer the following to assess your compatibility with your mentee.

Do you feel your mentee was a good match for you personally and professionally?

Please explainDo you feel you were able to provide adequate guidance?

Do you feel your mentee now has a better understanding of the available resources and CC responsibilities?

What changes would you make if you were a mentor again?

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks to the Center Directors for their support of the program. Special thanks to Fernando Cubillos, MD for his support and guidance. Thanks to the Task Force for their hard work and engagement. Very special thank you to all of the past and present Mentors/Mentees, as this program would not exist without your participation.

CONCLUSIONS

With Phases I & II complete, Phase III is underway with eight Mentor/Mentee matches. Phase III will also include onsite Mentee-to-Mentor visits to further strengthen the coordinators’ exposure to other COE processes, resources, and structures. Feedback has been positive overall.

We are encouraged by the feedback received that this phase of the MNP will help current and future COE coordinators gain the resources needed to confidently interact with the PD community. Several mentees from previous phases have elected to become mentors in Phase III, supporting the sustainability of this intervention.

MENTEE POST PROGRAM ASSESSMENT1. My PF Center Coordinator (CC) responsibilities are clear to me.

1 = Strongly Disagree

2 = Disagree

3 = Neutral

4 = Agree

5 = Strongly Agree

2. My PF CC responsibilities are clear to my supervisors and colleagues.

3. I have received sufficient training to do my job as PF CC.

4. I have someone in my institution I can discuss my CC responsibilities with.

5. I have someone outside my institution I can ask about my CC responsibilities.

6. I am aware of PF’s resources for patients and can easily access them.

7. I am aware of PF’s resources for caregivers and can easily access them.

8. I am aware of PF’s resources for professionals and can easily access them.

9. I feel informed about the latest PD research.

10. I feel confident in my role as PF CC.

Please answer the following questions to help assess your compatibility with your mentor.

Did you feel your mentor was a good match for you personally and professionally?

Please explainDid you feel your mentor provided adequate guidance?

Was your mentor knowledgeable of the available resources and CC responsibilities?

Did you fell comfortable asking your mentor for help or advice?

IMPLEMENTATION OF A PEER-TO-PEER MENTORING INTERVENTION FOR CENTER OF EXCELLENCE COORDINATORS

Christine B. Hunter, BSN; Kelly Arney, MSW; Jori E. Fleisher, MD, MSCE; Pamela R. Palmentera, MSW, LCSW; Jessica Shurer, MSW; Fernando Cubillos, MD

Parkinson’s Foundation Centers of Excellence Program, USA

MNP OVERALL P ROGRAM EVALUATION

0

1

2

3

4

5

Orientation Components Match Expectations Time Duration KnowledgeBase

Impact ResourcesAvailable

AchievedOutcomes

Mentors MenteesREFERENCES

Fleming M, House S, Hanson VS, et al. The Mentoring Competency Assessment: Validation of a new instrument to evaluate skills of research mentors. Acad Med. 2013;88(7):1002-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318295e298.

Korentager R. Mentoring and modeling professionalism: Clinical care. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(3):e361. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000313. eCollection 2015 Mar.

McBride AB, Campbell J, Woods NF, Manson SM. Building a mentoring network. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65(3):305-14. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

Altonji SJ, Baños JH, Harada CN. Perceived benefits of a peer mentoring program for first-year medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2019;Feb 18:1-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1574579.

Download poster