Upload
rizwan-alam
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Impact of Science on Economic Development
1/6
IMPACT OF SCIENCE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
INTRODUCTION
There is a lively debate on the link between science and technology and economic development. One
view is that Athere is no theory of research, invention, innovation and diffusion that meshes well with
existing (economic) models. Hence, carefully testing the role of technology in economic growth is
methodologically problematic. This view further contends that the direction of the science and
technology link to economic growth is difficult to specify although growth correlates well with the
growth of capital per worker and the expansion of skills. The second view is that science and technology
generate innovations. Continuous innovation (technological, organisational, managerial) generated by
learning entities have been shown to be responsible not only for productivity increases, but also for
dynamic competitive advantage of firms, industries and nations in the unfolding global economy.
Economic development is seen as the result of this dynamic process.
According to this second view, the innovation process is nonlinear, multidirectional and is
central to a complexity of factors which are each necessary but alone insufficient to bring about
development. When innovation is missing from the development process, development becomesunsustainable in the long run. Because innovation has many sources, research and development
expenditure (which has always been the focus of those attempting to measure the contribution of S & T
to development) is only a small tip of the innovation iceberg. Failure to recognise this fact may be
responsible for the inconclusive results obtained from cross - country regression models which find a
positive but statistically insignificant relationship between R & D expenditure and economic growth.
The second view is based on certain empirical facts that: economic development is a long - term
process, and innovative activities have varying periods, and change is not instantaneous; the innovation
process is characterized by uncertainty, risks and unpredictable outcomes; the change process is not
always linear, nor unidirectional; and the behaviour of change agents (firms, farmers, individuals) is
embedded in their history, organisational practices; strategies, and particular objectives; so that the
same market signals can be interpreted differently by different change agents.This second view ascribes
much of the phenomenal rate of economic growth shown by Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Malaysia,
Thailand, China, Singapore and a host of countries in Latin America, to their harnessing the fruits of
science and technology. This is not to deny the absence of exact measures of the contribution of
science and technology to this growth. More importantly, international competitiveness in increasingly
8/3/2019 Impact of Science on Economic Development
2/6
being defined in terms of agility to access, learn, adapt, utilize and innovate from available technology.
Firms or nations that fail to innovate lose their competitive position.
WHY FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE IS NECESSARY FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT?
. A number of examples from the past are given where a discovery in fundamental science has led to a
major economic development. Even the industrial revolution of the 17th century had its origin in basic
science. Funding basic science should be the responsibility of the Government and not that of an
individual or a group. The benefits of basic science are long-term and unpredictable, so in general one
cannot expect a return in the short-term.
Our lives are enriched, and our outlook changed, by knowledge of the heliocentric system, the
genetic code, how the sun works, why the sky is blue, and the expansion of the Universe. The point was
elegantly, if arrogantly, made by Bob Wilson (first Director of Fermilab, a large particle
physics/accelerator laboratory near Chicago) who, when asked by a Congressional Committee "What
will your lab contributeto the defense ofthe US?replied "Nothing, butitwill make itworth defending".
A number of scientists would like to defend the basic sciences without any practical applications, at least
in the beginning; and this is a very ancient phenomenon, as shown by the following dialogue in Plato's
Republic:
Socrates: Shall we set down astronomy among the subjects of study?
Glaucon: I think so, to know something about the seasons, the months and the years are of use for
military purposes, as well as for agriculture and for navigation.Socrates: It amuses me to see how afraid you are, lest the people should accuse you of
recommending useless studies.
Search for fundamental knowledge, motivated by curiosity, is as useful
as the search for solutions to specific problems. The reason we have practical computers today, and did
not have them 100 years ago, is not that meanwhile we have discovered the need for computers. It is
because of discoveries in fundamental physics, which underwrite modern electronics, developments in
mathematical logic, and the need of nuclear physicists in the 1930s to develop ways of counting
particles. I shall cite many examples, which demonstrate the practical and economic importance of
fundamental
research. But if fundamental, curiosity-driven, research is economically important, why should it be
supported from public, rather than private, funds? The reason is that there are certain kinds of science,
which yield benefits that are general, rather than specific to individual products, and hence generate
economic returns which cannot be captured by any single company or entrepreneur. People or
organizations that have no commercial interest in the results consequently fund most pure research,
and the continuation of this kind of funding is essential for further advance.
OBAMA:THIS SUD SOLVE
D PROBLEM OFRECESSION!!!
8/3/2019 Impact of Science on Economic Development
3/6
THE POSSIBILITY OF DISCOVERIES OF ENORMOUS ECONOMIC
AND PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE BYHAVING EXPENDITURE ON BASIC SCIENCE
It is not hard to show that expenditure on basic science often leads to discoveries of enormous
economic and practical importance, is highly profitable, and has easily paid for itself. Casimir, the
renowned theoretical physicist, and one-time Research Director of Philips, has given a splendid list of
examples: "I have heard statements that the role of academic research in innovation is slight. It is about
the most blatant piece of nonsense it has been my fortune to stumble upon.Certainly, one might speculate idly whether transistors might have been discovered by people who had
not been trained in and had not contributed to wave mechanics or the quantum theory of solids. It so
happened that the inventors of transistors were versed in and contributed to the quantum theory of
solids.
90 One might ask whether basic circuits in computers might have been found by people who
wanted to build computers. As it happens, they were discovered in the thirties by physicists dealing with
the counting of nuclear particles, because they were interested in nuclear physics.
One might ask whether there would be nuclear power because people wanted new power sources or
whether the urge to have new power would have led to the discovery of the nucleus. Perhaps - only it
didn't happen that way.
.
.WHY ARE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IMPORTANT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT?
Expanded scientific activity is thought to benefit national economic development through improved
labor force capacities and the creation of new knowledge and technology. However, scientific research
activity expands as a global process and reflects the penetration of societies by a general rationalistic
world culture. Scientific expansion and the accompanying cultural penetration legitimate a boardprogressive agenda of social amelioration (e.g., by identifying environmental and health problems, and
social welfare and human rights issues) that can result in regulation and direct constrainsts on
productive economic activity in the short term. Thus, science can be seen as encouraging a trade-off
between short-term economic growth and boarder (and longer-term) social development. The effects of
dimensions of scientific infrastrucutre on national economic growth are examined over the 1970-1990
period. Cross-national analyses show that the size of a nation's scientific labor force and training system
has a positive effect on economic development, supporting conventional theories. However, indicators
MANMOHAN TO
OBAMA:WHAT AN IDEA
SIRJEE
8/3/2019 Impact of Science on Economic Development
4/6
of national involvement in scientific research activity show negative effects on economic growth.
Corollary analyses show that this negative effect is partially explained by the expansion of scientific
activity into more socially relevant domains (e.g., medicine, environmental sciences, etc.) thus
supporting the main argument.
The central question of this paper is; what has science and technology contributed to African
development? Ideally, this section should document: the new firms that have been brought into being
as a result exploiting science and technology opportunities; the new products and processes that have
resulted; the number of jobs that have been created as a result of technology - based firms that have
been started; the contribution of science and technology to Gross Domestic Product (GDP); and the
development of new industry clusters of high technology firms.
In the introduction, we showed that there are theoretical and methodological problems in trying toisolate the contribution of science and technology to GDP. However, it is generally agreed that science
and technology is critical for economic growth even when its precise contribution has rarely been
determined. We shall therefore examine the less controversial contributions of science and technology
in the rest of this section.
Science and technology has contributed to Africa=s development in at least four areas: agriculture,
transport and communication, energy, human and animal health; education and the environment.
African agriculture has witnessed considerable transformation in several respects. Crops that were
formally alien to the continent such as wheat, barley, rice, maize, tomatoes and apples have been
successfully introduced and adapted to different countries in Africa.
Many research results from the agricultural research institutions on the continent have been
successfully disseminated to farmers. This dissemination has transformed plant breeding, agronomy,
physiology and horticulture. The impact of these results has been manifested in higher yields; the
introduction of disease, and pest - resistant varieties; and the production of crops of higher nutritional
value. Our Table 8 gives the lowest and highest yields achieved in the four most popular staple foods of
Africans - maize, sorghum, cassava and yams. When these are contrasted with traditional yields, the
impact of new technology becomes obvious. The highest yield increases were achieved with respect to
root croPS.
IMPORTANCE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
8/3/2019 Impact of Science on Economic Development
5/6
Economic and commercial integration is not enough for the sustainable development of the Western
Hemisphere. Integration based onscientifi c and technological common interests and efforts is also
necessary for the better use of scarce resources and the collaboration, and strengthening of the scientifi
c community, among other things. Investment in cyber infrastructure, for example, will allow smaller
countries to have access to highly elaborate and sophisticated research facilities located in other more
developed countries. With these new forms of collaboration, efforts suchas thematic networks and
transnational laboratories could be more easily introduced in the region. In delineating national and
regional policies and strategies, it is essential for intergovernmental institutions like the OAS to
stimulate an active dialogue between the scientifi c community and the political and social leadership.
National and regional development of science and technology requires a strong and committed
scientifi c community and an active network of collaborating scientifi c institutions. International
organizations have an important role in promoting collaboration in conjunction with institutions that
share the same purposes. Collaboration can complement expertise and result in increased funding, so
that more ambitious projects and programs can be undertaken to benefi t the countries of the region.
Smaller countries can take advantage of the economy of scale afforded by such collaborative schemes,
while the entire scientifi c community of the region will be a benefi ciary of greater cooperative
possibilities. The generation of national and regional policies and strategies requires the establishmentof a very active dialogue between the scientifi c community and political and social leaders. In this sense,
intergovernmental agencies such as the OAS should stimulate dialogues and contacts that facilitate this
encounter. Academies of sciences and other scientifi c institutions also have a major responsibility in
presenting the opinions and initiatives of the scientifi c community.
Science and technology is fundamental for promoting and expanding democracy. The concept
of democracy must encompass the active involvement of all citizens in making and monitoring decisions
that affect the public welfare. In the Knowledge Society of today, this means that citizenship should
involve training and literacy in basic scientifi c principles. In this regard, the importance of having the
scientifi c perspective as an integral part of the education system from its very earliest stages was
stressed.
HOW CAN BASIC SCEINCE CAN BE USED FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
OF A NATION?
inclusion of science and technology in formal education, beginning at the earliest levels, in a way thatbalances education and science concerns;
teacher education and training programs and the development of curriculum components and
knowledge content that insure teachers ability to transmit and students capacity to receive
basic scientifi c principles and a scientifi c message and outlook;
educational activities grounded on basic scientifi c principles and the provision of local opportunities
for
students to apply science and scientifi c principles at the local level in response to local needs;
8/3/2019 Impact of Science on Economic Development
6/6
involvement of the scientifi c community as change agents in the development of a scientifi c mindset
within the educational system;
promotion of foreign language learning to facilitate information exchange;
utilization of the educational portal of the OAS for scientifi c education.
Moreover, governments should develop and execute national and regional policies and programs that
remove or mitigate gender-related considerations hindering the construction of a sciencebased
outlook and mindset through:
removal of gender-role stereotypes affecting career choices, attitudes, teacher behavior, and
education and training materials; instead, targeting girls for science career.
incorporation of the concept of gender fairness into the educational curriculum and the establishment
of
a balance between male and female teachers;
examination of existing programs addressing gender issues and provision of mechanisms to facilitate
their use by education professionals.
Government policies should be developed and executed that expand scientifi c knowledge and implant
a scientifi c mindset at all levels of society through:
inclusion within the concept of scientifi c institutions and scientifi c community those institutions
andgroups (hospitals, museums, zoos, etc.) capable of collaborating in science research, dissemination,
and popularization activities necessary to insure science and technologys viable and effective
contribution to social development;
programs that popularize science and technology in a user-friendly way;