Upload
saba-ilyas
View
141
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 1
Abstract
This research has explored the dynamic relationship between mutual fund characteristics,
managerial attribute and its return. Variables are including Fund Size, Net Asset Value, Price to
Earning, price to Book Value, Turnover and impact variable is Return. The data for this study is
gathered through secondary sources since the fund has been launched except some funds.
Multiple Regression analysis is used to determine the impact mutual fund characteristics on its
return. The empirical results show that the managerial attribute, mutual fund characteristics and
its return have a significant relationship as well as the managerial attribute (Turnover) are the
key determinant of the mutual fund return movements.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 2
Chapter # 1
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 3
I - Introduction
Different management companies are actually managing mutual fund money. The management
companies are having nominal resources so it is given advised to be as competent eligible
department. Portfolio Handler is the one who managed the portfolio of shared fund through his/
her capable skills which could easily satisfied the interest of the investors. In order to select
appropriate securities of finance for investors they first investigate about uncertainties, economic
conditions, market and business trends, political situation and regulations in order to forecast the
positive return on stocks, and income generated for these companies and investors too. In fact,
the system and procedure of management companies isn’t remained unchangeable so these
managers are responsible to organize the fund portfolio again in a way that could help them to
maximize the return as per situation required.
1.1 - Concept of Mutual Funds:
The concept of mutual fund is to spend the investor’s money into pool of public money by
money manager and partnering over promotion selection of money manager or portfolio trainer.
This application brings several benefits for the inconsistent investors who don’t rely easily on
saying of portfolio managers because these type of investors are not normally looking for
immediate buying of funds. This entire concept is related to mutual fund.
On daily basis, the portfolio manager look in to the money holding of investors, counts
the accumulated fund, and observe that how the shares bought by the shareholders, and in the
end the fund manager calculate the net asset value of the mutual fund but at the same day, the
payment is distributed among investor by money manager. If you’re required to buy new shares
then you have to give right to your fund administrator to further buy it at most recent cost. It is
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 4
fact that the net asset value (NAV) of your shares or fund would be bigger or increased if your
fund administrator is managing your fund appropriately. So the right choice of selection of
portfolio manager to manage the funds is really important.
1.2 – Types of Mutual Funds:
There are two types of mutual fund exist which are named as:
Open end mutual fund
Closed end mutual fund
1.2.1 – Open-Ended Mutual Funds:
Open end mutual funds are those funds which is subscribed and delivery of shares done on
continuous basis. The net asset value is find out for the rescue of shares open end assets and
subscribed at the mention terms by money manager after adjusting sales or repurchase fee
responsibility. Whereas there is thirteen undecided end shares finances exist in Pakistan named
as; Human venture (Investment) unit, Swear (National Investment trust; NIT) in people
perspective & Titan earnings Money, Histrion agamid fund, Faysal counterpoised ontogenesis.
Money, Dwawood money industry fund, Pakistan income fund, Pakistan inventory industry
Money, Metro Bank-Pakistan dominant fund, Meezan islamic fund, Organization Belief of
Pakistan, UTP income money, UTP Islamic fund and Fused money market in classified facet.
1.2.2 – Close- End Mutual Funds:
Close end funds are those funds in which the shares are issued openly in public in the beginning
and then buy and sell of shares traded as in additional activity. Whereas trading is commonly
done in case of weak decrease to net asset value (NAV). At the end of minute, the fund managers
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 5
assorted the needs of investors and mature the variety of investment products related to its shared
funds. This countenance includes:
growth funds
balanced funds
income funds
1.2.3 – Growth Funds:
In case of "development funds" it provide sufficient blessing during the dealing of shared funds,
but in such case, the current revenue (income) would be low. Whereas the inconsistency in asset
or funds value would be piercing. Specified finances equip is used in reserves stock & someone
authorized to perform better in new funds & another funds should be treated through different
phase of experience.
1.2.4 - Balanced Funds
In case of "ontogenesis and income funds" or "counterbalanced funds", message forecasts for
equally fairish approvals as in percentage quantity and substantially in case of circulating
income. In this situation, the inconsistency in assets or fund will be low. These funds are
commonly spent in stocks reserve, in case of corporate debts & governance packing.
1.2.5 - Income Funds
The "connectedness money" or "income finances", pay superior ongoing income but real little
potentiality for growth. Specified assets outfit in polity paper, issued bonds through municipal,
anesthetic organization, organized loan (debts) & stocks in case of usefulness business, content
prescribed convey.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 6
1.3 – Sources of Profit Generation:
The profits can be generated through shared money from many ternary sources which are named as:
Bonus (Dividend)
Top (Increase) Gains
Perceptiveness of Acquire cost (price)
1.3.1 - Dividend:
The income generated through application of shared money from conventional dividends and
also from those whose funds are hold by shared support companies. These generated incomes
from mutual funds are further divided in to its own funds holders.
1.3.2 – Top Gains:
It is clearly evident that the portfolio of fund changes by the fund manager according to changes
made in business and economic condition. In fact, the investors of funds are given dividend
through purchase and sells transaction of shares in terms of generating capital gain in the
application of mutual funds.
1.3.3 - Perceptiveness of Acquire Price:
Mutual fund help to increase the investment of investor through appreciating the share price of
related fund. By considering an example i.e. let say the subscription price of fund is Rs.11 and
after passing the time of eight months, what if the subscription price of related fund goes up to
Rs.20, so the extra Rs.9 would show the profit earned by the fund manager for investor through
selling its mutual fund in the market.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 7
1.4 - History of Mutual Funds in Pakistan:
The concept of mutual fund were initiated in history of Pakistan in 1962 through public offering
of NIT (National Investment Trust) that is considered as open end mutual fund in public sector.
Similarly, it was focused and followed the same approach by the ICP (Investment Corporation
Pakistan) in 1966 through initiating the series of offers of closed end mutual fund in the history.
There is only one open end fund exist presently i.e. NIT mutual fund in the public sector.
Whereas there are twelve open end mutual fund and fourteen closed end mutual fund exist in
Pakistan under the management of private sector. In addition to, there are many mutual funds
related to closed an open end fund are lying in the channel.
1.5 - Rules Control Shared Finances in Pakistan:
Mutual funds are governed by two basic rules in the context of Pakistan which are named as;
Asset direction companies rules, 1995 (command open end mutual fund)
Investment companies and Asset advisor rules, 1971 (i.e. control closed end mutual fund)
1.6 - Mutual Funds in Pakistan:
There are two types of mutual fund operating in Pakistan i.e. open ended mutual fund and
closed ended mutual fund under the management of public and private sector. There is only one
open ended mutual fund operating in public sector i.e. NIT mutual fund whereas there are twelve
open ended mutual fund operating in private sector of Pakistan. Similarly, there are eighteen
closed ended mutual fund operating in Pakistan under the public and private sector management
which is clearly shown through figure (1-1) of mutual fund in Pakistan mentioned in appendix B.
From theses fact, I move forward to the record of mutual funds in Pakistan, and rules governed
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 8
for mutual asset in Pakistan. In portion of methodology, I have explained the reviewed literature,
sample size selection of mutual assets (funds), collection and analyzing of data, selection of
statistical technique for application of mutual fund and lastly checked validity and reliability of
the data.
In chapter of context of reference I have explained the theoretical background related to
testable assumption (hypothesis) of efficient market and fund portfolio management, attributes of
funds that affect the financial performances of mutual funds. Afterwards, I went for application
of mutual fund through illustration of empirical results by using multivariate regression analysis
and that’s how it helps me to do final conclusion to support of my study and further it provides
guidance in case of future research of studies.
1.7 - Background
In March 2000, the stock market was dramatically busted almost in every country due to incident
of terrorist activity; held on USA on Sept. 11, 2001 by falling down of twin towers and even
faced because of IT bubble in the economy. This may not only causes the result of decline in
stock market return but also it hampered the raising growth occurred in stock market. In past few
years and even at present situation, it also revealed the severe downturns have been seen faced in
stock market after the occurrence of 9/11 incident on USA. That’s how the consequences of
inflation have been floated in specially developing and transitional economy across the many
countries and different regions.
In fact there is no doubt that equity stocks purely invested in stocks return but also this
decision comes under the supervision and authorization of portfolio of fund manager. As
authorized by the portfolio management, the fund manager is deemed to responsible for holding
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 9
fixed income and other type of securities in the application of mutual fund. In order to meet the
required liquidity situation and potential redemption of shares, the funds is usually hold around 4
to 5 % of total assets in case of money market securities.
Accordingly Elton and Gruber, (1995); the mutual funds brought lots of diversification in
investment through funds collection from many investors in order to further invest it in different
securities across the countries of world. There are two types of investment strategies followed by
fund manager in application of mutual fund i.e. firstly active strategies which is all about
investment in variety financial products, and secondly; passive strategies which is all about do
investment in a market index. According to Jack Treynor1 et al (Bodie Investments 2002) who
briefly described that idea of diversification is remained quite older after occurrence of modern
finance theory so they wanted to emphasize on the quote that “do not pull all your legs in one
basket” because it won’t fruitful to implement diversification every time.
According to views of Harry Markowitz (1952); he has given model of portfolio selection
for representing the diversification principles. This model is deeply well presentable and
considered as beginning step for portfolio management, and even commonly it is referred as
efficient set of portfolios of risky assets. This model revealed the fact that the investor are
looking for greater return if he goes for maximum risk and in such situation he is willing to
receive the expected return against bearing the greater risk of mutual funds (assets). In order to
adjust the risk performance evaluation method, there would be using two criteria i.e. model of
capital asset pricing method (CAPM) is used with another evaluation method i.e. mean variance
criteria for adjusted risk performance evaluation.
1.8 – Contextual Frame Work
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 10
In past couple years, there were many research took place in mutual funds by different economic
researchers. It is true that most of the time, individual investor doesn’t have required knowledge
and information about different investment firms and lacking investment vision and criteria in
the available securities of Pakistan. It is the requirement of financial instrument in case of foreign
& local capital and money markets that the individual investor must have the specialized
knowledge about securities in case of capital and money markets in order to have the increased
profitability and improved performance of financial instrument. That’s how the individual
investor are far behind in comparison of others and lacks in doing investment in such financial
markets due to having incomplete and correct information related to securities. That is reason
they are unable to modify and expand their portfolio of mutual fund. There is no doubt that there
are many investment funds are available in Pakistani financial market out of which many of
them, are offering various type of investment, level of risk, the prices (fees).There have been
seen many establishment related to several new Pakistani fund management companies and
foreign fund management companies.
1.9 - Problem Discussion
The past study of mutual fund deny the fund manager ability for market portfolio of adjusted risk
while support the efficient market reported by Jensen (1968), Sharpe (1966), Treynor (1965), but
the view of Inppolito (1993) was totally opposite about it. Although, lots of academic research
have been done in past and recent too, but it is difficult to identify the superior performance
funds because it is unpredictable to assess the performance of individual mutual fund in the
financial market. It is fact that the investors are able to make successful investment strategies in
order to beat the market but sometimes remained unsuccessful because of efficient market.
According to past studies, the fund returns may change from year to year because the objective
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 11
of investment funds by individual investor may changed and that’s how it affects the fund returns
significantly due to change of investment decision by investors; reported by Laurie Prather,
William J. Bertin, Thomas Henker (2002).
Lehmann, Blake, Timmerman (1999) reported that the asset allocation is an important
factor to achieve total returns for multiple class portfolios by fund manage. It is disclosed by
Wermers (2000) that stock picking ability is considered an important factor for improving
overall performance in case of mutual funds by fund manager. Measuring fund performances and
error tracking is a critical process, which could be done through portfolio configuration which in
fact explains the portfolio’s composition, reported by Keim D. (1999). Through this study, I
wanted to find out does the return equity of mutual funds got affected through fund’s
characteristics. There is no doubt that the funds attributes (characteristics) is considered an
important source for selecting top performing funds, and leaving worst funds, in short, it is cleary
mentioned in academic research that fund characteristics could help to differentiate among top
and worst funds in case of mutual funds. Accordingly to past researchers named as Laurie
Prather, Thomas Henker, & William J Bertin (2002); the fund attributes have been divided or say
categorized into four variables i.e. Popularity Variables, Growth Variables, and Management
Variables & Cost Variables.
1.9.1 - Popularity Variables
This measures for responsibility for money or fund aggregation which reflects the purchase and
merchandising somaesthesia and the funds noesis to alter that somesthesia. The popularity of
assets may be dependent proportionate to its recent action; either it meets the investment
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 12
objectives distinct in its catalogue. Thusly the popularity variables permit amount money size,
funds marketplace estimation and net quality appreciate (NAV).
1.9.2 - Growth Variables
Ontogeny (essay) shifting measures those factors which effect the hereafter show or grown
prospects of a money with the plain mean existence that ontogeny factors positively affect
performance. We included value earnings ratios (PE), soprano to volume ratio (PB) and cost to
interchange ratio (PC), there are some different factors of diversification train and individual
holdings can also be thoughtful. Value earning, toll to assemblage, and terms to change rate
alikeness the assets damage to value-impacting accounting versatile, such as earnings,
accumulation amount and cash line.
1.9.3 - Cost Variable
Outlay variables measures the expenses of the finances incurred during the sane bed of
performing. These measures let the expenses ratio (TKA), front most end burden, deferred
encumbrance and assets of finances gordian. Expenses ratio represents the pct of fund assets paid
as direction fee including trainer's compensation and operating expenses much as explore proof,
administrative fees and all new asset-based outlay incurred by the fund excluding workplace
charges.
1.9.4 - Managerial Variable
Managerial variables attempt to usurp managerial and administration attributes as vessel as
monitoring mechanism that adhere manager to stated funds promotion objectives which
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 13
ultimately relate the execution of money. Managerial attributes includes bulk, finances under
direction, management term, fund age, extremum initial get, and direction artifact.
1.10 - Problem Identification/ Statement
We have discussed about the background, current situation of Pakistani funds market and
variables which are affecting the mutual funds performance. Managerial attributes affecting the
mutual funds performance has been studied by different academics and they have suggested how
efficiently investment strategies can be made to gain a profit on stocks and mutual funds.
Although past performance is not indicating the future gains, but the previous studies shows that
fund characteristics affect the performance of mutual funds. Some academics have studied the
Pakistani mutual fund industry performance. We also have added our research analysis since the
fund has been launched of funds industry and special focus is on the mutual fund characteristics
affecting the performance. We have tried to answer the following question.
1.11 - Research Questions
The research proven to fulfill the mass interrogative
How the mutual funds characteristics affect the Pakistani mutual fund industry?
1.12 - Hypothesis Testing
In our research dependent variable is mutual fund return and factors affecting (popularity, growth
and managerial variables) the performance are independent variables.
H0: Fund size has insignificant impact on performance of mutual funds.
H1: Fund size has significant impact on performance of mutual funds.
H0: NAV has insignificant impact on impact the return.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 14
H2: NAV has significant impact the return.
H0: Growth variables (PE and PB has insignificant impact on the return of mutual funds.
H3: Growth variable has significant influence the return.
H0: Turnover has insignificant impact on the return of mutual funds.
H4: Turnover has significant influence the return.
We will accept the null hypothesis if managerial attributes has insignificant impact on the
performance and alternatively reject the null hypothesis if these managerial attributes impact the
return of mutual funds.
1.13 - Purpose of the Research/study
Our intention is to probe whether managerial attributes and mutual assets characteristics touching
the assets execution and either it unexcelled point the incoming action. Contrary variables are
utilized and proved by using the abnormality analysis.
1.14 - Justification/ Significance of the Research
This research analyzed how these finances characteristics influencing the shared assets, their
reciprocity, and comparability with the old investigate studies.
1.15 - Limitations
Time limitations and Resources not allow me to take samples of all mutual fund companies of Pakistan.
This study only focuses open-end mutual funds of Pakistani mutual fund industry.
1.16 - Scope of the Research
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 15
This investigate included 20 shared assets companies operative in Pakistan which jazz 77 open-
end assets. The accumulation is included since fund has been launched roughly the returns and
different characteristics i.e. Turnover, Fund size, Net asset value, etc.
Chapter # 2
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 16
II - Literature Review
The construct of portfolio "execution" has at minimal two separate dimensions: The tailing
dimensions were highlighted by Michael C. Author in his studies in May 1968 "The Action of
Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964".
The noesis of the portfolio trainer or security analyst to process returns on the
portfolio through successful prediction of succeeding instrument prices.
The ability of the portfolio administrator to inform (through "efficacious"
diversification) the total of "insurable risk" dropped by the holders of the portfolio.
Different articles and thesis had been studied for conducting this research thesis mainly
financial research studies. Digital library of Jstor, Mutual Fund Association of Pakistan and
Google scholar was used for searching the literature relevant to the topic. Composed information
is used in the opening parts. Mostly the intelligent text are portfolio execution, finances
characteristics, mutual assets, justice mutual finances, finances size, mass ratio, efficient
markets. Whatsoever articles bibliography was old spell studying the articles for references.
Dissimilar scientist has conferred different results for their extent of investigate but we jazz used
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 17
only content related to our expanse of portion. Considerable search meditate was acquirable in
our area of search but academics know attained dissimilar results. We make used attributes in our
hypothesis, which has already been utilized in our literature retrospect.
As sort of educator work on finances show enhanced due to the fast ontogeny in shared
assets industry. Initially treatment with timing/investment abilities of finances handler there are
added factors too which may fighting the fund action including assets expenses, economies of
scale and administrator aim characteristics. Despite the development in the mutual fund literature
over the once various decades, academics soothe arrive to the contradictory conclusions
regarding the knowledge of money managers to constantly outperform the marketplace and
managerial attributes and fund peculiar characteristics that effect show.
Aboriginal mutual finances studies (i.e. Jensen (1968) Traynor (1965) validation the
economic markets by denying the ability of fund managers to oscillation a risk-adjusted
marketplace portfolio; however these were challenged by Ippolito's (1993) which reaches the
opposition finish. Bers and Madura (2000), Grinbalatt and Titman (1992), Goetzmann and
Ibbotson (1994), Hendricks, Patel and Zeckhauser (1993), Ibbotson and Patel (2002), Volkman
and Wohar (1995, 1996), strengthener this concept of marketplace inefficiency by find evidence
of repeated winners among fund managers and formal execution continuation.
Wermers (2000) finds that funds' capital production cognition enables them to raiment their
costs, patch oppositeness perspective bestowed and bust show durability among small-cap assets.
Detzel and Weigand (1998) encounter that investment name and the filler of stocks held by
finances explains the enduringness observed during their reflect period. In shared fund literature
there is other disputable topic nearly the interrelationship and scrap of expenses, volume and
weight on money execution. Sharpe (1966) finds that assets with berth expenses savvy wagerer
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 18
show, and much late, Golec (1996) suggests that fees are mostly associated with counter
relationship between show, after expenses, and assets fees and turnover, piece in a read of
alluviation and no concern funds, Hooks (1996) concludes that low cost laden finances
sufficiently outperform middling disbursement no-load finances. In oppositeness, Dellva and
Olson (1998) hit that assets with front-end weight charges earn minify risk-adjusted returns,
whereas Droms and Writer (1996) conclude no someone between action and loads, but a
supportive relation between fund expenses and returns.
Laurie Prather, et al (2004) yield umbrella touch of past shared fund execution by
analyzing a monstrous set of both mutual funds and fund attributes in an endeavour to nexus
action to fund-specific characteristics. The results present that the hypothesized relationships
between show and the explanatory variables are mostly upheld. After attractive into
consideration overall market conditions and money finance objective, the symptomatic variables
that think to fund popularity, maturation, outlay, and management also inform show. Eventually,
after controlling for survivorship and benchmark misconception as good as fund-specific factors,
the results controvert the action strength phenomenon. Anders G. Ekholm, Micheal Sound
(2007) canvass the personalty of 17 various shared money characteristics on shared money
action, including both publically accessible substance and non-public information equanimous
through a questionnaire among fund managers in Finland. We label that an hyperbolic limit of
investors love an adverse issue on mutual money show, and that indicant finances perform their
actively managed peers. Moreover, we uncovering that shared assets that are trading against in-
house brokerages underperform their peers, probably due to soft-commission arrangements. This
object potentially has restrictive implications for the mutual money industry.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 19
Arturo Bris, et al (2006) examine a take of 125 justness shared finances that tight to new
assets between 1993 and 2004. They feat that assets intimate masses a stop of leading
performance and brachydactylic money inflows. Fund managers cite their fees when they
approximate to correct managers for losses in income due to the restrictions in size imposed by
the money end resoluteness. Managers reopen when fund size declines. However, they do not get
lake around majestic money managers. Marcin Kacperczyk , Writer Sialm, Lu Zheng (2003)
Despite wide revelation requirements, mutual money investors do not discover all actions of
money managers. We computation the upshot of undetected actions on fund returns using the
instrument gap-the disagreement between the reportable money key and the appearance on a
portfolio that invests in the previously revealed fund holdings. We credit that undetected actions
of any finances persistently create see, while such actions of additional funds defeat duration.
Our water conclusion shows that the reappear gap predicts money execution.
Massimo Massa and Rajdeep Patgiri (1998) calculable the modify of contractual
incentives on the execution of shared funds. We get that high-incentive contracts make managers
to position many danger and throttle the assets' chance of action. Yet, finances with high-
incentive contracts speak higher risk-adjusted key, and the prime execution remains lasting. The
top inducement quintile of funds outperforms the nether quintile by 2.70% per assemblage.
Moreover, high-incentive mortal finances from one period eff a optimistic alpha of 0.41% per
period in the people twelvemonth. Focusing on assets' holdings, we line through which
incentives gain execution. Nicolas P. B. Bollen , Jeffrey A. Busse (2004) calculation parameters
of touchstone support selection and activity timing models using daily shared money returns and
quarterly measure periods. We then excel assets quarterly by atypical key and decide the
performance of apiece decile the pursuing rear. The common abnormal recall of the top decile in
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 20
the post-ranking poop is 39 basis points. The post-ranking atypical travel disappears when funds
are evaluated over yearner periods. These results inform that arch.
Thomas Kalsson and Marina Persson (2005) were old a number of shared money
investors and can be a large plus in the assets resolution. They chance that the financial advisors
we surveyed use a much informed determination impact than somebody investors. The use of
individualist search sources and the thoughtfulness of a author oblique set of fund characteristics
demonstrate that advisors incline to alter the decision-making touch for investors. Though
advisors do not reckon money disbursal ratios as burning as most academics would upgrade, they
clearly engage see to clients. Not astonishingly, advisors who pass the superlative noesis and use
the most objective info free.
Jhon C. Bogle(1970) vindicate the action of money groups (stable, income/growth,
development, and invasive maturation are the categories utilised) bears a highly invariable
relationship to the proceeding of the industry and has, in fact, been rather rigidly certain. (It
should be emphasised that it is unit being perform- ance that is predictable, not organism fund
performance, nor unquestioning show.) Several confirmable studies person explored the holdfast
between a fund's risk-adjusted proceeds and cost ratio as excavation as numerous otherwise
collateral issues. Sharpe (1966) reports that funds with decrease expenses possess higher reward-
to-risk ratios. But Ippolito (1989) finds fund returns to be misrelated to expenses. In acquisition
to these typewrite totality, other papers summarized here are those addressing another money
characteristics and execution. Among these are Dellava and Olson (1998), who investigate the
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 21
relationship of money execution and fund characteristics specified as fees, bulk, and enatic
variables. Their results mostly present that choice assets acquire.
Addressing the bulk payoff, the beforehand wreak of Mortal; still, both Malkiel (1995)
and Carhart (1997) inform a destructive outcome for portfolio bulk and complete money
expenses on fund returns. Grinblatt and Titman (1994) and Wermers (2000) shew a certain
relation between action and bulk, suggesting that those assets reserved in more progressive
trading may be judgement low priced securities. Thusly the shared fund literature oftentimes
reaches opposed conclusions regarding the noesis of money managers to disturb the marketplace
and the fight of volume and expenses on fund thin centering may encourage to the inconsistent
findings.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 22
Chapter # 3
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 23
III - Methodology
In this chapter; the strategy taken to conduct this research as well as a suitable framework for this
study will be presented, including research approach, its design, population and sampling, data
collection methods and its analysis techniques with the justification of the specific choices we
made for this study. The aim is to simplify the understanding of each step taken to complete the
study (See figure 3-1 method of research work in appendix one).
3.1 - Research Approach
In this study, quantitative research approach has been taken to investigate the relationship among
managerial attributes, mutual fund characteristics and its performance. According to the nature of
the research, a quantitative research approach is suitable with descriptive research purpose to
examine the association between the variables i.e. Fund size, NAV, price to Earning, Price to
Book, Turnover and Return because this research has to explore the relationship as well as
developing a mathematical model between these numeric variables. However in this study
analytical methods will be performed. While designing this research, it is considered that it
should serve the purpose practically and should be in line with the objective of the study.
3.1.1 - Quantitative Research
Burns and Grove (1991) quantitative research is a formal, objective, systematic process in which
numerical data are utilized to obtain information about the world. Quantitative methods are research
practices that are used to collect quantitative facts - information dealing with numbers and
anything that is quantifiable. Tables, graphs and statistics, are frequently applied to present the
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 24
outcomes of these methods. The core objective of quantitative research methods is to extend and
utilize theories, mathematical models and/or hypotheses pertaining to phenomena. The procedure
of measurement is vital to quantitative research because it gives the fundamental association
between mathematical expression and empirical observation of quantitative relationships.
3.1.1.1 - Steps in the quantitative approach
The amount the most cardinal steps of a quantitative search, nonetheless it is seldom observed in
its clear conformation. Level so, the personage can be old to apprehension the concept and
outgrowth of a denary learn (Bryman, 2004). The noesis starts with theory, which is an speech of
the deductive study on the relationship between theory and explore, a conception is derivable
from theory and proven to sustain or spurn the theory. The hypothesis is not at all an unavoidable
manoeuvre and is most commonly observed in experimental studies. An large move of all valued
studies are conducted without strictly formulated construct, instead researchers often formulates
numeric explore questions as a batter for the theory. Steps 3 through 8 transact with the design
and implementation of investigate tools. Choices here are oftentimes essential for obtaining a
good construction of reliability and rigor. The lastly steps, 9 through 11, is where the scientist
psychoanalyse and compare is to possess any result at all opposite than for the investigator
himself the results of the scrutiny has to be prefab people, and once its public it becomes a
portion of theory and the junction is fulfilled (Bryman, 2004).
3.2 - Research Design
This research is design to illuminate the relation in between managerial attributes, mutual fund
characteristics ant its performance, so a correlational research design is appropriate for this
study.
Table 3-2: Symbolic Presentation of variables
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 25
3.2.1 - Correlational Research Design
A correlational research design is a quantitative technique of research in which researcher has
two or more quantitative variables from the similar group of subjects, & the researcher is trying
to conclude if there is an association (or co-variation) between the two variables (a similarity
between them, not a difference between their means). Theoretically, any two quantitative
variables can be correlated; however, it is probably a waste of time to collect & analyze data
when there is little reason to think these two variables would be related to each other1.
3.3 - Population & Sampling
The target population in this study is mutual fund industry of Pakistan. As there are twenty two
companies of which twenty companies data available, so we can say that the whole population
has been taken as a sample for analysis.
3.4 - Research Variables
To see cause and affect relationship this research is focusing on two types variables
Dependent Variables Symbols Independent Variables Symbols
Monthly Return MR Fund Size FS
Net Asset Value NAV
Price to Earning PE
Price to Book PB
Turnover T
1 http://www.capilanou.ca/programs/psychology/students/research/correlation.html
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 26
3.5 - Data Collection
The data used in this study is monthly from January-2001 to July-2010. In this study the data has
been gathered through secondary sources including monthly fund manager reports issued by
companies their financial statements, different research reports, magazines and different web-
sites (MUFAP)2.
3.6 - Data Analysis
Data analysis will be conducted by using SPSS. The following well-known statistical technique
is used for tabulating, interpreting and the analyzing the data for this research study.
Karl Pearson’s Correlation coefficient
Regression Analysis
3.6.1 - Karl Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient
Correlation refers to the degree of relation between two numerical variables. It is denoted by "r", which is
typically known as Correlation Coefficient.
The Correlation coefficient gives the mathematical value for measuring the strength of the linear
relation between two variables. Mathematically the value of "r" always lay between -1 and 13.
3.6.2 - Regression Analysis
Regression is the relationship between selected values of independent variable and observed
values of dependent variable, from which the most probable value of dependent variable can be
predicted for any value of independent variable. The regression equation is
2 http://mufap.com.pk/33http://www.mba-tutorials.com/statistics/452-correlation-analysis.html
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 27
y=α+βx1+βx2+ βx3+ε
MR=α +β1 FS+β2NAV +β3 PEandPB+ β4 T+ε
The use of regression to formulate quantitative predictions of one variable from the
values of another variable is called regression analysis4.
4 http://www.audioenglish.net/dictionary/regression_analysis.htm
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 28
Chapter # 4
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 29
IV - Data Analysis
This chapter comprises of empirical results, which is used in order to find out the hypothesis
values. For testing purpose the approach which is used; is quantitative research approach in
which historical quantitative data of selected samples were used in order to check the impact of
different mutual fund characteristics, managerial attribute on its return. The statistical technique
used in this study to test the hypothesis is Karl Pearson Correlation Coefficient and Regression
Analysis. This chapter also presented the basic assumptions for Regression analysis before
applying the test; all using SPSS.
Firstly, the hypothesis is tested through Karl Pearson Correlation coefficient to find out
the degree of relationship between each dependent variable with independent variables.
Secondly, the hypothesis is being tested through Linear Regression analysis to determine the
extent of relationship between dependent and independent variables because in this study; one
dependent variables is present so we setup regression models for dependent variable.
4.1 - Summary Statistics
The summary below highlights the descriptive statistics for each variable.
Table 4-1: Summary StatisticsVariables N Minimum Maximum Mean Std Dev
Monthly return 77 -2.29 16.55 6.79 4.54
Fund Size 77 112.02 41741.41 2923.72 6689.76
Net Asset Value 77 9.07 122.96 65.18 36.55
Price to Earning 77 6.20 11.40 8.47 1.22
Price to Book 77 1.40 3 2.41 0.24
Turnover 77 -0.21 1.51 0.69 0.46
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 30
This table presents a summary statistics for the variables as monthly return minimum -2.29 and
maximum 16.55 due to global financial crisis and environmental instability, Fund size minimum
112.02 and maximum 41741.41 due to different strategy of companies, Net asset value minimum
9.07 and maximum 122.96, Price to earnings minimum 6.20 and maximum 11.40, Price to book
minimum 1.40 and maximum 3. In turnover minimum -0.21 and maximum 1.51 rest of four due
to impact of return.
Table 4-1 is showing that mostly variables have their mean lie between minimum and
maximum value some close to minimum value and some close to maximum value. As monthly
return has mean 6.79 which is lie between minimum and maximum value, Fund size has mean
41741.41 lie between minimum and maximum value, Net asset value has mean 65.18 lie between
minimum and maximum value, Price to earning has mean 8.47 which is close to minimum value
which refers to low earnings, Turnover has mean 0.69 and standard deviation 0.46 here is mean
value close to minimum value with less volatility and price to book has mean 2.41 and standard
deviation 0.24 here is mean value close to maximum value which shows that larger number of
observations are close to the maximum value as price to book was less volatile or it can say that
it was constant therefore mean is close to maximum value.
4.2 - Karl Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient
Correlation refers to the degree of relation between two numerical variables. It is denoted by "r", which is
typically known as Correlation Coefficient. The Correlation coefficient gives the mathematical value for
measuring the strength of the linear relation between two variables. Mathematically the value of "r"
always lay between -1 and 1 with:
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 31
+1 representing absolute positive linear relationship (as X increases, Y increases).
0 representing no linear relationship (X and Y have no pattern).
-1 representing absolute inverse relationship (as X increases, Y, Decreases).
Table 1 presented the test results for Karl Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient among Dependent
variable with every Independent variable.
Table 4-2: Pearson Correlation Coefficients
Variables Return Fund size Net Asset Value
Price to Earning
Price to book
Turnover
ReturnCorrelationP-Value 1
Fund sizePearson CorrelationP-Value
-0.122 (0.291)
1
Net Asset ValuePearson CorrelationP-Value
0.035(0.761)
-0.142(0.216)
1
Price to EarningPearson CorrelationP-Value
0.140(0.225)
-0.171(0.138)
0.016(0.892)
1
Price to bookPearson CorrelationP-Value
0.250*(0.028)
0.142(0.217)
0.035(0.760)
0.358*(0.001)
1
TurnoverPearson CorrelationP-Value
0.865*(0.000)
-0.093(0.421)
-0.022(0.853)
0.158(0.170)
0.260(0.170)
1
The table contains two rows; the first row shows the value of correlation coefficient,
second row shows the significance value and the row labeled as N presented the total number of
observations. All variables carry 77 observations and the p-value for the test is less than 0.05, so
we can reject our null hypothesis at 5% level of significance and admit that there is some
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 32
correlation present among the variables. The row labeled Pearson Correlation gives the values of
correlation. The value of 0.865 explains that there is a strong positive relationship between return
of mutual fund and turnover. While in the case of price to book, price to earning and net asset
value; there is a weak positive correlation with return and it is decreasing respectively. This
means that the change in turnover influenced more on the return than price to book, price to
earning and net asset value respectively. The impact of fund size is inversely proportional on net
asset value, price to earning and turnover than net asset value has also a negative impact on
turnover.
4.3 - Analysis of variances
The table A-1 gives the test results for the analysis of ANOVA. Here model, Error and Corrected
total, is breakdown of variance in the outcome variable, which we will examine. Model summary
gives the adequacy and accuracy of the fitted model. Degree of Freedom (DF) is associated with
the sources of variance. The total variance has n-1 degrees of freedom. The known degree of
freedom corresponds to the number of coefficients estimated minus 1. Including the intercept,
there are 6 coefficients, so the model has 6-1=5 degree of freedom. The unknown degree of
freedom is the DF total minus the DF model, 76-5 =71.
The value of adjusted-R2 is 0.745, which shows that the independent variables in the
model can accurately predict 75.4% of the total variance present in the dependent variable. F-
value and p-value comes from the test of ANOVA, which shows the sufficiency of adjusted-R2.
With respect to the p-value in our case the null hypothesis is rejected, so it means the
independent variables used in this study to predict the values of dependent variable can
accurately measures enough variance.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 33
4.4 - Parameter Estimation OLS Method
This table 4.4 shows the dependent variables, constant, coefficients, t statistic, R-Square and
F-statistic. Constant referred as the Y intercept the height of the regression line when it crosses
the Y axis. In other words, this is the predicted value of dependent variable when all
independents variables are 0. R-Square which is called the coefficient of determination and it
gives the adequacy of the model. In this study, we have a dependent variables monthly return. In
order to fulfill our requirement, we setup a regression model for dependent variable. The general
model for regression analysis is given by:
MR=α +β1FS+β2 NAV +β3 PEandPB+ β4 T+ε
Where,
α = Regression Constant
β = Regression Coefficient ( β1 Regression Coefficient of FS, β2 Regression Coefficient of
NAV, β3 Regression Coefficient of PE and PB, β4 Regression Coefficient of T).
Dependent Variable = MR which is monthly return of Mutual funds
Independent Variables = FS (Fund size), NAV (Net Asset Value), PE (Price to Earning), PB
(Price to Book) and T (Turnover).
ε=
The value of R2 is 0.754, which shows that the independent variables in the model can
accurately predict 75.4% of the total variance present in the dependent variable. Coefficients
Standard error of residual
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 34
gives the regression coefficients and related statistics for all independent variables separately in
different rows. These regression coefficient and constant can be used to construct an ordinary
least squares (OLS) equation and also to test the hypotheses for each Independent variable.
According to p-value in this case, the p-value of Fund size, Net asset value, Price to earnings and
Price to book is shown as 0.482, 0.442, 0.792 and 0.568 respectively which is greater than 0.05,
this means that the change in the values of these variables has insignificant impact on the
monthly return of mutual fund and we should eliminate this variable from the OLS equation.
While the hypothesis for other independent variable is rejected. By using the regression
coefficient and the constant term; we can construct the OLS equation for predicting the monthly
return i.e.
Monthly Return = -0.332 + 8.342 (Turnover)
Table 4-3: Ordinary Least Square Estimation
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 35
Ordinary Least Square (OLS)
Intercept -0.332
C.I.* 95% [-5.983 ; 5.318]
T-Value -0.177
P-Value (0.907)
Fund size -3.0E-005
C.I. 95% [0.000 ; 0.000]
T-Value -0.707
P-Value (0.482)
Net Asset Value 0.006
C.I. 95% [-0.009 ; 0.021]
T-Value 0.773
P-Value (0.442)
Price to Earning -0.064
C.I. 95% [-5.74 ; 0.419]
T-Value -0.264
P-Value (0.792)
Price to Book 0.698
C.I. 95% [-1.726 ; 3.122]
T-Value 0.574
P-Value (0.568)
Turnover 8.342*
C.I. 95% [7.141 ; 9.543]
T-Value 13.853
P-Value (0.0001)
R2 0.754
F 43.455*
(0.0001)
C.I: Confidence interval
4.5 - Testing OLS Assumptions
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 36
Before applying the Regression analysis, we first check the following basic assumptions of
regression analysis in order to ensure that the given data provides reliable and valid outcomes.
Test for Normality
Test for Multi-Collinearity
Test for Autocorrelation
4.5.1 - Test for Normality
Statistical methods are based on various underlying assumptions. One common assumption is
that a random variable is normally distributed. In many statistical analyses, normality is often
conveniently assumed without any empirical evidence or test. But normality is critical in many
statistical methods. When this assumption is violated, interpretation and inference may not be
reliable or valid. There are two ways of testing normality (1) Graphical Methods (2) Numerical
Methods. Graphical methods visualize the distributions of random variables or differences
between an empirical distribution and a theoretical distribution (e.g., the standard normal
distribution). Numerical methods present summary statistics such as skewness and kurtosis, or
conduct statistical tests of normality. In this study, we used both of these methods to find out the
normality of the data. In numerical method, we used Shapiro-Wilk statistics to conclude the
results and also setup several histograms to determine normality graphically. All The variables
are supposed to be normally distributed with mean 0 and Standard Deviation 1 (See the
Appendix for details).
Table A-2 gives the test results for Shapiro-Wilk Statistics. The Shapiro-Wilk W is the
ratio of the best estimator of the variance to the usual corrected sum of squares estimator of the
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 37
variance (Shapiro and Wilk 1965)5. The statistic is positive and less than or equal to one. Being
close to one indicates normality.The above table clearly shows that the Shapiro-Wilk Statistics
for dependent and independent variables used in this study are very close to 1, this ensure the
data being used has come from normally distributed population.
4.5.2 - Test for Multi-Collinearity
Multi-Collinearity is a statistical phenomenon in which two or more predictor variables in a
regression model are highly correlated. In this situation the coefficient estimates may change
inconsistently in response to small changes in the model or the data. Tolerance and the Variance
Inflation Factor (VIF) are two Collinearity diagnostic factors that can help identifying Multi-
Collinearity. The value of tolerance must be greater than 0.50, while the value of VIF is less than
2.50.
Table 4-4: Multi-Collinearity Statistics
Independent VariablesCollinearity Statistics
Tolerance VIF
Fund size 0.887 1.128
Net Asset Value 0.973 1.028
Price to Earning
Price to Book
Turnover
0.819
0.776
0.911
1.221
1.289
1.098
5 Shapiro, S. S. and Wilk, M. B. (1965). "An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)", Biometrika, 52, 3 and 4, pages 591-611.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 38
Table 4 shows the Collinearity statistics for independent variables used in the study. The
tolerance value for all IVs is greater than 0.50 and VIF is less than 2.50, this indicates that the
correlation among the IVs are very low and hence no Multi-Collinearity factor exist in the
regression model.
4.5.3 - Test for Auto Correlation
Auto Correlation is the relationship between values of a variable taken at certain times in a time
series and values of a variable taken at other, usually earlier times. The term also referred to as
“Lagged Correlation” or “Serial Correlation” the hypotheses usually considered in the Durbin-
Watson test are;
Ho : ρ=0
Ho : ρ>0
Here null hypothesis is showing there is autocorrelation exist and alternative hypothesis
showing there can be +ve, -ve and autocorrelation exist. The statistical technique used to identify
the existence of Autocorrelation in the residuals from a regression analysis is called Durbin-
Watson statistics calculate through following formula;
d=∑t=2
T(e t−e t−1 )
2
∑t−1
Te
t2
. The value of Durbin-Watson must be greater than 1.20 and less than 2.00, which
indicates very low (negligible) or No Autocorrelation. If Durbin-Watson is less than 1.20 or
greater than 2.00, there may be cause for alarm. In regressions, this can imply an under/over
estimation of the level of statistical significance.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 39
Table 4-5: Durbin-Watson Statistics
Monthly return
Durbin-Watson 1.88
As shown in the above Table, the values of Durbin-Watson statistics for dependent
variables in our case are nearest to 2.00, this indicates that there is no autocorrelation exists in
our study and the regression models assume that the error deviations are uncorrelated.
4.6 - Result of Analysis
A relationship between return and independent variables can be check in the scatter plot
Appendix II. All scatter plots indicates some kind of linear relationship. Our regression analysis
give us results that either will accept the null hypothesis if managerial attribute does not
influence the performance and alternatively reject the null hypothesis if the managerial attribute
impact the return of mutual fund.
H0: Fund size has insignificant impact on performance of mutual funds.
H1: Fund size has significant impact on performance of mutual funds.
H0: NAV has insignificant impact on the return.
H2: NAV has significant impact on the return.
Among the popularity variables the null hypothesis stating that fund size does not influencing the
performance of mutual fund. There is a positive relationship with return. Thus the fund size
influences the fund performance because larger fund have more diversification of investment and
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 40
economies of scale and a negative relationship indicates that the fund size may impact on its
ability to implement a particular investment style.
H0: Growth variables (PE and PB) has insignificant impact on the return of mutual funds.
H3: Growth variables has significant impact on the return.
Within the growth variables the coefficient estimates for PE and PB are positive and negative
respectively and statically significant. Impact of these variables reflects a positive influence of
growth opportunities. So we found that growth variables influences the mutual fund return.
H0: Turnover has insignificant impact on the return.
H4: Turnover has significant impact on the return.
Within managerial variables earlier studies by Friend et al (1970), Grinblatt and Titman (1994),
wermers (2000), Arshad ali javeed and Azhar iqbal (2008) finds a positive relationship between
turnover and return which is consistent with our analysis.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 41
Chapter # 5
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 42
V - Conclusion
The research gives a detailed and incorporated analysis of mutual funds performance, history and
current trends of mutual fund industry of Pakistan and fund characteristics impacting the mutual
funds. We select different kinds of categories of popularity, growth and managerial variables
which influencing the performance. These include detail discussion of the relationship between
mutual funds performance and fund related factors with a recent data of mutual funds and fund
characteristics.
Our research builds upon earlier research and provides investor a framework which
factors should they consider while investing in mutual funds. We select 77 mutual funds, the
fund attributes shows the relationship with return how it is affected by the fund size , net asset
value, price to earnings, price to book and turnover. The research provides a significant update to
the previous literature by examining mutual funds industry recent conditions and rapid growth of
mutual fund industry. The relationship between mutual fund performance and fund specific
factors shows the results are generally consistent with the studies conducted by previous
researchers.
5.1 - Findings
Turnover reacts positively to the rise in performance of mutual fund industry of
Pakistan.
The impact of Net asset value and Price to book variable is very little on the
performance of mutual fund industry of Pakistan.
While Fund size and Price to Earning influences the performance of Pakistani mutual
fund industry negatively.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 43
Our finding indicates that there is no Autocorrelation and Multi Collinearity factors exists
in the model, therefore the results are authentic and reliable. The impact of turnover is more
severe on the performance of Pakistani mutual fund industry because turnover has a strong
positive correlation with return. 1% increases in the turnover increases more than 8% value of
the return of mutual funds. Thus, investors who are interested in investing in mutual funds
should pay more attention to the managerial attributes represents turnover.
5.2 - Future Research Proposal
We studies different research papers, thesis related to mutual fund performance which has given
us an idea for future studies. We include sample size of 77 open end mutual funds and only a few
variables influencing the performance of the mutual funds. The future study can be done close-
end mutual funds and variables such as fund age, management tenure, diversification level,
number of holdings etc. Do these variables influence the performance of mutual funds?
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 44
References
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 45
VI - References
Anderson, B. (1966). The Psychology Experiment: An Introduction to the Scientific Method.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
http://www.statpac.com/research-papers/research-process.htm
Arshad ali javeed , Azhar iqbal (2008). Swedish Mutual Fund Performance, (200-2007)
Master Degree Project in Economic and Finance, University of Skovde.
Arturo Bris, Huseyin Gulen, Padma Kadyala and P. Raghavendra Rau (2006), The impact of
Mutual Fund Closures on Fund Managers, Flows, Fees, and Performance, Review of
Financial Studies.
http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/3/953.short
Bauer, R., Koedijik, K. & Otten, R., (2002) International Evidance on Ethical Mutual Fund
Performance and Investment Style.Working Paper March (2002), Limburg Institute of
Financial Economic Maatrich University.
http://ideas.repec.org/p/eth/wpswif/08-85.html
Blake, D., B. N. Lehmann, and A. Timmermann, (1999), Asset Allocation Dynamics and
Pension Fund Performance," Journal of Business, 72, 429-461.
Bers, M. K., & Madura, J. (2000). The performance persistence of closed-end funds. Financial
Review, 35, 33-52.
Bodie, Z., Kane, A., Marcus, A. J. Perrakis, S. & Ryan P. J.,(2002), Investment McGraw-Hill,
Toronto, 4th Canadian Edition.
Bryman, (2004), Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?
Qualitative Researc, vol. 6 no. 1, 97-113.
Burns and Grove, (1991), “Ways of Approaching Research: Quantitative Design”, cited by
Cormack, pp 140.
http://www.fortunecity.com/greenfield/grizzly/432/rra2.html
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 46
Carhart, M.M., (1997), On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The journal of Finance, Vol
52, p 57-82.
Davis, J. L. (2001). Mutual fund performance and manager style, Financial Analysts journal,57,
19-27.
Detzel, F. L., & Weigand, R. A.(1998). Explaining persistence in mutual fund performance.
Financial Service Review, 7(1), 45-55.
Devella, W. L.,& Olson, G.T.(1998). The Relationship between Mutual Fund Fees and Expenses
and their Effect on Performance. Financial Review, 33 (1), 85-104.
Droms, W. G. & Walker, D. A., (1996), Mutual Fund Investments Performance, The Quarterly
Review of Economics and Finance, Vol 36, 347-363.
Elton, E. J. and Gurber, M.J., Das, S., & Halvka, M (1993) Efficiency with Costly Information:
An interpretation of Evidance for Managed Portfolio. Review of Financial Studies, Vol 6
(1), p1-22.
Elton, E. J. and Gurber, M.J. (1995) Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, J.Wiley
and Sons.
http://www.soa.org/library/professional-actuarial-specialty- guides/professional-actuarial-
specialty-guides/1998/august/spg9808alm.pdf
Eriksson, L-T. & Wiedersheim-Paul F. (1999) Atta Utreda, Froska och Studera, Libera Ekonomi,
Malmo.
http://ideas.repec.org/p/eth/wpswif/08-85.html
Filbeck, G. & Tompkins, D. L., (2004) Management Tenure and Risk Adjusted Performance of
Mutual Funds, The Journal of Investing, Vol 13, p 72-80.
Friend, I., Blume, M., & Crockett, J. (1970), Mutual Fund and Other Institutional Investors. New
York McGraw-Hill.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 47
Goetzmann, W.N., & Ibbotson, R.G. (1994). Do winners repeat? Patterns in mutual fund
Performance. Journal Portfolio Management, 20, 9-18.
Golec, J. H. (1996). The Effects of Mutual Fund Manager’s Characterstics on their Portfolio
Performance, Risk and Fees. Financial Services Review Vol 5(2), 133-148.
Grinblatt, M. & Titman, S., (1992). The Persistence of Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of
Finance, 47, 1977-1984.
Grinblatt, M. & Titman, S., (1994), A Study of Monthly Mutual Funds Returns and Portfolio
Performance Evaluation Techniques Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 29
(3) 419-444.
Gurber, M.J., (1996) Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds. The
Journal of Finance, Vol 3, p 783-810.
Hendricks, D., Patel, J., & Zeckkauser, R. (1993). Hot hands in Mutual Funds: Short-run
Persistence of Relative Performance, 1974-88. The Journal of Finance, 48, 93-130.
Hooks, J. A. (1996). The effects of loads and expenses on open end mutual fund returns journal
of Business Research, 36, 199-202.
Ibbotson, R. G., & Patel, A. K.(2002). Do winners repeat with style? (Yale ICF Working Paper
00-70). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Ippolito, R., (1989), Efficiency with Costly Information: A Study of Mutual Fund Performance
1965-1984. The quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol 104, P 1-24.
Ippolito, R.A. (1993). On studies of mutual fund performance, 1962-1991. Financial Analysts
Journal, 49, 42-50.
Jensen, M. C. (1968), The performance of Mutual Funds in the period of 1945-1965, Journal of
Finance , Volume23, p389-416.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 48
Jack L. Treynor,(2002) “How to Rate Management of Investment Funds,” Harvard
BusinessReview 43, no. 1, Jan-Feb 1965: 63-75.
Jhon C. Bogle(1970), The Mutual Fund Industry 60 Later, Financial Analysts Journal.
http://johncbogle.com/speeches/JCB_FAJ2005.pdf
Keim, D. (1999) “An Analysis of Mutual Fund Design: The Case of Investing in Small-Cap
Stocks.” Journal of Financial Economics, 51 173-194.
Michael C. Jensen, (May 1968): “The Performance of Mutual Finds in the Period 1945 – 64,”
Journalof Finance 23, no. 2 389-416.
Laurie Prathera,, William J. Bertina, Thomas Henker (2002); Mutual Fund Characterstics,
Managerial Attributes, and Fund Performance. Review of Financial Economics.
Marcin Kacperczyk , Writer Sialm, Lu Zheng (2003), Unobserved Actions of Mutual Funds,
NEBR Working Paper No. W11766.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=847038
Markowitz, H., 1952, Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, Vol 7, Issue 1, p 77-91.
Malkiel, B. G. (1995). Returns from investing in equity mutual funds (1971-1991).Journal of
Finance, 549-572.
Massa, Massimo, and Rajdeep Patgiri, 2005, “Mutual Funds and Bubbles: The surprising role of
contractual incentives,” Working Paper.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=759365
Nain Sipra (2006) Mutual Fund Performance in Pakistan 1995-2004. CMER Working Paper no.
06-45.
Nicolas P. B. Bollen , Jeffrey A. Busse (2004), Short-Term Persistence in Mutual Fund
Performance, Review of Financial Studies.
http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/content/18/2/569.abstract
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 49
Nikolai Chuvakhin. (2002). Efficient Market Hypothesis and Behavioral Finance – is a
Compromise in Sight? University’s Graziadio Business Report (No. 22,).
R. Otten and D.Bams, (2002) European Mutual Fund Performance, European Financial Journal
Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, p.75-101.
Sharpe, W. F., (1966), Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Business, Vol 39, P 119-138.
Thomas Kalsson and Marina Persson (2005). Mutual Fund Performance, Master Thesis.
Goteborg University, Sweden.
http://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/1704/1/0405.47.pdf
Treynor, J. L., (1965), How to rate Management Investment Funds. Harvard business Review,
Vol 43, p 63-75.
Volkman, D . A., & Wohar, M. E. (1995). Determinants of Persistence in relative Performance
of mutual funds. Journal of Finance Research, 18(4), 415-430.
Volkman, D . A., & Wohar, M. E. (1996). Abnormal profits and relative strength in mutual funds
returns. Review of Financial Economics, 5(2), 101-116.
Wermers, R.,(2000), Mutual fund performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock picking
Talent, Style, Transactions Cost and Expenses. The journal of Finance, Vol 55(4), p
1655-1703.
William F. Sharpe, (January 1966 )“Mutual Fund Performance,” Journal of Business 39, no. 1,
part 2,:119-138.
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 50
Appendix
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 51
VII – Appendix A
Table A-1: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Source DFSum of Squares
Mean Square F-Value P-Value
Monthly return
Model 5 1182.468 236.499 43.455* (0.0001)
Error 71 386.400 5.442
Corrected Total 76 156.868
Table A-2: Test for Normality
VARIABLES
Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df
Monthly Return 0.911 77
Fund size 0.388 77
Net Asset Value 0.856 77
Price to Earning 0.957 77
Price to Book 0.906 77
Turnover 0.858 77
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 52
Appendix BFigure 1 – 1 Mutual Funds in Pakistan
Open-End Mutual Funds1 ABL Income Fund 52 IGI Income Fund2 ABL Stock Fund 53 IGI Islamic Income Fund3 AKD Income Fund 54 IGI Money Market Fund4 AKD Index Tracker Fund 55 IGI Stock Fund5 AKD Opportunity Fund 56 JS Aggressive Asset Allocation6 Meezan Capital Protected Fund 57 JS Aggressive Income Fund7 Meezan Cash Fund 58 JS Capital Protected Fund8 Meezan Islamic Fund 59 JS Capital Protected Fund IV9 Meezan Islamic Income Fund 60 JS Cash Fund
10 Meezan Sovereign Fund 61 JS Fund of Funds11 Alfalah GHP Alpha Fund 62 JS Income Fund12 Alfalah GHP Cash Fund 63 JS Islamic Fund (Formerly UTP Islamic Fund)
13 Alfalah GHP Income Multiplier Fund 64 JS KSE 30 Index Fund (14 Alfalah GHP Islamic Fund 65 JS Principal Secure Fund I15 Alfalah GHP Principal Protected Fund 66 JS Principal Secure Fund II16 Alfalah GHP Principal Protected Fund II 67 Unit Trust of Pakistan17 Alfalah GHP Value Fund 68 KASB Balanced Fund18 MetroBank Pakistan Sovereign Fund (12/12) 69 KASB Capital Protected Gold Fund19 MetroBank Pakistan Sovereign Fund (Perpetual) 70 KASB Cash Fund20 Pakistan Capital Market Fund 71 KASB Islamic Income Fund21 Pakistan Capital Protected Fund (FIS) 72 KASB Liquid Fund22 Pakistan Cash Management Fund 73 KASB Stock Market Fund23 Pakistan Income Enhancement Fund 74 Lakson Equity Fund24 Pakistan Income Fund 75 Lakson Income Fund25 Pakistan Int'l Element Islamic Fund 76 Lakson Money Market Fund26 Pakistan Stock Market Fund 77 MCB Cash Management Optimizer Fund27 Askari Asset Allocation Fund 78 MCB Dynamic Allocation Fund28 Askari Income Fund 79 MCB Dynamic Cash Fund29 Askari Islamic Asset Allocation Fund 80 MCB Dynamic Stock Fund30 Askari Islamic Income Fund 81 NAFA Cash Fund31 Askari Sovereign Cash Fund 82 NAFA Government Securities Liquid Fund32 Atlas Income Fund 83 NAFA Income Fund33 Atlas Islamic Income Fund 84 NAFA Islamic Income Fund34 Atlas Islamic Stock Fund 85 NAFA Islamic Multi Asset Fund35 Atlas Money Market Fund 86 NAFA Multi Asset Fund36 Atlas Stock Market Fund 87 NAFA Saving Plus Fund37 BMA Chundrigar Road Saving Fund 88 NAFA Stock Fund38 BMA Empress Cash Fund 89 National Investment Trust (GBF)39 Crosby Dragon Fund 90 National Investment Trust (IF)40 Crosby Phoenix Fund 91 National Investment Trust (LOC)41 Dawood Islamic Fund 92 National Investment Trust (Non LOC)42 Dawood Money Market Fund 93 Pak Oman Advantage Islamic Fund43 Faysal Asset Allocation Fund 94 Pak Oman Advantage Islamic Income Fund44 Faysal Balanced Growth Fund 95 Pak Oman Advantage Stock Fund45 Faysal Income & Growth Fund 96 Pak Oman BOP Advantage Plus Fund46 Faysal Savings Growth Fund 97 UBL Liquidity Plus Fund
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 53
47 First Habib Income Fund 98 United Composite Islamic Fund48 First Habib Stock Fund 99 United Growth & Income Fund49 HBL Income Fund 100 United Islamic Income Fund50 HBL Multi Asset Fund 101 United Stock Advantage Fund51 HBL Stock Fund
Close-End Mutual Funds1 Golden Arrow Selected Stock Fund 10 JS Large Cap Fund 2 Pakistan Capital Protected Fund 1 11 JS Value Fund Limited3 Pakistan Premier Fund Limited 12 Pak Oman Advantage Fund4 Pakistan Strategic Allocation 13 PICIC Energy Fund5 Atlas Fund of Funds 14 PICIC Growth Fund6 Al Meezan Mutual Fund 15 PICIC Investment Fund7 Meezan Balanced Fund 16 Asian Stocks Fund8 First Capital Mutual Fund 17 Safeway Mutual Fund9 JS Growth Fund 18 UBL Capital Protected Fund
1.00.80.60.40.20.0
Observed Cum Prob
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Expected Cum Prob
Dependent Variable: Monthly Return
Figure 4-2 : Normal P-P Plot of Regression Standardized Residual
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 54
6420-2-4
20
15
10
5
0
Mean = -3.76E-16Std. Dev. = 0.967N = 77
Figure 4-1: Normal Curve for Monthly Return
Frequency
Impact of mutual funds characteristics on mutual funds return 55