28
Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

Impact of imaging on newer radiation

techniques in Gynaecological cancer

Page 2: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

Morphology of local tumour (MRI)

Mapping of metastatic disease (PET/CT)

Tailored EBRT (IMRT, selective dose escalation)

Conformal brachytherapy (reduced toxicity, ? Improved control & survival?)

Newer insight into clinical behaviour of cancer

Page 3: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

FIGO Staging of cervix cancer

Five year survival from around the world

Stage-1Stage-2 Stage-3 Stage-4

52-90%38-68% 22-61% 0-10%

Page 4: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

Cervix, 6 cm 2bExamination under anaesthesia

Axial MRI

02/11/02663

Page 5: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Cervical histology

MR

I / E

UA Histology

EUA

MRI

Page 6: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 7: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 8: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 9: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 10: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 11: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

41 year old

FIGO IIIB

Extensive infiltration lower uterine segment

Exophytic component in vaginal lumen

Infiltrating beyond the vagina on left

Mass 5.7 x 4.8 x 6.2 cm

Left parametrial extension

L external iliac node

Page 12: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

40 Gy Whole Pelvis

Ant & Post R&L lateral fields

Prone on Bellyboard

Ant-Post R&L Lat fields

10 Gy boost to Left ext iliac node

10 Gy boost

LPSW

Page 13: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

40 Gy + cisplat (+10 Gy LN boost)

Bulk of tumour resolved

Residual tumour left cervix and upper vagina

Extension into left parametrium

Page 14: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

Tandem inserted using real time Ultrasound guidance

MRI taken one hour after insertion and treatment

Patient moved from brachy theatre to MRI scanner

Page 15: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

Dose escalationRadiation resistanceInfiltrating diseasePresence of metastases

Page 16: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

In conformal brachytherapy where dose is limited to residual tumour,the incident dose at point A is variable.

In patients treated with LDR the dose (80 Gy) was prescribed to Point A.This meant that patients who responded well to EBRT had small residual withdiameter of <4cm. All such tumours would have received much higher than the prescribed 80 Gy and hence had unintended dose escalation!

Page 17: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 18: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 19: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 20: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 21: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 22: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

Mobilization of Viable Tumour Cells into the CirculationDuring Radiation Therapy. Martin et al 2013, Red journal10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.10.033

Page 23: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

A randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study.Stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer(RTOG 0617): (Bradley et al. 2015).

Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy high-dose (74 Gy in 37 fractions) or standard dose (60 Gy in 30 fractions) radiotherapy concurrently with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin

with or without cetuximab, followed by consolidation chemotherapy in all groups.

Page 24: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 25: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

Interpretation of results were: 74 Gy with concurrent chemotherapynot better than 60 Gy plus concurrent chemotherapy

Addition of cetuximab to concurrent chemoradiation and consolidation treatment provided no benefit in OS

Median overall survival was 28·7 months for 60 GyAnd 20·3 months (17·7–25·0) for 74 Gy

Page 26: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

The authors of RTOG 0617 still believe the way forward is still the radiation dose intensification!

RTOG 1106 is using a mid-treatment PET adapted hypofractionated radiation therapy boost to intensify radiation dose to residual tumour volumes during a total duration of 30 fractions (NCT01507428).

RTOG 1308 is exploiting the protons compared with photons to escalate radiation dose to 70 Gy (NCT01993810).

Both of these trial designs were built on the knowledge gained from RTOG 0617.

Page 27: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer
Page 28: Impact of imaging on newer radiation techniques in Gynaecological cancer

Questions…