1
Impact of Heating on Quantum Yield Quantum yield as a function of heating time. (Inset is heating times after 30 min.) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 H eating Tim e (m in) Q uantum Yield M PA G LU M SA TGA TGL CYS TIO Quantum yield as a function of time after 8 months of TIO-CdSe QDs. 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 12 24 38 Tim e (m in) Q u an tu m Yiel 2/2/2010 6/2/2009 Used by 9 th century artisans for pottery Wires Resistors Switches Transistors Diodes Capacitors Chemical sensors 1 Optoelectronics 2 Photovoltaics 3 Fluorescent display devices 3 Light-mediated binding & release of biomolecules 3 Absorbance 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 Integrated F luorescence 1e+7 2e+7 3e+7 4e+7 5e+7 6e+7 7e+7 R hodam ine 6G (347 nm ;R 2 = 0.998) Fluorescein (323 nm ;R 2 = 0.989) Relative Quantum Yield Equation 5 Ф X = Quantum yield of QDs Ф ST = Quantum yield of standard η = Refractive index Grad = Slope of integrated intensities from the plot Reaction Mixture Metal perchlorate: Cd(ClO 4 ) 2 ·H 2 O, Zn(ClO 4 ) 2 ·6H 2 O or Pb(ClO 4 ) 2 ·3H 2 O in Type 1 water. Water-soluble thiols added in 2.4:1 thiol:metal ratio Procedure The pH is adjusted to ≥ 11 using 1 M NaOH while stirring Mixture was deaerated for ~30 minutes with N 2 Selenium source comes from either Al 2 Se 3 or NaHSe Mixture was allowed to reflux over a period of time Impact of Structure on Quantum Yield Previous research explored quantum yields of CdSe quantum dots produced using Al 2 Se 3 (t HEAT = 0). 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 G LU TIO M PL TG L MSA M PA TG A CYS Thiols Q u an tu m Yie A l2Se3 at480 nm NaHSe at347 nm QDs with ZnSe and CdSe core and different thiols (t HEAT = 0). 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 G LU TIO MPL TG L MSA MPA TG A CYS Thiols Q u an tu m Y ield ZnSe CdSe 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 30 80 130 180 230 H eating Tim e Project Overview Water-Soluble, Monolayer-Protected QDs Monolayer-Protected Gold Nanoparticles A study of quantum yield in water–soluble, monolayer-protected quantum dots (QDs) was completed. The study examined the changes in quantum yield from the effects of heating, method of selenide addition, type of surrounding thiol, and material lifetime. Subsequent modifications of the QD surface were characterized using electrochemistry. Monolayer-protected gold nanoparticles were prepared using several different synthetic methods. The nanoparticles were characterized by UV-visible spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and mass spectrometry. Different thiols were used in the synthetic scheme in order to monitor differences in surface chemistry. KIM Synthesis 8 Add HAuCl 4 ·3H 2 O to a solution of Oct 4 NBr in toluene Remove aqueous phase Add 1-hexanethiol in 5:1 ratio thiol/gold ratio Cool to 0°C, reduce with NaBH 4 , and stir for 30 min Collect black organic phase and wash 4x with Type 1 H 2 O Remove solvent under reduced pressure Add slowly DMSO to the MPC and allow to stand overnight Collect black product Add acetone to the flask to extract Au 25 Remove acetone with reduced pressure Wash with acetonitrile and ethanol 1) J.W. Grate et al. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 1868-1879. 2) Kamat, P.V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7729-7744. 3) Thomas, K.G.; Kamat, P.V. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 888-898. 4) N.Gaponik et al. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7177-7185. 5) M.Grabolle et al. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 6285-6294. 6) M. Brust et al. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1995, 1655-1656. 7) M. S. Devadas et al. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114 (51), 22417- 22423. 8) J. Kim et al. Langmuir. 2007, 23 (14), 7853-7858. 9) Z.Wu et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 177-183. NSF CHE-095940, Faculty Research Grants, Academic Initiatives, Conduff Scientific Grants, and Croom Beatty Chemistry Research Internship References/ Acknowledgements DEVADAS Synthesis 7 Make solution of 3:1 thiol/HAuCl 4 ·3H 2 O ratio Reduce with NaBH 4 and stir for 30 min Obtain Au 25 by stepwise recrystallization with methanol Centrifuge at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes Wash with a 4:1 H 2 O:methanol mixture WU Synthesis 9 Dissolve HAuCl 4 ·3H 2 O in H 2 O, and cool to 0°C for 30 min Add thiol to solution in a 4:1 ratio with gold and stir for 1.5 hr Solution was reduced with NaBH 4 and stirred for >12 hours Add methanol to reaction mixture Collect precipitate by centrifugation (3800 rpm, 10 minutes) Wash solid with MeOH/H 2 O and wash repeatedly w/ MeOH Dry under reduced pressure for 4 days DPV of ferrocene modified TGL-CdSe QDs and ferrocene monomer. -3.00E-06 -2.00E-06 -1.00E-06 0.00E+00 1.00E-06 2.00E-06 3.00E-06 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P otential(V )vs.A g/A gC l Current (A) Fc-modified QDs Ferrocene COOH Surface Modification of QDs The Synthesis and Analysis of Metallic and Semiconducting Nanoparticles HS OH O HS OH OH O HS HS OH OH HO OH O O SH N H OH SH O O HO H N N H OH O NH 2 O HS O O glutathione (GLU) tiopronin (TIO ) 3-m ercaptopropionic acid (M PA ) m ercaptosuccinicacid (M SA ) 3-mercapto-1-propanol(MPL) thioglycolicacid (TGA) thioglycerol(TGL) HS NH 2 OH O cysteine (CYS) Water-Soluble Thiols Elizabeth M. Henry and Deon T. Miles The University of the South, Department of Chemistry, Sewanee, TN Applications Brust/Schiffrin MPC Synthesis 6 [Au(I)SR] n 0 ºC AuCl 4 + RSH Au III Au I Au 0 3X 10 X BH 4 Small core of Au atoms that are stabilized by a monolayer of chemisorbed alkanethiolate ligands Monolayer-Protected NanoCluster (MPC) Synthetic Methods for Au 25 MPCS Spectral and Electrochemical Analysis -6.00E-13 -4.00E-13 -2.00E-13 0.00E+00 2.00E-13 4.00E-13 6.00E-13 -2 -1 0 1 2 E(V)vs Ag/AgCl C u rre n t (A DPV CYS-Au 25 MPC (Wu Synthesis) in 0.05 M tetra- n-butylammonium bromide/H 2 O using Pt WE, Pt CE 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 250 450 650 850 W aveleng th (nm ) UV-vis spectrum of MSA-Au 25 MPC (Wu Synthesis) Au 140 Synthesis of QDs 4 Image: http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/11/1/154/ ew anee cholarship S ew anee cholarship S Professor . . Miles Elizabeth 4 x10 0 1 2 3 4 5 Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z) 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 -ESI Scan (0.693 min) Frag=225.0V 03_07_2011_01.d 260.9975 980.0089 602.9399 1170.9094 Mass Spectrum of CYS-Au 25 MPC (Wu Synthesis) Anticipated MW = 5173 Da Aliquots were collected based on visible change in color. Color change progresses towards red region.

Impact of Heating on Quantum Yield Quantum yield as a function of heating time. (Inset is heating times after 30 min.) Quantum yield as a function of time

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Impact of Heating on Quantum Yield Quantum yield as a function of heating time. (Inset is heating times after 30 min.) Quantum yield as a function of time

Impact of Heating on Quantum Yield

Quantum yield as a function of heating time. (Inset is heating times after 30 min.)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Heating Time (min)

Qu

an

tum

Yie

ld MPA

GLU

MSA

TGA

TGL

CYS

TIO

Quantum yield as a function of time after 8 months of TIO-CdSe QDs.

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

12 24 38Time (min)

Qu

an

tum

Yie

ld

2/2/2010

6/2/2009

Used by 9th century artisans for pottery

Wires

Resistors

Switches

Transistors

Diodes

Capacitors

Chemical sensors1

Optoelectronics2

Photovoltaics3

Fluorescent display devices3

Light-mediated binding & release of biomolecules3

Absorbance

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10

Inte

gra

ted

Flu

ore

sce

nce

1e+7

2e+7

3e+7

4e+7

5e+7

6e+7

7e+7Rhodamine 6G (347 nm; R2 = 0.998)Fluorescein (323 nm; R2 = 0.989)

Relative Quantum Yield Equation5

ФX = Quantum yield of QDsФST = Quantum yield of standardη = Refractive indexGrad = Slope of integrated intensities from the plot

Reaction Mixture Metal perchlorate: Cd(ClO4)2·H2O, Zn(ClO4)2·6H2O or

Pb(ClO4)2·3H2O in Type 1 water. Water-soluble thiols added in 2.4:1 thiol:metal ratio

Procedure The pH is adjusted to ≥ 11 using 1 M NaOH while stirring Mixture was deaerated for ~30 minutes with N2

Selenium source comes from either Al2Se3 or NaHSe Mixture was allowed to reflux over a period of time

Impact of Structure on Quantum Yield

Previous research explored quantum yields of CdSe quantum dots produced using Al2Se3 (tHEAT = 0).

Note: Different excitations were used

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

GLU TIO MPL TGL MSA MPA TGA CYS

Thiols

Qu

an

tum

Yie

ld Al2Se3 at 480 nm

NaHSe at 347 nm

QDs with ZnSe and CdSe core and different thiols (tHEAT= 0).

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

GLU TIO MPL TGL MSA MPA TGA CYS

Thiols

Qu

an

tum

Yie

ld

ZnSe

CdSe

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

30 80 130 180 230Heating Time

Project Overview Water-Soluble, Monolayer-Protected QDs Monolayer-Protected Gold NanoparticlesA study of quantum yield in water–soluble, monolayer-protected quantum dots (QDs) was completed. The study examined the changes in quantum yield from the effects of heating, method of selenide addition, type of surrounding thiol, and material lifetime. Subsequent modifications of the QD surface were characterized using electrochemistry. 

Monolayer-protected gold nanoparticles were prepared using several different synthetic methods. The nanoparticles were characterized by UV-visible spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and mass spectrometry. Different thiols were used in the synthetic scheme in order to monitor differences in surface chemistry.

KIM Synthesis8

Add HAuCl4·3H2O to a solution of Oct4NBr in toluene Remove aqueous phase Add 1-hexanethiol in 5:1 ratio thiol/gold ratio Cool to 0°C, reduce with NaBH4, and stir for 30 min Collect black organic phase and wash 4x with Type 1 H2O Remove solvent under reduced pressure Add slowly DMSO to the MPC and allow to stand overnight Collect black product Add acetone to the flask to extract Au25  Remove acetone with reduced pressure Wash with acetonitrile and ethanol 1) J.W. Grate et al. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 1868-1879.

2) Kamat, P.V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7729-7744. 3) Thomas, K.G.; Kamat, P.V. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 888-898.4) N.Gaponik et al. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7177-7185. 5) M.Grabolle et al. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 6285-6294.6) M. Brust et al. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1995, 1655-1656.7) M. S. Devadas et al. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114 (51), 22417-22423.8) J. Kim et al. Langmuir. 2007, 23 (14), 7853-7858.9) Z.Wu et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 177-183.

NSF CHE-095940, Faculty Research Grants, Academic Initiatives, Conduff Scientific Grants, and Croom Beatty Chemistry Research Internship

References/Acknowledgements

DEVADAS Synthesis7

Make solution of 3:1 thiol/HAuCl4·3H2O ratio Reduce with NaBH4 and stir for 30 min Obtain Au25 by stepwise recrystallization with methanol Centrifuge at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes Wash with a 4:1 H2O:methanol mixture

WU Synthesis9   Dissolve HAuCl4·3H2O in H2O, and cool to 0°C for 30 min Add thiol to solution in a 4:1 ratio with gold and stir for 1.5 hr Solution was reduced with NaBH4 and stirred for >12 hours Add methanol to reaction mixture Collect precipitate by centrifugation (3800 rpm, 10 minutes) Wash solid with MeOH/H2O and wash repeatedly w/ MeOH Dry under reduced pressure for 4 days

DPV of ferrocene modified TGL-CdSe QDs and ferrocene monomer.

-3.00E-06

-2.00E-06

-1.00E-06

0.00E+00

1.00E-06

2.00E-06

3.00E-06

0.00.20.40.60.81.0

Potential (V) vs. Ag/AgCl

Curr

ent (

A)

Fc-modifiedQDsFerroceneCOOH

Surface Modification of QDs

The Synthesis and Analysis of Metallic and Semiconducting Nanoparticles

HS OH

O

HS OH

OH

O

HS

HS

OH

OH

HO

OH

O

O

SH

NH

OH

SH

O

O

HOHN

NH

OH

O

NH2

O

HS

O

O

glutathione (GLU)tiopronin (TIO)

3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA)

mercaptosuccinic acid (MSA)

3-mercapto-1-propanol (MPL)

thioglycolic acid (TGA)

thioglycerol (TGL)

HS

NH2

OH

O

cysteine (CYS)

Water-Soluble Thiols

Elizabeth M. Henry and Deon T. Miles The University of the South, Department of Chemistry, Sewanee, TN

Applications

Brust/Schiffrin MPC Synthesis6

[Au(I)SR]n

0 ºC

AuCl4– + RSH

AuIII

AuI

Au0

3X

10X

BH4–

Small core of Au atoms that are stabilized by a monolayer of chemisorbed alkanethiolate ligands

Monolayer-Protected NanoCluster (MPC)

Synthetic Methods for Au25 MPCS

Spectral and Electrochemical Analysis

-6.00E-13

-4.00E-13

-2.00E-13

0.00E+00

2.00E-13

4.00E-13

6.00E-13

-2-1012

E(V) vs Ag/AgCl

Cu

rre

nt

(A)

DPV CYS-Au25 MPC (Wu Synthesis) in 0.05 M tetra-n-butylammonium bromide/H2O using Pt WE, Pt CE

0.5

0.7

0.9

1.1

1.3

1.5

1.7

1.9

250 450 650 850

Wavelength (nm)

UV-vis spectrum of MSA-Au25 MPC (Wu Synthesis)

Au140

Synthesis of QDs4

Image: http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/11/1/154/

ewaneecholarshipSewaneecholarshipS

Professor. . MilesElizabeth

4x10

0

1

2

3

4

5

Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000

-ESI Scan (0.693 min) Frag=225.0V 03_07_2011_01.d

260.9975

980.0089

602.9399

1170.9094

Mass Spectrum of CYS-Au25 MPC (Wu Synthesis)

Anticipated MW = 5173 Da

Aliquots were collected based on visible change in color.Color change progresses towards red region.