Imp Questions on Ipr

7/27/2019 Imp Questions on Ipr

1/4

Assignment I: Fundamentals of IPRs and Trademarks

NAME: DEBDEEP SINHA; USER ID: debdeep25056 Page 1

QUESTION 1:

What are the important theories of protection of intellectual property rights?

ANSWER:

Protection of intellectual property rights hold immense significance in todays world since intellectual

property plays a vital role in the modern economy. These innovations hold the key to any nations

progress and prosperity. The important theories of protection of intellectual property rights are as

follows:

1) MORAL DESERT THEORY: According to John Locke, every man has a property in his own person,i.e., the fruits of a mans labour belongs to him. In this scheme intellectual property rights would

seem to follow naturally since the individual must surely be permitted the fruits of his mental

and physical and mental labour.

2) PERSONALITY THEORY: According to Kant and Hegel, if ones artistic expressions are synonymouswith ones personality, then they are deserving of protection just as much as the physical person

is deserving of protection since in a sense they are a part of that physical person. Here

personality of a person has been shown to be a very valuable property.

3) UTILITARIAN THEORY: Advocated by economists such as Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill,the utilitarian theories assume that the objective of any policy should be the attainment of the,

greatest good for the greatest number. The utility gains from increased incentives for

inventions must be weighed against the losses incurred from monopolization and their

diminished diffusion. Hence greatest good can only be achieved by protecting the greatest good,

i.e., intellectual property.

QUESTION 2:

Distinguish between a collective mark and a well known trademark?

ANSWER:

The differences between a collective mark and a well known trademark are as follows:

i) Section 2(g) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 defines the term collective mark means a trademark distinguishing the goods or services of members of an association of person not beinga partnership within the meaning of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 which is the proprietor

of the mark from those of others.

Whereas, as per section 2(1) (zg), Well-known trademark in relation to any goods or

services, means a mark which has become so to the substantial segment of the public which

uses such goods or receives such services that the use of such mark in relation to other

goods or services would be likely to be taken as indicating a connection in the course of


2/4



trade or rendering of services between those goods or services and a person using the mark

in relation to the first-mentioned goods or services.

ii) A Collective mark cannot be owned by individuals or a body corporate. It can be registered onlyby a group or association of persons and the use thereof is reserved for members of the

group or association of persons. Section 61 to 68 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 contains

provisions relating to the registration of collective trademarks.

Whereas, a well-known trademark can be owned or used only by an individual or a

corporate body who is the original user. Section 11 (6) to (11) deals with matters relating to

well-known trademark.

iii) A collective mark can be obtained by an organization which can permit the members to use themark. The association has to prepare and file a regulation with the Trade Mark Registry

setting out the rules specifying standards and criteria for membership.

Whereas a well known trade is that trade mark which has been acquired by the user of the

said mark by using the said mark for a long period of time and which associates the owner

to the goodwill and name-fame related to his service or products.

iv) The primary function of a collective mark is to indicate a trade connection with the Associationor Organisation.

Whereas the underlying principle for protection to well-known trademarks cases is to

prevent traders taking free ride. They may tend to take advantage of the goodwill of the

well-known trademark without doing efforts.

v) A case of infringement can be filed for protecting a collective trade mark as defined undersection 67 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

However a well known trade mark can be protected but an infringement case cant be filed

in the said case, but still we can oppose any similar trademark to be registered.

Question 3:

Distinguish between Passing Off and Infringement under trademark law?

Answer:

The differences between passing off and infringement under trademark law are as follows;

i) The Trade Mark Act, 1999 recognizes the Common Law remedy of passing off. The tort ofpassing off is based upon the principle that no man is entitled to represent his goods as

being the goods of another man; and no man is required to use any mark, sign or symbol,

device or means, whereby without making a direct representation himself to a purchaser

who purchases from him, he enables such purchaser to tell a lie or to make a false

representation to somebody else who is the ultimate purchaser.


3/4



Infringement on the other hand refers to the unauthorised use of a registered trademark,

i.e., use without permission of the trademark holder.

ii) For a passing off action registration of trademark is not relevant. It is based on property ingoodwill acquired by use of the mark, wherein the plaintiff has to prove that he is user of

the mark, which has become distinctive of the product.

On the other hand infringement is based on statutory right acquired by registration of

trademark.

iii) In case of a passing off action, the defendant's goods need not be same as that of the plaintiff;they may be allied or even different.

In case of an action for infringement, the defendant's use of the offending mark may be in

respect of the goods for which the mark is registered or similar goods. In the claims of

infringement based on well known trademarks, the barrier of goods stands further diluted in

view of the provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

iv) In passing off action identity or similarity of marks is not sufficient; there must also be likelihoodof confusion.

But in case of infringement if the marks are identical or similar no further proof is required.

In the case Durga Dutt Sharma V. N.P. Laboratories, a Supreme Court judgment, the difference between

the two has been laid. It was held that An action for passing off is a Common law remedy, being in

substance an action for deceit, that is, a passing off by a person of his own goods as those of another.

But that is not the gist of an action of infringement. The action for infringement is a statutory remedy

conferred on the registered proprietor of a registered trade mark for the vindication of the exclusive

right to use the trade mark."

Question 4:What kind of protection is afforded to the registered trademarks under the Trademark Act?

Answer:

The registration gives the proprietor exclusive right to use the trademark in relation to goods or services

in respect of which the registration is being made under section 28 of the Trade Marks Act 1999. The

right of exclusive use shall be subject to conditions and limitations with which the registration is made. A

registered trademark is infringed when a person, not being a registered proprietor or permitted user,

uses in the course of trade, a mark, which is identical or similar to the registered trademark, in relation

to goods or services in respect of which the trademark is registered. Section 29 of the Act gives instancesof what shall constitute infringement which can be summarized as in cases where the mark is

deceptively similar and is likely to cause confusion on the part of the public. On such infringement the

owner of the trademark can directly sue for infringement to get relief. Mere registration on the part of

the plaintiff is enough to give him the right to sue.


4/4



Question 5:

Write a note on framing and linking.

Answer:

Framing: One can have a stronger case of trademark infringement on ground of framing rather than

linking. Framing refers to the situation where a website instead of showing its original contents puts the

links of a few popular websites related to his, creating a framed website and when the user clicks on

these links instead of talking him to the website of the original source the framed website drags its

contents to its own site. The problem which arises here is that such contents are framed within the

webpage of the framed website cutting off the original websites advertisements and showing the

advertisements of the framed website only. This kind of activity is known as framing which is again more

of an unfair competition issue. The companies might get upset due to loss of revenue through

advertisements, plus copyright issues are also involved. It confuses the users as to the origin or source of

the contents as the framing sites web address is displayed. The chances of trademark infringement

depend upon framing of contents.

Linking: Linking is a bit different from framing. Linking refers to a case where a website puts links of

different sites on its webpage such that when the internet user clicks on the links it takes him to the

website of the particular link. It facilitates the users in navigating through the Internet with considerable

ease. In most cases, linking is welcome, but in some cases it affects advertising. Advertising is a major

source of revenue for any website. An advertiser/company chooses where to advertise on the internet

by checking the number of hits on a webpage, i.e., how many people have accessed/visited the

websites homepage. The more the hits the more the advertisers are attracted. A problem would arise

if another website would permit to skip the home page of a website (which contains the

advertisements) by deep linking into the site, i.e., by linking information found more deeper in the

webpage and not on its homepage, and this would reduce the number of hits thus reducing

advertisements and causing trademark infringement.

Documents

Imp Questions on Ipr