Upload
kylie-corbett
View
225
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IMO Goal Based New Construction Standards
Seminar in Heraklion17 October 2005
Dragos RautaINTERTANKO
INTERTANKO Involvement• INTERTANKO Position Paper in 1999• Joint paper with OCIMF in 2000• Discussions with individual Classification Societies &
IACS in 2000 - 2002• Tripartite initiative since 2001 (Singapore, Shanghai,
Seoul, Yokohama, Beijing) • Although GBS would apply to all ships,
INTERTANKO speaks on behalf of tanker operators• Tanker - the most “targeted” ship type followed by
bulkers• Everyone expects perfection• Tanker safety records is extremely good but• “Zero tolerance” is the rule of the game
Tanker incidents and age development
Source:LMIS/Informa/INTERTANKO
%
0
220
440
660
880
1100
0.0
3.2
6.4
9.6
12.8
16.0
Incidents
Age
Tanker pollution and age development
Source:LMIS/Informa/INTERTANKO
000 ts
0
130
260
390
520
650
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04P05
0.0
3.2
6.4
9.6
12.8
16.0
Pollution
Age
Years
Z ERO
TO L ERANCE
TANKERS
GBS Basic Principles – INTERTANKO view
• Background – should industry alone have dealt with this? Absolutely YES but . . – did IMO need to get involved? Too late to ask isn’t it?
• What is intended on this regulatory project?Ships are to be designed and constructed for a specified design life to be safe and environmentally friendly, when properly operated and maintained under the specified operating and environmental conditions, in intact and specified damage conditions, throughout their life.
. . . . . . specified operating and environmental conditions are defined by the operating area for the ship throughout its life and cover the conditions, including intermediate conditions, arising from cargo and ballast operations in port, waterways and at sea.
Source: draft Tier I - Goals
GBS Basic Principles – INTERTANKO view
• Is the ”goal” too ambitious or is it achievable?– What should GBS cover
• design (Class rules & design approval)• construction standards• survey of ship building• (system for feedback reporting to ship yard after
delivery)
– What should GBS not address• POLITICS• ships in service (perhaps in phase II of the project)
Port State ControlPercentage of inspected ships detained
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2003 est.200220012000199919981997
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
of which tankers
All ships
Inspections and detentions
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Num
ber
All inspections:55,121
Otherdetentions:
3,159
Tankerinspections:
8,893
Tanker detentions:328
TANKERSPRIMARY TARGET FORPORT STATE CONTROL
SIGNIFICANT LESSDEFICIENCIES THANALL OTHER COMMERCIAL SHIPS
GBS Basic Principles – INTERTANKO view
• Sufficient rules for monitoring ship in service• Poor monitoring for new building• Problems and errors on new buildings are primarily
due to lack of rule/standard implementation rather than ”unknown” stressess and efforts on the ship’s strucutre (e.g. minimising corrosion allowances although it has been prooved corrosion could be higher than assumed)
• Many problems with onboard equipment • Equipment built according to unclear regulations• ”deterministic” vs. ”risk based” approach?
Structural damages in SH VLCCs
Class NK: Comprehensive damage reviewof 2nd generation of VLCCs, Dec. 1998
Structural damages in SH VLCCs
Class NK: Comprehensive damage reviewof 2nd generation of VLCCs, Dec. 1998
Experience with structural defects on DH tankersAge profile
Source: JTP – Structural Defects Experience
DH tankers - Age profile
Source: JTP – Structural Defects Experience
Source: Class NK – Summary of hulldamage incidents in 2004
Damages in cargo areas of large bulk carriers
DEFECTS ON RUDDER
FOUND FEW MONTHS AFTERSHIP DELIVERY
Defects in large castings
FILLINGS IN A NEW PROPELLER
found 6 months after ship delivery
Defects in large castings
DEFECTS IN WINDLASSES
DEFECTS IN WINDLASSES
sub-dimensioned
very poor execution
Tier III Verification – INTERTANKO view
• The essential Tier of the GBS • What should be verifiable
– Class rules– Relevant IMO Regulations– Relevant Industy standards
• Who should be the Verification Authority– An Independent IACS body
• How to verify– Guidelines developed by an IMO Group of Experts
• How to monitor verification– Audit by the IMO Group of Experts
• IMO Group of Experts – professional expertise to be required
ships should be designed according to common regulations
ship designs should be basedon similar principles
improve further CSR
stop compete on producing the less costly design
Tanker fleet development m dwt
-20-15
-10-505
10152025
3035
92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Phase-out
Deliveries
Demolition
Net changeTotal phase out 2010
w ill be betw een 8-65 m dw t, subject to administrations
Tanker fleet double-hull development
Source: Fearnleys/INTERTANKO
%
622
51 59 67 70 73 76 8494
78
49 41 33 30 27 24 16
0
20
40
60
80
100
1991
1997
End 0
2
End 0
3
End 0
4
End 0
5
End 0
6
End 0
7
End 1
0*
DH SH/DB/DS
% dw t share*:
* Assumes phase out according to regulations (rounded upw ards, 25 years after 2010.
GBS Enforcement – INTERTANKO view
• ”zero tolerance” on tanker incidents
• INTERTANKO enviseages its new goals:– Zero deaths and serious injuries– Zero oil and chemicals entering the sea – Zero worldwide detentions
GBS Basic Principles – INTERTANKO view
• Operators cannot do this alone• What it takes to get a sound result?• Commitment required from:
– Owners– Flag Administrations– Class Societies/ROs– IACS– Ship builders
• Somebody has to take the responsibility that the ship delivered is up to standards needed to meet ”zero tolerance” expectations
• Statments ”but it is up to the owner” are not acceptable
Goal Based Standards - Conclusions• The SYSTEM should close loopholes on ”choices” for
substandard design/construction even if accepted by those buying new ships
• Key word: assuming responsibility• The industry cannot miss the opportunity and leave politics
and group interests to dominate these developments• Any delay will only harm the industry• Regulators have given priority for new regulations for
tankers in service• Same priority should be given to develop standards for
design and construction monitoring of these ships