Upload
everett-sharp
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Immanuel Kant
categorical imperative
HOW DO WE DETERMINE MORALITY?
morality is derived from duty
moral principles are intrinsically valid
moral principles must be obeyed in all
circumstances
all moral obligations must be tested
through the categorical imperative
HOW DO WE DETERMINE MORALITY?
moral law applies to any and all rational
agents
means of an action matter more than the ends
moral actions must have a moral intent
moral law is a principle of reason not of fact
WHAT ’S WRONG WITH IMMORALITY?
immorality=irrationality
WHAT IS THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE?
a three tiered “test” to determine whether
a maxim is moral
maxim: principle or an action
HOW DOES THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE WORK?
the three tiers act as three tests
they must be worked through in consecutive
order
if you “pass” test one you move on to test
two then test three
HOW DOES THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE WORK?
morality is determined by the successful
completion of all levels of the imperative
but you can’t take two or three without passing
test one
if you don’t pass any of the tests the maxim is
immoral
TIER ONE: UNIVERSAL LAW
“act only in accordance with that maxim
through which you can at the same time will
that it become a universal law.”
ex: lying about harboring jewish people in
your attic
TIER TWO: HUMANITY FORMULA
“we should never act in such a way that we
treat Humanity, whether in ourselves or in
others, as a means only but always as an end
in itself.”
ex: kidnapping to get ransom money
TIER THREE: KINGDOM OF ENDS
“act in accordance with the maxims of a member giving universal laws for a merely possible kingdom of ends"
• 1. it requires that we conform our actions to the maxims of a legislator of laws
• 2. that this lawgiver lays down universal laws, binding all rational wills including our own
• 3. that those laws are of ‘a merely possible kingdom’ each of whose members equally possesses this status as legislator of universal laws, and hence must be treated always as an end in itself.
TIER THREE: KINGDOM OF ENDS
simply put:• our fundamental moral obligation is to act only on principles which could earn acceptance by a community of fully rational agents each of whom have an equal share in legislating these principles for their community.
• liken unto the golden rule: do unto others as you would have done unto yourself
TIER THREE: KINGDOM OF ENDS
within the kingdom of ends there is a
realm of ends
• within the realm of ends the end of a maxim is eternal
CRITICISMS OF KANT
universal moral law is not binding
laws only applies to rational agents
people are inherently immoral, kant assumes that people
are inherently moral
kant also assumes that people automatically desire to be
moral
any questions?
Fin