13
Image description. Cover Image End of image description. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from about 7,000 institutions that provide postsecondary education across the United States. IPEDS collects institution-level data on student enrollment, graduation rates, student charges, program completions, faculty, staff, and finances. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (http://collegenavigator.ed.gov), an online tool to aid in the college search process. For more information about IPEDS, see http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? As suggested by the IPEDS Technical Review Panel, the figures in this report provide selected indicators for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. This report provides a list of pre-selected comparison group institutions and the criteria used for their selection. Additional information about these indicators and the pre- selected comparison group are provided in the Methodological Notes at the end of the report. Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data? Each institution can access previous Data Feedback Reports as far back as 2005 and customize this latest report by using a different comparison group and IPEDS variables of its choosing. To download archived reports or customize the current Data Feedback Report (DFR), please visit our website at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Home/UseTheData. Morgan Community College Fort Morgan, CO

Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Image description. Cover Image End of image description.

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

What Is IPEDS?

The Integrated Postsecondary Education DataSystem (IPEDS) is a system of survey componentsthat collects data from about 7,000 institutions thatprovide postsecondary education across the UnitedStates. IPEDS collects institution-level data onstudent enrollment, graduation rates, studentcharges, program completions, faculty, staff, andfinances.

These data are used at the federal and state level forpolicy analysis and development; at the institutionallevel for benchmarking and peer analysis; and bystudents and parents, through the College Navigator(http://collegenavigator.ed.gov), an online tool to aidin the college search process. For more informationabout IPEDS, see http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds.

What Is the Purpose of This Report?

The Data Feedback Report is intended to provideinstitutions a context for examining the data theysubmitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is toprovide institutional executives a useful resource andto help improve the quality and comparability ofIPEDS data.

What Is in This Report?

As suggested by the IPEDS Technical Review Panel,the figures in this report provide selected indicatorsfor your institution and a comparison group ofinstitutions. The figures are based on data collectedduring the 2016-17 IPEDS collection cycle and arethe most recent data available. This report provides alist of pre-selected comparison group institutions andthe criteria used for their selection. Additionalinformation about these indicators and the pre-selected comparison group are provided in theMethodological Notes at the end of the report.

Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data?

Each institution can access previous Data FeedbackReports as far back as 2005 and customize thislatest report by using a different comparison groupand IPEDS variables of its choosing. To downloadarchived reports or customize the current DataFeedback Report (DFR), please visit our website athttp://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Home/UseTheData.

Morgan Community CollegeFort Morgan, CO

Page 2: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Morgan Community College  

COMPARISON GROUPComparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting your institution’s statistics. For this report, you specified a customcomparison group.

You described this custom comparison group as follows: MCC CO Comp DFR

The custom comparison group chosen by Morgan Community College includes the following 12 institutions:

Arapahoe Community College (Littleton, CO)Colorado Northwestern Community College (Rangely, CO)Community College of Aurora (Aurora, CO)Community College of Denver (Denver, CO)Front Range Community College (Westminster, CO)Lamar Community College (Lamar, CO)Northeastern Junior College (Sterling, CO)Otero Junior College (La Junta, CO)Pikes Peak Community College (Colorado Springs, CO)Pueblo Community College (Pueblo, CO)Red Rocks Community College (Lakewood, CO)Trinidad State Junior College (Trinidad, CO)

The figures in this report have been organized and ordered into the following topic areas:

1) Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools) [No charts applicable] 2) Student Enrollment Fig. 1 and 2 Pg. 33) Awards Fig. 3 Pg. 34) Charges and Net Price Fig. 4 and 5 Pg. 45) Student Financial Aid Fig. 6, 7, 8 and 9 Pg. 4 and 56) Military Benefits* [No charts applicable] 7) Retention and Graduation Rates Fig. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 Pg. 5, 6 and 78) Finance Fig. 17 and 18 Pg. 89) Staff Fig. 19 and 20 Pg. 810) Libraries* [No charts applicable]

*These figures only appear in customized Data Feedback Reports (DFR), which are available through Use the Data portal on the IPEDS website.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 2

Page 3: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, American Indian or Alaska Native.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 1.Group 2, Asian.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 2.Group 3, Black or African American.Item 1, Your institution 3.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 3.Group 4, Hispanic/ Latino.Item 1, Your institution 23.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 21.Group 5, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01.Group 6, White.Item 1, Your institution 64.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 61.Group 7, Two or more races.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 3.Group 8, Race/ethnicity unknown.Item 1, Your institution 6.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 5.Group 9, Nonresident alien.Item 1, Your institution 2.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 2.Group 10, Women.Item 1, Your institution 66.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 56.Race/ethnicity or gender Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Enrollment measureHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Unduplicated headcount - total.Item 1, Your institution 2171.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 9723.Group 2, Total FTE enrollment.Item 1, Your institution 872.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 4117.Group 3, Full-time fall enrollment.Item 1, Your institution 327.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 1652.Group 4, Part-time fall enrollment.Item 1, Your institution 1147.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 4440. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Level of awardHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of awards.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Associate's.Item 1, Your institution 176.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 667.Group 2, Certificates of at least 2 but less than 4 years.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01.Group 3, Certificates of at least 1 but less than 2 years.Item 1, Your institution 52.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 130.Group 4, Certificates of less than 1 year.Item 1, Your institution 208.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 444. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Morgan Community College  

Figure 1. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2016

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

American Indian orAlaska Native

Asian Black or AfricanAmerican

Hispanic/Latino

Native Hawaiian orother Pacific Islander

White Two ormore races

Race/ethnicityunknown

Nonresident alien Women

1 1 0 2 3 3

23 21

0 0

6461

1 36 5

2 2

66

56

Race/ethnicity or gender

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See "Use ofMedian Values for Comparison Group" for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2017, Fall Enrollment component.

Figure 2. Unduplicated 12-month headcount (2015-16), total FTEenrollment (2015-16), and full- and part-time fallenrollment (Fall 2016)

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000

Number of students

Part-timefall enrollment

Full-timefall enrollment

Total FTEenrollment

Unduplicatedheadcount - total

4,440

1,147

1,652

327

4,117

872

9,723

2,171

Enrollment measure

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: For details on calculating full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, see CalculatingFTE in the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2016, 12-monthEnrollment component and Spring 2017, Fall Enrollment component.

Figure 3. Number of subbaccalaureate degrees and certificatesawarded, by level: 2015-16

0 200 400 600 800

Number of awards

Certificates of lessthan 1 year

Certificates of at least 1but less than 2 years

Certificates of at least 2but less than 4 years

Associate's

444

208

130

52

0

0

667

176

Level of award

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2016, Completionscomponent.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 3

Page 4: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Image description.Academic yearHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Tuition and fees.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, 2016-17.Item 1, Your institution $3494.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $3702.Group 2, 2015-16.Item 1, Your institution $3538.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $3533.Group 3, 2014-15.Item 1, Your institution $3394.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $3394.Group 4, 2013-14.Item 1, Your institution $3224.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $3224. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Academic yearHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Net price.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, 2015-16.Item 1, Your institution $6822.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $9721.Group 2, 2014-15.Item 1, Your institution $8230.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $9513.Group 3, 2013-14.Item 1, Your institution $8769.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $9596. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Any grant aid.Item 1, Your institution 70.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 72.Group 2, Federal grants.Item 1, Your institution 52.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 47.Group 3, Pell grants.Item 1, Your institution 52.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 47.Group 4, State/local grants.Item 1, Your institution 57.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 42.Group 5, Institutional grants.Item 1, Your institution 27.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 16.Group 6, Any loans.Item 1, Your institution 9.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 31.Group 7, Federal loans.Item 1, Your institution 9.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 30.Group 8, Other loans.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 1. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Aid dollars.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Any grant aid (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $5769.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $6201.Group 2, Federal grants (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $4914.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $5031.Group 3, Pell grants (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $4867.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $4928.Group 4, State/local grants (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $2086.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $1733.Group 5, Institutional grants (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $886.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $1637.Group 6, Any loans (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $3775.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $4814.Group 7, Federal loans (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $3775.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $4665.Group 8, Other loans (N=6).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $11361. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Morgan Community College  

Figure 4. Academic year tuition and required fees for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates: 2013-14to 2016-17

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000

Tuition and fees

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

$3,224

$3,224

$3,394

$3,394

$3,533

$3,538

$3,702

$3,494

Academic year

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: The tuition and required fees shown here are the lowest reported from thecategories of in-district, in-state, and out-of-state. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2016, InstitutionalCharacteristics component.

Figure 5. Average net price of attendance for full-time, first-timedegree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students, whowere awarded grant or scholarship aid: 2013-14 to 2015-16

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000

Net price

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

$9,596

$8,769

$9,513

$8,230

$9,721

$6,822

Academic year

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: Average net price is for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students and is generated by subtracting the average amount of federal,state/local government, and institutional grant and scholarship awarded aid from the totalcost of attendance. Total cost of attendance is the sum of published tuition and requiredfees, books and supplies, and the average room and board and other expenses. Fordetails, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparisongroup.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2016, InstitutionalCharacteristics component and Winter 2016-17, Student Financial Aid component.

Figure 6. Percent of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students who were awarded grant orscholarship aid from the federal government, state/localgovernment, or the institution, or loans, by type of aid:2015-16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of students

Other loans

Federalloans

Any loans

Institutionalgrants

State/localgrants

Pellgrants

Federalgrants

Any grantaid

10

309

319

1627

4257

4752

4752

7270

Type of aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federalgovernment, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell grantsand other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans awarded tostudents. For details on how students are counted for financial aid reporting, see CohortDetermination in the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2016-17, StudentFinancial Aid component.

Figure 7. Average amounts of grant or scholarship aid from thefederal government, state/local government, or theinstitution, or loans awarded to full-time, first-timedegree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students, bytype of aid: 2015-16

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000

Aid dollars

Other loans (N=6)

Federalloans (N=12)

Any loans (N=12)

Institutionalgrants (N=12)

State/localgrants (N=12)

Pellgrants (N=12)

Federalgrants (N=12)

Any grantaid (N=12)

$11,361

$4,665$3,775

$4,814$3,775

$1,637$886

$1,733$2,086

$4,928$4,867

$5,031$4,914

$6,201$5,769

Type of aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federalgovernment, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell grantsand other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans awarded tostudents. Average amounts of aid were calculated by dividing the total aid awarded by thetotal number of recipients in each institution. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2016-17, StudentFinancial Aid component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 4

Page 5: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Any grant aid.Item 1, Your institution 36.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 50.Group 2, Pell grants.Item 1, Your institution 24.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 38.Group 3, Federal loans.Item 1, Your institution 11.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 27. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Aid dollars.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Any grant aid.Item 1, Your institution $5217.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $6118.Group 2, Pell grants.Item 1, Your institution $4942.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $4898.Group 3, Federal loans.Item 1, Your institution $5291.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $5000. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Attendance levelHorizontal Bar chart with 2 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Full-time retention rate.Item 1, Your institution 62.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=10) 54.Group 2, Part-time retention rate.Item 1, Your institution 53.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=10) 41. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.MeasureHorizontal Bar chart with 2 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Graduation rate, Overall.Item 1, Your institution 45.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 27.Group 2, Transfer-out rate.Item 1, Your institution 13.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 10. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Morgan Community College  

Figure 8. Percent of all undergraduates awarded aid, by type ofaid: 2015-16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of students

Federalloans

Pell grants

Any grant aid

27

11

38

24

50

36

Type of aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federalgovernment, state/local government, the institution, or other sources. Federal loansincludes only federal loans awarded to students. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2016-17, StudentFinancial Aid component.

Figure 9. Average amount of aid awarded to all undergraduates, bytype of aid: 2015-16

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000

Aid dollars

Federal loans

Pell grants

Any grant aid

$5,000

$5,291

$4,898

$4,942

$6,118

$5,217

Type of aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid from the federal government,state/local government, the institution, or other sources. Federal loans includes federalloans to students. Average amounts of aid were calculated by dividing the total aidawarded by the total number of recipients in each institution. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2016-17, StudentFinancial Aid component.

Figure 10. Retention rates of full-time, first time degree/certificateseeking students: Fall 2015 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Part-time retentionrate

Full-time retention rate

41

53

54

62

Attendance level

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10)

NOTE: Retention rates are measured from the fall of first enrollment to the following fall.Academic reporting institutions report retention data as of the institution"s official fallreporting date or as of October 15, 2015. Program reporters determine the cohort withenrollment any time between August 1-October 31, 2015 and retention based on August1, 2016. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions inthe comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2017, Fall Enrollmentcomponent.

Figure 11. Graduation and transfer-out rates of full-time, first-timedegree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150%of normal time to program completion: 2013 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Transfer-out rate

Graduation rate,Overall

10

13

27

45

Measure

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: Graduation rate cohort includes all full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students. Graduation and transfer-out rates are the Student Right-to-Knowrates. Only institutions with mission to prepare students to transfer are required to reporttransfer out. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2016-17, GraduationRates component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 5

Page 6: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, Graduation rate, Overall (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 45.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 27.Group 2, American Indian or Alaska Native (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 100.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 9.Group 3, Asian (N=10).Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 26.Group 4, Black or African American (N=12).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 12.Group 5, Hispanic/ Latino (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 44.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 23.Group 6, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (N=9).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 33.Group 7, White (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 46.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 30.Group 8, Two or more races (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 67.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 16.Group 9, Race/ethnicity unknown (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 20.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 23.Group 10, Nonresident alien (N=11).Item 1, Your institution 100.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 20.Graduation rates by race/ethnicity Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Time to program completionHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Graduation rate.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Normal time.Item 1, Your institution 26.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=10) 17.Group 2, 150% of normal time.Item 1, Your institution 38.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=10) 26.Group 3, 200% of normal time.Item 1, Your institution 39.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=10) 29. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Student aidHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Pell grant.Item 1, Your institution 44.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 20.Group 2, Stafford loan.Item 1, Your institution 33.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 31.Group 3, Neither Pell grant or Stafford loan.Item 1, Your institution 55.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 37. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Morgan Community College  

Figure 12. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150% of normal time to programcompletion, by race/ethnicity: 2013 cohort

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

Graduation rate,Overall (N=12)

American Indian orAlaska Native (N=12)

Asian (N=10) Black or AfricanAmerican (N=12)

Hispanic/Latino (N=12)

Native Hawaiian orother Pacific Islander (N=9)

White (N=12)

Two ormore races (N=12)

Race/ethnicityunknown (N=12)

Nonresidentalien (N=11)

45

27

100

9

0

26

12

44

23

33

46

30

67

1620

23

100

20

Graduation rates by race/ethnicity

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. The graduation rates are the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) rates. Medianvalues for the comparison group will not add to 100%. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2016-17, Graduation Ratescomponent.

Figure 13. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within normal time, and 150%and 200% of normal time to completion: 2012 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Graduation rate

200% of normal time

150% of normal time

Normal time

29

39

26

38

17

26

Time to program completion

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10)

NOTE: The 150% graduation rate is the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) rates; the Normaltime and 200% rates are calculated using the same methodology. For details, see theMethodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2016-17, 200%Graduation Rates component.

Figure 14. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150% of normal time toprogram completion, by financial aid type: 2013 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Neither Pell grantor Stafford loan

Stafford loan

Pell grant

37

55

31

33

20

44

Student aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: Graduation rate cohort includes all full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students. Data were collected on those students, who at entry of thecohort, were awarded a Pell Grant and students who were awarded a Subsidized Staffordloan, but did not receive a Pell Grant. Graduation rates are the Student Right-to-Knowrates. Only institutions with mission to prepare students to transfer are required to reporttransfer out. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2016-17, GraduationRates component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 6

Page 7: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 47.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 30.Group 2, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 50.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 31.Group 3, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 1.Group 4, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 16.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 37.Group 5, Enrollment status unknown.Item 1, Your institution 32.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 29.Group 6, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 62.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 41.Group 7, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 62.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 42.Group 8, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 1.Group 9, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 31.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 42.Group 10, Enrollment status unknown.Item 1, Your institution 8.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 21.Completion and enrollment measures Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 38.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 19.Group 2, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 38.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 20.Group 3, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 2.Group 4, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 17.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 27.Group 5, Enrollment status unknown.Item 1, Your institution 45.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 51.Group 6, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 42.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 23.Group 7, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 42.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 24.Group 8, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 1.Group 9, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 47.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 41.Group 10, Enrollment status unknown.Item 1, Your institution 11.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 33.Completion and enrollment measures Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Morgan Community College  Figure 15. Award and enrollment rates of full-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by prior postsecondary

experience: 2008 cohort

First-time Undergraduates Non-first-time Undergraduates (N=12) (N=12)

              

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolledat same institution

Enrolledat another institution

Enrollment statusunknown

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolledat same institution

Enrolledat another institution

Enrollment statusunknown

47

30

50

31

1 1

16

3732

29

62

41

62

42

0 1

31

42

8

21

Completion and enrollment measures

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: Award and enrollment measures are measured from eight years after entering the institution into one of four degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate student cohort (First-time,full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; and Non-first-time, part-time). Academic reporting institutions report outcome data as of the institution"s official fall reporting date oras of October 15, 2015. Program reporters determine the cohort with enrollment any time between September 1, 2007 and August 31, 2008. For more details, see the MethodologicalNotes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2016-17, Outcome Measurescomponent.

Figure 16. Award and enrollment rates of part-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by prior postsecondaryexperience: 2008 cohort

First-time Undergraduates Non-first-time Undergraduates (N=12) (N=12)

              

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolledat same institution

Enrolledat another institution

Enrollment statusunknown

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolledat same institution

Enrolledat another institution

Enrollment statusunknown

38

19

38

20

0 2

17

27

4551

42

23

42

24

0 1

4741

11

33

Completion and enrollment measures

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: Award and enrollment measures are measured from eight years after entering the institution into one of four degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate student cohort (First-time,full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; and Non-first-time, part-time). Academic reporting institutions report outcome data as of the institution"s official fall reporting date oras of October 15, 2015. Program reporters determine the cohort with enrollment any time between September 1, 2007 and August 31, 2008. For more details, see the MethodologicalNotes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2016-17, Outcome Measurescomponent.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 7

Page 8: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Image description.Revenue sourceHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of function total.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Tuition and fees.Item 1, Your institution 30.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 39.Group 2, State appropriations.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01.Group 3, Local appropriations.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01.Group 4, Government grants and contracts.Item 1, Your institution 38.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 39.Group 5, Private gifts, grants, and contracts.Item 1, Your institution 4.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01.Group 6, Investment return.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01.Group 7, Other core revenues.Item 1, Your institution 27.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 16. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Expense functionHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Dollars per FTE.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Instruction.Item 1, Your institution $6375.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $5117.Group 2, Research.Item 1, Your institution $0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $0.01.Group 3, Public service.Item 1, Your institution $62.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $3.Group 4, Academic support.Item 1, Your institution $1688.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $846.Group 5, Institutional support.Item 1, Your institution $2698.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $1297.Group 6, Student services.Item 1, Your institution $1258.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $1677.Group 7, Other core expenses.Item 1, Your institution $737.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $1371. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Staff categoryHorizontal Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of staff.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Postsecondary Teachers and staff.Item 1, Your institution 52.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 164.Group 2, Instructional support occupations.Item 1, Your institution 9.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 40.Group 3, Management.Item 1, Your institution 20.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 28.Group 4, Business and financial operations.Item 1, Your institution 9.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 22.Group 5, Computer, engineering, and science.Item 1, Your institution 4.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 10.Group 6, Community service, legal, arts, and media.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 17.Group 7, Healthcare.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01.Group 8, Other.Item 1, Your institution 15.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 58. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Academic rankHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Average salary.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, All ranks (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $52856.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $55645.Group 2, Professor (N=4).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $60313.Group 3, Associate professor (N=2).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median No data.Group 4, Assistant professor (N=2).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median No data.Group 5, Instructor (N=4).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $49882.Group 6, Lecturer (N=0).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median No data.Group 7, No academic rank (N=6).Item 1, Your institution $52856.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $53250. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Morgan Community College  

Figure 17. Percent distribution of core revenues, by source: Fiscalyear 2016

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of function total

Other corerevenues

Investment return

Private gifts, grants,and contracts

Government grantsand contracts

Localappropriations

Stateappropriations

Tuition and fees

1627

01

04

3938

00

00

3930

Revenue source

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: The comparison group median is based on those members of the comparisongroup that report finance data using the same accounting standards as the comparisoninstitution. For more information, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2017, Financecomponent.

Figure 18. Core expenses per FTE enrollment, by function: Fiscalyear 2016

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000

Dollars per FTE

Other coreexpenses

Student services

Institutional support

Academic support

Public service

Research

Instruction

$1,371$737

$1,677$1,258

$1,297$2,698

$846$1,688

$3$62

$0$0

$5,117$6,375

Expense function

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: Expenses per full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, particularly instruction, may beinflated because finance data includes all core expenses while FTE reflects credit activityonly. For details on calculating FTE enrollment and a detailed definition of core expenses,see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2016, 12-monthEnrollment component and Spring 2017, Finance component.

Figure 19. Full-time equivalent staff, by occupational category: Fall2016

0 50 100 150 200

Number of staff

Other

Healthcare

Community service, legal,arts, and media

Computer, engineering,and science

Business and financialoperations

Management

Instructional supportoccupations

Postsecondary Teachersand staff

5815

00

171

104

229

2820

409

16452

Staff category

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: Graduate assistants are not included. For calculation details, see theMethodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2017, HumanResources component.

Figure 20. Average salaries of full-time instructional non-medicalstaff equated to 9-months worked, by academic rank:Academic year 2016-17

$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000

Average salary

No academic rank (N=6)

Lecturer (N=0)

Instructor (N=4)

Assistant professor (N=2)

Associate professor (N=2)

Professor (N=4)

All ranks (N=12)

$53,250$52,856

$49,882

$60,313

$55,645$52,856

Academic rank

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: See Methodology Notes for more details on average salary. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group. Medians are not reported for comparison groups withless than three values.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2017, HumanResources component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 8

Page 9: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Morgan Community College  

METHODOLOGICAL NOTES

Overview

This report is based on data supplied by institutions to IPEDS during 2016-17 data collection year. Response rates exceeded 99% for mostsurveys. IPEDS First Look reports at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010 provide some information on aggregateinstitutional responses.

Use of Median Values for Comparison Group

This report compares your institution’s data to the median value for the comparison group for each statistic shown in the figure. If more thanone statistic is present in a figure, the median values are determined separately for each indicator or statistic. Medians are not displayed forcomparison groups with fewer than three values. Where percentage distributions are presented, median values may not add to 100%. Toaccess all the data used to create the figures included in this report, go to ‘Use the Data’ portal on the IPEDS website at this provided link(http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds).

Missing Statistics

If a statistic is not reported for your institution, the omission indicates that the statistic is not relevant to your institution and the data were notcollected. Not all notes may be applicable to your report.

Use of Imputed Data

All IPEDS data are subject to imputation for total (institutional) and partial (item) nonresponse. If necessary, imputed values were used toprepare your report.

Data Confidentiality

IPEDS data are not collected under a pledge of confidentiality.

Disaggregation of Data by Race/Ethnicity

When applicable, some statistics are disaggregated by race/ethnicity. Data disaggregated by race/ethnicity have been reported using the1997 Office of Management and Budget categories. Detailed information about the race/ethnicity categories can be found athttps://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Section/Resources.

Cohort Determination for Reporting Student Financial Aid, Graduation Rates, and Outcome Measures

Student cohorts for reporting Student Financial Aid and Graduation Rates data are based on the reporting type of the institution. Forinstitutions that report based on an academic year (those operating on standard academic terms), student counts and cohorts are based onfall term data. Student counts and cohorts for program reporters (those that do not operate on standard academic terms) are based onunduplicated counts of students enrolled during a full 12-month period.

DESCRIPTION OF STATISTICS USED IN THE FIGURES

Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools)

Admissions and Test Score Data

Admissions and test score data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open admission policy, and apply to first-time,degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students only. Applicants include only those students who fulfilled all requirements for considerationfor admission and who were notified of one of the following actions: admission, non-admission, placement on a wait list, or applicationwithdrawn (by applicant or institution). Admitted applicants (admissions) include wait-listed students who were subsequently offeredadmission. Early decision, early action, and students who began studies during the summer prior to the fall reporting period are included. Forcustomized Data Feedback Reports, test scores are presented only if scores are required for admission.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 9

Page 10: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Morgan Community College  

Student Enrollment

FTE Enrollment

The full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment used in this report is the sum of the institution’s FTE undergraduate enrollment and FTE graduateenrollment (as calculated from or reported on the 12-month Enrollment component). Undergraduate and graduate FTE are estimated using12-month instructional activity (credit and/or contact hours). See “Calculation of FTE Students (using instructional activity)” in the IPEDSGlossary at https://surveys.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/VisGlossaryAll.aspx.

Total Entering Undergraduate Students

Total entering students are students at the undergraduate level, both full- and part-time, new to the institution in the fall term (or the priorsummer term who returned in the fall). This includes all first-time undergraduate students, students transferring into the institution at theundergraduate level, and non-degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates entering in the fall. Only degree-granting, academic year reportinginstitutions provide total entering student data.

Charges and Net Price

Average Institutional Net Price

Average net price is calculated for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates who were awarded grant or scholarship aidfrom the federal government, state/local government, or the institution anytime during the full aid year. For public institutions, this includesonly students who paid the in-state or in-district tuition rate. Other sources of grant aid are excluded. Average net price is generated bysubtracting the average amount of federal, state/local government, and institutional grant and scholarship aid from the total cost ofattendance. Total cost of attendance is the sum of published tuition and required fees, books and supplies, and the average room and boardand other expenses.

For the purpose of the IPEDS reporting, aid awarded refers to financial aid that was awarded to, and accepted by, a student. This amountmay differ from the aid amount that is disbursed to a student.

Military Benefits

Military Benefits

IPEDS collects data on two military educational benefit programs – Post 9/11 GI Bill and Tuition Assistance.

The Post 9/11 GI Bill is a federal education benefit for veterans, who served on active duty after September 1, 2001. This benefit provides upto 36 months of education benefits for the following college costs: tuition and fees, books and supplies and housing. The tuition and feesbenefit payment is made directly to the postsecondary institution; whereas, payments for books, supplies, and housing are sent to the student.

The Tuition Assistance Program covers the tuition and course-specific fees of active, eligible service members. The benefit is directly paid tothe institution by the service member’s Armed service.

Retention, Graduation Rates, and Outcome Measures

Graduation Rates and Transfer-out Rate

Graduation rates are those developed to satisfy the requirements of the Student Right-to-Know Act and Higher Education Act, as amended,and are defined as the total number of individuals from a given cohort of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates whocompleted a degree or certificate within a given percent of normal time to complete all requirements of the degree or certificate program;divided by the total number of students in the cohort of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates minus any allowableexclusions. Institutions are permitted to exclude from the cohort students who died or were totally and permanently disabled; those who leftschool to serve in the armed forces or were called up to active duty; those who left to serve with a foreign aid service of the federalgovernment, such as the Peace Corps; and those who left to serve on an official church mission.

A further extension of the traditional Graduation Rates (GR) component which carries forward 100% and 150% graduation rates datapreviously reported in the GR component is the Graduation Rates 200% (GR200) component, which request information on any additionalcompleters and exclusions from the cohort between 151% and 200% normal time for students to complete all requirements of their program ofstudy.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 10

Page 11: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Morgan Community College  

Transfer-out rate is the total number of students from the cohort who are known to have transferred out of the reporting institution (withoutearning a degree/award) and subsequently re-enrolled at another institution within the same time period; divided by the same adjusted cohort(initial cohort minus allowable exclusions) as described above. Only institutions with a mission that includes providing substantial preparationfor students to enroll in another eligible institution are required to report transfers out.

Retention Rates

Retention rates are measures at which students persist in their educational program at an institution, expressed as a percentage. For four-year institutions, this is the percentage of first-time bachelors (or equivalent) degree-seeking undergraduates from the previous fall who areagain enrolled in the current fall. For all other institutions this is the percentage of first-time degree/certificate-seeking students from theprevious fall who either re-enrolled or successfully completed their program by the current fall. The full-time retention rate is calculated usingthe percentage of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates, while the part-time rate is calculated using the percentage ofpart-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates.

Outcome Measures Data

Alternative measures of student success are reported by degree-granting institutions to describe the outcomes of degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students who are not only first-time, full-time students, but also part-time attending and non-first-time (transfer-in) students.These measures provide the 6-year and 8-year award-completion rates after entering an institution, which is calculated by dividing thenumber of total awards at 6- or 8-year status points divided by the adjusted cohort. The initial cohort can be revised and take allowableexclusions resulting in an adjusted cohort. The type of award is not reported, but institutions report the first award earned by the student ateach status point. For students who did not earn an undergraduate award after 8-years of entry, the enrollment statuses are reported as eitherstill enrolled at the institution, subsequently transferred out of the institution, or status unknown. Unlike the Graduation Rates data, allreporting institutions must report on their transfer outs regardless if the institution has a mission that provides substantial transfer preparation.

Finance

Core Revenues

Core revenues for public institutions reporting under GASB standards include tuition and fees; government (federal, state, and local)appropriations and operating and nonoperating grants/contracts; private gifts, grants, and contracts (private operating grants/contracts plusgifts and contributions from affiliated entities); sales and services of educational activities; investment income; other operating andnonoperating sources; and other revenues and additions (capital appropriations and grants and additions to permanent endowments). “Othercore revenues” include federal appropriations, sales and services of educational activities, other operating and nonoperating sources, andother revenues and additions.

Core revenues for private, not-for-profit institutions (and a small number of public institutions) reporting under FASB standards include tuitionand fees; government (federal, state, and local) appropriations and grants/contracts; private gifts, grants/contracts (including contributionsfrom affiliated entities); investment return; sales and services of educational activities; and other sources (a generated category of totalrevenues minus the sum of core and noncore categories on the Finance component). “Other core revenues” include government (federal,state, and local) appropriations, sales and services of educational activities, and other sources.

Core revenues for private, for-profit institutions reporting under FASB standards include tuition and fees; government (federal, state, andlocal) appropriations and grants/contracts; private grants/ contracts; investment income; sales and services of educational activities; and othersources (a generated category of total revenues minus the sum of core and noncore categories on the Finance component). “Other corerevenues” include government (federal, state, and local) appropriations and other sources.

At degree-granting institutions, core revenues exclude revenues from auxiliary enterprises (e.g., bookstores and dormitories), hospitals, andindependent operations. Non-degree-granting institutions do no report revenue from auxiliary enterprises in a separate category, and thusmay include these amounts in the core revenues from other sources.

Core Expenses

Core expenses include expenses for instruction, research, public service, academic support, institutional support, student services, grantaid/scholarships and fellowships (net of discounts and allowances), and other functional expenses (a generated category of total expenseminus the sum of core and noncore functions on the Finance component). Expenses for operation and maintenance of plant, depreciation,and interest are allocated to each of the other functions. Core expenses at degree-granting institutions exclude expenses for auxiliaryenterprises (e.g., bookstores and dormitories), hospitals, and independent operations. Non-degree-granting institutions do not reportexpenses for auxiliary enterprises in a separate category and thus may include these amounts in the core expenses as other expenses.“Other core expenses” is the sum of grant aid/scholarships and fellowships and other expenses.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 11

Page 12: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Morgan Community College  

Endowment Assets

Endowment assets, for public institutions under GASB standards, and private, not-for-profit institutions under FASB standards, include grossinvestments of endowment funds, term endowment funds, and funds functioning as endowment for the institution and any of its foundationsand other affiliated organizations. Private, for-profit institutions under FASB do not hold or report endowment assets.

Salaries and Wages

Salaries and wages for public institutions under GASB standards and private (not-for-profit and for-profit) institutions under FASB standards,include amounts paid as compensation for services to all employees regardless of the duration of service, and amounts made to or on behalfof an individual over and above that received in the form of a salary or wage.

Staff

FTE Staff

The full-time-equivalent (FTE) by occupational category is calculated by summing the total number of full-time staff and adding one-third ofthe total number of part-time staff. Graduate assistants are not included.

Equated Instructional Non-Medical Staff Salaries

Institutions reported the number of full-time nonmedical instructional staff and their salary outlays by academic rank, gender, and the numberof months worked (9-, 10-, 11-, and 12-months). Salary outlays for staff who worked 10-, 11-, and 12-months were equated to 9-months ofwork by multiplying the outlays reported for 10-months by 0.90, the outlays reported for 11 months by 0.818, and the outlays reported for 12-months by 0.75. The equated 10-, 11-, and 12-outlays were then added to the outlays for instructional staff that worked 9-months to generatea total 9-month equated salary outlay. The total 9-month equated outlay was then divided by total number of instructional non-medical staff todetermine an equated 9-month average salary. This calculation was done for each academic rank. Salary outlays were not reported for staffthat work less than 9-months and were excluded.

Student-to-Faculty Ratio

Institutions can provide their institution’s student-to-faculty ratio (i.e., student-to-instructional staff) for undergraduate programs or follow theNCES guidance in calculating their student-to-faculty ratio, which is as follows: the number of FTE students (using Fall Enrollment surveydata) divided by total FTE instructional staff (using the total Primarily instruction + Instruction/research/public service staff reported in HumanResources component and adding any not primarily instructional staff that are teaching a credit course). For this calculation, FTE for studentsis equal to the number of the full-time students plus one-third the number of part-time students; FTE for instructional staff is similarlycalculated. Students in "stand-alone" graduate or professional programs (such as, medicine, law, veterinary, dentistry, social work, or publichealth) and instructional staff teaching in these programs are excluded from the FTE calculations.

Libraries

Library Collections

Collections comprise of documents held locally and remote resources for which permanent or temporary access rights have been acquired.Degree-granting institutions with total library expenditures greater than zero and/or had access to a library collection reported their physicalbooks, media, and serials collections and their digital/electronic books, media, serials and database collections.

Digital/electronic books and media are reported by titles owned or leased by the library if individual titles are cataloged and/or searchablethrough the library catalog or discovery system. E-serials are reported by titles that are accessible through the library’s catalog or discoverysystem. Digital and Electronic databases are reported by the total number of licensed digital/electronic databases in the institutions collectionif there is bibliographic or discovery access at the database level.

Counts in each category (i.e., physical books, media, and serials as well as digital/electronic books, media, serials, and databases) are thenumber of held at the end of the most recent fiscal year. The percent distribution of each resource is derived by dividing the counts in eachcategory by the total of all categories.

Library Expenditures

Library expenditures are funds expended by the library (regardless of when received) from its regular budget and from all other sources,reported for the most recent fiscal year. Salaries and wages are reported from the library budget or all other institutional sources that areidentifiable. Fringe benefits are reported only if paid from the library budget. Degree-granting institutions with total library expenditures lessthan $100,000 were not required to report their expenditures to IPEDS. The percent distribution of each category of expense is derived bydividing each expense category by the sum of total library expenditure. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT

12

Page 13: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ... · for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17

Morgan Community College  

Additional Methodological Information

Additional methodological information on the IPEDS components can be found in the publications available athttp://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010.

Additional definitions of variables used in this report can be found in the IPEDS online glossary available at this provided linkhttps://surveys.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/VisGlossaryAll.aspx.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 13