Upload
neacuho-org
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Supervising Your Underrepresented Staff Member. Throughout this article we want to examine the differences and challenges plus provide tips on how to further develop supervision of underrepresented staff members.
Citation preview
“I’m the Only One”: Supervising Your Underrepresented Staff Member? written by Tanika Mangum (Newbury College), Heather Quire (Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts)
and Frida Rodriguez (Connecticut College) Opening Questions ● Have you greeted someone with a “fist pound” rather than a handshake? Have you
utilized stereotypical phrases (“hey girl,” “ain’t nobody got time for that,” “are you bringing THAT dish to the pot luck, what’s the name of it?”) mid-‐conversation?
● How do you know an under-‐represented person is uncomfortable or feeling singled out based on being “the only one”?
● How do you supervise someone who is the only LGBT person, only person of color, only person of a specific faith, only male or female on the staff, etc.?
Introduction The purpose of this article is to explore these questions. While preparing this article we acknowledge two different levels of Housing and Residential Life staff members: Paraprofessionals and Professional staff. Throughout this article we want to examine the differences and challenges plus provide tips on how to further develop supervision of underrepresented staff members. Supervising Paraprofessionals How is job performance affected if someone feels uncomfortable in their environment?
As Housing and Residential Life Professionals we supervise a very particular, and most times very busy, type of individual: students. Acknowledging this very basic fact about our supervision is extremely important when it comes down to providing our supervisees with the support they need. Paraprofessionals are not only focused in, and trying to excel at, their positions as members of the Housing and Residential Life community but they are also working hard to: 1) be the best they can be academically, 2) successfully meet the requirements of a very unstable social life, 3) constantly being stressed out about future jobs, internships, summer programs, thesis and 4) everything else we have heard them stressed out about. Disappointingly enough, for some of our supervisees, this list also includes dealing with less than comfortable situations in an environment where they can easily say “I’m the Only one”.
Given our job descriptions, including the never forgotten “Other Duties as assigned”, we are often times our students’ support network, especially if we, ourselves, are identifiable as part of the marginalized group they are members of. Because of this, we
need to be prepared, educated and ready for the time when our supervisees seek our assistance in dealing with less than comfortable situations due to their identity if we truly want them to succeed as students, as individuals, and as members of our team. Given the involvement of our paraprofessional staff members, we can identify at least three categories in which they might struggle when it comes down to being “the Only One” and which would certainly affect their performance as members of our staff as well as their relationships with the students they oversee. Academic
How many times have you had a student come into your office visibly frustrated not because their program did not go well, not because their on-‐call calendar was not done effectively, but because they just got out of a classroom where the topic at hand was them, their identity, their background, and they were being talked about as if they were not in the classroom or as if they were not part of the community or group being dissected? If you have been lucky enough to not have experienced this yourself, go ahead and ask around your colleagues to see if they have had at least one experience such as this one. More likely than not, at least one person in your office has experienced this and they, or you, have had to work around this situation with the student in your office.
You might be asking yourself, “How is this relevant to supervising my paraprofessional staff members?” The academic sphere is of such importance to our students that if they feel marginalized and not heard, they tend to disconnect and start underperforming in the classroom. This would, more often than not, lead them to a state of self-‐doubt and disinterest in other aspects of their lives including their position and ultimately, underperforming in this area as well. Social
The social life of a college student is one of the most controversial aspects of their higher education experience. Each year presents the students with a myriad of difficulties and challenges which can be extremely dangerous if not overcomed successfully. Our paraprofessional staff, in particular, deal with a higher level of stress or anxiety around this topic primarily due to the expectations they have to meet due to the nature of their positions. At many Higher Education institutions, paraprofessional staff members are responsible for documenting incidents regardless of who is involved. Sometimes this might involve some of their close friends or individuals who might have threatened them and they are expected to confront them and enforce policy no matter how difficult this might be for them. Sometimes, our student staff might have to deal with individuals who are disrespectful to them not only because they might be perceived as “snitches” but also because they might be identified as members of an unrepresented or marginalized population. Our offices might have done a good job during training to help them solve the situation at the time but the follow up is something all institutions should consider
revising as this is the part that stays with our paraprofessionals, and the part that might deter them from giving their position their best. Work
Have you taken the time to look at the composition of your staff? Have you identified who would need your support more than others? Have you made an effort to educate yourself about issues your staff might be needing support with? Being the “Only One” within such a strong staff, like the ones we strive to create, can be tougher than what we anticipate and can certainly have a negative impact on their performance as well. If one of our students is not fully identifying with the rest of the group, feels marginalized, or does not feel supported enough, their interest in being a part of the group or their interest in giving their best to the position might very likely decrease. They might no longer be excited about being part of the team, being there for their residents, or even being responsible with other administrative tasks required of the position. This further affects not only that one staff member and their job performance, but it also affects the team as a whole in that now they might feel less supported by this staff member and feel less of a need to take them into consideration.
Another way in which being the “Only One” at work can affect our paraprofessional’s job performance is that some of our team members are in positions of supervision as well. Community Advisors, House Coordinators, Housefellows, and Graduate Hall Directors are only some of the titles some of our paraprofessionals have earned and they have the responsibility to supervise, guide, and support their own staff, even those who might be feeling like they are the “Only One”. If we are unable to train our paraprofessional staff to develop awareness and be supportive of the “Only One”, their supervision style could become another stressor. This could further lead to our “Only One” staff member feeling like there is no one to process issues with and disconnect even more from the group ultimately leading to a poor job performance.
Regardless of the environment in which our “Only Ones” are feeling targeted or marginalized, their job performance will most certainly be affected as they could become less motivated, invested, or empowered to continue striving for success. As professionals in the field, our job is to make sure that our paraprofessional staff feel supported and comfortable as this is the only way they will be able to give their best to their residents and to their position. How do you approach the conversation to someone who may be underrepresented on your staff?
The first question you want to ask yourself is: “Am I ready to address this topic with the staff member?” Of course the answer to this question will vary depending your knowledge and experiences, the staff member you are dealing with, and the topic at hand. It is extremely important that you take the time to answer this question fully and honestly. If you are not well prepared for it your intentions to support someone might become detrimental. If you do not feel ready to address the issue you have two options: 1) educate yourself and become more open and available to the staff member so that they can be more comfortable with you when you decide to approach them, or 2) not address it YET and find another professional staff member who might be more comfortable with the topic whom you can discuss and learn from. If, and when, (don’t wait too long) you feel comfortable and ready talking to your supervisee about it, you might want to take the following into consideration: Staff readiness As a professional staff who is ready to address a difficult topic with one of your supervisees, you do not want to assume that they are ready to have the conversation as well. We are all well aware, through the extensive theories of Higher Education as well as through experience, that some of our students are not ready to deal with some aspects of their lives, they are still in the process of defining who they are, how do they want to be identified, and what groups they want to be a part of. Addressing the topic when they are not at a place in their lives where they can deal with a conversation as deep as this one, or where they would end up being the “teacher”, might be more detrimental than if the topic was left unaddressed. Therefore, we do want to make sure as best as possible that the conversation with our supervisee will have a positive impact. We can only do this is by getting to know them and assess where they stand on the issue. Time and Place Lets face it, our schedules can barely fit another meeting and our paraprofessional staff members are extremely committed and running around from early in the morning to late at night. Given the difficulty of our schedules, we have to find the right time to start the conversation. We do not want to start such an intense discussion when they have class in 15 minutes, or when we have another student waiting to meet with us. But we do want to let the student know we do want to talk to them about it as their wellbeing is of importance to us. Depending on how urgent the conversation is, we need to carve out the time, and enough time, to listen and converse with our student staff. If they just went through a difficult situation in the classroom, with their friends, or at the staff meeting, the conversation might be more urgent than we might anticipate so rescheduling for later in the week might not be an option. Another aspect to take into consideration is the place for such conversation. Just because an uncomfortable situation might have happened in public it does not mean that you have to address it with the staff member in public. This would
just make the situation even worse for them as it could very easily turn into embarrassment. Pulling them to the side and letting them know you would like to follow up with them whenever they are available would be a better option. During your private conversation, and based on your assessment, it might be a good idea to ask the staff member if they think sharing the issue in a more public setting, such as a staff meeting, would be beneficial as a way to educate others on the issue. But this is only an option if the staff member feels completely comfortable doing so. One last thing to consider... You have prepared and finally feel comfortable addressing the topic with your staff member. You have revisited your understanding of the topic at hand, you have gotten to know the staff member very well and it seems as though they will be comfortable talking to you about them being the “Only One”, you have set an appropriate time and place for your conversation but just when you thought you were ready to have the conversation with your staff member you realize there are other aspects, identities, backgrounds that might make your conversation more complex than you ever imagined: the differences between you and them, and the complexity of the multiple identities you both carry with yourselves. Interestingly enough, this is an aspect you cannot control or change but it is definitely one which should not be left unaddressed during your conversation. Acknowledge that you do see the differences, that you are aware of them, and that it is because of such differences that you are having the conversation, because you need to better understand them to be able to provide them with the support and supervision they need. Oh, and one last thing to consider... a box of tissue at hand might be perfect to dry up the tears that might join your meeting. Supervising Professionals How is job performance affected if someone feels uncomfortable where they work and live? Let’s start with acknowledging the elephant in the room: we are special! We are unique! As Housing and Residence Life professionals we hold the “highest sacrifice” award out of all Student Affairs offices. We take pride in this award because we truly believe in the development of our students outside of the classroom. We believe we have the ability to influence, challenge, mentor and teach students what it means to be productive citizens, community and social justice advocates, and understanding the essence of responsibility and accountability. So although, not always initially with a smile, we work long hours, have the debatable privilege to interact with students after business hours (whether you live on or off-‐campus), respond to situations when the world seems to be asleep, take our daily dose of stress and anxiety with a zesty taste of multi-‐tasking, promote intentional
conversations with students to inspire reflection or simply awareness, while receiving blank stares in response and we still are proud to say we are Housing and Residence Life! It goes without saying, you must love where you work. This is especially true within our field, as the majority of our time is affiliated with work. Author Kristen Gregory writes in The Importance of Employee Satisfaction that “Employee satisfaction is essential to the success of any business. A high rate of employee contentedness is directly related to a lower turnover rate” (Gregory, 29). It is vital that employees feel connected not only to the position, but the environment as well. Disconnection and discomfort can lead to 1) lack of communication, 2) lack of productivity, and 3) lack of motivation and interest-‐ all directly related to job performance. Visible examples such as increased delay or late tasks, bold non-‐verbal body language and little to no social interaction are common. These actions are sure to affect the one thing that we are passionate about -‐ our students. Dissatisfaction and feelings of exclusivity are hard to mask and can and will showcase themselves. Professionals of course want to remain professional and therefore, will state that they keep personal thoughts and opinions private, but professionals are human and the emotions of frustration will be visible, even if they are minute and brief. It is very important that supervisors do not focus just on the behavior, but also try to identify the root of the issue. Supervisors should be careful not to discard or dismiss the feelings of supervisees, as the feedback may be critical to the growth and development of the department, the individual and the overall staff. Having a diverse staff is an asset only if the diversity is celebrated and incorporated in the fabric of the department. How do you approach the conversation to someone who may be underrepresented on your staff? Prepare but do not assume Employers are very knowledgeable of the benefits of a diverse staff. However, one of the most common mistakes is that employers rarely assess if they have adequate support for a diverse staff. This is usually not intentional, as the cultural norm and atmosphere is often not reviewed (ex. If it’s not broke, why fix it). It will be beneficial for employers to assess the support networks at the institution and in the surrounding neighborhood. They should ask the following: 1) What may be difficult for underrepresented staff in the department/institution/neighborhood? 2) What support initiatives are available? 3) As a supervisor, am I comfortable addressing “I’m the only one” feelings and if not, am I willing to learn? These questions will prepare the department to develop effective supervisors and also ignite recruitment initiatives. The most important aspect is to not over prepare, as it can
lead to assumptions. These questions should be thought of in a holistic manner and not to particular identities. Be honest and realistic about your support initiatives and knowledge ,or lack thereof, of identities. Be aware that identities are not always visible to the eye. Therefore, approaching conversations regarding underrepresented populations in a holistic manner lowers the tendency for bias and promotes a genuinely supportive atmosphere for both the majority and underrepresented staff. Remember, the goal is to promote and develop an inclusive working environment for ALL staff members. State Intentions “Our actions are the results of our intentions and our intelligence.” -‐ E. Stanley Jones A large part of being a supervisor is building a professional relationship with your supervisee. Trust and honesty are critical aspects to building any relationship. Be honest about your own knowledge of their identity. The infamous words of “I understand” can be harmful and comforting, depending on how it is used. There are two distinct groups that can assist you in not making the mistakes -‐ New Staff and Current Staff. New Staff The greatest responsibility of a supervisor of a new staff member is to assist them throughout their adjustment to the new role or position. This is a perfect opportunity to connect with the supervisee and develop a trusting and open relationship about what their experience has been. The key word “open.” Often supervisors can seem unwilling to discuss certain aspects of the position that is outside of the administrative responsibilities. This is especially detrimental in our field, since many administrative responsibilities will and can affect the personal aspects of our lives. Let’s be clear that one is not expected to share everything about their personal life. However, it is the responsibility of the supervisor to create a “safe space” for their supervisees to share their concerns and struggles. Remember, this is not an opportunity for you to share all of your struggles, although in moderation, can provide much needed perspective and understanding. The main goal is for supervisees to be reflective of their personal feelings and experiences. Your job is to be the supportive listening ear, assess and provide resources to help them adjust. Current Staff Now, if you are reading this and realizing that you 1) have not had a conversation regarding “I’m the only one” with your supervisees or 2) are realizing that you may have current staff that may feel like “I’m the only one” and don’t really know how to approach the topic, these tips are helpful for you.
Observations: Are you aware that they may identify as “I’m the only one”? Have they displayed any disconnected or uncomfortable behavior? If you answered yes, to one of these questions, then it is only wise to approach the conversation. You can do so in a few ways: 1. Utilize this article: Share with your staff or supervisee(s) what you have recently read and explain how you are interested in hearing about the “I’m the only one” experience. This can be beneficial as they too are supervising others and could provide feedback regardless if they self-‐identify. 2. Share your observations: In your 1on1s, over a coffee or lunch meeting, share what you have noticed about their disconnect or uncomfortable behavior. Ask them about their adjustment to the department, institution and surrounding area. Ask them about their impression of the environment thus far. Assess and Develop: Do you only do a 30 minute-‐hour session on diversity during training only? Do you have high turnover of diverse staff members often? Does your department/division have a diversity statement? Does your department discuss recruitment of underrepresented staff? How do you celebrate diversity in your department/division? Are only the underrepresented staff serving on diverse committees and task forces? Now, rather you are biting your lip in embarrassment or proudly rising your confident chest on these questions, one thing is certain: this is not a one-‐time assessment and continuous training and development is necessary. 1. Create an anonymous assessment to be completed by staff members to identify the pulse of your department. Devote a staff meeting to discussing the results and developing a strategic plan or initiatives to address concerns. 2. Review your recruitment, diversity statements and training. Discuss whether they are still relevant or need a makeover. “It is not enough to be well-‐intentioned; one must strive to put those intentions into action in a capable way. One must consider the effect his actions will have on others. Looked at like this, to persist in ignorance itself is dishonorable.” -‐Andrew Cohen Challenge and Support Up to this point, we have talked solely about the S word-‐ Support, and now we introduce the word Challenge. As student affairs practitioners we should put to practice the Challenge and Support theory. Nevitt Sanford suggests that “the goal should be to find the range of optimal dissonance for the person. If the environment presents too much challenge, individuals tend to regress to earlier, less adaptive modes of behavior; polarize and
solidify current modes of behavior; escape the challenge if possible; or ignore the challenge is escape is impossible. If there is too little challenge in the environment, individuals may feel safe and satisfied, but they do not develop” (Evans, Forney, and Guido-‐DiBrito 26). This theory is key for supervisors, as it is a measurable tool for supervisees. It is vital to understand that every supervisee will not be ready to be challenged to the same measures as another. Supervisors can challenge by assigning them to projects/tasks, sending them to professional development opportunities, get involved regionally, network or gain a mentor, or empowering them to try something new. Be mindful of.... the “token” issue
Placing an individual in a "box" is never a good thing. Tokenism means just that, placing an individual in a category just because of a specified characteristic, for example: age, religion, gender, race/ethnicity, disability, ect. Being the token, can be a descriptor that is used or it can be a feeling that the person has because they are the only one who represents the certain population in your department or on the campus. The underrepresented individual becomes the token gay person, token Asian, token Muslim, etc -‐ this moniker placed on a person can exemplify the “I’m the only one” feeling.
Often underrepresented people become the “token so-‐and-‐so” for the institution for any underrepresented population that needs representation for the institution. Let's be honest in thinking about it, when this person is placed as the “token”, often, it makes for a misleading outward appearance of more inclusiveness than there really is. What is implied, is the assumption there is a representative that encompasses the diversity of the population.
When thinking about an underrepresented person on staff, you never want to have them feel like the “token.” For example, just because they may be a GLBT person does not mean they want to be on EVERY diversity committee on campus or do EVERY training or presentation having to do with GLBTQ topics. It would be best to 1) ask and not just assume or better yet 2) let the individual volunteer their time on those specific topics. There could be aspects that they are completely passionate about or you just tokenized them and because “it is part of the job” they feel they have no choice but to do it. Another example of an assumption that “tokenizes” a staff member who happens to represent a minority; don’t assume they are in the position in order to represent an underrepresented population or that this is the reason they were hired. Think about it, does this happen on your campus; it is said that the faculty and staff should represent the student population. With that being said, if the best person who was hired happens to be a minority; it is not okay to assume they got the position based on this reason. The person was hired because they truly were the best person for the position. What not to do
So, now you given thought to this aspect, having an underrepresented person on your staff, now what? Let’s talk about what NOT to do in this conversation.
First, try your best not to make assumptions as to how your supervisee identifies or feels about what sets them apart. Just because there may be only one person of color or one GLBT person on your staff, that they feel one way or another on this topic. The individual could not have realized that this is true, never thought about it, or they have thought about it and do not feel as if it matters. The other scenario is that the person does feel isolated and not sure how to talk about it to you, the Supervisor, and a conversation would be a good thing. Second, what is your reasoning for having this conversation, is it for knowledge, is it to make sure the person is comfortable, and is it necessary? You want to make sure you are not singling any one person out. Thinking about it and actually having a conversation are two different aspects. Do not assume the individual is comfortable talking about what sets them apart from the rest. Your assumptions can cause for an adverse reaction. Third, in order to have this conversation, like any conversation, your tone and attitude play a big part in the perception and reception. Tone is not just referring to the level at which you are speaking but also to the manner and the intended meaning of what you are saying. Do not attack or use sarcasm as a starter to the conversation. You will have shut down the person and the conversation without getting to a greater understanding. That being said, humor may not the best way to interact either, though it may put you at ease, it may send a mixed signal to the individual, as if you are not serious or taking the person/topic seriously. Best Practices How to address it and being comfortable addressing the topic
This may be a sensitive topic for supervisors as well. You may not feel completely comfortable. Lead by example, challenge yourself. Initiate the conversation and ask for assistance. Don’t act like an expert, promote learning. Environment
A message can be lost or misinterpreted if the environment is not suitable. One must first identify if this a personal or public discussion. You may say yes to both, in which case, it is wise to have the personal conversation first before the public discussion. This will limit the feeling of being “put on the spot”. For public discussions, make sure to alert the staff prior to the meeting with discussion topic and guiding questions. This will allow for each staff member to reflect on the questions and come prepared to participate in the discussion.
How to end the conversation and follow-‐up It is important that you end the conversation with a sense that this is an important
topic that you intend to address continuously. Be aware that this conversation should not be so frequent that it is the main topic of all your staff meeting and 1on1’s, but it should be often enough so that it is valuable. One way to assure this, is by creating a plan that turns into action and progression. There is nothing worse than have an engaging dialogue that later feels like a waste of time. Key point: Take the time to find ways to educate yourself before addressing the conversation. Learn more about what you may not know. For example 1) attend NEACUHO Social Issues Conferences, 2) attend Social Justice Institute, 3) attend Regional and National presentations (ex. NASPA, ACPA, ENCORE), 4) attend webinars, join or create a book club or host film discussions. Challenging Questions for Staff Discussion ● If it’s not a visible “I’m the only”, is it your job to approach the conversation? ● Do you as a Supervisor treat the under-‐represented person differently? What if you
identify with the one, who is under-‐represented, does that change how you think about your supervision?
● Is the Student Development Theory inclusive? How do you customize it to meet the needs of your supervisees?
Recommended Readings: Will you be my Mentor? By Kerry Ann Rockquemore http://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2011/11/14/essay-‐mentoring-‐and-‐minority-‐faculty-‐members Supervising New Professionals in Student Affairs: A Guide for Practitioners By Diane L. Cooper, Don G. Creamer, Joan B. Hirt, Steve M. Janosik Teaching as Relationship: Opportunities to Mentor our Students By Rebecca Fawns-‐Justeson http://www.nea.org/home/53433.htm References Evans, Nancy, Deanna Forney, and Florence Guido-‐DiBrito. Student Development in College. First Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-‐Bass, 1998. 26. Print. Gregory, Kristen. "The Importance of Employee Satisfaction." Neumann Business Review. (2011): 29. Web. 17 Mar. 2013.