IJEB 44(10) -854

  • Upload
    vi-vi

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 IJEB 44(10) -854

    1/3

  • 7/28/2019 IJEB 44(10) -854

    2/3

    SHORT COMMUNICATION 853

    sec. The tubes were incubated at room temperature for The electrophoretic profile (0.8% agarose) of these

    5 min and the contents were centrifuged at 12879g, at DNA preparations obtained using all detergents has

    4 C for 10 min to get rid of the cell debris. The been shown in Fig. 1. The presence of single bando

    supernatants so obtained were transferred to other with high intensity in all cases indicated the high

    microcentrifuge tubes and the centrifugation was integrity of DNA since there was no shearing of DNA

    repeated to remove any existing residue of proteins observed on the profile. The DNA preparationsetc. The final supernatants of two tubes having same obtained using all detergents and Flexi gene DNA kit

    detergent, were pooled in 15 ml centrifuge tube. were used for amplification of goat aromatase exon 2.

    Absolute ethanol about 4 ml was added to pooled The results (Fig. 2) of PCR product profile in 2%

    supernatant and mixed gently for precipitation of agarose gel indicated the presence of 352 bp band

    DNA. The DNA threads were retrieved by using heat representing exon 2 in all DNA preparations. The

    sealed Pasteur pipette. The DNA on the Pasteur results suggested that even the genomic DNA isolated

    pipette was washed with 4 ml of 70% ethanol and by some of detergents showed poor purity factor and

    immediately kept in 1 ml of 10 m MTris-HCl buffer yield also, this did not affect exon 2 amplification.

    (pH 8) for proper dissolution. Then, the DNA solution This further supports the view that these preparationsowas incubated at 60 C for 2 hr in a water bath to had DNA of high integrity.

    inactivate DNases. Finally, the DNA solution was The synthetic detergent powders consist of surfaceostored at -20 C until further use. Similarly, the two active agents (alkyl sulphates), builders and fillers. In

    sets of WBC suspensions were processed for each addition, they have additives like antidepositiondetergent separately used for isolation of genomic agents, optical brighteners, bleaching agents, foam

    DNA as per above protocol.Table1 Purity and yield of DNA isolated from goat blood using

    Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) The PCR was different brands of household detergents and Flexi gene DNA kit

    performed in a total volume of 50 l of reaction [Values are mean+ SE from 6 observations each]mixture consisting of 1X PCR buffer [10 m MTris-

    YieldHCl ( pH 9), 50 m MKCl, 1.5 m MMgCl , 0.01% Detergent brand name Purity factor2 (A 260/A280) (g/ml of blood)gelatin], 0.15 m Mof each dNTP. 0.2 Mof each

    aAriel 1. 87 0.015 29.48 2.l2primer and 1U Taq DNA polymerase. TheActive wheel 1. 8l 0.022 28.34 1.34 aamplification was done in a thermocycler using cycleTide 1. 55 0.015 45.74 1.5a bconditions as 94 C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 94 C for 1Henko stain Champion 1. 8l 0.016 28.68 2.57 amin, 60 C for 1 min, 72 C for 1 minute and a lastRin 1. 76 0.016 39.36 3.73 bcycle at 72 C for 5 min.Ezee 1. 79 0. 017 38.69 1.95 b

    The data were analyzed byStatistical analysis Flexi gene DNA kit (Control) 1. 84 0.085 44.22 3.51 bANOVA, using MS EXCEL software.

    indicate the significant difference. Critical difference for puritya , bThe genomic DNA was isolated from goat

    0.01. Critical difference for yield 6.979peripheral blood using different detergents as

    described. The purity factor (A /A ) and yield of 260 280

    DNA are presented in Table 1. The results showed a

    similar purity factor for DNA isolated by different

    detergents except the DNA isolated by Tide which

    exhibited a little impure preparation showing the

    purity factor (1.550.015) below the acceptable range

    (1.7-2.0). Among all the detergents used Ariel gave

    the DNA of highest purity (1.870.015) even better

    than that of control. However, the DNA yield with

    this detergent was very poor. Similarly, Active

    Wheel, Henko stain champion showed good purity

    factor but lower yield of DNA. Isolation of DNAFig. l Electrophoretic profile (0.8% agarose) of genomic DNA

    using Rin and Ezee resulted in significantly higher(100 ng) isolated from goat blood using different brands of

    purity factor and yield and these were comparable detergents (Lane 1, Ariel; Lane 2, Active wheel ; Lane 3, Tide;with that of DNA isolated by Flexi gene DNA kit. Lane 4, Henko stain Champion ; [Lane 5, Rin; Lane 6, Ezee].

  • 7/28/2019 IJEB 44(10) -854

    3/3

    INDIAN J EXP BIOL, OCTOBER 2006854

    enzyme, may break down and denature the proteins.

    Addition of 5 MNaCI precipitates the denatured

    proteins due to salting out. In addition, alkyl sulphates4which are anionic surfactants may separate

    negatively charged DNA molecules from other

    molecules. The differences in the purity and yield ofDNA between different detergents may be due to

    difference in the proportion of above compounds.

    Though it seems Rin and Ezee are best as far as purity

    and yield are concerned, there is no difference in

    downstream processing (PCR, the heart of molecular

    biology) among all detergents, suggesting that all the

    detergents used in present study can be recommended

    for DNA isolation and downstream applications such

    as PCR to small laboratories having budget

    constraints. This method is highly economic and

    efficient, because the use of proteinase K, phenol,Fig. 2 Electrophoretic profile (2% agarose) of amplified goat

    guanidinium hydrochloride which is commonly usedaromatase (exon 2) genomic DNA: The PCR was performed as

    in standard DNA isolation protocols, are no moreper protocol described [Lane 1, 100 bp DNA ladder; Lane 2,required.3,4,5,6,7 and 8 represent the PCR products after amplification of

    DNA isolated by Flexi gene DNA kit, Ariel, Active Wheel, Tide,

    Henko stain Champion, Rin and Ezee, respectively].References

    1 Bahl A & Pfenninger M, A rapid method of DNA isolationregulators, organic sequestering agents, enzymes using laundry detergent, Nucleic Acids Res , 24 (1996) 1587.(subtilisin, cellulase), perfumes, and substances to 2 Drabek J & Petrek M, A sugar laundry detergent and saltregulate density and assure crispiness of the clothes. method for extraction of deoxyribonucleic acid from blood,

    Biomed Papers , 146 (2002) 37.During DNA isolation, by adding detergent solution3 How green your detergent? Web: http://www.consumer-

    the WBC will be lysed due to hyper osmosis andvoice.org/

    vigorous shaking. The detergent organic sequestering 4 MSDS # FH/H/2002/GLGL-59YQJN, Tide granular Laundry4agents and enzymes such as subtilisin , a proteolytic Detergent MSDS.Doc.P&G.s