PAGE �

Legal Daily News Feature

EmploymentCrossing is the largest collection of active jobs in the world.

We continuously monitor the hiring needs of more than 250,000 employers, including virtually every corporation and organization in

the United States. We do not charge employers to post their jobs and we aggressively contact and investigate thousands of employers

each day to learn of new positions. No one works harder than EmploymentCrossing.

Let EmploymentCrossing go to work for you.

www.lawcrossing.com

08/18/10

Her efforts have not borne fruit but that has not deterred the good doctor, who is now running for

Attorney General in California so that she can use that office to continue her crusade. Before we pick up with the latest chapter in our hero’s journey, let me bring everyone up to speed on Taitz v McDonald.

Last year, Taitz brought a law suit in a federal court in Georgia on behalf of army Captain Connie Rhodes. Rhodes had been ordered to deploy overseas and sought an injunction barring the deployment on the grounds that President Obama is not the lawful commander in chief and therefore the order was not lawful. Unsurprising, the judge threw the case out of court. Undeterred, Taitz, acting without her client’s consent, filed a motion to reconsider. She also publicly accused the judge of treason. As an aside, she has also accused AG Eric Holder of

treasonous behavior in a separate lawsuit. The judge not only declined to reconsider his dismissal, he gave her two weeks to show cause or face a $10,000 fine. Her response was a motion for recusal, also denied, and a refusal to pay. The judge doubled the stakes and issued a $20,000 fine for violating rule 11 of the FRCP. Taitz asked the appellate court for a stay of the fine, which was denied. In her motion, linked above, she takes several very entertaining trips to the zoo, accusing the judge of political bias and attempting to litigate the case itself. Unsurprisingly, this too was denied. So Taitz went to Justice Thomas and asked him for an emergency injunction. Denied.

At this point, a rational person would pay the fine and be done with it, but Taitz soldiered on. She petitioned Justice Scalia for a stay, who in turn referred it to the Court. Yesterday, without comment, the Court said no. At the time of this writing, Taitz has not reacted to the news on her website so perhaps she will quietly give in and pay the fine.

If at first you don’t succeed, try try again... and again... and again... and again... By Joshua Nave

It’s time to turn our attention once more to the ongoing tale of one Orly Taitz, D.D.S., J.D., birther lawyer extraordinaire. Dr. Taitz has

brought suit in numerous cases in courts across the country alleging that President Obama is not the lawful president because he fails

to meet the constitutional requirements of office, to wit that he is not a natural born citizen of these United States.