Upload
hardik-gandhi
View
164
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A
Review Paper
Submitted
By
Hardik Gandhi (50166075)
On
3D PRINTING MATERIALS FOR ELECTRICAL
CIRCUITS
In
The partial fulfillment
of
Coursework IE 506
ABSTRACT
One of the greatest challenges for the electrical circuits is formulation and
processing of material, effects of oxidation on inks and various desired
properties required such as surface tension, adhesiveness and density for
ideal inks are discussed in the start to begin with. Here we limit our
discussion only upto conductive materials. In the beginning two different
formulations of particle-free conductive solutions are introduced that are
low in cost, easy to deposit, and possesses good electrical properties.
Further, a metallo-organic decomposition (MOD) ink with its wear and
fracture properties are subsequently introduced in brief [2]. Next, the
paper discusses about Graphene material for ink-jet printing. In addition
to aforementioned materials for 3D printing this paper further extends to
discuss a simple, low cost conductive composite material for 3D printing
in great details. As part of it, “carbomorph” as a composite material and
its physical properties with results are discussed in lucrative way. To
conclude this paper comparison between various materials is discussed in
the end.
Keywords: Aqueous solution ink, conductive inks, Electrical circuits,
Graphene, Piezoelectric effect, Carbomorph, Capacitive Sensors
INTRODUCTION
3D printing (3DP) is a term to describe technology used for the rapid
production of 3D objects directly from digital computer aided design (CAD) files.
The 3D printing process allows 3D objects to be fabricated in a bottom-up, additive
fashion directly from digital designs, with no milling or molding. It can be likened to
clicking on the print button on a computer and sending a digital file, such as a letter,
to a printer sitting on an office desk. The difference is that in a 3D printer the material
or ink is deposited in successive, thin layers on top of each other to build-up a solid
3D object. Various governing factors and individual assessment of each types of inks
is listed below:
Resistance of this conductive material is deciding factor for various industrial
application. One of the general method of fabricating electrical circuits called
photolithography make use of selective masking and etching technologies to create
metal substrate on the surface for upto 100nm levels. But this method of printing is
proven to be time consuming and expensive. In addition to that, photolithography
can’t be used where substrates are manifold in three dimensions[2]. To overcome
these difficulties researchers came up with the idea of inkjet printing, as a subcategory
of direct writing electrical component. There are two distinct categories of inkjet
techniques that have become famous. The first being Drop-on-Demand and second is
Continuous-Inkjet. As part of this review paper we will not go into the depth of these
methods but central idea would be to discuss the challenges of preparing conductive
inks for these methods and their respected properties.
Another method called Instant Inkjet Circuits has ability to print highly
conductive traces and patterns onto flexible substrates such as paper and plastic films
cheaply and quickly [4]. Electrical components such as large-scale sensors, high
frequency antennas, actuators, electrical components for switches, moisture sensors,
and capacitive touch sensors are supported by this technique. One of the biggest
advantages of using this methodology over others is it uses the inks, which don’t
require sintering, and which can be applied cheaply and easily. Further details about
inks, merits and demerits of it are explained in the detail in following chapter. For
electrical component such as transistors, photovoltaic devices, organic light emitting
diodes and displays printed from Inkjet printer uses Graphene, which is the two
dimensional building block for sp2 carbon allotropes and further it can be stacked into
3d graphite, or rolled into 1d nanotubes, or 0d fullerenes. More details on properties
of Graphene and ink requirements are discussed in progressive chapter [3].
Inks used for above all the methods have limited-functionality. For the
expensive business of fabricating electric sensors which finds many applications in
the medical implants uses a new simple, low-cost composite material termed
‘carbomorph’is presented in the end of the following chapter. Material formulation
and testing for carbomorph, its characterization, application on 3DP Flex Sensor, 3DP
Embedded Flex Sensor and 3DP Capacitive Buttons as a latest interest of researchers
are also covered [1].
DISCUSSION
1. CHALLENGES OF CONDUCTIVE INKS FOR INKJET PRINTING
One of the foremost and important property for printing electronic
components is the formulation of the conductive inks with suitable physiochemical
properties. Formulation is critical because it determines the inks’ ability to be printed,
its adherence to a substrate, the resolution of the conductor produced, and the
mechanism for conductivity. Surface tension and viscosity, the most important
rheological properties of the ink, play a crucial role in optimizing the ejected droplet
velocity, size, and stability, as well as the shape of the droplets impinging on the
substrate. The impingement shape establishes trace resolution and thickness, which
ultimately determine the trace mechanical and electronic properties. Inks possessing a
surface tension on the order of 25–70 mN/m and Newtonian viscosity of 1–10 MPa
were shown to be most suitable for Continuous Inkjet printing. But, most
commercially available conductive inks generally possess viscosities above this range
and do not allow them to be inkjet printed.
To satisfy the comprehensive requirements of inkjet printing of electrical
circuits, the conductive inks must contain the appropriate precursors, vehicles, and
other components. Various adhesion promoters are generally included in the
composition, depending on the nature of the precursors. In the case of inks for
conductors, the contents must be adjusted to provide the required resolution, adhesion,
and electronic conductivity for the printed lines. Conductive inks are typically based
on noble metals because of the chemical inertness in ambient atmosphere and good
electrical conductivity. There are several categories for precursors of conductive inks
that include nanoparticles and metallo-organic compounds. One of such precursor of
conductive ink is Aqueous solution ink based on Silver Nitrate is discussed below.
Nano-scale particles or metallo-organic decomposition (MOD) precursors are
two general resources for synthesizing conductive inks whose rheological properties
permit inkjet printing. They work well under small-scale experimental conditions, but
these materials are expensive and sometimes not available commercially. In this paper
I would like to focus on the precursor developed by the researchers. These precursors
are commercially available and substantially less expensive than metallo-organic
compounds. Due to its low cost, silver nitrate was chosen as the primary inorganic
compound in an aqueous ink composition. Silver nitrate is used in almost all
processes for producing silver compounds and has a wide range of applications that
vary from painting, xerography, chemical electroplating, electric batteries, and
medical catalysts. Silver nitrate melts at 212 C and decomposes to silver at
temperatures between 440 C to 500 C. It also has solubility of 219 g in 100 g water
at room temperatures, which is significant when very dense ink is needed for high-
resolution electric circuits. Considering its broad resources and physical properties,
silver nitrate makes an excellent candidate for conductive inks. But, after being
printed on a glass slide and cured at 500 C for 15 min, a structure was obtained that
was neither aesthetical nor functional. So, additives are deemed necessary to change
the characteristics of this Ink Based on Silver Nitrate.
After numerous tests, the researchers found Aluminum nitrate nonahydrate
(molecular formula: Al NO 9H O) to be the most effective additive for improving
the conductive silver nitrate ink. Fig. 1 shows a scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
structure of the conductive trace that was produced after curing.
Figure1Microstructureofconductivetraceafternovelconductiveinkwascured
From the above figure they conclude that the silver has a purity of 95% and
produces good electric conductance. The high purity of silver demonstrates that the
oxidation is insignificant during the 485 C curing in an ambient atmosphere. In
addition, the electric conductance was found to remain unchanged when the material
was cured in a protective atmosphere (964%H) that is known to minimize oxidation.
Silver film from different cells is continuous, which assures silver conductivity
between cells. This property is crucial for continuous conductive traces in a macro-
scale because the slightest amount of discontinuity will make the trace nonconductive
as a whole. The durable aluminum oxide ridges surround the silver cells to protect the
soft silver film from wear and also allow it to strongly adhere to the glass substrate.
This special functional composite structure explains the traces’ beneficial
characteristics.
Once the preliminary ink solution was obtained, researchers carried out a
factorial design with MINITAB to determine the critical processing parameters for
further optimizing the conductive inks. Mechanical adherence of the ink was not
considered because it was found to be a very stable property and closely correlated
with the quality of the electric resistance and thus only they screened only three
factors:
• Ink density: high (1.68 g/mL) and low (1.4 g/mL);
• Substrate temperature: high 75 C and low 20 C;
• Curing time and temperature: High Temperature at short interval and low
temperature at large interval
It is clear from Fig. 5 that all three factors—ink density, plate temperature, and
curing parameters—were important variables. By further analysis, curing temperature
and ink density were found to be relatively more important. Based on the factorial
analysis, dense inks, low substrate temperatures, as well as low curing temperatures
were found to provide the best results for reducing electric sheet resistance.
Figure2FactorialDesignandMainEffects
The response surface method, shown in Fig 3., was used to find the optimum
composition for the new ink. There were two additional factors studied: the amount of
silver nitrate (ranging from 0.4 1.5 g), and the amount of additive (ranging from 0.05
0.4 g) material in 1 mL water. Taking into consideration the solution stability and
cost of the ink, 1.0 g silver nitrate plus 0.2 g of additives was determined to be the
best combination studied and worthy of further investigation [2].
Figure3ResponseSurfaceforElectricalResistivity
2. Sintering-free Conductive Ink
Recent advances in materials science have resulted in a variety of
commercially available conductive inks and paints, which do not require sintering and
which can be applied cheaply and easily. Bare Paint and related products are already
popular among hobbyists and artists, but unfortunately the properties of these paints
mean that they are not suitable for on-demand rapid prototyping. For example, their
high sheet resistance (e.g. 55 Ω/�1) makes it virtually impossible to use narrow traces
or printed antennas. Moreover, because of their high viscosity, screen-printing must
be employed instead of inkjet printing in order to print precise patterns. Unfortunately,
screen-printing requires a time-consuming and expensive process of making a screen
and stencil, and requires large amounts of ink, which are ultimately wasted.
Conductive ink pens are popular with electronics professionals. These are
designed for the manual rework of electrical circuits to fix breaks in electrical
conductivity. However, the main draw- back of this technology is the relatively large
size of the silver particles, which are suspended in the ink in order to make it
conductive. This makes it hard to create patterns less than 1 mm wide. It is also
impossible to deposit the thin, consistent layer of ink required for flexible circuitry, so
the traces are very brittle [4].
3. Graphene as an Inkjet Printed Material
Graphene is at the center of an ever-expanding research area. Near-ballistic
transport and high mobility make it an ideal material for Nano-electronics, especially
for high- frequency applications. Furthermore, its optical and mechanical properties
are ideal for micro- and Nano-mechanical systems, thin-film transistors, transparent
and conductive composites and electrodes, and photonics. Graphene was isolated by
micromechanical exfoliation of graphite. This technique still gives the best samples in
terms of purity, defects, mobility, and optoelectronic properties. However, large- scale
production approaches are needed for widespread application. These encompass
growth by chemical vapor deposition, sublimation of Si atoms by heat treatment of
silicon carbide, segregation from metal substrates, and liquid phase exfoliation (LPE).
Among these, LPE is ideally suited to produce printable inks. LPE was first achieved
through sonication of graphite oxide.
A key property of inks viable for printing is their ability to generate droplets.
Ink viscosity, surface tension, density, and nozzle diameter influence the spreading of
the resulting liquid drops. These can be arranged into dimensionless figures of merit
such as the Reynolds, Weber, and Ohne-sorge numbers. During printing, the primary
drop may be followed by secondary (satellite) droplets. This needs to be avoided in
drop-on-demand printing. When inks contain dispersed molecules or nanoparticles,
the latter should be smaller than the nozzle diameter, to prevent clogging. Research
suggests that, as a sufficient condition, that they should be at least 1/50 of the nozzle
diameter, in order to exclude any printing instability, such as clustering of the
particles at the nozzle edge, which may cause deviation of the drop trajectory, or
agglomerates, eventually blocking the nozzle.
Stable dispersions of Graphene require the Gibbs free energy of mixing,
ΔGmix, to be zero or negative, where ΔGmix = ΔHmix _ KΔSmix, K being the
temperature, ΔHmix the enthalpy of mixing, and ΔSmix the entropy change in the
mixing process. For Graphene and nanotubes, ΔSmix is small. Therefore, for
dispersion and stabilization of Graphene in solvents, ΔHmix needs to be very small.
This can be achieved by choosing a solvent whose surface energy is very close to that
of Graphene [3].
4. Composite material “carbomorph” for 3d printing of electronic
sensors
Carbon Black (CB) is an amorphous form of carbon, produced from the
incomplete combustion of heavy petroleum products such as FCC tar, coal tar,
ethylene cracking tar and a small amount from vegetable oil. As such it is a readily
available and inexpensive. Amorphous CB has been previously shown to be a good
filler material in conductive polymer composites. [11]. CB is preferable for this
application over a material such as copper because finely divided copper is prone to
oxidation and becoming non-conductive. A transition from insulating to non-
insulating behavior for composites with conductive filler is generally observed when
the volume concentration of filler reaches a threshold of about 25%. [12]. To provide
a printable thermoplastic matrix for the composite, we chose a readily available
modeling plastic, polymorph, a commercial formulation of polycaprolactone (PCL).
PCL is biodegradable polyester with a low melting point of around 60degC and a
glass transition temperature of about 260uC. The low temperature processing
conditions of the polymorph offers significant advantages for formulating the final
composite to work in the 3D printer as it did not require high temperature or
expensive extrusion equipment. This new composite material is termed as
‘carbomorph’.
The electrical conductivity of the of the carbomorph depends on the physical
mixture of the conductor with the insulator in high enough proportions that electrons
can either percolate through a network of carbon black. The filler ratio had to be high
enough to deliver a useable electrical conductivity but low enough so as to enable the
material to exit the heated extrusion nozzle of the 3D printer.
(I) Use of Carbomorph as a 3DP Flex Sensor
Resistivity tests proved that the printed carbomorph material exhibited
piezoresistive behavior. The piezoresistive effect describes the changing resistivity of
a semiconducting material due to applied mechanical stress. Piezoresistivity is a
common sensing principle for micro-machined sensors. In order to test the sensing
properties of the printed material and incorporate the electrical connection method
into the devices, a CAD design was made of a standalone monolithic printed device
composed of a carbomorph track (composed of a single printed filament) with two
printed sockets at the end for connection to ‘banana plugs’ (Fig. 4) below.
Figure43DPFlexSensor
By printing the sockets for connection in the same single build process the
need for connecting to the tracks using conductive paint or glue for instance is
removed, making sensor implementation and use much easier.
(II) Use of carbomorph as a 3DP Embedded Flex Sensor
Under this topic researcher showed an ‘exo-glove’ to detect resistance changes
upon movement of the finger (Fig. 5). The design incorporated loops for attachment
of a securing a strap and printed jaws for gripping to fingers. The whole device was
printed in a single, un-paused print run with the flat back portion of the ‘glove’
printed first (Fig. 5i). Contacts were made to the tracks in this case using silver loaded
epoxy resin in order to maintain an ohmic contact during testing. Upon the authors
putting on the glove and flexing a finger (Fig. iii & iv) the resistance of the tracks was
seen to change.
Figure53DPEmbeddedprintedglove
This effect could be repeated for each of the fingers of the glove. A difference
in initial resistance of the individual fingers was observed due to the differing length
of the carbomorph tracks within each finger. Fingers 1 and 3 (the index and ring
fingers respectively) are of similar length, while finger 2 (the middle finger) is much
longer and hence exhibits a higher resistance and finger 4 (the little finger) is shorter
and hence exhibits a lower resistance. With the manufactured sensors, the response
was still detectable with a simple potential divider and basic electronics and did not
require amplification.
(II) Use of carbomorph as a 3DP Capacitive Buttons
In addition to its piezoresistive properties, the carbomorph could be used to
print capacitive devices. Capacitive sensing as a Human Interface Device (HID)
technology, for example to replace the computer mouse, is growing increasingly
popular. An example 3D printed capacitive interface was designed to interface to a
computer as described in figure 3a. Again, the device was designed to accept
commonly available ‘banana plugs’ into a 3D printed socket. To use the printed
device, a user touches the printed conductive pad, the capacitance of the pad increases,
which is then sensed by the board and used to trigger an operation [1].
Figure6CarbomorphusedasHID
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION
This review paper was aimed to cumulate and compare various levels of conductive
materials used in Electrical or composite circuit. To conclude this paper I envision
that in future researchers would definitely find materials or inks better compared to
aluminum nitrate to overcome oxidation of it when applied on substrates, which can
be used as multiple ranges of temperature varying from low to very high. Further, till
the time Graphene has provided us lots of excitement as a 3D Printing material. But,
further research on Graphene would definitely lead to improve its mobility; thus
improving its viability for flexible electronics. In the end, Capacitive sensing can
further be used in many different types of sensors, including those to detect and
measure proximity position or displacement humidity fluid level and acceleration to
biomedical and medical industry. In sum, research can be done in the direction to
cancel out various materials for various applications to one unique and standardize
material for 3D Printing, which have noble adherence, surface tension, viscosity,
Glass Temperature and above all high-speed and industrial low cost such that the use
of 3D Printing as a next advanced manufacturing technology can be commercialized.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. A Simple, Low-Cost Conductive Composite Material for 3D
Printing of Electronic Sensors by Simon J. Leigh, Robert J.Bradley,
Christopher P.Purssell, Duncan R.Billson and David A. Hutchins at
School of Engineering, University of Warwick, U.K.
2. Formulation and Processing of Novel Conductive Solution Inks in
Continuous Inkjet Printing of 3D Electric Circuits by Junfeng Mei,
Michael R. Lowell and Martin H. Mickle, Life Fellow, IEEE
3. Inkjet-Printed grapheme Electronics published in ACS NANO
from Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge,
Cambridge, U.K.
4. Instant Inkjet Circuits: Lab-based inkjet Printing to Support Rapid
Prototyping of UbiComp Devices by Yoshihiro Kawahara, Steve
hodges, Benjamin S. Cook, Cheng Zhang, and Gregory D.Abowd