1
INTRODUCTION With the increased demand on clinical service quality and rising operating cost, greater emphasis must be put on the optimization of the operation theatre rooms’ performances in order to ensure a successful and high- standard operation. In our project, we helped the hospital to develop an intelligent dashboard tool that will provide comprehensive monitoring for the operations team to track the situation on the ground, and hence to make informed decisions to improve the efficiency of the operation theatre rooms. OBJECTIVES Accurate Measurement KPIs through data automation process Easy Monitoring Performance across multiple benchmarks Empowered Improvement Management of Operating Theatre Rooms OPERATING THEATRE ROOM WORKFLOW 1. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS 3. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Liang Yiying Wang Yifeng Yang Hongjie 4. SYSTEM DESIGN Variation in surgeons’ performance Lack of formally trained admin clerk Management has other priorities Lack of automation Lack of proper system user interface Lack of user-friendly smart tool Busy daily job activities on operational level OTRs are not used in accordance to the plan No tracking on several crucial data Lack of proper KPI system Lack of straightforward information Erroneous data set Limited Visibility on Operating Theatre Room Performance People Method Environment Measurement Material 2. DATA ANALYSIS 3. KPI concepts 1. Root cause analysis 4. System Design 2. Data Analysis 5. Implementation APPROACH User input data into the system Utilization rate Prediction Bias Tardiness No Show rate Waiting Time Automated data cleaning Map relevant information Calculate KPI based on developed algorithm Breakdown to different OTRs, specializations and surgeons. Breakdown to different time period Highlight most problematic areas Update dashboard and return to user User 5. IMPLEMENTATION To understand the situation on the ground, we proposed 4 KPIs (Key Performance Indicators). They provide an overview and empower hospital management to monitor and evaluate the performance of the OTRs. Utilization Rate Are the available Operating Theatre Rooms properly utilised? Surgery Prediction Bias Are surgery durations estimated accurately? Start Time Tardiness Do surgeries start on time? No-Show Rate How many of the scheduled surgeries are fulfilled? OTR set up (turnover time) Patient wheel in Intra- operative surgical room time Patient wheel out Clean Up (turnover time) Next patient wheel in FUTURE DIRECTION Simulation Model is used to empower Operating Theatre Rooms’ operations in the future. Base model was built based on Year 2015 historical data. 24 Main Operating Theatre Rooms, 7 levels of Surgery Complexity and 13 Clinical Disciplines are simulated in the base model. The simulation was a 7-day terminating simulation as weekly utilization rates are more stable than daily utilization rate. 53 replications were run which are more than the required R for the predetermined precision. Average surgery durations for different severities and disciplines which are approximated by using regression modelling follow exponential distribution. OT Reservation OT Reporting Both Data Identified potential problem associated with high absentee rate (31% of patient do not show up on the reserved date). Identified reservations with long waiting time (6% of the patients need to wait more than 12 weeks). Identified OTR with unusually low utilisation rate with Pareto Chart (2.5 Sigma below mean utilization rate). Identified possible systematic surgery prediction bias (average + 38.5 mins and 83% of data points lie within positive region). Identified and documented erroneous data set with its respective causes and resolutions. Identified systematic human errors in data collection arising from the misuse of the hospital’s recording system. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% OT1 OT2 OT3 OT4 OT5 OT6 OT7 OT8 OT9 OT10 OT11 OT12 OT13 OT14 OT15 OT16 OT17 OT18 OT19 OT20 OT21 OT22 OT23 OT24 Utilization Rate by OT (Actual vs Simulated) Actual average weekly UR Simulated average weekly UR Model Validation Possible future improvement Proposal 1: Allocate more elective surgeries to OT16 to fully utilize all resources. Proposal 2: Schedule Nuerosurgeries to OT1 and OT3 alternatively to make sure there is at least one room up for Emergency Nuerosurgeries during resource hours. This will free up OT2 for other emergency surgeries during 8am to 9pm Below is the effect on the UR of each proposed solution simulated. Proposal Effect on other OTs’ UR Effect on OT16 UR Effect on OT2 UR 1 Up 1.1% Up 15% No observable effect 2 Up 1.4% No observable effect Up 8% Main OTR Dashboard shows the main information of each KPI Summary of Utilization Rate categorized by time period, room, and surgery type Utilization Rate (UR) trend categorized by time period (daily, weekly, monthly) Snapshot of tardiness of chosen month Snapshot of no show rate of chosen month Snapshot of surgery prediction bias of chosen month Room Dashboard shows more detailed information for each OTR X-MR control chart with k=2 is used to monitor the variation in Utilization Rate for each OTR. Categorized by the type of surgery (elective/emergency) Utilization breakdowns to different disciplines Different KPIs for each OTR After we understood the root problems, analysed the data, and identified the key KPIs, our next step was to design and build a system that would take in the raw data set, analyse and perform various functions automatically in Excel VBA. We took into account the human errors nested within the data set and eliminated them accordingly to deliver the most accurate representation of the OTR performance. Our dashboard user interface is optimized to meet the need of the management. We adopted various Human Factor Engineering theories to maximize the dashboard usability by presenting the data in a concise, easy-to-read and visually attractive manner. Moreover, we also included several control charts to monitor the variations in OTRs’ utilisation rate. Other than the Main and Room dashboard, we also provided a detailed dashboard for each of the Key Performance Indicators. Supervising professors: Dr. Yap Chee Meng Asst Prof Cardin, Michel Alexandre Company supervisors: Ms. Jasmine Zhang Xiaojin Mr. Daniel Chua Yong Chuen Ms. Ayliana Dharmawan Course coordinator: Dr. Bok Shung Hwee Athletea Widjaja George Lam Changwei Team members: Elective Waiting Time How long a patient wait to have an elective surgery? IE3100R SYSTEMS DESIGN PROJECT GROUP 17 HOSPITAL OPERATING THEATRE ROOM (OTR) DASHBOARD Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Management

IE3100R SYSTEMS DESIGN PROJECT GROUP 17 HOSPITAL … · admin clerk Management has other priorities Lack of automation Lack of proper system user interface Lack of user-friendly smart

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: IE3100R SYSTEMS DESIGN PROJECT GROUP 17 HOSPITAL … · admin clerk Management has other priorities Lack of automation Lack of proper system user interface Lack of user-friendly smart

INTRODUCTIONWith the increased demand on clinical service qualityand rising operating cost, greater emphasis must be puton the optimization of the operation theatre rooms’performances in order to ensure a successful and high-standard operation. In our project, we helped thehospital to develop an intelligent dashboard tool that willprovide comprehensive monitoring for the operationsteam to track the situation on the ground, and hence tomake informed decisions to improve the efficiency of theoperation theatre rooms.

OBJECTIVESAccurate Measurement KPIs through data automation process

Easy Monitoring Performance across multiple benchmarks

Empowered ImprovementManagement of Operating Theatre Rooms

OPERATING THEATRE ROOM WORKFLOW

1. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS

3. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Liang YiyingWang YifengYang Hongjie

4. SYSTEM DESIGN

Variation in surgeons’ performance

Lack of formally trained admin clerk

Management has other priorities

Lack of automation

Lack of proper system user interface

Lack of user-friendly smart tool

Busy daily job activities on operational level

OTRs are not used in accordance to the plan

No tracking on several crucial data

Lack of proper KPI system

Lack of straightforward information

Erroneous data set

Limited Visibility on Operating

Theatre Room Performance

People Method

Environment Measurement Material

2. DATA ANALYSIS

3. KPI concepts

1. Root cause analysis

4. System Design

2. Data Analysis

5. Implementation

APPROACH

User input data into the system

Utilization rate Prediction Bias Tardiness No Show rate Waiting Time

Automated data cleaning Map relevant information

Calculate KPI based on developed algorithm

Breakdown to different OTRs, specializations

and surgeons.

Breakdown to different time period

Highlight most problematic areasUpdate dashboard and

return to user

User

5. IMPLEMENTATION

To understand the situation on the ground, we proposed 4 KPIs (Key Performance Indicators). They provide anoverview and empower hospital management to monitor and evaluate the performance of the OTRs.

Utilization Rate

Are the available Operating Theatre Rooms properly utilised?

Surgery Prediction Bias

Are surgery durations estimated accurately?

Start Time Tardiness

Do surgeries start on time?

No-Show Rate

How many of the scheduled surgeries are fulfilled?

OTR set up (turnover

time)

Patient wheel in

Intra-operative surgical

room time

Patient wheel out

Clean Up (turnover

time)

Next patient

wheel in

FUTURE DIRECTIONSimulation Model is used to empower Operating TheatreRooms’ operations in the future. Base model was built basedon Year 2015 historical data. 24 Main Operating TheatreRooms, 7 levels of Surgery Complexity and 13 ClinicalDisciplines are simulated in the base model. The simulationwas a 7-day terminating simulation as weekly utilization ratesare more stable than daily utilization rate. 53 replications wererun which are more than the required R for the predeterminedprecision.

Average surgery durations for different severities anddisciplines which are approximated by using regressionmodelling follow exponential distribution.

OT Reservation OT Reporting Both Data

• Identified potential problemassociated with high absenteerate (31% of patient do notshow up on the reserveddate).

• Identified reservations withlong waiting time (6% of thepatients need to wait morethan 12 weeks).

• Identified OTR with unusually lowutilisation rate with Pareto Chart(2.5 Sigma below mean utilizationrate).

• Identified possible systematicsurgery prediction bias (average +38.5 mins and 83% of data pointslie within positive region).

• Identified and documentederroneous data set with itsrespective causes and resolutions.

• Identified systematic humanerrors in data collection arisingfrom the misuse of the hospital’srecording system.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

OT1

OT2

OT3

OT4

OT5

OT6

OT7

OT8

OT9

OT1

0O

T11

OT1

2O

T13

OT1

4O

T15

OT1

6O

T17

OT1

8O

T19

OT2

0O

T21

OT2

2O

T23

OT2

4

Utilization Rate by OT (Actual vs Simulated)

Actual average weekly UR

Simulated average weekly UR

Model Validation Possible future improvement

Proposal 1: Allocate more elective surgeries to OT16 to fully utilizeall resources.Proposal 2: Schedule Nuerosurgeries to OT1 and OT3 alternativelyto make sure there is at least one room up for EmergencyNuerosurgeries during resource hours. This will free up OT2 forother emergency surgeries during 8am to 9pm

Below is the effect on the UR of each proposed solution simulated.

Proposal Effect on other OTs’ UR Effect on OT16 UR Effect on OT2 UR

1 Up 1.1% Up 15% No observable effect

2 Up 1.4% No observable effect Up 8%

Main OTR Dashboard shows the main information of each KPI

Summary of Utilization Rate categorizedby time period, room, and surgery type

Utilization Rate (UR) trend categorized by time period (daily, weekly, monthly)

Snapshot of tardiness of chosen month

Snapshot of no show rate of chosen month

Snapshot of surgery prediction bias of chosen month

Room Dashboard shows more detailed information for each OTR

X-MR control chartwith k=2 is used tomonitor the variationin Utilization Rate foreach OTR.Categorized by thetype of surgery(elective/emergency)

Utilization breakdowns to different disciplines

Different KPIs for each OTR

After we understood the root problems, analysed the data, and identified the key KPIs, ournext step was to design and build a system that would take in the raw data set, analyse andperform various functions automatically in Excel VBA. We took into account the humanerrors nested within the data set and eliminated them accordingly to deliver the mostaccurate representation of the OTR performance.

Our dashboard user interface isoptimized to meet the need of themanagement. We adopted variousHuman Factor Engineering theoriesto maximize the dashboardusability by presenting the data in aconcise, easy-to-read and visuallyattractive manner. Moreover, wealso included several control chartsto monitor the variations in OTRs’utilisation rate. Other than theMain and Room dashboard, wealso provided a detailed dashboardfor each of the Key PerformanceIndicators.

Supervising professors:

Dr. Yap Chee MengAsst Prof Cardin, Michel Alexandre

Company supervisors:

Ms. Jasmine Zhang XiaojinMr. Daniel Chua Yong Chuen

Ms. Ayliana Dharmawan

Course coordinator:Dr. Bok Shung Hwee Athletea Widjaja

George Lam Changwei

Team members:

Elective Waiting TimeHow long a patient wait to have an elective surgery?

IE3100R SYSTEMS DESIGN PROJECT GROUP 17

HOSPITAL OPERATING THEATRE ROOM (OTR) DASHBOARDDepartment of Industrial Systems Engineering and Management