Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Identifying Origins and Pathways of Spread of Zebra Mussels using Genetics and Genomics
Michael McCartney and Sophie MallezMN AIS Research Center (MAISRC)University of Minnesota, St. Paul
Upper Midwest Invasive Species ConferenceLaCrosse WI
October 17th, 2016
North American invasion
• Several introductions to the Great Lakes in ship ballast water
• Appeared in Lake St Clair (1988: arrow)
• Through navigable waters (Great Lakes and Mississippi Basins, Hudson and Susquehanna Rivers)—they reached Louisiana to the south, Quebec and New York to the east, Oklahoma and Minnesota to the west in 5 years!
2011: Brown and Stepien
Spread to inland lakes: much slower, less predictable
• In Minnesota…
• Introduced in 1989, in Lake Superior
• Upper Mississippi and St Croix Rivers: early 1990’s
• First natural inland lake infested in 2003: Ossawinnamakee
• A long lag, 10 years longer than other US states. Now invasion rate of inland lakes is very high
Data sources:• US Geological Survey (NAS:
2014)• MnDNR (2015)
Minnesota’s rate of new inland invasions is now among the highest in the US
From Mallez and McCartney (in review)
We have the time, the will, and the resources to slow spread and prevent infestation of many prized water bodies!
• Prevention works, but must be targeted by
• Studying transport pathways (boats, docks, lifts…)—both on the map and to understand the vectors
• Using genetics and genomics to directly pinpoint invasion sources and determine routes
Hypotheses for inland spread in MN
• Longer lag• Prevention success
• Slow dispersal from Miss/St Croix Rivers, into inland “hub” lakes
• Post-2008 increase• Secondary spread
from inland hub(s) (e.g. Mille Lacs Lake)
DNA markersVariable (ie. polymorphic) genes or DNA fragments whose
chromosomal location is known
Distinguishes individualsAllows their assignment to population-of-origin
Invasion genetics and genomics
DNA markers to “track” invasion paths, both past and present
Genetic markers for zebra mussel
• Microsatellite markers• Repeated motifs – GTTAGTCCAGAGAG….AGAGAGTTCGATCT• Polymorphic – numerous alleles
• Genotyping of 9 microsatellite markers• Obtained from the literature • Optimized for this study
Waterbodies sampled— 2014-2016
• Sampling throughout Minnesota (and nearby regions)• 59 sites - 35 water bodies – 1747 individuals
Waterbodies sampled— 2014-2016
• Sampling throughout Minnesota (and nearby regions)• 59 sites - 35 water bodies – 1747 individuals
Detroit Lakes area (9 lakes)
Analyzing the invasion in Minnesota
• 1747 individuals genotyped at 9 microsatellite markers• 35 lakes, 3 river systems• Several lakes (e.g. Gull, Mille Lacs, Minnetonka, Prior,
Pelican, Superior); Mississippi & St. Croix Rivers at multiple sites
Each brand of analysis targets a different invasion process:
- Analysis of genetic diversity = Number of individuals introduced, severity and duration of bottleneck when lakes were colonized
- Analysis of genetic structure/clustering = Genetic differences between lakes set up by unique “histories”
- Analysis of invasion models = Origins and routes of introduction. Contrast of detailed scenarios to describe invasion history. Most lessons for
management are generated here.
Analysis of genetic diversity
*Mille Lacs Lake Prior Lake 8 lakes in Alexandria area
Moderate founder effects due to bottlenecks
Broad pattern: large numbers of mussels and/or larvae cause infestations
Analysis of genetic structure/clustering
Some well-defined genetic clusters distinguish important lake infestations
K = 2
K = 3
K = 4
K = 5
K = 6
K = 7
K = 8
Mille Lacs Prior Alexandria area Brainerd area
Analysis of invasion models
• Comparisons of scenarios of invasion• Approximate Bayesian Computation• Selection of the most likely scenario of invasion based on probabilities
Focus on distinguishable lakes
“Super-spreader” lakes Clustered invasion
Mille Lacs LakePrior Lake
Alexandria-area Lakes
Mille Lacs Lake – A source for spread to other inland lakes infested later (post-2005)?
Analysis of invasion models – “Super-spreader” lakes
Independent invasion scenario
Mille Lacs Lake
Successive invasion scenario
Mille Lacs Lake
X
Gull Lake
Mille Lacs LakeMille Lacs Lake
Gull Lake
Mille Lacs Lake – A source for spread to other inland lakes infested later (post-2005)?
Analysis of invasion models – “Super-spreader” lakes
The answer ‘’No’’ was strongly preferred for 10 of 11 lakes (Prior is ambiguous)(Posterior Probabilities from 0.86 to 0.99)
Independent invasion scenarioSuccessive invasion scenario
X
Posterior P = 0.89
Mille Lacs Lake
Gull Lake
Mille Lacs LakeMille Lacs Lake
Gull Lake
Mille Lacs Lake did not infest Carlos, LeHomme Dieu, Darling, Gull, Pelican (Otter Tail), Minnetonka, Xmas, Pike (St. Louis), Bass, Sand (Itasca)
Where are we going with this?
Expanded sampling of water bodies, both in MN and throughout the Upper Mississippi and Great Lakes Basins
• To examine, more comprehensively the causes of clustered invasions
• To obtain several more recently-infested lakes to increase confidence in results for “hubs”
• Mille Lacs was heavily infested only ≥ 2009
• Minnetonka ≥ 2010
Where are we going with this?
• New lakes sampled in 2016—for Mille Lacs analyses• Alexandria— was this large cluster “founded” from Mille Lacs?• Brainerd Lakes: geographically proximate to Mille Lacs• Many new infestations 2009 or later
Alexandria Lakes Region Brainerd Lakes Region
Mille Lacs Lake
AIS-infestedZM-infestedZMSampled
Where are we going with this?
• New lakes sampled in 2016—for Mille Lacs analyses
Pelican Rapids/Detroit Lakes Region
Cass/Winnie Region
• Lakes (e.g. Cass) that are “next stop” destinations for boaters
Mille Lacs Lake – A source for spread to other inland lakes infested later (post-2005)?
Analysis of invasion models – “Super-spreader” lakes
The answer ‘’No’’ was strongly preferred for 26 of 27lakes tested so far (Prior Lake is ambiguous)
Independent invasion scenarioSuccessive invasion scenario
X
Posterior P = 0.89
Mille Lacs Lake
Gull Lake
Mille Lacs LakeMille Lacs Lake
Gull Lake
Mille Lacs Lake – A source for spread to other inland lakes infested later (post-2005)?
Analysis of invasion models – “Super-spreader” lakes
Independent invasion scenario
X
Posterior P = 0.89
Mille Lacs Lake
Gull Lake
Mille Lacs Lake did not infest Alexandria Region Lakes: Brophy, Cowdrey, Darling, Carlos,Irene, Miltona, Ida, Victoria, Geneva, LeHomme Dieu, Mary, Maple; Brainerd Region Lakes: Gilbert, Gull, Round, Rice, North Long, Cross, Lower Hay, Ossie, Pelican (Crow Wing); also
Minnetonka, Christmas, Pike (St. Louis), Bass, or Sand (Itasca)
The Zebra Mussel Genome Project
• We sequenced the zebra mussel genome using Illumina “short read” technology
• 100s of millions of fragments, each 50-300 base pairs
• Piled up and “stitched together” using bioinformatics
• We used this draft genome to help genotype Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) markers
• 5,000 to 200,000 markers per mussel!
• Genotyped using Sequence Based Genotyping (SBG)—
new technology at UMGC
These thousands of variable SNP markers providehigher resolution for studying sources and pathways of spread
Genomic Markers for Studying Spread
24 mussels from Minnetonka and 24 mussels from Gull Lake (2 putative “super spreader” lakes)
• Genotyped with 9 microsatellite markers (left panel)
• Genotyped with > 5,500 genomic (SNP) markers (right panel)
• Analyzed the same way (Principal Component Analysis) to examine
genetic differences between lakes
Lake Minnetonka
Gull Lake
Co
ord
. 2
Coord. 1
Higher genetic resolution = more complex scenario testing = more targeted management
Lake Michigan
Upper Miss
Mille Lacs
Minnetonka
Tim
e
Scenario I: Successive invasions inland
Management: target boat traffic between inland lakes
Scenario II: Chronic reintroductions
Management: increase surveillance of chronic sources (e.g, Mississippi boat ramps, or sources out of state)
Mille Lacs
Minnetonka
Tim
e
Lake Michigan
Analyses of “super
spreader” lakes (Mille Lacs,
Prior) have so far indicated
a surprising lack of
contribution to spread
• We continue to analyze lakes
infested post-2009 for better
confidence
Management implications?
Lakes infested post-2009
• Watercraft inspection of boats departing Mille Lacs may be working
• Invasions are not following patterns of transport of trailered boats (veligers in residual water, mostly)
Mille Lacs
Upper Miss
Lake Michigan
Mille Lacs
Lakes infested post-2009
• Time is now to consider “other pathways” (docks, lifts, transport of resident boats from marinas on St. Croix/UMR)
• How to better monitor and intercept these less frequent but high risk events?
© www.nps.gov© www.marinedocklift.com
Upper Miss
Lake Michigan
Management implications?
Thanks to…
UMN: • Grace Van Susteren, Sarah Peterson, Maxwell Kleinhaus , Melody Truong
for collecting help and lab support• UM Genomics Center: Kenneth Beckman, Daryl Gohl, Shea Anderson,
Aaron Becker for molecular biology; John Garbe for informatics
NPS: Byron Karns, Michelle Prosser for field support on St. Croix & Mississippi
MnDNR: Dan Swanson, Rich Rezanka, Keegan Lund for field support and
advice on collecting MN waters
USGS: Mary-Anne Evans for collections in western Lake Erie
Clear Water Fund, ENRTF for funding