Upload
suzanna-bruce
View
221
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
How Microsoft Legal does eDiscovery E.J. BastienLead eDiscovery Program ManagerMicrosoft, LCA Litigation
SPC235
Principle eDiscovery concernsPreservation of potentially relevant data
Prevent deletion of responsive data.Minimize disruption to the business.
Find relevant data to produce to opposing parties
Dire consequences associated with failing to produce data within aggressive deadlines.Multi-phased approach that typically involves iterative stages of filtering across different tools.
Identify and
Preserve
Process and
SearchReview Produce
In-Source Out-Source
Average Microsoft case from FY11-1368 cases with active eDiscovery efforts per year
45 people under legal hold
1.3TB
13 people’s data searched
288.8GB
Reviewed
16.8GB
Produced
4GB
Used
249 pp.
If we were to outsource the unfiltered entirety of the data to be processed and searched by a vendor, the rough standard charge would be ~$200/GB, totaling $57,760 per case, or $3.9 million/year.
If we outsource only the culled data, our data processing charges are reduced to $3,360 per case, saving us an average of $3.7 million/year.
Pre-Office 2013 eDiscovery workflow at MicrosoftExchange Mailboxes Local Data SharePoint File Shares
Litigation Data
Repository
Data Minimization Tool
Linear Review Tool
Review Attorneys
Tiffing and Production Tool
Production Set
• Completely Outsourced
• Inside Corp Firewall• Managed by MSIT• Entirely MS
technology
• Outside Corp Firewall• Co-managed by MS
FTEs and Data Center Vendor
• Third party technology
Office 2013 eDiscovery workflow at Microsoft
• Completely Outsourced
• Inside Corp Firewall• Managed by MSIT• Entirely MS
technology
Exchange Servers
Local Data
SharePoint
Linear Review Tool
Review Attorneys
Tiffing and Production Tool
Production Set
File Shares
.pst content Non-.pst content
Problem: Offline data still must be collected and processed before it can be searched.
Solution: Windows Server file shares, a SQL database, and a custom web UI to catalog and organize the content. Newly collected data is copied to the file share with metadata and folder structure intact. The collection is checked in and attributed to the appropriate custodian in the web UI. Collected data is organized by custodian, by collection. Custom scripts are generated to facilitate the import of any .pst data. UI catalogs all known locations for each custodian’s data: Active mailbox(es), file share location.
Managing offline content
Demo
SharePoint eDiscovery Center
MySPCSponsored by
connect. reimagine. transform.
Evaluate sessionson MySPC using yourlaptop or mobile device:myspc.sharepointconference.com
© 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries.The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.