Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
1 |
Identification of acceptable comparators
and comparator issues.
Dr. Jan Welink
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
2 |
IntroductionIntroduction
Multi-source (generic) drug products must satisfy the same standards as those applicable to the originator’s product.
In addition, assurance must be provided that they are, as intended, clinically interchangeable with nominally equivalent market products.
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
3 |
BioequivalenceBioequivalence
Reference Test
Pharmaceutical Equivalent
Products
Possible Differences
Drug particle size, ..
Excipients
Manufacturing process
Equipment
Site of manufacture
Batch size ….
Documented Bioequivalence
= Therapeutic Equivalence
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
4 |
ComparatorComparator
Introducing the comparator:
* a pharmaceutical product with which the multi-
source product is intended to be interchangeable in clinical practice.
* the selection of the comparator product is usually made at the national level by the drug regulatory authority.
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
5 |
Choice of the comparator:
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
6 |
ComparatorComparator
Example of how a national DRA can select a comparator:
� choose national granted innovator for which quality, safety and efficacy has been established (nationally authorised innovator)
� choose WHO comparator product from the comparator list (WHO comparator product)
� choose innovator product from well-regulated country (ICH et al. innovator)
� if no innovator comparator is available, a generic market leader can be chosen
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
7 |
Comparator
Selection of a comparator for a single
national market:
cannot be translated in case other countries are at stake
national comparator may be the national market leader
no problem in that market but others!?
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
8 |
EMA (Europe)EMA (Europe)
Differentiate between use for single market or many countries!
A u s tria
F ran c e
L a tv ia
P o lan d
B e lg iu m
G erm a n y
L ie c hten s te in
P o rtu g a l
C yp ru s
G ree ce
L ith u a n ia
S lo vak R e pu b lic
C zec h R ep u b lic
H u n g ary
L u x em b u rg
S lo ven ia
D e n m ark
Ic e la n d
M a lta
S p a in
E sto n ia
Ire lan d
T h e N e th e rlan d s
S w ed en
F in la n d
Ita ly
N o rw ay
U n ited K in g d o m
EMA:
For an abridged application claiming essential similarity to a reference product, application to reference product from one Member numerous Member States based on bioequivalence with a
can be made.State
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
9 |
Prequalification program
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
10 |
EOI
To manufacturers of medicinal products:
HIV/AIDS - 10th Invitation for EOI
Malaria - 8th Invitation for EOI
Tuberculosis - 10th Invitation for EOI
Reproductive Health - 5th Invitation for EOI
Influenza - 2nd Invitation for EOI
Zinc - 1st Invitation for EOI
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
11 |
Comparator lists
List of acceptable reference products for the
prequalification project for reproductive health
List of acceptable reference products for the
prequalification project for reproductive health
List of acceptable reference products for the
prequalification project for Zinc
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
12 |
Identifying comparators
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
13 |
Identifying comparators
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
14 |
Identifying comparators
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
15 |
Identifying comparators
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
16 |
Guidance documentsGuidance documents
Comparator products:
Comparator products should be obtained from a well regulated market with stringent regulatory authority i.e., from countries participating in
the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH)
Countries officially participating in ICH are the ICH members European Union, Japan and USA; and the ICH observers Canada and Switzerland.
Note: some are not available in ICH
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
17 |
Guidance documentsGuidance documents
Information Requirements
Within the submitted dossier, the country of origin of the comparator product should be reported
together with lot number and expiry date, as well as results of pharmaceutical analysis to prove
pharmaceutical equivalence. Further, in order to prove the origin of the comparator product the
applicant must present all of the following documents:
1. Copy of the comparator product labelling. The name of the product, name and address of the
manufacturer, batch number, and expiry date should be clearly visible on the labelling.
2. Copy of the invoice from the distributor or company from which the comparator product was
purchased. The address of the distributor must be clearly visible on the invoice.
3. Documentation verifying the method of shipment and storage conditions of the comparator
product from the time of purchase to the time of study initiation.
4. A signed statement certifying the authenticity of the above documents and that the comparator
product was purchased from the specified national market. The certification should be signed by th
company executive or equivalent responsible for the application to the Prequalification Programme
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
18 |
An example of selectionAn example of selection
Terizidone: - first selection Terizidex
Questions from CROs regarding availability!
meanwhile, Terivalidin was included in South Africa’s National Tuberculosis Control Program!
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
19 |
comparator issuescomparator issues
comparator from non-ICH countries
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
20 |
comparator issuescomparator issues
wrong comparator from ICH countries
Choice justification:
- national market leader
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
21 |
comparator issuescomparator issues
unclear from which country
Statement:
- The comparator product was bought in an US pharmacy by a relative and carried in his luggage to India!
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
22 |
comparator issuescomparator issues
unclear from which country
Protocol:
Study report:
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
23 |
ConclusionConclusion
For the Prequalification Program:
* the comparator should be selected from the comparator list (http://apps.who.int/prequal/info_applicants/info_for_applicants_BE_comparator.htm)
* guidance on selection and the to be provided documents should be followed.
* if comparator is not available, information can be obtained at: [email protected]
Manufacturers meeting, Geneva, April 2011
24 |
End
Thank you for your attention