Upload
joanna-underwood
View
228
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
IBM System Storage Archive and DataRetention Systems
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Information business challenges
Information Life Cycle Management
DR550 product
Retention policies
Architecture and solutions
Differentiators
Whats new
Resources
Competition
Review questions
Agenda
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Do you have this kind of information?
Instant messages,
Orders, Confirmations
Customer/ Supplier Records
CustomerCorrespondence
, Reports
Photos, Videos, Audio (Phone
Conversations)
Web Content
Invoices, Financial and Tax Statements
Call Center
Wireless & PDA
Kiosk
Portal /Browser
BusinessContent
@@BusinessContent
CreateSearchStore
ManageDistribute
Retain
SAP
SAP
ExchangeNotes
SAP
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Sources: IBM & Industry Studies, Customer Interviews
Do You Have Any of These Business Challenges?
Up to 40% of IT budgets spent on
integration
Up to 40% of IT budgets spent on
integration
30% of people’s time is spent searching for relevant information.
30% of people’s time is spent searching for relevant information.
The average billion dollar company: 48 disparate financial systems
2.7 ERP systems
The average billion dollar company: 48 disparate financial systems
2.7 ERP systems
Health care represents major challenges in data growth and
compliance
Health care represents major challenges in data growth and
compliance
42% of transactions are still paper-based.42% of transactions
are still paper-based.
Inadvertent deletion / modification of information is a leading cause of non-compliance
Inadvertent deletion / modification of information is a leading cause of non-compliance
Good business practices dictating
long-term retention of data
Good business practices dictating
long-term retention of data
85% of information is unstructured.
85% of information is unstructured.
Trx.
DocumentsReports
e-Mails
Media
CustomersEmployees
Partners
Databases
Orgs.FinancialsProducts
WebContent
79% of companies: have 2 +
repositories… 25%: have 15 +
79% of companies: have 2 +
repositories… 25%: have 15 +
Sarbanes-Oxley and SEC regulations
dictating information retention
Sarbanes-Oxley and SEC regulations
dictating information retention
Rapidly growing storage requirements causing costs to spiral out of
control
Rapidly growing storage requirements causing costs to spiral out of
control
More and more information is being kept “Just In Case”
More and more information is being kept “Just In Case”
“Missing Email May Cost Morgan Stanley 10M$”
“Missing Email May Cost Morgan Stanley 10M$”
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Archiving a Big Client Pain, Big Growth Opportunity and an Easy Opportunity to Identify
Document Management
Document Imaging
Output / Report Management
Digital AssetManagement
Digital Rights Management Web Content
Management
Archiving RecordsManagement
Archiving
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Slow/Low
Fast/High
MortgageLoan Payoff
Life InsurancePolicy Payoff
1 Ho
ur1 D
ay
1 Month
5 Years
20 Yea
rs
50 Yea
rs
100+
Y
ears
StorageMigration
StorageMigration
Time – Record Life Cycle
StorageMigration
Accessib
ility – Sp
eed
/Freq
uen
cy
RegulatoryRequest
Legal DiscoveryRequest
Active
Semi-active
Source: Cohasset Associates, Inc.
Data becomes “Just In Case”
Just-In Case Information
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
What is Information Lifecycle Management (ILM)
The process of managing business data throughout its lifecycle from conception until disposal in a manner that optimizes storage and access at the lowest cost
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
The IBM System Storage DR550
A purpose built, information archive for long term data retention and protection
►Policy-based, non-erasable, non-rewriteable disk storage►Industry leading IBM advanced technology
Automatic policy-based tiered storage management Data encryption – In flight and at rest IBM dual processor Power5 technology for high performance
(benchmarked at over 3x competition) IBM SATA disk technology for low cost Enablement of secondary storage, i.e. WORM Tape (optional)
supporting very low TCO Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Monitoring – proactive
system problem prevention and correction
►High speed 10/100/1000 Ethernet connectivity
►Disaster recovery options with synchronous and asynchronous replication
►Deemed compliant with SEC 17a-4 by independent consultants
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
IBM Information Infrastructure for Information ComplianceIBM System Storage™ DR550 V4.6
Client value– Improves performance in large
environments, due to larger disks– Reduces TCO and power
consumption up to 50% with blended disk and tape option, compared to all-disk configurations
Reasons to buy: – New 1TB drives adds 33% more disk
capacity than previous drives – IPv6 support on single node
configurations expands network address space to 128 bits and eliminates the network address translation (NAT) role
Information Compliance
DR550 Model DR1 DR550 Model DR2
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr
33% more disk capacity
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
DR550 Ranges from 5.6 to 89.6 TB of raw disk storage
capacity Single or dual server options Choice of Ethernet connections Synchronous or asynchronous replication options Tape ready
Optional TS1120 or LTO-3 WORM
IBM DR550
IBM DR550 Express
DR550 Express Ranges from 1.1 to 6.7 TB raw disk
storage capacity Choice of Ethernet connections Optional 25U rack with lockable doors Tape ready
Optional TS1120 or LTO-3 WORM
IBM System Storage DR550 Family
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Add Tape for Complete Archive Solution
Add tape to provide:
– Backup for the DR550 operational files
– Migration path for DR550 controlled data to lower cost storage
– Lower overall TCO
– DR550 scalability to petabytes
– Unique differentiation versus competition
IBM DR550
IBM DR550 ExpressIBM TS3500
DR550 tiered storage with IBM System Storage TS1120 Enterprise tape system and/or other attached WORM tape media such as LTO Ultrium Generation 3 WORM Tape drives and IBM WORM tape libraries
Attached tape example
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
DR550 Retention Policies
Default and custom policies
Expire based on a predetermined expiration date
Expire based on a retention event
Expire on demand
Stored indefinitely
Use a deletion hold and release– Holds data for an indefinite period of time, regardless of the
expiration date or defined event
– Used for audits and legal events
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Replication Options
IBM DR550
Application with Retention Policy
E-mail, images, documents and other object and files that
need retaining
Dual writes byapplication
Metro or GlobalMirror
IBM DR550
IBM DR550
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
DR550 Solution Architecture Examples
Businessapplication
Document filesE-mail IBM DB2 Content Manager
Three critical components required to build a “Retention Managed Data” solution
1. Business application
2. Content management application
3. Retention device – policy based non-erasable non-rewritable
Retention device
Content management application
Optim 6.2SQL Server
DB2
Enterprise Vault
IBM DB2 CommonStore… and others IBM System Storage DR550
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Where can the DR550 help? The DR550 solution can help with the following:
► Solve problems of archiving E-mail archive, Instant messages, voice mails, etc. with policy-based tiered storage
► Archive inactive tables/rows of CRM/ERP databases (e.g. PeopleSoft, Siebel, UDB, Oracle Financials, SAP, etc.)
► Replace aging optical storage (for example IBM 3995 Jukebox)
► Images (any kind of digital media), engineering drawings, contracts, any corporate asset worth protecting, even college transcripts
► Corporate retention policies
► Sarbanes-Oxley retention requirements
► SEC retention requirements
► Other legal or regulatory requirements – can help to protect records from policy-based deletion during legal or other inquiries
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
DR550 Information Retention Solutions
Examples of DR550 solutions include many IBM and non-IBM solutions:
Retention: DR550 + IBM Content Manager
Exchange Archiving: DR550 + IBM Content Manager + IBM CommonStore Exchange
Exchange Archiving: DR550 + Symantec Enterprise Vault
Exchange Archiving: DR550 + Zantaz EAS
Domino Archiving: DR550 + IBM Content Manager + IBM CommonStore Domino
Domino Archiving: DR550 + Zantaz EAS
SAP Archiving: DR550 + IBM Content Manager + IBM CommonStore SAP
SAP Archiving: DR550 + EasySoftware Easy Enterprise x
Optical Replacement: DR550 + IBM Content Manager for iSeries + MBS Technologies StorageView Connector for CM/i
Database Archiving (Oracle, DB2, PeopleSoft, Siebel): DR550 + Princeton Softech Optim
Image Archiving: DR550 + FileNet Image Manager
NFS/CIFS/FTP Gateway: DR550 + Triade TriFSG Gateway
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Application Support for IBM DR550 AXS-One BrainTribe (Formerly Comprendium) CaminoSoft Ceyoniq D.velop AG Easy Software Heilig & Schubert (H&S) FileNet Hummingbird Hyland Software (OnBase) Hyperwave IRIS Software (Documentum Connector) MBS Technologies
– (iSeries Connector for IBM CM V5) OpenText (formerly IXOS) Princeton Softech Optim 6.2
– for PeopleSoft; Siebel; Oracle Saperion SER Solutions TRIADE (NFS/CIFS/FTP Gateway) Veritas Enterprise Vault (formerly KVS) Waters (Creon Labs, NuGenesis) Windream Zantaz
IBM DB2 CM for Multiplatforms IBM DB2 CM for zOS IBM DB2 CM On Demand for
Multiplatforms IBM DB2 CM On Demand for zOS IBM CommonStore for Exchange
Server IBM CommonStore for Lotus Domino IBM CommonStore for SAP IBM CM for Message Monitoring and
Retention– With iLumin
BRMS iOS (also via IFS to BRMS)
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Key DR550 Differentiators Event-based retention management Policy-based automatic expiration/deletion of data Policy-based reuse of storage Tiered storage management to multiple tiers of less expensive
storage – Can significantly reduce TCO using disk & WORM tape combination
Off-site (vault) protection of the data Media Migration – When replacing old media with new Data Encryption – for enhanced security Very High Performance with IBM Power5 technology Very Competitive Price on base models Integration of different technologies with our storage pool hierarchy Access and authentication control Enterprise class availability, reliability, scalability
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Competition
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Strengths of EMC Centera
Allows Single Instance Storage
– One and the same object is stored only once
– In-band data deduplication
Scalable based on RAIN Architecture
– Storage is added via storage nodes (disk only)
– Performance scales with access nodes (Ethernet connectivity)
– Supports Active-Active Mirroring relation between nodes
Includes Outboard Search capabilities in Centera
– Allows to search for Content
Established and recognized Product in the market
– Many customer references available, many ISV support EMC Centera API
CAS architecture is a marketing advantage
– Content Address can be used to validate content authenticy
– Clever idea, but not required by regulations
*Based on preliminary findings of internal IBM projections.
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Weakness of EMC Centera
Does not offer Tiered Storage or alterative storage technologies– Higher TCO, especially for longer term archiving– Less flexibility for migration to other storage technologies
Data protection only through additional disk– Content Mirroring is not synchronous– No backup of data to less expensive storage media
Sticky Technology– Replacement of MD-5 hash requires application to read all data
Known Performance Issues– According to non-disclosed sources and ISVs– Partially caused by RAIN Architecture (CAS and Centera Network)
No data encryption included
*Based on preliminary findings of internal IBM projections.
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Key Strengths for IBM DR550
DR550 allows for lower Total Cost of Ownership for long retention times– DR550 supports true tiered storage (disk, optical, tape)– With removable media storage DR550 is more energy-efficient– With Centera data is kept on disk for long archival period, less energy efficient
DR550 includes Data Migration Functions– Centera is disk centric, migration just from disk to disk
DR550 is not a sticky Technology– DR550 leverages industry-leading technology such as TSM– Centeras’ CAS implementation is sticky
DR550 provides flexible options for Data Protection– DR550 provides synchronous mirroring or backup to tape – Centera requires disk and even more disk
DR550 has leading Archival – Retrieval Performance– Get real numbers from EMC Centera and compare it to DR550
DR550 includes Data Encryption Techniques– On disk via API encryption, On tape via Tape encryption
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Performance ComparisonNetApp and EMC Centera Testing 8 Enterprise Vault Servers
archiving 8 Exchange Servers 4 x 1-Gbit Ethernet Interfaces NetApp FAS3050 and R200 EMC Centera G4 with 4 Access
Nodes and 12 Storage Nodes using CPM
DR550 Testing 5 Zantaz EAS servers archiving 4
Exchange Server 2 x 1-Gbit Ethernet Interfaces DR550 with 7 TB single node
Performance Comparison E-Mail Archiving
02468
101214
Device Type
Th
rou
gh
pu
t in
MB
/sec
FAS3050
R200
Centera
DR550
Source: Test Report from Veritest, July 2006“Network Appliance™ FAS3050, R200, and EMC Centera G4 Performance Comparison”
ESG Lab Review™, May 2007http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/pdf/esg_lab_review03072007.pdf
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Single Instance Storage
Where is single instance storage really efficient and required?
– When data objects are identical
Suited for E-mail archiving (especially attachments)
– Most e-mail archiving systems however include single instance storage
• IBM CommonStore, Zantaz, Symantec EV
• Therefore, DR550 does not need it.
• Means less overhead with DR550 and more performance
Other Arguments to discuss:
– MD-5 which is not longer unambiguous
• What happens an object is not stored due to a faulty algorithm
– Single Instance Storage cuts back I/O performance
• See Centera Performance
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Where to go for more information
DR550– Spec sheets– Redbook– White Papers– Manuals
All DR550 components
– Spec sheets– Redbooks
IBM DR550 Sales Kit:–IBM Sales Teams: http://w3-1.ibm.com/sales/systems/portal/_s.155/254?
navID=f220s240&geoID=AM&prodID=Disk&docID=dataretentcomplsk.skit&docType=SalesKit&skCat=DocumentType
–Business Partner Sales Teams: http://w3-1.ibm.com/sales/systems/portal/_s.155/254?navID=f220s240&geoID=All&prodID=IBM%20eServer%20And%20TotalStorage%20Products&docID=dataretentcomplsk.skit&docType=SalesKit&skCat=DocumentType_moreinfo
IBM System Storage Data Retention External web site– http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/storage/disk/dr/index.html
IBM External Information Lifecycle Management (ILM) web site
– http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/storage/solutions/ilm/
IBM WORM Tape offering – External Web Site– http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/storage/tape/3592/index.html
IBM System Storage Archive Manager– http://www-306.ibm.com/software/tivoli/products/storage-mgr-data-reten/
IBM System Storage Archive Manager – Supported Devices– http://www-3.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/
IBM_TSM_Supported_Devices_for_AIXHPSUNWIN.html/
IBM System Storage Archive Manager developer site– http://www.developer.ibm.com/tivoli/about_tsmdr.html
Searchstorage.com Articles:– June, 2004 - EMC dodges question on Centera Performance– February, 2005 - EMC Centera Scalability Hampers Large e-mail Archives– December, 2005 - Hospital ditches EMC Centera for long-term archiving
Byte and Switch Article:– January, 2006 - The CAS Conundrum
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Review questions• The DR550 has what major competitive features?
• Performance, retention policies, and tape attachment• Energy conservation, SAS drives, and 8 gb/s FC connection• Performance, massive capacity, and iSCSI attachmnt• Optical migration, SAS attachment, and perfromance
• The major competitor of the DR550 is?• EMC Centura• HP Virtual Archive• SunFire 25000• VMWare
• The DR550 is a key part of a tiered data retention solution. What are the other parts?• Power Systems and TS3500• Key enterprise application and a policy making application• Information Life Cycle Management and Business Continuity• DB2 CommonStore and Microsoft Virtual Server
• The major applications for the DR550 are • High speed transaction applications and business intelligence• CRM,SCM, and ERP• Spinning archive and compliance • Insurance and distribution
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Additional Information
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
• Advisory services
• Legacy transformation services
• Custom application services
• Business risk and compliance
• Strategy and change
• Vertical expertise
• Data Classification
• IT infrastructure services
• Performance & availability
• Tiered storage deployment
Add IGS services to the solution… Implementation Services for the IBM System Storage DR550 Implementation Services for Mirroring via System Storage DS4000
Family Enhanced Remote Mirror Services RAID Conversion Services for the IBM System Storage DR550 MES Services via an Equipment Modification Contract for Hardware Offerings that include implementation services, onsite
software/firmware upgrades, and three-year maintenance upgrades
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
References Large UK Bank – IBM Content Manager on Demand
Depository Trust – IBM Content Manager
Porsche (Automotive) – Ceyoniq
IBM Customer Support Organization – IBM Content Manager
Hudson Valley Credit Union – Hyland
Boehringer (Pharmaceutical) – Documentum
Large US-based Financial Services Company – IBM Content Mgr
Large Semi-conductor company – IBM CommonStore for SAP
Leading Logistics provider – d.velop document mgmt software
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
EMC Centera Overview
Source: “A Centera Whitepaper: Understanding and Addressing the Challenges of Compliance and Discovery” by EMC Corp.
Centera does notallow deletions ormodifications
(Object based)
Cen
tera
AP
I
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Data Migration
Who knows which storage technology is “most appropriate” in the future?
– Holographic Storage and solid state disk is just “around the corner”
– Storing data on disk for long periods might become really expensive
Long term archiving requires to migrate data to other storage devices and –technologies in the future
– As well as migration of client, DMS and other infrastructure
With EMC Centera customers are bound on disk
– Migration to other technologies becomes more complicated and might not be transparent to the application
DR550 has Data migration capabilities built-in
– New storage technologies are supported by SSAM
– Data Migration is transparent to application
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Links: DR550 vs. Centera DR550 Home Page
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/index.html
DR550 Performance Measurement Report:
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/performance.html
DR550 Performance Whitepaper from ESG Lab Review™
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/pdf/esg_lab_review03072007.pdf
Veritest Report about NetApp and Centera Performance
http://www.netapp.com/news/press/news_rel_20060912a
http://www.lionbridge.com/competitive_analysis/reports/netapp/NetApp_FAS3050-R200_EMC_Centera_Report.pdf
TCO Study from RFG comparing cost of disk and tape:
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/pdf/RFG_Paper.pdf
TCO study from DMG “Is tape really cheaper than disk?”
http://www.lto.org/News/paper-form.php
CAS Condrum Article at ByteAndSwitch
http://www.byteandswitch.com/document.asp?doc_id=87375
EMC Centera Home Page
http://www.emc.com/products/family/emc-centera-family.htm
Holographic Storage
http://www.inphase-technologies.com/products/default.asp?tnn=3
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
DR550 Competitive Attack PointsIBM DR550 EMC Centera Customer Business Value
Tiered storage with attached WORM or non-WORM tape helps provide lower total cost of ownership
Centera data is disk only, which is more expensive due to initial purchase cost, and power, cooling and service costs over long archiving periods
Lower TCO with DR550 over long archiving periods by off-loading “aged” data to lower storage tiers (e.g. tape or optical) and Implements ILM practices
Integrated data migration capabilities for long term archiving: DR550 supports many storage technologies (disk, tape, optical) and data migration functions. As data “outlives the media”, DR550 provides transparent migration capabilities to new storage technologies.
EMC Centera is disk centric, with no media migration path to other storage technologies.
Improved operational efficiency for long term archiving and commitment to open architecture
Addressing the risk of technology obsolescence
High performance archive and retrieve enabling data rates of up to 60 MB/sec and more than 2000 objects/second. Scalable performance through multi-object transaction enabled by TSM API.
EMC will not publish performance data. Vendors report significant performance deficiency of EMC Centera compared to DR550.
DR550 offers improved return on overall IT investment through improved overall system throughput, scalability and quick access to archived data
Disaster protection options:DR550 supports synchronous and asynchronous replication as well as asynchronous replication (backup) and offline vaulting to many external devices.
Asynchronous replication only, does not provide integrated capability for backup and offline vaulting.
Synchronous mirroring offers higher data protection with better recovery point objective and lowers risk of data loss as result of a disaster.
Backup to tape offers lower TCO than backup to disk over long archiving periods.
DR550 maintains data integrity via hardware RAID and embedded Cyclic Redundancy Checks (CRC)
EMC Centera Content Addressable Storage (CAS) technology is not future proof. The content address will become vulnerable, and then the application will need to read and rewrite all objects in order to provide a new, more secure content address.
IBM DR550 built-in data integrity capabilities help to assure compliance and enable transparent upgrades of data integrity check methods.
The DR550 has flexible data encryption with the option for transparent key management done by the DR550 or by the application.
Another option for data encryption is on the tape storage media with key management by DR550 or another key manager.
Data encryption is not included. Flexible encryption options protect data using tiered storage, and additionally prevent sensitive data disclosure on removable media that could be misplaced.
Built-in and cost-free file archiving solution via SSAM Archive Client
No built-in file archiving solution. Offers cost efficient file archiving solution.
DR550 scales in three dimensions: storage, performance and price (economies of scale)
Only scales in one dimension: storage. It does not scale performance or price.
Supports growth, provides investment protection, enables an open architecture for archiving, and lowers TCO.
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Performance
Prior Centera Performance:– In 2002 Centera achieved a rate of 18,450 per hour for archiving
• about 5 objects per second
Newest EMC Centera Performance results: – 16-node Centera system archived upwards of 240,000 e-mails per hour
• About 67 e-mails per second– Average size of e-mail is assumed at 10 – 100 KB– Veritas Enterprise Vault was used as DMS
DR550 does 111 Object per second with 10 Objects (64K) per transactions– Multi-object transaction with 500 Objects per transaction achieves about
170 Objects (128 K) and 833 Objects (8K) per second
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Performance Comparison
EMC Centera1 IBM DR550 V 1.5
Obj.-Size 1 – 128 KB 32 – 128 MB
W 1 – 2 MB/s
6 – 22 MB/s*
20 – 36 MB/s
R 1 – 2 MB/s
6 – 21 MB/s*
30 – 44 MB/s
Obj-Size 1-128 kB 32-128MBW/R 1 MB/s 3,9 MB/sR 3 MB/s 7-8 MB/s
* Multi-object Transaction
Detailed DR550 Performance Report: http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/storage/disk/dr/performance.html
1 EMC internal numbers (undisclosed sources)
IBM Confidential
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
Performance of Competition
Single node FAS3050 was 38% faster than 16-node Centera (4:12)
R200 was 45% faster
Single disk drive failure:
– FAS3050 was 80% faster
– R200 was 74% faster
4 x 1 Gbit Ethernet Channel has been used for all systems
300 MB/Minute =
5 MB/sec !!!(with 4 channels)
Source: Test Report from Veritest, July 2006“Network Appliance™ FAS3050, R200, and EMC Centera G4 Performance Comparison”
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
New Technology – holographic storage
Next Generation optical storage
– Faster: read and write matrices of bits
• Traditional optical reads and writes serial.
– More Capacity: more than 200 GB initially
• Blue-Ray / UDO targets 100 GB (+)
Press Release (Heise, 19.4.2005Press Release (Heise, 19.4.2005
Inphase Technology plans to release a Inphase Technology plans to release a 300-Gigabyte-300-Gigabyte-Laufwerk Laufwerk with a transfer rate of with a transfer rate of 160 MByte/s 160 MByte/s to the market to the market in the next year. In a next generation in the next year. In a next generation 1,6 TByte Kapazität 1,6 TByte Kapazität and and 960 MByte/s 960 MByte/s shall be archieved….shall be archieved….
How will EMC Centera handle this in the future?
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
EMC Centera on zOS Here are some limitation I see with this solution
– Not a one-hand solution: 3490 or 3995 emulator from third (either bustech - 3490 or interkom - 3995).
– No retention management with this solution, because the leading application on zOS such as CM or CMoD does not send the retention time for an object.
– Leading application is device dependent, thus future migrations to other device have to be performed through the leading application.
– No hierarchical storage management. Thus the data will always be on disk. This causes much higher TCO.
– zOS is IBM-World, thus the integration between hardware and software is much better with an IBM DR550.
– 3490 and 3995 architecture is fairly old.
Escon / Ficon LAN
zSeries
CM OAM
3490 or 3995
Emulator
Centera
IBM Storage Sales
© 2007 IBM Corporation
EMC Centera and TSM TSM and SSAM support EMC Centera as storage device There are many limitation making it impossible to migrated
data from or to Centera:
– No Migration.
– No Reclamation.
– No Move data into or out of a Centera storage pool.
– No Moving node data into or out of a Centera storage pool.
– No Storage pool backup of Centera storage pools.
– No Restore volume of Centera storage pool volumes.
– No Exporting data to a Centera device class or importing data from a Centera device class
– No Using a Centera device class for creating backup sets; however, files stored in Centera storage pools can be sent to backup sets.
– No Defining Centera volumes.
– No Using a Centera device class to back up a database.
– No Using a Centera device class for database loading or unloading.
– No Using a Centera device class as the target of volume history, device configuration, trace logs, error logs, or query output files.