Upload
leslie-evans
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency
IAEA Regional Training Course on Radiation Protection of patients for Radiographers,
Accra, Ghana, 11-15 July 2011
Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 2
Introduction
• Dental radiology makes use of specific types of equipment, needed for different purposes.
• Frequent exposures (though each with low dose) involve a risk for the practitioner and for the patient
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 3
Dental X-ray equipment
Radiation protection in dental radiology
Quality control for dental equipment
Topics
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 4
Dental x-ray equipment: Types of units
• “Intra-Oral” units• Standard dental tube
• uses an intra-oral image receptor
• has extra-oral x-ray tube
• Panoramic (orthopantomography (OPG))
• Cephalometric ( Ceph)
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 5
Intra-Oral Dental X-Ray Equipment
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 6
Modern Dental X-Ray Unit
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 7
Panoramic X-Ray Equipment
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 8
Cephalometric X-Ray Equipment
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 9
X-Ray Tube
• stationary Anode
• avoid overheating
• tube duty cycle:• typical: 1:30 intraoral
• 1:10 OPG
• 420 mAs/hr intraoral
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 10
Generators & Pre-Heat
• Medium frequency - stable waveform
• Single phase (SP) - pulsed
• Pre-Heat: separate circuit for heating filament
• Single Phase units without a pre-heat circuit • initial pulses of variable kV
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 11
Collimator
1. Lead Collimator
with central hole
2. Spacer Tube
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 12
Applicator Cones
Good Bad Bad
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 13
Cephalometric Holder
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 14
Intra-Oral Dental X-Ray Equipment (technical data)
Exposure time from 60 ms to 2.5 s
Tube Min. 50 kV, ~7mA
Focal spot size 1 mm
Inherent filtration ~2 mm Al equivalent
Focus-skin distance 20 cm
Irradiated field 28 cm2 with round section, 6 cm
diameter collimator
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 15
Panoramic X-Ray Equipment (technical data)
Focal spot 0.5 mm
kV 60 - 80 kV in 2 kV steps
mA 4 - 10 mA steps 4, 5, 6, 8, 10
Exposure time 12 s (standard projections)
0.16 - 3.2 s (cephalometric projections)
Flat panoramic cassette 15x30 cm (Lanex Regular
screens))
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 16
Image Receptors in Dental Radiology
• Small films (2 x 3 or 3 x 4 cm) in light-tight envelopes (no screen)
• Digital intraoral sensors - compared with category E film, the radiation dose is reduced by 60%.
Intraoral Radiology
Panoramic Radiology and Cephalometry• Film-screen combination• Digital sensors - compared with film-
screen sensitivity class 200, the radiation dose is reduced by 50-70%.
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 17
Dental Radiology Film Types
Sensitivity class D• Very good spatial resolution• Typical delivered dose: about 0.5 mGy• Typical exposure times: 0.3 - 0.7 s
Sensitivity class E• Good spatial resolution• Typical delivered dose: about 0.25 mGy• Typical exposure times: 0.1 - 0.3 s
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 18
Facts Very frequent examination (about 25% of all
the radiological examinations)
Delivered doses may differ of a factor 2 or 3. (entrance doses between 0.5 and 150 mGy)
Image Quality often very low
Organs at risk: parathyroid, thyroid, larynx, parotid glands
Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 19
Keep under control time and temperature of the developing process.
Do not use oxydized chemicals
Do not adjust development time by viewing the film
Quality Control of Film Processing
Technical hints to reduce patient doses
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 20
Lead apron and collar
•Useful when the path of primary beam intercepts the protected organs (downward bite-twin projection).
Technical hints to reduce patient doses
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 21
Panoramic examination
• Image quality not as good as in intra-oral films
• Important global information
• Relatively low dose(one panoramic examination 35 intra-oral films)
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 22
Why Dental QC ?
• Widespread use of dental units
• Lack of QC history on most units
• Dental practitioners working in the primary health care sector do not have the continuous medical physics support available in a hospital-based diagnostic imaging department
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 23
What Tests ?
• Collimation
• Dose Evaluation
• Exposure Time
• Half Value Layer
• Kilovoltage (kVp)
• Leakage Radiation
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 24
The recommended tests are consequently divided into:
those simple tests which can be performed by dental practice staff
those more complex tests which can be carried out by medical physicists.
Quality Control for Dental Equipment
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 25
Quality Control for Dental Equipment
Tests which can be performed bydental practice staff
Physical parameter Tolerances Frequency
Image Quality ±10% reference values
Quarterly
Developer temperature and condition of processing solutions
Specified by the film manufacturer
Every time processing solutions are used
Processing Base+Fog: >0.2 ODSpeed and Contrast >0.15 OD about baseline
Every time processing solutions are changed
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 26
Quality Control for Dental Equipment
Tests performed by medical physicists
Physical parameter Tolerances Frequency
Tube voltage >50 kV and error <10%
3 yearly
Beam size/collimation <60 mm diameter (intra-oral) <150 x 10 mm at cassette (panoramic)
3 yearly
Dose at cone tip 50 kV: <5.0 mGy70 kV: <2.5 mGy(E speed film)
1-3 yearly
Dose-width product for panoramic film
<75 mGy mm 1-3 yearly
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 27
Dental QC Methods
UnitIntra-Oral Receptors (I/O)
Cephalometric (Ceph)
Panoramic (OPG )
Test Methodas for Radiology QC
as for Radiology QC
where possible:• immobilise unit• remove slit collimator
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 28
“Dead man” Switch
• timer at 50 cm from focus
• set low kV, mA, long time
• start exposure
• release switch during exposure
Require exposure cut-out when switch is released. Check exposure time is less than set time
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 29
Dose Evaluation
Skin dose from I/O units:
• place cone 10 mm from dosimeter
• set maxillary molar/ bitewing setting
• Should be (65-70 kVp):
2-3 mGy for molar view
< 5 mGy for any view
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 30
kVp HVL (mm Al) Intraoral Ceph/OPG
60 1.5 1.8
70 1.5 2.1
80 2.3 2.3
90 2.5 2.5
HVL- Minimum Values
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 31
• Keep under control time and temperature of the developing process.
• Do not use oxidized chemicals
• Regularly check processing with phantom
Quality Control of Film Processing
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 32
Dental Phantom
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 33
Dental Phantom
IAEA 22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 34
Summary
• Although doses are generally low, the high frequency of examinations requires radiation protection (for the practitioner) in dental radiology
• Some tests are detailed for Quality control of dental equipment.
IAEA
THANK YOU!
22: Optimization of Protection in Dental Radiology 35