•

•

Improvmg agrkultural.ustaiulbllity ud liveJiboods iu tbe Central American biDsides

I .~~-"-- '-' ... ,~m_.

f "ooV . ~1/18e)

COlE((!ON HiSTORICA

~abase of soil conservation projects and practices in Honduras

Kareo Aoo Dvorak HiIIsides Program

loteroatiooal Ceo ter for Tropical Agriculture

Internal Report

July 1996

Tegucigalpa. Honduras Central Amena

'lmpro~ing agricultural sustainability and Uvelihoods in the Central America hillsídes" is a project executed by CIAT, with support from tbe Swiss Development Cooperation (SDC) and the Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (CIMMYT) The Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (DCA) provides administrative and technical support foc the project offices in Honduras and NICaragUa

Karen Amt Dvorak. 1996. Database of soil consemmon projects and practices in Honduras. Internal Report. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: CIAT.

Centro Internacional de AgricuJtural Tropical (ClAT) 2° piso, Edificio Palmira, Colonia Palrnira, frente

Hotel Honduras Maya Apdo 1410, Tegucigalpa, Honduras MDC

Telephone 504-32-1862 Fax: 504-39-1443

E-mail ciathill@hondute1.hn

•

Table 01 Conteats

TABLE or CONnN"I'S ... H.".H .... h ........ ~ ... ~H_ ............... H ••••• U.u~ ............................ UH_ .............. _* •••••• u.U ............... h i

O.BJICI'IVES~ ........... _._ ........... _ ••• _ •• ..-•• ___ ............ _ .... _~ ...... _ ... "" .. _______ •. _._ .. __ ... _ .... _ ......... _1

METIIODS .... ________ . ____________ •• ___ • _____________ ... _._. _ ............ _ 2

DISTRIBV1l0N or CASES BY COUNTRY __ .• _ .... _._._. __ o _ .. __ ....... __ .. _ ... _ ... _ .. J

SOtL CONSERVATION PRon:crs AND PRACllCES, HONDURAS _ ...... __ ..... _ ..•••..•• __ 4

KEn.RENCJ:.S ... _ ......... _ ..... _._ ......... ___ ._ ........... ~._""._ ....... __ ._ ..... ___ ..... __ .. ~ ......................... 2:0

plQ.Utl.doc 07-19-1996

Objectives

In 1994, tbe Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) initiated tbe project "Improving Agrirultural Sustainability and üveühoo<!s in Central Amerita hillsides." One of tbe primary results expected from the ínitiaJ phase of \he project wu 4ft "analysis oC successes and failures of dill'erent projects on soiI conservation practices in Central Amerita" (ClAT 1993, p. 1 S). A project activity wu designed with two objectives

eto provide information to natiooal and local organizations on soil conservation technologies with a bigb potential for adoption in biDsides fiuming systems in Central Ameri~and

eprovide information to national and intemational research communities on research needs on agricultura! produc:tion and soil conservation in Central Amerita.

There has been, in Central America, substantial local experience with agrirultural extension of improved techoologies, with soil conservation projects, and with rural development projects with agricultural or soil conservation components. The resu1ts have been mixed. There are cases wbere a rural deve10pment project, \he introduc:tion of oew technology, or indigenous innovatíon has resulted in dynamic systems, growing incomes and improved husbandry of natural resources. In many other cases, adoption of soil conservation practices has been minimaI. Or, improved soil and crop management practices have been adopted but, despite \he apparent benetits, failed to spread beyood "corea communities in wbicl1 ioterventions \Vere concentrated.

Project design is only one part of tbe adoption puzzle-\he other two parts being \he techoology offered, and \he charac:teristícs of \he &rming systern ioto which oew technology is introduced These tbree components; i.e .• (1) characteristics oftbe change agent; (2) \he technology itself; and (3) characteristics of \he production system, provide a framework for synthesízing lbe disparate experience with soil conservation and agricultural technology in CemraI Amerita.

Literature

Experíence with soil management and conservation in Central Amerita is weD documemed.1 The pr(lCA"Ntings of a worbbop in 1991 on opportunities for collaboration betweeo institutions working in biIlsides agrirultural systerns in Central America brougbt togetber regiona1 background material and selected country case studies (DCA 1991). Meyrat, Velasquez and ArdOD (1992) provided 10 inventory ofsoil and water conservation prac:tices in Nicaragua, Guatemala and Honduras Kaímowitz (1993) summarized \he results of 18 soil conservation and forestry projects funded at more than SI00,OOO between 1970 and 1992. Lutz, Pagíola and Reicbe (1994) assernbled studies that calcu1ated cost -benefit ftows over time for a soil conservation technology in ene region in each of \he Central America countries, \he Dominican Repubüc and Haití. Mejía (1993) and Zutter and

• Tbe , ... ,,,.1111 of cxpc:ricII<:c cxtcnds ~llOd doc.OIomIaIion. Tbe au1hor beodillAOd .,..nJy &om dí5cussioos .. ;th IIIIIIY pcople "ho haY<: ,,"Cri<ed ,,;th a¡ricuItln 0Dd ooil ~ tn Cc:ntraI Améri<:a. 0Dd ",..., "'ÍlliII8 lo speod time 11:> sbare Ibocír m...1cdac.

proL'" dIx: 01·19·1996 1

Bustamante (1995) summarized soil conservatioo activities oC private development organizations in Honduras. In addition, tbere are many in-deptb case studies oC local areu, a1tbough many oC tbese are unpublished (" gray. literature).

The empilases in the Kaimowitz (1993) and Lutz. Pagiola and Reiehe (1994) studies were ecooomie. Kaimowitz includes infurmation 00 instltutional features of the projects and incentives ofrered, but infurmation on the agricuItural systems is laeki.n¡. The ~ in Lutz, Pagiola and Reiche specify the bio-physical parameters IleCeSsary to estimate cbanges in soil productivity under altemative technologies. (Because oC data requirements, almost aD the anaIyses wece of pbysical soil cooscrvation structures.) A summary cbapter provides salient, but DOt aItogether consiste.nt, system chantderistics. The case studies also provide infonnatioo on institutioos responsible for soil cooservation policy, and on instltutional "bornes" ofthe projects anaIyzed Mejia (1993) and Zutter and Bustamante (1995) contain detaiJed infonnation on cbange ageots 100 incentives, and describe the techoologies prorooted, but do not incIude descriptions oC the production or cropping systems where projects wece based.

Local case studies, with the exceptioo of sorne project evaluation documents, often contain detailed information on fiuming systems, although the particulan reported vary widely (Olle is tempted to say "wildly") from study to study. Again with the exception of project evaluations, information 00 the structure of the project (Le., the change agent) and incentives used is frequently omitted.

Traditional soil conservation practices (Wilken 1987, Thurston ~ Al· 1994), local adaptatioo of soil management technologies (Calderón ~ Al 1991) and indigeoous innovatioo (Bueldes ~ Al 1994) are a valuable source of information 00 good "fits' between fiuming systems and soil conservatioo teclmologies. Rather than exclude tbese sources of infonnation by focusing exclusively 00 technologies introduced by external projects, documented cases of indigenous adaptation and innovation were incIuded in the cstaIogue and database. In tbese cases, the cbange agents were the producers themselves.

Metbods

After a review of conventional and • gray· literature, a catalogue and, subsequently, a database oC cases was prepared. The database was designed to facilitate geo-referencing so that the project data could be combined with digital databases 00 agriculture being developed fur use in a geographic information system.

A standard form was developed to record information 00 each case reviewed For eacb case reviewed, information was recorded on: (1) general information, including project title and dates; (2) geographíe location or coverage; (3) technologies; (4) ebaracteristics of ageots; and (5) fiuming system characteristics. These forms were collated in a catalogue (Dvorak 19968). Nmety-ooe cases liad been catalogued by JuIy 1996. These cases represen! on1y a fraction of the Iíterature available 00 soil conservation and soil management practices in Central America. The number of cases was considered sufficient to use as a test set for database development, mapping and anaIysis. Aside from an etnpbasis 00 cases from Honduras and, to lOme extent, Nicaragua. the selection of cases for entry was essentially arbitrary. The catalogue entnes can be considered neither exhaustive oor necessariIy representative of experience with soil conservation in Central America.

TIte type and depth of information reported for the cases was uneveo. The roost detailed ínformation was found in individual case studies, Project overviews, because of lbeir thematie nature, lend to focus on 000 type of information to the exclusioa of others, Technical overviews tended to omi! information on change agents and incentives.

Regardless ofthe source, information on geograpbic Iocation was very general; ¡e, usually giving departments2 or 1mmicipios, and ooJy rarely com.munities (aldeas) or geograpbic coordinates, Because the spread of lecllnology from a "COIlt4ct" community to its neighbors wilmn a nfUmclpio was by no means assured, it would llave beeIl desirable lo know. for soiI conservation or rural devdopmeot ~ which c:ommunities bid bid ex!etlSÍon activities aod, for indigeoous tecllnological inDOvatioos, in wbich communities tbe practice had been ooserved. Because it was a rarity for a projec:t to be active in aIl communities in a tmmicipio. the geograpbic information in tbis report must be regarded as a first approximation. Project areas designated as a tmmicipio or departtnent should be taken lo mean that sorne. rather than a/I, cornmunities in tbat ImInÍcipio or departtnent were involved in a project.

TIte information 00 environmental and farming systems cbaracteristics was very uneven in the cases reviewed, For tbis reason, tbe informatioo avai1able appears in tbe catalogue, but the data were not included in tbe database, A1temative methods of incorporatmg system features using secoodary data are being expIored,

It was sornetimes difficult to discem ir i!l technologies offered were reported, or only those that bid proved successful, Any lecllnology mentioned in a case study was incIuded in tbe database. "Mínimum tiIIage" incIudes "zero tiIIage," .no-tiII" and "mínimum tiI1age.' "Organic malter" includes composting, applicatíon of compost, use of animal manures, and "organic malter management," but oot tnanagement of crop residues, GeneraIIy, tbe Ianer was included as "00 bum" or "mínimum tillage.· In some cases, local terminology varied. No c1ear panero ofuses ofthe lenns ror ditches (acequias and zanjas) couId be discemed. Tbe two were entered in lbe database separately according lo the n.ame used in tbe case study,

Information on geograpbic location, tecllnology, and agen! was coded in the catalogue (Appendix A) Information 00 technology, agenl and initíal year oftbe project was transferred lo a digital dalabase (Dvorak 199b) For Honduras, codes for department and municipio were added Where a project covered more Iban one department or nnmicipio in Honduras, mu1tiple records appear in tbe database-one for eacl! Iocation reported. Data entered in tbe catalogue and database are presented, by case, in Appendix B, Tbe identification codes for the entries consist of two parts, On tbe Ieft-band-side of tbe decimal appears tbe primary code for a project. Distinct eomponeou of ooe project, or sub-projects, are identified by sequential numbering to tbe rigbt-band-side of tbe decimal point.

Distribution oC cases by country

OC the 91 cases in tbe database, tbe distnbutinn of cases by counuy was: 34 úom Honduras, 20 from Nicaragua, lO &om Costa Rica, 8 from El Salvador, 7 from Guatemala, 6 from Panama, ami 4 ITom Mexico. Two were Central America-wide. A wide variety of

'Hooduras is dividod into 18 depctmcnts (d~) for admi:iWIIraáve~. The deportmaIts are dhidod into """"cípios. T'bere....., 291 -"1""" ÍIl H<lodor&s in 1993.

proLltI.doc 07-19-1996 3

tecbnologies were represented in tbe cata10gue (Table 1) TechnoJosies included most frequent!y in tbe repot1s were Iive barriers (23 cases), ditcbes (23 cases), green manures (21 cases) and minimwn tillase (19 cases). Twenty-seven of tbe cases reported were soiI conservation projects, foDowed by rura1 development (15 cases) and furestly (14 cases) projects (Table 2)

Excepl for soil conservation work in !he cottOll-growing region oí Nicaragua in tbe 19505, lhe projects reported were begun between 1972 a.nd 1995 (TabIe 3).

Table 3. Year project initiat~ 58 cases

1972-1 197~2 1981-1 198~2 1991-2

1974--2 19n-1 1982-2 1987-8 1992-2

1975-1 1978-1 1983-2 1988-1 1994-6

1979-3 1984--3 1989-4 1995-1

1980-3 1985·) 1990-6

Soil conserntion projects and practices. Honduras

Tbe cases for Honduras were coded by departmeDts and, where koown, municipios. No cases were reported for the departments of Cortes, Gracis a Dios or Islas de la Babia (T able 4) Of tlle remaining 15 departments, all had bad sorne project experience with biological conservatíon or soiJ lI'IlIlI4gement practices. A11 except Atlántida bad projects promoting physical soil conservation structures. Forestry or agroforestry projects bad been implemented in all departments except Choluteca and Valle in southem Honduras.

Geographic distnoutions of project areas al !he department or municipio leve!, by technology, appear in Figures I through 9.

Discussion

For purposes of anaJyses., it is desirab1e to have variability in combinations of technologies, change agents, and production systerns.

Many cases did oot provide infonnation about !he type of ataoo method used. Among those projects tbat did project thi5 information, there are al Ieast two cases fbr each of lile major extension categories; i.e, conventional extension servi<:e, pa.rallel atemion service, communíty development workers, farmer-promoters, and contact farmers (Table 5). Obtaining data trom tlle missing cases would probably add cases in each of these categories.

There are good distributíons of cases with varying combinations of project type a.nd technology, type of extension agent and tecbno1ogy, a.nd technology offered and incentives used in a project.

The catalogue data on produaion systems were DOt consisteut eoough to use in a comparative manner, but !he geograpbic distributioo in Honduras, and lM.1I'OII CeutraI America as a whole, suggest tbat variability in production systems wiD also be fiidy bigb.

Different combinations of technologies. change agents and production systems are of interest in temu of selecting cases ror anaIy7ing good "Iits" between !he tbree components. NevertheJess, because it is DOt possible to construct a samp1ing frarne of projects, !he cases in !he database cannot be considered representative of son cooservation activities tbat llave been carried out in Central America or Honduras. Appareut correIations can not be interpreted as representative of oational or regional, spatial or temporal, trends in soiI conservatioo activities.

. . .

5

Table l. Tecbnolodet reDOrkd. 91 tue nudlel. bv countn. Central A_rka

I TerrA( I Bencb I Ollle I Onl.n I Oltcb Coatour I Oltcb I Contour! Dead I Uw I No M...... Orcuk e terrace I _la ditcb "",,,,14 I tllI_ I banier banier 1"''' lIIIae .. tter

,,~::,,···,,··t······i····""l······¿·····""··"···~········,,····~·····l,,·····~·········I·······~·········t········~·········I···········~··········t······}·····+······+·····+·····~·······I·········_·-i···_········I··---··.+ ...... _._-

AlI I 13 I 5 I 4 I 3 I 16 2 7 10 14 I 23 I 7 I 19 17

Rld&et I GIftII Pluted I Improved I FOreRry I N ... ry Impnmd I rmllber .aa.re faJlow utlIre varIecJ

=li-I:I¡I~lij¡I¡I¡j-~+-:~:~::Fl~-AII 21 2 3 14 11 3 6 2 5 4 5

6 proLdb.doc 07-19-19%

Table l. Number or cases based on calle .tudies uf indigenoullnnovation, rellearch sites, or projed type, by countr)', 91 cases. Central Amerka

I - , Type of pr~iect, ¡ Country Indigenous I Soil 1

1

Forestry I Agricultur I Rural I Natural rescurce ¡ Research Not known case studv I conservation ! e ! develol>menl! manaRement ¡ site

Honduras 2 3 4 4 14 O 4 3

;,;,;[::EI:E ::~:¡:I~E=E:l:::::tl, ••••.. ~.~:··::~~~:~:::·.t·.··::~.:~·~·.··::·:·:·~= Central I O i O I 1 i 1 lO! O O I O Á_"": I I I ¡ I n.J"g ,ca I I ¡

A11 9 27 14 8 15 2 10 6

proLcI>.doc 01·19-19\16 7

T.ble". Teelmolotdel rellOl1ed. Mmber of cae IhIdlca. b'

Terrace I BelSCb I D1tcb Dlttll C .... tour ¡ Deo I Uve I No M...... 01'1" Gnn I terrace I _la _,,/4 dllaRe I barrier i barrier........ .IU_ _r _re

A.!I~'~'~'~'¡,::'::.i:,::::'t:".:":': :::':::::i'::t::::':i.,'::J::'i:'::J::.::-:!':.J::::!.::.:J.::.i .. t:::~:::~::'::~::::l":",.~~~:,,:,,::j.,,,,:,,:=!.:.::: ... :: Copu 11 i Ji JIJ iJ 2111413 4

:;:::'·""j·,··"",·,·~,·,,,··""t" "'·"·'·'··"'·'·I"""",~"",·"t"""""'I"'"."., '1"""""';"""" .......... ; ......... ! ..... ,.~." .. " .. ,·········;,··· .. ···t""""'''i .. ·,,·,,·,,··t·''''''''''i''", ..... + ... """;.,, ...... .

. ~J .... " . ..!."""l"":·:.::"":l::.::::::I.::::""::: :::·:::':::L::::t.:::.::::::::::t:::::::1.:,::.:::L.:,:::::::::::::1::::'.: .. ':::::::.:1'::::"::"::;::::::::::'1' .".,,, ... ,L,,.,, .. _.""L".",," ·,~·~!'! .. ",l·",!,,·,' ...." ....... , .,."}.,,, .. """." .. , .. I ....... , ... I"""'II." ... .1..""" .. I" ... }"."".l···,,}··· ,"""''''''.!'''''''''''' ,,, .. ,,"~,,,,.,.- .. ""." .• 1. ...... _ ;.~~~"tl , .. , .... ".\"" .... " "'"''''j''''''' · .. · .. ""i .. " .. · .. ·"·"·" .. 1 .. "·"'\····" .. ·;· .. · .. · .. · .. "."} ... "I.",.;."."".I", .. .1."".,, I ""·",,,,,,;,,··,,,,·,,t'"',,,,·,,;,,,,,,,,,, ""'"i'''-'''''

··y;;;""···,,¡ .... ···i·" .... · .. ..... · ...... "........····· .. ······j······I· .. · .. · .. ··"· .. ¡,,,,··I······i'"'" ."", ... ".". ""· .. ···2··· .. ·"··)""""'''\" ... ,,'''' "" .... "·2"""·"· A.II ¡ 11 2 22 8 I 21 ¡ 17 35 11 3\ I 28 35

J No ...... repon.od ro. ~ óf C-. Oníciu a Dios or Islas de la BalUa

8 proL <lb,do<: 07·19·1996

{,I ¡ 1 j,. 1 i ,i i: ¡ ¡ J! ¡ : ::' t ! ¡.: _: j 1

!" I-! -¡ - l! ¡ I l,!! ¡ -; - -O

! : ¡ .,! i :. • ¡. 1

--~ -+j -+~--j:-+--f-----+--+-T-'+!, --ji~+¡ -"'!-i, -- f-¡ ; 1 l ¡: 1 ¡ ¡ :,: _1 ¡ ¡ ¡ ,¡ ; 1 ! ¡

-1 - i ¡ ,: - ~ :-1 i ; : ,', ¡ ; l ¡ ¡ i :

¡ ¡ t

f---I.--L--i.-~,-+-... ! _-l---L-...L~_'¡~-..L---l.... __ L-l-_. ¡ ¡ ';; l . . . ;

i • Z

i ¡ í ¡ i ¡ !! 1 ¡ ¡ :: ¡ 1 ¡ ¡; í _: -l - ~,: i ! ,¡ !,', -f :" -í" ! ¡ ",,, 1, ¡ t,'"

;

';; l,_ : • ' 1, ..• :

!: l ¡ ¡ ¡ : ¡ ! ~ ¡ ! , !

- t""'I: , ~,.' i .

; ~ , - -jN - ~

- ~

Figure l. LocatioDll of projects promoting lerraces and bench terraces, CIA T project databaae, Honduraa

~- R

Y'

. - '''h .• ......' ~"'A. /lJ~, ._' l/ ~._'_ , . J .1"-. '

"C," .0;:;,,-' ... '-, _1""-""("'// r¡-'" .;-¡: J f \, I ' ' ) , ,......----~.

L, r""/ '- """" /' • ~... r l)--< '.',. ~ /' l " '--:--.1 • ,. "':~"", i

\

'" ~.p-./,. ":\. ' ',',o .. r ':, 1

..- t ,",' .'~ -;, ,. , " ,> ''-.. ,: '. ,', ~ , .' '.'- '- j

(S,:', 'J.: (1, '1.... )---"~~,r'" \' <~:~:I ~J1 .... ~ ("" ' " \J')< -y , "~~\·1

~\ '. "" ",- 3. < ,:, 5 '~J'< f~'~ f'-'S"'--\ "" . , " ,,' , " ') .' "-.', , ' I

é' ,,"\" {'" , ~"'" r' \ Ir "",' ',~r ','. . \. ( ~",>,~),J:' )~, [~ Depar'lme",ts ",dh prOJects --....,;-;. .. ', '\., -., \ / / / '-'L. /~ \ ~- pr omo t. Ir)Q t .. r rOCeS

'i.' ., "{. ,,/~. - \~-", , , .. j (- '7\ f r \..'l~ .... .> " //'~',:V)" -< /"7,')0./

""--r' --'1 ,', . ' ¡ J> ( " \...~ ~,c. (J ",f-~j '"\ \

(~~ ~.",.)

10 prOj db,doc 7112196

[]

[J

MunlClp10S wllh proJecls pr' üMO t I ng t f.':1 ( oces

Deportments w,th prOJects p .... omút lng bench lerroce.

Figure 20 Locations of projects promoting zanjas or acequias, ('lA T project database, Ilondw-as

¡:;¿::r-N R

s:;t

",,:,/-~ "'_.,. _ f . o-T'" ,o o.:~r/~- )o fA"..- _._.0 /¡;~ ff·.I " I /' -- -~""'< ("V .... / .,.r',r--~ '-~ .J'

/'-- L "'~~J r J / '~_ ,/ , ~- '-~/ \ ,/ l r,' ,'" "

A F" , , "., \, • 'o' ',' '---...,

"'-\/k' " ! ,'" ':',' ]o' ¿: \ .... _. '" ,'\ ".'_ \, .' -, / " ,,' --./' ("'~".( ',' "" '

V,, '.. '/ / b\:, :' '-', ~'''~:,\\'~ '-'> ' (// o, / ,r:r, o, ",'- .T ' 1 / / ,,/ / / { ,".. ) .r~

e

~,

~'''''' "'­~

/"" /~~/ '.j ''X/'' re '1. { «/// 7/>l/ :">'~" ?(-;": o~ n Deporolme"lsw.lhproJéets -~,-;:1;X- // ,0, ,- ", :<:'::~'~ \ L.J prom,>lH'I\J zonJ'JS

'to ,','.- ' / ' !,,':;" " ~" ~

"\."') / /iZ/ / ~)~/' "'.1 ': "''('' ~;'''' f F::::::'I M\Jn.e,plos ... .lh prOJeds "'- " ,) } r ~ L:.:..J promol '1"\9 zar'Jos "" , )_'\ " ,/ "-'~o¡' ,--" .. - J ! \..J

pro)..db,do<: 11121%

\"~,,", r ................ '-'" .. ...-/

.Yr'" t;., '-'"' \.. r.()< /"" ... ~}..w-f;( )< J", '. '''', ~. ,"- . . x, f'\ •

" ,: ,. )< '"

'X'.(, ,( ;., '''f' ... : '. " /'<, ,l",- -, ." /' .

_ "\)'\ ,~",

~ :y~,,";;';

o ~

Deparlments ... ,th proJects promol,ng ac~qu.as

Mun,c,p.os ",.lh proJect$ pr omo l I ny ocequ I os

11

\ \~

IJIID -(1) <.10 ID­--,-0-~­a.

1.. ..c:;¡ -o

00 - E CO :)1..

.:!:a.

'" ... 111 VI/l -'''' q,1.. VI.. .,. •• 0- --. -L L 0,-

LL el/.¡ elO .L.,;;, .., ... ..c - " ... " 3 > - )

); 91-

'!'(T> ... it' • r

- -,f I E - 0.---LO ..)0

- E &~ e e ~ ~ q)1..

i::a. ca.

I ~ c: :f 1 .! .a '::; u

I \\ ~

\ -u &' '¡

.t:>

I/l '" ..... ue .-.., .. 0,-1. o a..o

,,¡;;. ... e>

- j ;tlll

" ;/l.

~7 --'" -.. -... -\... ,~

OE 0.0 ~. e

00.

'" "'" ~.

u -el. ..... ... 00 ... ..0 el , ..::e> ~o - ., ,"

1/1 0?l - ~ ú-

vO - E ce , 1-

l:o.

n U

"" -

., "'., ., - " -O> 01)0> o - 00 -o " o tI- \)-., " -.- e-o -. o - "">-",o o· <. .... 0-Q.e Le Q. L

L o.~ e (lE ..t:::> ..t:::;¡ :> -J> ..cA -E LE - - .... -lO -o 1 e

1 ~ e 1 e .,. ;lE E .... '" ~ ;:0> 001 ''JI ('r'" tiC -c <11 : - e E - 0.- E - u.--- ~ ~-LO '.\ o ~ " \/ e oe - E OE - E 0.0 ca 0.0 c,,:, ti ... :)L <l>L J ~

00. ~o. 00. ~o.

; § --1 !l ~ -<.> ., ~ '[

!-

f22 Q n \

U

\ I

) Á f,

\ <: \ ....

\ u g; ~ § Ji

'ª ~ ... o • §

.t:J

g • ,~ o

l :¡ ~ ''''' §. ""' o

,1 .. ~

...¡

.,...

~

figure 6, tocaliom of projeClJI promoling organic matter managemenl pracliCC8, CIAr projc:cl <!alabase, Honduras

~~

s~;;;

••

""-'-... "- f .

t .. " '\ .

¿:~ "'1' (, \. \. '. '. ~ ... , \. ' ' .'

." <. \. .. ..... , .... " ,

.... \." ...

'-': .. '\ '. ",~ . ...t, "" ~~"

pro) dI> doe 7/12/96

R

.....

," ~""" ,< ,,,'~ . <~\.. 'c-" '" <:,:,,<, "" "< ..... ",. "', '.' " ", ,', .... '" '

.... "~\.'" ':~'" . , ',,, "'-. ",', ,",,' '.,"-: ... , ".' "" "

E'J

CJ

-\,

::~ -~ ~

"' ___ y" J"--'~

D"porl", .. ,.l,. ... dh proJeclSl prom<Jl ¡ng org(lf"llC rnolter manog""Gr\ 1

MuniCIpiOS wtth proJ6cls promol Ing orgonlc mollar monog ...... "l

15

Figure 7. I.ocations 01' projects promoting gJ"een manures or cover cropll Of indigenoUII adaptalÍon of green manlUCll, projeet database. Honduras

~- R

.• "")0')0;",------- I """"",~..-___ -,

~./ /h"''''''" - ...... ,.. ",,1';77:/-'

/ 1'\ /,L-." , ,'1 'i'>//// ....,)'. - /"", -1' //// /._

¡-, ~, '/".' - ,";'~ "" ". . /,,,."',f-'" ,'. 'l ) ,r ",' ; ,. / ", ' , , ... , " - '\ ," \. . p, 1 .. ".', . ~ , .J",~",.J.r.. , .. '.,. ~ .. '\~,,:\

/(.",·,··-l.'l',,·' '.,','<>. -",' ',_~v/ .' ••. :-~~.~~, /' ,~ "'""'" ,'" ~Y"""- , ,_,',".' '~~_,' , " "'. " ',' ,"', " .. '.', ' -j' , .',~.-",- ~".,

,c'. "',' . '1 " " ','';''>':,:' ",. \"::-"~",, ~~<, ~ ,,<:~ ',', ,.,,~,.,:., '" ", ' - . '''~0,,,·::- >. " .. ~

f " '-, '-,' ',' '., '. """ . , " ' ., ,-', "'''''" '1" r \ ",,::.;. .:~'0; ", " " , - " .. \. \' ~........., ", '" ' "'o'" - " " ' "

"-~, "\' ,", "\' "',"', '" ",-

Y', \.:, '"l.'. ,<, , . \ )' \. '\~,' '~' .,,~, 0~:' " '/-.l "'\ ! ····(0' .... " "." \ [3: / ' "',,, '\ ,," "" t '\ , \ ' '.. ". "\", " ' " " ... " " " ""'¡,... [:"-...~, 'fS:', . , ",' '':''.' " ..:;.,. ", .".' , /. .' .;'~ /'\. ___ t( ',' ,. ,,', 'y • .J", , !., ..

'. " " , '~'~ "'" • " !,' " "

\'~"''''''' ' '''''' '\ r'"'~''''' '- , ,,: -'\ . ,;1>, , ' ~,t ,,/' -~ "':',

~~""-'\.... , ,"~., -1. .J

16 proJ.db,doc 7112/%

... -,,". f. r \ ' "",,', .: '\"v. , " '\, '" ~,,'~', ,"o '\", ' ", "

" " '"""" ~ , ",

" ,',.::: J'" .~) , . Q.':'~.: .'. ,."

~..x . ~ ...........

[]

~

-. ~,

D .. par I mer, l s w, l h pe oJee l s promot log green mOnu~~S or COv(#r crops

Mun'c,p,os w,th proJ.cls promol Ing green monures or Cover crops

Ind'genous adaplal,on of green monure lo producl,on syslems

; 1 ::r: ú ] ~ ~

'g \

'[ \ ~ u ~

ti

1 ~ ." e ~ 6

f <2

i . x

e <2

i . " , <

.... <:> :!l .~ e j ,.¡

.~ ;¡.

.., ";::v -. -o. l

>­"'1. --CIJI G> 4> e '­-o <.4-00 0. ... G>O\ 00

1>-\.

If¡­o J1 - ~\ y. 1. - o

IJI ..c.., -u -. l ..,

o {ji ...

-o. e <1,> EL

IJI .... V <P

-; ~ <.tI 0..

.e ... -. - " :l':; tIIC

LO oe 0.0 IJ>L 00.

; I f -i! -C)

.g, i.

¡... « -u .r 8 I:l

<.\:l

1 ·f [ !! <.) ., I '-o e o .~

;; j a:.

.~ 11.

~ \

\ '",

.. .... VIII •• .... v oc ~ <1> 0. ....

.c.o> ~C

"" -

Table 5. Cat, r "" _ .. _ .. - _ .... t a.d DroiKt'

Calegory of project

Category of agent Soil Forestry Agricultur Rural Natural Notknown Total conservation e development Resources

Extension service 7 I 1 O O O 9

Paralld extension O 3 2 I O 2 8 servJce

Community 1 O I 1 O O 3 development workers

Farmer·promoters 4 O O I O O 5

eonllel fanners O 1 I O O O 2

Agent nol reported 17 10 4 12 2 4 49

Total 29 15 9 IS 2 6 76

"Does nol include cases ofindigenous innovation (9 cases) or researcb sites (10 cases).

¡lIOUI>.doc 01-19-19% 19

Referenees

Bueldes, Daniel, Ponce, Ignacio, Saín, Gustavo, and MediDa, Gilmer. 1994. ·Cowardly land bewmes braveo the use and diffusion of fertilizer bean (Mucuna deeringi'nwn) on tite hillsídes of Atlantic Honduras. pp. 249-262 in Thurston, H. David, Smitb, Margaret, Abawi, George, and Kear\, Steve. 1994. TAPADO Slashlmulch' IW! Farmeo 1lx 11 B!ld WhA! Researchers ~ Al!Qu1 lt Itha<:a, New York: Cornell lntemational Institule for Food, Agriculture and Development (CIIFAD).

Calderón, Fausto, Sosa, Heriberto, Mendoza, Saín, Gustavo, and Barreta, Héctor. 1991.

ClA T 1993. lmproving agricultura! sustainahi!ity and livelihoods in the CeotraI American hillsides A proposal for Swiss Developmeot Cooperation (SOC). Cali, Colombia: ClAT

Dvorak, Karen Ann. 1996a. Catalogue of soil conservation practices and projects in C«rtral Arnerica. Interna! Report. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: ClAT.

Dvorak, Karen Ann 1996b. Soil conservation practices and projects in CeotraI America Digital database. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: ClAT.

DCA 1993 Memorias del Taller sobre Agricultura Sostenible en las Laderas Centroamericanas Oportunidades de Colaboración Interinstitucíonal, 13-16 de agosto de 1991, Corooado, Costa Rica. [Proceedings oftlte Workshop en Sustainble AgriculturaI in the Central America HiUsides Opportunities fue lnterinstitutional CoIaboration, 13-16 August 1991, Corooado, Costa Rica]. San José, Costa Rica: DCA.

Kaimowitz, David. 1993. La experiencia de Cerrtroamérica y República Dominicana con proyectos de inversión que buscan sostembilidad en las laderas. [Expcrience in C«rtral Amerka and the Domincan Republic wíth projects investi.ng in sustainable agri<:uIture in hillsides] Documento de Programa 40. San José, Costa Rica: DCA

Lutz, Emst, Pagiola, Slefano, and Reiche, Carlos 1994. Ecooomic and institutional analyses oí soil cooservatíon projects in Central America and the Caribbean. World Bank Eo\ironment Paper No. 8. Washington, D.e. Tbe World Bank.

Mejía, Francisco S 1993 Las actividades de conservación de suelos en las organizaciones privadas de desmoUo de Honduras. [Soil conservation activities in private deveIopment organizations in Honduras] Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Federación de Organi.zaciooes Privadas de Desarrollo de Honduras (FOPRIDEH) y Cooperación Suiza al DesarroUo (COSUDE-P/ONG).

Meyrat, A1ain, Velasquez, Dionías, and Ardon Mejia., Mario. 1992. Inventorio de técnicas de conservación de suelos y agua de laderas en NICaragua, Guatemala y Honduras. [Inventory of soil and water conservation technique in the hillsides oC Nicaragua, Guatemala and Honduras.1 Managua., NICaTagUI: Programa para la Agricultura Sostem'ble en Laderas de América Central (pASOLAC).

Thurston, H. David, Smith, Margare!. Abawi, George, and Kearl, Steve. 1994. TAPADO Slashlmulch How Fauners UK lt llI4 W1lA1 Researchers ~ Ahm!llt Ithaca, New York. ComeU Intemational Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development (CIIFAD).

20 proLcI!.doc 07-19-19'96

Wilken, Gene e 1987. QQQd Farmers: Iradjtional A¡ricuIturaI Resouree Man8uemmt iD Mexjco mi Central America. Berlteley: University ofCalifomla Pms.

Zutter. lean PierTe and Bustamante, Benjamin. I99S. Estudio sobre incentivos en la conservación de suelos. [Study ofincentives in soil conservation·1 Tegucígalpa., MDC .• Honduras P ASOLAClPROGRAMA ONG/lnlercooperaUon.

proLdb.doc 01·19·1996 21

AppendiI A. Variables aod eodes

Project typeIClase de proyecto

(1) indigenous/JocaI (2) limited-purposelobjetivo limitado

(2A) soil conservation/COnservaciÓll de suelos (28) agroforestry -forestry!agroforestería -siIvacultura

(3) multi-purposelobjetivo múltiple (3A) agrieuIturaIIagríooIa (38) rural developmeotldesarroUo rural (3C) natural resource consetvationlconsemlción de los recursos naturales

Technologyffechnología'

I TerraWterraza 2 Bench terracelterraz.a de banco 3 Dike/dique 4 Drainldrenaje S Drainage ditcWzanja 6 Contour ditcWzanja a nivel 7 DitcWacequia 8 Contour tillage/surcos a nivel 9 Dead barriertbarrera muerta 10 Living barriertbarrera viva 11 No bum/no quema 12 Mínimum tilIage/labranza mínima 13 Organic matter/material orgánica 14 Ridgesl camellones 15 Oreen manure, cover crop/abono verde, coberatura vegetal 16 Planted fallow/guamil sembrada 17 Improved pasturelpasto mejorado 18 Forestry, reforestationlsilvacultura, reforestación 19 Agroforestry/agroforesteria 20 Nurs.erylvivera 21 Communal nursery/vivera comunal 22 Wmdbreaklcortina rompeviento 23 Living fencelcerca viva 24 lmproved varietyfvariedad mejorada 25 Fertilizer/fertiliz.ante

Type of agentrripo de agente

(1) Existing extension servicelextensiomstas

• T cclmologí .. reporu:d b),1t \casi ...., pmJCCI 001 DOt includcd in !he databue,..".. in-row tillage, "otns lisi<as," lI"II<!o de laderas )' lI"II<!o de di...,., cuItI"" .., calIaljaD<S. planting deosity, bome gardens, ......,.¡ <:ClIIroI, hcrt>!cide use, pesticide u..:. ~. and ¡uIly m:lIImaban.

proulJ\toc 07-19-1996 23

(2) ParaIlel extension servicelsistema paralelo de extension (3) Community development workersldesarroUo de la comunidad (4) Farmer extension agentiVproductores agentes (5) Contact farmerslproductores de contacto

Payments for IaborlPagar por trabajo (L)

(LI) Cash payments (by hour/daylweeklmonth) Efectivo por horaIdíalsemanalmes

(L2) Cash payments (by unitlmeter/etc) Efectivo por unidadlmetroletc,

(L3) Food for worklalimentos por trabajo Trabajo por alimentación

(L4) Inputs for workfl1lSUlIlOs por trabajo

Provide inputs or services witbout subsidylProveer insumos o servicios sin subsidío (P)

(P 1) Soil conservation inputsfmsurnos de conservación de suelos (PIA) Vegetative materiallmaterial vegetatiYa (P I C) Animal tractionltracción de los animales (P ID) Tractorsltractores (P I E) T ool!Vherramientas (PIF) Bags (nurseries)/bolsas (YÍveras)

(P2) Other inputslotros insumos (P2A) SeedlsemiDa (P2B) F ertilizer/feni1izante (p2C) Other chemicalslotros químicos (P2E) T ools/herramientas

(P 3) Serviceslservicios (P4) Creditlcrédito

Subsidíes for input s or serviceslDar subsidios por insumos o servicios (S)

(S 1) Soil conser.-ation inputsflllSUrDOS de conservación de suelos (S I A) Vegetative materiallrnaterial vegetativa (SIC) Animal traction/tracción de los animales (S 1 O) T ractor!Vtr&ctores (S 1 E) T ool!Vherramientas (SIF) Bags (nurseries)/bolsas (viveras)

(S2) Other inputsIotros insumos (S2A) SeedlsemiDa (S28) Fertilizer/fertilizante (S2C) Other chemicalslotros químicos (S2E) Toolslherramientas (S2F) AnimalsI animales

(S3) Serviceslservicios (54) Creditl~no

24 proLtb,doc 07·19·1996

CountrylDepartmeot (21) Sucbitepequez (A) Central America (22) Totonicapan (C) Costa Rica (23) Zacapa

(01) A1ajuela (H) Honduras (02) Cartago (01) Atlá.ntida (03) Guanacaste (02) Colon (04) Heredia (03) Comayagua (05) Limon (04) Copan «6) Puntarenas (05) Cortes (07) San José (06) Cboluteca

(E) FJ Salvador (07) FJ Paraíso (01) Ahuachapán (08) Francisco Morazán (02) Cabai\as (09) Gracias a Dios (03) Cuscatlán (10) Intibuca (04) Chalatenango (11) Islas de la Bahía (OS) La Libertad (12) LaPu (06) LaPu (13) Lempita (07) La Unión (14) Oootepeque (08) Morazán (15) Ola.ncho (09) San Miguel ( 16) Santa Barbara (10) San Salvador (17) VaDe (11) San Vicente (18) Yoro (12) Santa Ana (M) México (13) Sonsonate (N) Nicaragua (14) Utulután (01) Boaco

(G) Guatemala (02) Carazo (1) Aha Verapaz (03) Chinandega (2) Baja Verapaz (04) Chontales (3) Beliee (05) Estelí (4) Chímaltenango (06) Granada (S) Chiquimula (07) Tmotega (6) El Progresso (08) Leon (7) El Petén (09) Madriz (8) El Quiché (10) Managua (9) Escuintla (11) Muaya (10) Guatemala (12) Matagalpa (tI) Huehuetenango (13) Nueva Segovia (12) IzabeI (14) Río San luan (13) Jalapa (15) Rivas (14) Jutiapa (16) R. AA N. (15) Quezaltenango (17) RAAS. (16) Retalhuleu (18) Zelalas

(17) Sacatepéquez (P) Panamá (18) San Marcos (19) Santa Rosa (20) Sololá 'Curncntly, IlAAN. and R.A A.S.

proL<I!doc 07·19·1996 25

Appendix B. Catalogue data, by case

27

Table 81. Database byentry. Identifteation, countly and titIe

10 PAil: TfTLE I 1 e no-till in lrijo/espeque in Cost¡¡Rica I 2 G maiZe+chore<:j\jeJ.Lathytus nttrivalvis) 3 H m~ize+~S()t.at>~m+[)()Jíc",QS lablaL ___ ~~~~~=-------~--

--~--

~

41 C I'<llto.':.e~stac,ón en HOjancha, Guanacaste_~ i

_:!.2 C t-latural Resot!~ ~servation PfOj~ (COREN~ f-~-~- ...... __ .

5 C Programa de ~saffOUO Mrícola y Forsta..!í~ODAF) 6 E Viveros comunales

_J I--~---'---~--""--' .

_1.1 fgo~1 ()( marceño . ..... _.~.

8 G'- f:.~ de Desarroll9. Agrícola del Altiplano 9 G Proyecto Agroforestal m

10 H_ P!~rama de OesarrolloRural de Occidente (PRODERO) Proyecto de Agr%restería, Unidad de Manejo de la Sierra de Omoa (antenonnente

" H Pr<.l~ Ord!.naciónJnt~rad~~~ ~uencas Hi(jtClllráficas) - .. - .m;_ 12 1 ,lL ~.!LconselVllIJ012 in cott0n r~ion in ~tem N'c:aragua f--_ ...

Proyecto de Conservación de Suelos y Medio Ambiente (pcEO)lSoí1 Conservation and

1--122 N r,mnví(on~~ta..!l'!.Olect f---m.

13 -.4- ~9-ARE: La Escale~__ ..... [: 14 N lC~RE MAG San Ramón agrotorL_m ___ ~___ _ . 15 N lliol1.J~a-º.u~rTlplí<!~~_ranJuezJ ______ L--- __ m. .-I 16 N p'-()r~o P¡kínGue.rr..'!~~_ ..... _ .. L-__ f--c-- .~ , 17 H P'E1..ecto_<le Ma".llJc>.E.e R~ursos N~tu..rales

18 H P'!oyecto de Desagollo del Bosque Latdoliado 19 ~~- ¡:>!(.)yecto Re~stación delVan~de Jalapa Jl"i!....~Monte)

~_2()1 C estudio de conservación de suelos en Costa Rica - --------.. _--- - - - -~-----..... -202 -~ :;(ji! ~nservatJon economies case study, TIerra Blanca·San Juan Chicoá, Costa Rica

21 A P10tect~~~l!!sem.nac~.~~~s;:\l1tM:l de Arbole1o<:l<!l Uso Múltiple ~eleña) ..... -- <-<,

r------::2? G Proyecto de ()¡serninación del CultM:l de Arboles de Usot.\últiple (Madele~a) 23 N ~!ICAHF'research s/te, Estel!, Nicaragua 24 N CIA11CAHP research s/te, Matagalpa,Nicaragua ,- ... ~.

25 e SENACSA ~--~~_.

...... _m. Proyecto de Conservación de Suelo en Santa Lucia, Teustepe y Pochocuape,

261 N Carn¡><l:S--,,~~~_-C!Imperslno pilot.Pl'?Iect lO Santa Luc¡¡¡ ______ .... ~ __ -,- ... _-_ .. 26.2 N eampes.n!l::a-Ca"'f'(!sinolFarmer-tc>:-Earmer _ ..... r--'

1-3!l.l N ASOPROL ._--26.4 N ri@onaTYnlo!'ofFarmers and~anchersISan Juan RlV!f casel- . 26.5 -N- Can'l¡¡<'.!SIm:>-¡¡::C:::a~rsln<l.19inco Pinos} . . ~- -~-

mvesllgae'ón del PRMlCIMMYT en Azuero, Panamá sobre uso de rastrojo de 27 P maiz+CanavaJia ensiformis

.-~~ -----._-----_ .....

~~ e soíl conservaboneconomics case study. Hered.a, Costa Rica . . 29 C so,1 conservaban economies case studv, Turrubares, San José, Costa Rica

Pla~t3clo;'es-Forestales para Energi ay Rehabilitación de la Llanura Volcánica e León· 30 N ,Chll1a~(j~a . .íE'r~ Cord,lIera .<ltllos M¡¡flb,os~ __ .... 31 H abonera .n northern Honduras

-----.. _-------_ ..... !;a,1 conseMlbon-econ"m.C$ca~ Study, Patzité,OUíché'--" 32 G ¡;oíl conservation economies case study, Tatumbla, Franeisco Morazán (Soil and Water

33 H c::o_nservatíon and}~~anagement Program19!7, PAf!M 1¡¡¡¡~, LUPE 1900) -341 -~-N FAgdemonstraciones en bloques, . .. _: ... 342 N !,(joption studyo/ FAO btock~em.2n.;;tratio.rl .. trials, Condega, Region 1118 .-- .

35 N INTA ~.~ . ' - -----~-~----_._----~---- ..... _-~-----....

36 O ADERSO ._- .... __ .... _----37 H CIA TlCAHP researchstte Atl~ritiº~-Hoñduras ._ ..

Table 81. Dalabase byentry Identification. eountry and Iitle

10 PAI:5 TIllE

42.1 H Wor1d Netghbors "422"f--fi VecíllO$ Mundiales. El Socooo. Siguatapeque

Programa de DMarrollo AgricOOillntegrado de CanlarranHlCantarranas lntegrated 42.3 H AgriculturalOelle lit Program

-42.4 f-H Guino¡.¡e Integrated 0eIIe nt Programme i

42.5 ~ ~rama de .. 0es:!1T011o Agricola Integrado de San Marti". ____ . __ ... _ ... ______ _ .. J 43 E ProY8CtOGuacotecti o Proyecto AgrolOtestal a Comunidades deE~~sos~ecu~_.J 44 P Agtpfocestry Proje<;t for Communi!t. Oevelopment (CAREJlNREN"RE) .

I-~'i National Direc\l)fate 01 Renewable Natural Resources/Freoch Mission for Technical 45 P COOperation .... _ .. _____________ .............. __ .J 46 P Canal Watershed Management Project ... - =J 47 A Pr~ AgrosiNopastoril

-----c~ M detelio~tl 01 trad~aU.a.'1d~J'11<1n'!ll~ent pra~s. __ ._ .. _ ..... _______ . _ _ ~9 . r-t- Proyecto Agrotorestal El Pital .... _.._

SO H Comisión Cnstiana de DMarrollo (CCD},-:-:-_-,,;-:-c-:-:-__ ' __________ -j __ ~~ control de la erosIÓn en 1<l<:1J~f1<:a sur del La,ao XoIotIa=' "c. _____ . ___ . ___ .. __ . __

52 e Iapado in Costa Rica_ ---;.~r--E- ~doin PanalTl".c_____ . __ . __ ._ .. ___________ -1

54 E ¡plantee! fallow~lmcídla sepium) for fue' WOO<I. ___________________ ... _51? E ~'-ta~ínEISalvador _. ____ . __ . ______ . ___ . _ ... ____ ._. ______ ._.

Conservation TIllage Project; Programa de Producción T ecnmcada de Granos Basicos (PPTGB) y Programa de Rehabilitación y Desarrollo de la Infraestructura Bas.ca y

~ 1--~_ Diversificación de la ProdUCCIón Agricola ~RE:t:>Iªº'=Al. _____ . ____ . _ __I

i-c.!!J E Proyecto Metapán. Cuenca d"'e:.;.I.:..R:::ío::..Sa;--=:n.'-:J;::05e=·'c-______ _ r-..581 E 'proteger proyecto hídroeléctrico ~rI.ón_ºrc::a.;.;.nd::.:e'---:-;;;:_-::-___ ._ .. _______ -c

58 2 E POSRA (AcelhuatEl_R,ver Ca.,tchmej1! ~a.n_'!lI!!ImentF'f()JE!<:tl~ ___ . __________ _j

5Q E Proyecto de Rehabilitación de la Subcuenca del Río Las Cañas i

80 M malZe.nescaf!1Stizol()bilJlTI spp) mm_mm ---j 61 H Hermandad de Honduras (HH) -.------~----

62 H PRODAI (pr~rna de Desarrollo "¡¡ncola Integrado E!§!<pontu) _. ~: ..... ~-=~ __ ._._ 63 H Pf(XIrarna de R.8C:(;)f1stru<:x:iéll1.:.:R'7u""ra",1 "'La"-"'8u"'e"'-n:=a-'-F-"'e-'(P'-'R'-'R"')'--~ _____ ~~ __ _1 64 H F~" (Alimentos para Millones)

PROCONOEMA (Programa de Promoción V Capacitación para la ConservacIón del 65 H Medio Ambiente) ..... ___ ... ________ --1

r. 66 H F\jfl<:!<I<:ión Banhcafe (FUNDANHCAFE) _______ _ 1--67 H Vision Mundial (VM) _ .. ______________ . ______ . __ ._ r-~ . .!i _ -E0lTlento Evangelico ..E:!r.a~Progr~mde_ Honduf!SJ.F§PR9.!:'l ___ .... _____ _ ___ _

69 H Programa Aldea Global I--~~~~~~~~~~~~---~~~~~~~-------------~

70 H Asoci:il<:í<ifl para el Desarrollo Integral de Honduras (AOIH) .mmmmm. ____ ~~~r

1--11 H Asociación Save !he Childre.'UASCH1... ._._......_~ 72 H ~ Agroforestal Comunal JF'~9O-CARE) ._ _ .

1---:7",3+ H LUPE (pro~ M~pamiento del Uso 't Productividad de la TIerr~L _____ _ 1-- .1~ H PPBL Proyecto de Desarrollodel. ~ue L".blo1i~<l.()___ _ ... _____ ......... ~=

75 H PlAN en Honduras 76 M conservación eñ ¡:a-¡:'raYiesca Chlapas-· -- ----.

Table B2 CategOly 01 project and ageot. year 01 iniliation. incentNes and technologiM. by case

ID I NS : L1 ,

L2 L3 1 L4 ! P1 1 P1A I P1E I P1F , P2 !P2AIP2E1 P3 10 1

,

! 20, NS , , I I

3.0 NS , , ! i I ¡ I i I : 4,1' , , , ~ I

42 5.0, , 6.01 I ! L3 l 1 ,

! !

7.0i NS , ! , ! 80, L2 I , I ¡ , I , 9,0' L3 ! , I P1A I , P1F ! ,

10.0' I

11.0: L3 I I

12.11 , : ¡ I I , , 122: 13.0 , , 14.0 , : , I I

150! 160 17.0 L2 l3 , ! 18.0 , 19.0 , , .

20.11 , I , : , , 20.2' , ,

210' ,

22.0 ,

230, , , : 24.0' ,

1 25.0 26.1 ; P1E: 26.2' ,

: 263' . P3 26.4

I 26.5 2701 , 280'

, , 290 I

30.0' , I

31.0 NS I , ,

32.0 , 33.0 , 341 34.2 P1 P2 350 , 360 370 I .

38.0 391 392 39.3

Table 82 ca~ 01 project and agent. year 01 initiatíon. incentivM and technologies. by case

ID I NS ! L1 i L2 , L3 , L4 P1 ' P1A , P1E I P1F • P2 !P2AIP2E1 P3 40.0 l2 41.0. , I , i ¡

, i :

42.1 i , I , , I I I I I I

42.2' , , . P2A

: 423 i 42.4' , I i ,

42.5' , I , ! ! ! I I , 1 i

: 430' L3 , , P1E . P2 , I P3

440 NS , : , , 450: , , i I 460 470 , 460, , I , , 490 , 500 , 51.0· , , , , I 520' NS , I , , I

530 NS 54.0 550 560 L3 P2 570 P1 , P2 , , 581· P1 , P2 , ,

i 562' . 590' L1 L4

600 61.0 , ,

I 620 ,

1630' 640 P2E

. 65.0 660 :

670 680 P2A 69.0 70.0 ,

710 ! , , no I I , I 73.0 I

, 740 ,

750 760

Table 82. Categofy of projed and agent. year 01 initiatíon, incentNes and !echnologies, by CIKe

110 l P4 I S1 ' S1A . S1E I S1F : 52 S2A S2E I S2F I SA lAG.' I AG·2 i AG-3 10 , : 1 l 2.0 , ¡ i I ,

30, , I I ! ¡ i , ! : I

4.1' I I ; ! , 1 : ! SA' :

42' , , i , , 5.0. , I

6.0! I : S1A i , 51F ¡ 52 ! ! I I I

70! "T , , r \ "T 1 , : r 8.0' , , í !

, , 1 ¡ i 9.0' 1 l S1A , I I ¡ I I , ,

10 O' S1E' 54 11.0 , S1A , 52 , j

12.1 I . : ¡ ¡ , I

122 ¡ , ;

13.0 • , 140· I I , I ! : 15 O' l

, I i , !

160 ,

17.0 ¡ , . S1A S1E S1F 180 : , 2 190

, \ S1A l

, S1F I , ,

201: I ,

í ¡ \ i 20.2' ¡ I

21.0 , ,

22.0 ,

23.0, I , , , : 240' , :

250 51 : ,

1 26.' i

262 ;

263 P4 ,

264 265.

1 270 28.0 290 , 300 , 54 31.0 , ,

í --,

32.0 330 341 34.2 P4 51 52 1 35.0 1 360 : ,

i

37.0 380 39.1 392 393 i

Table 82, Category d project and agent, vear d initiatioo. in<;enliYes and 1echnoIogíe$, by case

10 I P4 S1 I S1A I S1E I S1F I 52 ' S2A • S2E ¡ S2F I 54 I AG-1 AG-2 AG-3 40,0 410 42 l' i I , ! I I I I

422 ' S1A ' ! I I ,

423 , ,

424 , , 42.5' , , , , ! , I I , I , 43,0' P4 : ¡ , , 54 1 3 44.0' , , , , , , ; 1 I

45O' , , I

46,0' 470 ,

480 49,0 , I

50.0 S1A . S2E 52F 54 3 510, , , 52.0 530 540 550 560 52 1 57,0 ; 54 561 54 562 590 51A 1300 61,0 54 620 51A 63,0 640 P4 52A

. 650 3 ;000 :2

670 51A 52E 54 2 68.0 54 :2 690 S1 5lA 54 :2 700 52 52E 710' 54 2 720' S2A 52E 54 2 730 74 O 51A 52 54 2 750 54 76.0 52 54 ,

Table 82, Category ot pIOject and agent. ~r ot inftiation. incentives and technologies, by caN

ID I AG-4' A<>-SI AG-9, PROJ . TECH11TECH2: TECH3!TECH4! TECH5ITECH6 'TECH7 !TECHa 1,0 lA •

2,0. 9 1 I . I I , 30 , , 9 1 I ! I I ! 4, "

i lA • , 4,2 , 5,0 2B 6,01 ; I 2B I I I , , I , , 701 , {I 1 i , i 8,01 , 5 1 , 3A , T1 I I , , 901 I

, 2B T1 1 T7 · , · 100' 39 T1 T7 110 2B I T1 T7 12,11 ; ; 2A 12 ,

122 lA 13,0 , lA 14.0í ¡

• 2B • 150, , , lA I , , 1

16.0' le 170 . lA T1 T7 180' 2B 19.0 2B 20.1: lA l T1 13 I T4 : 18 20,2: 3N T5 210 2B 22.0 2B 230: , N2 24.0: ! N2 ,

25.0 i lA 26,' 4 • . lA T1 T3 T5 18 262 4 lA • !

263 3A 264 4 lA 26.5 27,0 3A 28,0, 3N 15 · 29.0 3N T2 , T5 30.0: • 2B 310 , 9 1 320 3N T1 33.0 lA T7 341 2A 34.2 2A

: 35,0 lA 360· , le 370' N2 38.0 N2 391 3B 392 N3 T7 393 N2

Table B2. Category of project and agent, year of inruanon, incenti\'e$ and technologies, by case

ID '110-4 110-5 ' IIG-9' PROJ TECH1' TECH2' TECH3' TECH4 ' TECH5 'TECH6, TECH71 TECH8 : 400 39 T2

, ¡.-.;"

410 r- 3B , Ti , I j I I 421 I

42.2 3B I I T7 ! T8 42.3 3B 15 :

42.4 , 3B , 15 , , , 425' I 3B : j : , , I 1'6 I I

43.0 4 2A Ti . 1'3 , • I I

«O, 5 ; 2B 15 í i 450

, 2A I , , , I I , 460 2A 15 47.0 3A T1 , 15 I , T8 46.0 , 1 T1 T4 ,

• ,

490 2B 500 38 15 Tll 510 2A i

520 9 1 I ;

530 9 1 •

54.0 1

550 1 56.0 2A 57.0 2A T2 581 211 T1 T2 13 T4 I

582 2A T6 159.0 2A

60.0 610 38 ,

I-~O 311 T5 , ,

630 4 39 T5 Tll 640 38 650 311 66,0 670 3B T5 680 3A TS Tll 690 311 I

70.0 38 , 15 , Tll 710 . 15 , , , T8 I

720 2B , ~ Tll 73.0 2A 74 O 28 750 38 760 2A

Table 82, Category of projecl and agen!. }'ear of initiation, incentiVes and technologies, by case

10 ITECH9 TECH10'TECH11 TECH12:TECH13 TECH14'TECH15ITECH16:TECH17 TECH18 1 O, ,

T12 20 , , ! T15 , i

30 ¡ i I I T15 I , I

41 ! • I I T18 42 , 50 , , 60! I , ,

I , I

TO' , i T15 , :

8,0 TQ , ,

I T18 , : ¡ , , 9,0' TQ : T10 , i 113 • ! T17 ! T18

10 O T12 , T15 T18 110, , , , 118 12,1 , i

122 , ,

13,0 • ! 140 , ¡ , I I

15 O I ! , !

160 ,

, 17 O T9 T10 ,

18 O n8 190' T18 20,1, no I , 20,2 , 210 , T18 220 !

, 118 ,

230 , , ¡ , , 240 I , 250 L 261 T9 no T11 112 113 115 : 262 263 264 T15 26,5 27 O Tl1 T12 : T15 280 290 , 300 T10 T13 , 117 118 31,0 ! T15 I

320 330 T9 no 341 342 35,0 I I

360 T10 , T15 i , T18 370 I

380 391 392 39.3

Table 62. Category of project an<! agent. )'Mr cA initialion. incentives lI!d technoIogies, by case

:10 'TECH9'TECH10 TE0i11 'TEOi12 ITECH13! TECH14 'TECH15fTEOi16!TECH17 'TE0i18 40.0

,

41.0 : 42.1' T9 ! no ! 1 T12 I T13 I 115 I ; , 42.2 , T10 T11 • T12 I T13 115 •

42.3 no T13 T15 42.4' Tl0 : , T13 , I

42.51 ! I , I I I i , ·43.0' T9 ,

1 , , , •

44.0 T9 no ¡ T13 , I

: 450 , I , ,

• 46.0 n7 47.0 T9 no I T12 T13 T14 T15 T1El 460' 49.0 .

50.0 T9 T10 T12 T13 T15 51.0 , I

520 I T12 530 T12 540 T16 55.0 n2 se.O Tl1 n2 T13 570 T9 T10 , T1a 581 T9 T10

; 582 no 59.0 600 T15 61.0 T12 ¡ T13 n5 62.0 T9 no T12 T13 ! T15 630 no n2 n3 640 T13 65.0 66.0 T13 670 T12 T13 T15 68.0 T12 T15 69.0 70.0 no :

71.0 T9 no n5 72.0 ; T12 T15 T1a !

73.0 . 74.0 no T11 , na 750 no T11 76.0 T11 T12

Table 92. Category cA project and agent. year of iniliation. incentives and technologies. by case

ID 'TECH19 i TECH20 TECH21 . TECH22. TECH23I TECH24 • TECH25IYEAR 10 , , I I 20 [ , , 3.0' I , I I ! I

4.1 I 1 T21 I 78 4.2 , 85 5.0' T19 . 87 601 I T T21 I I I 84 7.0

, T , 1 i

8.0: I , ¡ I i , 83 9.0 T19 , T20 I T21 ! T23 I ! : 75 ,

10 O 80 110. : 76 121 I , ,

• 50 12.2 119 , T22 80 13.0

, 86 ,

14 O i , , , I I , 15 O ! , , , I

16.0 ,

90 17.0 : 82 180 88 19 O T20 T23 84 20.1 , , 20.2 , 21.0 T21 79 22.0: I T21 230 94 240' ! 94 25.0 84 26.1 87 262 00 263 94 264 87 265 92 27.0 92 28.0 29.0 300 T23 89 31.0 32.0 33.0 n 34.1 T24 T25 342 T24 T25 95

• 35.0, , I

• 36.0 T19 ,

370 94 380 94 39.1 39.2 39.3 94

Table 82. Category of project and agen!, year of initiation, incentives alld technologies, by case

ID I TECH19: TECH20' TECH21 . TECH22; TECH23 TECH24 1 TECH25' YEAR • 400 41.0 , 421 ' , I , , 42.2 T19 , : 87 423

, 87

424 , 81 42.S: I ¡ ! I T25

, 72

43.0 T19 : 80 44.0 T21 , 86; 4S.0' I , 79 460 470 T19 T22 T23 460' 490 90 50.0. 82 510· , , 63 520 , ,

53.0 •

m T24 T25 74

¡ 581

• 582 : 590 91 :500

• 610 T19 76 '620 87

630 85 640 79 650 89 660 85

•

• 67 o 74 86.0 . 87 690 89 70.0 91 110 90 720 T19 T20 T23 T24 89 73.0 90 740 T19 90 75 o T19 87 760 T25

.­.... = = =

Marco TuIio Trejo y Hector Barreto. Noviembre 1995. Base de datos de Jos levantamientos de suelos y sus resultados anaIfticoI ea Honduras. Reporte Interno, Tegucigalpa. Honduras. Centro Internacional de AgrialItura Tropical. (mimeo.)

Karen Ann Dvorak, Pedro Jiménez, Daysí Medrano García, José Santos Martínez F. Manuel Velásquez, Duilio N"M.S. DonaIdo Suerez y Nestor H. Velásquez. 1996. Resumen de los datos del sondeo sobre recursos agrícolas: Santa Lucia, Boa.co, Nicaragua. Reporte Interno Tegucigalpa, Honduras CIAT. (mimeo)

Raúl Moreno y Hugo Pocasangre. Febrero 1996. Estudio preliminar de adopción de prácticas de conservación de suelos el! DanIí, El Paraíso, Honduras. Reporte Interno. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: CIAT. (m.imeo.)

Karen Ann Dvorak, Pedro fsméoez, Manuel Cantillano y Donaldo Velásquez. 1996. Resumen de Jos datos del sondeo sobre recursos agrícolas: Mwúcipio de Yorito, SuJaco, VICtoria y Moraz.án, Departamento de Yaro, Honduras. Reporte Interno. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: CIAT. (mimeo.)

Programa de Laderas, CIAT. Marzo 1996. Ayuda memoria de la segunda reunión del Grupo Consultivo, Tegucigalpa, Honduras, 21·22 de Septiembre de 1995. Reporte Interno. Tegucigalpa, Honduras CIAT. (mimeo)

Kareo Ann Dvorak Y Pedro funénez. Marzo de 1996. Resumen de los datos del sondeo sobre recursos agrícolas: Municipios de DanIí Y San Matias, Departamento de El Paraíso, Honduras. Reporte Interno. Tegucigalpa, Honduras CIAT. (m.imeo).

Karen Ann Dvorak y Pedro Tunénez. 1996. Resumen de los datos del sondeo sobre recursos agrícolas: Municipios de Arizona, La Ceba, La Masica y Tela, Departamento de Atlántida, Honduras. Reporte Interno. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: CIAT. (mimeo).

Karen Ann Dvorak y Pedro funénez. 1996. Guía del sondeo sobre recursos agrícolas en América Central. Segunda edición. Reporte Interno. Tegucigalpa, Honduras Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical. (mimeo.)

Karen Ann Dvorak. 1996. Sonden ofresource management systems and practices: Nationai Sampling Frame Cor Honduras. Project Report. Tegucigalpa, Honduras CIAT. (mimeo)

Dvorak, Karen Ann. 1996. Catalogue oC soil conseryation pramees and projects in Central America. Interna! Report. Tegucigalpa, Honduras CIAT. (mimeo)

Humpbries, SalIy. 1996. Migrants, dairy fa:rmers and agricultura! land·use in the bumid, tropical hillsides ofNorthem Honduras Interna! Report. Tegucigalpa, Honduras CIAT. (mimen)

Projeet Documeatll

CIA T, 1993. Improving agricultura) sustainabilíty and livelihoods in lhe Central American hilIsides A proposal for Swiss Development Cooperatíon (SDC) Calí, Colombia CIAT (mimen.)

CIAT/LlNAR Marzo 1995. LocaIízación y sistematización de la literatura grís sobre agricultura en laderas de Honduras. Tegucigalpa, Honduras. CIAT. (mimeo.)

Hector Barreto y Karen Dvorak. Mayo 1995. Plan operativo. Reporte Interno. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: CIAT. (mimeo)

Hector Barreto y Karen Dvoralc JU!lÍo 1995. Los comités locales del Programa de Laderas­CIAr en Honduras y N'tearagu.a: Fase de organización. Reporte Interno. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: CIAr. (mimen.)

Raúl Moreno Agosto 1995. Resumen de la primera reUllÍón del Grupo Consultivo del Proyecto de Laderas de América Central, La Lima, Cortés, Honduras, 18-20 de Mayo de 1994 y Objetivos y conclusiones del taller de consulta en Managua, Nicaragua, 27.28 Agosto 1993. Reporte Interno. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: CIAr. (mimeo.)

Hector Barreto. August 1995. Digital database of the IV National Agricultural Census for Honduras at municipio Ievel. lnternal Report, l10t for distribution. Tegucigalpa, Honduras CIAT (mimeo.)

Karen Ann Dvorak y Pedro funénez Septiembre 1995. Guía para el sonden sobre recursos agrícolas en América Central. Reporte Interno. Tegucigalpa, Honduras Centro Internacional de Agrícultura Tropical (mimen)

Hector Barreto. Octubre 1995. Atlas digital de Nicaragua. Reporte Interno. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: CIAT. (mimeo.)

HiDsides Research Working Group. October 1995. Proceedings of the working group on billsides reseatch in Central America, 1·3 March, 1995, Trujillo, Colón, Honduras Tegucigalpa, Honduras Hi1Isides Research Working Group. (mimeo.)

Grupo de Trabajo de Laderas. Octubre 1995. Memoria del grupo de trabajo para la investigación en 1aderas de Centro América, 1·3 marzo 1995, Trujillo, Colón, Honduras. Tegucigalpa, Honduras Grupo de Trabajo de Laderas. (mimeo.)