1
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Vol. 17, Supplement 1 S5 I-12 ROLE OF BONE IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS D. Lajeunesse CRCHUM, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, QC, Canada Purpose: Altered bone remodeling is now considered important in the progression and/or initiation of osteoarthritis (OA) both from in vivo and in vitro studies. The mechanisms that lead to altered bone remodeling are still largely unknown yet recent studies have keyed into the mechanisms that may be at play. Altered bone remodeling in OA may be due to the abnormal phenotype and proliferation of human OA osteoblasts (Ob). It may also be linked with abnormal signaling of key growth factors that modulate both the proliferation and function of Ob. Recent studies using imaging techniques have also revealed new data on the possible link between bone and lipid metabolism that may impact on OA bone tissue. The present presentation will examine the hypothesis of the key role played by bone in OA initiation/progression. Methods: Many studies have demonstrated that the subchondral bone is the site of several dynamic morphological changes that vary over time during the evoluton of the disease and seem to be part of the disease process. Here, we reviewed the evidence that bone tissue and function may be affected prior to the onset of car- tilage degradation in OA individuals. Studies aiming at defining the role of bone marrow lesions/oedema, of altered lipid metabolism, and of identifying early biomarkers will be presented. Evidence from microarray studies of bone tissues and in vitro experiments with OA Ob will underline the role of specific growth factors in OA. Results: Individuals with OA show increases in bone mass at all sites, not just those affected by OA, and they also show increases in body mass indes (BMI). Indeed, obesity is linked with OA, however, biomechanical effects cannot alone explain this link and systemic factors may be at play. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) now shows that bone marrow lesions/oedema can be ob- served in individuals free of OA prior to initiation of the disease and data reveal a link between bone marrow lesions/oedema and lipid metabolism. Abnormal bone marrow and/or bone metabolism could be linked with an abnormal response of Ob to local and/or systemic factors, and especially with an abnormal response to growth factors such as insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), trans- forming growth factor β-1 (TGF-β1), and the Wingless/β-catenin signaling (Wnts). The abnormal response to these factors by OA Ob influences the proliferation, differentiation and mineralization of these cells, possibly explaining the observed sclerosis of OA bone tissue. Moreover, factors released by OA Ob can influence osteoblasts as well as chondrocytes. Last, efforts to determine biomarkers of OA have now uncovered clusters of bone biomark- ers, as well as cartilage biomarkers, that may predict early OA. Conclusions: These results suggest that altered IGF-1, TGF-β1 and Wnt/β-catenin signaling all contribute to abnormal function of OA Ob and are possibly linked to OA pathophysiology. Moreover, altered lipid metabolism may lead to key alterations of bone marrow and thereof to bone tissue and cartilage. Finally, key bone-derived biomarkers, organized into clusters as opposed to single biomarkers, can predict future OA onset in otherwise healthy patients. Hence, these data strongly support a key role for altered bone tissue remodeling in both the initiation and progression of OA. I-13 PAIN INTERFERENCES ON SLEEP IN OAPATIENTS: AN OVERVIEW G. Lavigne Faculte medecine dentaire, U. Montreal and Sacre Coeur Hopsital, Montreal, QC, Canada Purpose: Chronic pain, due to its persistent harassment effect on the nervous and immune systems, is most likely associated with central sensitisation, i.e., intense pain is perceived as the result of alteration to the level of spinal and brainstem cellular networks. Sleep is under the control of brainstem, thalamic and hypothalamic networks. Sleep is a state of lower pain perception that can become very instable in presence of too much interference such as noise, pain, etc (Lavigne, Pain 2000, 2004). Active during wake and pain states, serotonin and noradrenalin neurons are less active during non-REM sleep and nearly silent during REM sleep. This is an OVERVIEW presentation - following sections were fit for requirements of Abst submission Methods: The sleep of pain patients is characterized by high levels of recurrent brief arousals (3-15 second rises in brain with alpha EEG activity, motor and autonomic-cardiac activity) that result in fragmented sleep architecture and are the source of non-restorative sleep complaints (i.e., un-refreshing sensation). 50 to 70 % of musculoskeletal chronic pain patients report non- restorative sleep related complaints. The presence of restorative sleep seems to predict the resolution of chronic widespread pain (CWP; Davies, Rheumatol 2008). A circular model has been proposed to help explain the interaction between pain and sleep: a night with poor sleep can be followed by a day with more intense and variable pain, and a day with pain can be followed by non-restorative sleep. This model is influenced by the patient’s life style, low level of physical fitness, presence of mild (i.e., sub-threshold for diagnosis and treatment) sleep breathing disorders (e.g., apnea/hypopnea; upper airway resistance) or periodic limb movements (PLM). Results: In normal and young subjects, sleep deprivation (4 hours instead of 8 hours) triggers mood alterations and complaints of pain after 3-4 days (Haack and Mullington, Pain 2005). In normal subjects, deprivation of sleep stages 3&4 and REM sleep enhances pain by reducing pain threshold or tolerance (Roehrs, Sleep 2006; Onen, J Sleep Res 2001). The duration of night sleep in most musculoskeletal CWP patients is about 60 minutes less (under 6 hours per night) than that of normal subjects (Okura, Sleep Med 2008; Edwards, Pain 2008). Female patients with CWP present twice as many sleep awak- enings, 25% present less REM sleep duration and 40% lower slow wave power density during sleep. Female CWP patients also spend 2.6 less time in sleep stages 3&4 than CWP male patients. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), sleep duration is in the same range to the one of control subjects (Drewes 1988). Similarly to CWP patients, the presence of intermediate frequency of PLM (about 10 per hr of sleep in RA; control about 1-3 and PLM pa- tients over 20) suggest that sleep fragmentation (with arousal and then Alpha EEG intrusions) may contribute to poor sleep quality perception and sleep instability (Drewes 1988, Okura 2008). Conclusions: The mode of action of medications known to im- prove both pain and sleep complaints (i.e., pregabalin and sodium oxybate in CWP and extended release of opioid or tramadol in OA patients) remains to be described (i.e., specific effect on sleep arousal-instability or continuity or circadian-homeostatic regulation or mood -sleep interferences). Research supported by CIHR, FRSQ, CFI and Canada Res Chair.

I-13 PAIN INTERFERENCES ON SLEEP IN OA PATIENTS: AN OVERVIEW

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: I-13 PAIN INTERFERENCES ON SLEEP IN OA PATIENTS: AN OVERVIEW

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Vol. 17, Supplement 1 S5

I-12

ROLE OF BONE IN THE DEVELOPMENT ANDPROGRESSION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS

D. LajeunesseCRCHUM, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, QC, Canada

Purpose: Altered bone remodeling is now considered important inthe progression and/or initiation of osteoarthritis (OA) both from invivo and in vitro studies. The mechanisms that lead to altered boneremodeling are still largely unknown yet recent studies have keyedinto the mechanisms that may be at play. Altered bone remodelingin OA may be due to the abnormal phenotype and proliferation ofhuman OA osteoblasts (Ob). It may also be linked with abnormalsignaling of key growth factors that modulate both the proliferationand function of Ob. Recent studies using imaging techniques havealso revealed new data on the possible link between bone andlipid metabolism that may impact on OA bone tissue. The presentpresentation will examine the hypothesis of the key role played bybone in OA initiation/progression.Methods: Many studies have demonstrated that the subchondralbone is the site of several dynamic morphological changes thatvary over time during the evoluton of the disease and seem to bepart of the disease process. Here, we reviewed the evidence thatbone tissue and function may be affected prior to the onset of car-tilage degradation in OA individuals. Studies aiming at defining therole of bone marrow lesions/oedema, of altered lipid metabolism,and of identifying early biomarkers will be presented. Evidencefrom microarray studies of bone tissues and in vitro experimentswith OA Ob will underline the role of specific growth factors in OA.Results: Individuals with OA show increases in bone mass at allsites, not just those affected by OA, and they also show increasesin body mass indes (BMI). Indeed, obesity is linked with OA,however, biomechanical effects cannot alone explain this link andsystemic factors may be at play. Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) now shows that bone marrow lesions/oedema can be ob-served in individuals free of OA prior to initiation of the diseaseand data reveal a link between bone marrow lesions/oedema andlipid metabolism. Abnormal bone marrow and/or bone metabolismcould be linked with an abnormal response of Ob to local and/orsystemic factors, and especially with an abnormal response togrowth factors such as insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), trans-forming growth factor β-1 (TGF-β1), and the Wingless/β-cateninsignaling (Wnts). The abnormal response to these factors by OAOb influences the proliferation, differentiation and mineralizationof these cells, possibly explaining the observed sclerosis of OAbone tissue. Moreover, factors released by OA Ob can influenceosteoblasts as well as chondrocytes. Last, efforts to determinebiomarkers of OA have now uncovered clusters of bone biomark-ers, as well as cartilage biomarkers, that may predict early OA.Conclusions: These results suggest that altered IGF-1, TGF-β1and Wnt/β-catenin signaling all contribute to abnormal function ofOA Ob and are possibly linked to OA pathophysiology. Moreover,altered lipid metabolism may lead to key alterations of bonemarrow and thereof to bone tissue and cartilage. Finally, keybone-derived biomarkers, organized into clusters as opposed tosingle biomarkers, can predict future OA onset in otherwise healthypatients. Hence, these data strongly support a key role for alteredbone tissue remodeling in both the initiation and progression ofOA.

I-13

PAIN INTERFERENCES ON SLEEP IN OA PATIENTS: ANOVERVIEW

G. LavigneFaculte medecine dentaire, U. Montreal and Sacre CoeurHopsital, Montreal, QC, Canada

Purpose: Chronic pain, due to its persistent harassment effecton the nervous and immune systems, is most likely associatedwith central sensitisation, i.e., intense pain is perceived as theresult of alteration to the level of spinal and brainstem cellularnetworks. Sleep is under the control of brainstem, thalamic andhypothalamic networks. Sleep is a state of lower pain perceptionthat can become very instable in presence of too much interferencesuch as noise, pain, etc (Lavigne, Pain 2000, 2004). Active duringwake and pain states, serotonin and noradrenalin neurons areless active during non-REM sleep and nearly silent during REMsleep.This is an OVERVIEW presentation - following sections were fit forrequirements of Abst submissionMethods: The sleep of pain patients is characterized by highlevels of recurrent brief arousals (3-15 second rises in brain withalpha EEG activity, motor and autonomic-cardiac activity) thatresult in fragmented sleep architecture and are the source ofnon-restorative sleep complaints (i.e., un-refreshing sensation).50 to 70 % of musculoskeletal chronic pain patients report non-restorative sleep related complaints. The presence of restorativesleep seems to predict the resolution of chronic widespread pain(CWP; Davies, Rheumatol 2008).A circular model has been proposed to help explain the interactionbetween pain and sleep: a night with poor sleep can be followedby a day with more intense and variable pain, and a day withpain can be followed by non-restorative sleep. This model isinfluenced by the patient’s life style, low level of physical fitness,presence of mild (i.e., sub-threshold for diagnosis and treatment)sleep breathing disorders (e.g., apnea/hypopnea; upper airwayresistance) or periodic limb movements (PLM).Results: In normal and young subjects, sleep deprivation (4 hoursinstead of 8 hours) triggers mood alterations and complaintsof pain after 3-4 days (Haack and Mullington, Pain 2005). Innormal subjects, deprivation of sleep stages 3&4 and REM sleepenhances pain by reducing pain threshold or tolerance (Roehrs,Sleep 2006; Onen, J Sleep Res 2001).The duration of night sleep in most musculoskeletal CWP patientsis about 60 minutes less (under 6 hours per night) than that ofnormal subjects (Okura, Sleep Med 2008; Edwards, Pain 2008).Female patients with CWP present twice as many sleep awak-enings, 25% present less REM sleep duration and 40% lowerslow wave power density during sleep. Female CWP patients alsospend 2.6 less time in sleep stages 3&4 than CWP male patients.In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), sleep duration is in thesame range to the one of control subjects (Drewes 1988). Similarlyto CWP patients, the presence of intermediate frequency of PLM(about 10 per hr of sleep in RA; control about 1-3 and PLM pa-tients over 20) suggest that sleep fragmentation (with arousal andthen Alpha EEG intrusions) may contribute to poor sleep qualityperception and sleep instability (Drewes 1988, Okura 2008).Conclusions: The mode of action of medications known to im-prove both pain and sleep complaints (i.e., pregabalin and sodiumoxybate in CWP and extended release of opioid or tramadol inOA patients) remains to be described (i.e., specific effect on sleeparousal-instability or continuity or circadian-homeostatic regulationor mood -sleep interferences).Research supported by CIHR, FRSQ, CFI and Canada Res Chair.