36
Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? David A. Pearson, MD, MS Associate Professor Director of Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Carolinas HealthCare System

Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest:

Where Are We Now?

David A. Pearson, MD, MS

Associate Professor

Director of Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

Carolinas HealthCare System

Page 2: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

2

Disclosures

I have no financial

interest,

arrangement, or

affiliations and no

commercial

interests, ties, or

grants related to

material covered in

this lecture.

Page 3: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

3

Objectives

• Institute of Medicine (IOM) Report & AHA 2015 Updates

• Targeted temperature management

• Regionalization & Systems of care: Code Cool

Page 4: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

8 Ways To Improve Survival:

1. Establish a national cardiac arrest registry.

2. Foster a culture of action through public awareness and training.

3. Enhance the capabilities and performance of EMS systems.

4. Set national accreditation standards related to cardiac arrest for

hospitals and health care systems.

5. Adopt continuous quality improvement programs.

6. Accelerate research on pathophysiology, new therapies, and

translation of science for cardiac arrest.

7. Accelerate research on evaluation & adoption of CA therapies.

8. Create a national cardiac arrest collaborative.

4

Page 5: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

AHA 2015: IHCA & OHCA Chains of Survival

5

Page 6: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

6 Safar P, 1961.

Page 7: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

7

Pre-Hospital Cooling

Page 8: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

AHA 2015: Pre-hospital Cooling

8

Page 9: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

• 1359 patients (583 with VF, 776 without VF)

• Decreased core temp by 1.20°C & 1.30°C

• No difference in survival or neurological status

• Re-arrest in field, pulmonary edema, diuretic use

higher w/ cold IVF (26% vs 21%, p=.008) Kim et al. JAMA 2013.

Page 10: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

Pre-hospital Cooling: North Carolina

• 847 patients in 2012

• 55% received pre-hospital hypothermia

• Pre-hospital initiation of hypothermia: OR 1.55

• Improved neuro outcome @ discharge: OR 1.56

10

Rao MP et al. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016

Page 11: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

Intra-Arrest Cooling

• Trans-nasal evaporative cooling, ice packs, cold IVF

• Improves defibrillation success?

• Mortality & neurological outcome?

11

Page 12: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

TARGETED TEMPERATURE

MANAGEMENT

Page 13: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

AHA 2015 Guidelines:

Targeted Temperature Management

13

Page 14: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

14

Landmark Trials

Page 15: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

15

Europe

• RCT n=275, 9 centers

• OOH witnessed VT/VF

• ROSC < 60min

• No purposeful response

• MAP > 80 mmHg

• 24 hr cooling to 32-34C

Australia

• RCT n=77, 4 centers

• OOH witnessed VF

• ROSC

• GCS < 7

• Pre-hospital cooling

• 12 hr cooling to 33C

HACA Study Group. NEJM 2002. Bernard SA, et al. NEJM 2002.

Landmark Trials

Page 16: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

Survival with Good Neuro Outcome

Page 17: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

• 939 comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients

• Randomly assigned: 33°C vs 36°C

• Outcomes:

– All-cause mortality

– Poor neurological function at 180 days

Nielsen et al. NEJM. 2013.

Page 18: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

Survival with Good Neuro Outcome

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

HACA Australian TTM

33°C

Not 33°C

Page 19: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated
Page 20: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

• 950 unconscious adults 939 included

• Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

• MMSE 6 months after cardiac arrest

• No difference with 33C vs 36C

• 66.5% at 33C vs 61.8% at 36C (p=0.32) with complete

mental recovery

20

Page 21: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

• 26,183 patients: Mar 2002 – Dec 2014

• 1568 (6%) treated with therapeutic hypothermia

• TH associated with LOWER in-hospital survival

(27.4% vs 29.2%; 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.97)

• TH associated with LOWER favorable neuro survival

(17.0% vs 20.5%; 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.90)

21

Page 22: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

Cool Questions

• Optimal time to initiate cooling?

• Optimal method of cooling?

• Optimal rate of cooling?

• Optimal temperature?

• Optimal duration?

22

Page 23: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

AHA 2015 Guidelines

23

Page 24: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

AHA 2015 Guidelines

24

Page 25: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

25

Minneapolis Experience

• 140 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients

• ROSC < 60 minutes

• Included: any initial rhythm, HD instability, STEMI

• Excluded: DNR, active bleeding, comatose before arrest

• 51% good neurological outcome

Mooney, et al. Circulation. 2011.

Page 26: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

26

CMC Experience

• Local: 46% good neurological outcome

• Referred: 39% good neurological outcome

Heffner, et al. AHJ. 2012.

Page 27: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

27

Japanese Experience

• Second link (early defibrillation) most important

• Fifth link (multidisciplinary post-resuscitation care in a

regional center) next most important

Page 28: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

28

Page 29: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

AHA-Recommended Hospital Designation

Level I Center:

Cardiac Resuscitation

Center

• Hypothermia

• PCI

• Critical care

• AICD assessment &

placement

Level II Center:

Cardiac Resuscitation

Center

• Resuscitate

• Initiate cooling

• Transfer

29

Page 30: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

30

Page 31: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

TTM - Stages

1. Induction

– Infuse 30 mL/kg 4◦C NS IV rapid bolus

• Typically 2500 mL

– 15 ice packs to axilla, groin, neck, torso

– Administer paralytic IV push

– Initiate device (surface or internal)

2. Maintenance

– Achieve goal temperature of 33◦C

– 36◦C for relative contraindications or cooling intolerance

– Maintain for 24 hours

3. Rewarming

– Controlled: < 0.5°C/hour

4. Controlled normothermia

Page 32: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

Induction Maintenance

• Surface (noninvasive)

• Medivance® (now Bard Medical)

• Arctic Sun® 2000, 5000

• Internal (invasive)

• Zoll IVTM™ catheter

• Quattro®, Icy®, Cool Line®

Page 33: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Jan - June2014

Code Cool Neurologic Outcome for Witnessed, Shockable

Arrest Patients 2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target*

33

Baseline: 50.7%

Target: 53.2%

*Includes all patients activated as “code cool” through the Physician Connection Line

*Good neurologic outcome is defined as a CPC score of “1” or “2”

Stretch: 55.8%

Page 34: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

Good Neuro Outcome: Witnessed

Shockable Arrests

34

Page 35: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

Final Thoughts

• Pre-hospital Cooling

• Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest – Cooling

• In-hospital Cardiac Arrest – Cooling

• Regionalization

35

Page 36: Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now? Cool 2016...2013/2014 Performance with 2015 Baseline and Target* 33 Baseline: 50.7% Target: 53.2% *Includes all patients activated

Questions?