Hydrographic Surveying Datums &Tides Why Multibeam?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Hydrographic Surveying Datums &Tides Why Multibeam?
  • Slide 3
  • Datums and Tides Mean Low Tide versus Mean Lower Low Water And the winner is.!
  • Slide 4
  • The following slide is taken directly from the NOAA/TCOON web sites pages that gives the official relationships for the various Sea Level Datums (Mean Sea Level and its various statistical offsets) and the Land (Terrestrial) Datums (NAVD88 and Mean Low Tide) for the Rainbow Bridge on the Neches River Channel. This location has been chosen because it is one of the (currently) few NOAA tide gauge sites for which data is available in real time on the internet, and has published the relationship between the Sea and Terrestrial datums. One thing should be borne in mind. Mean Sea Level changes both by location around the coastline of the U.S. and over long periods of time. The relationships at the Rainbow Bridge do NOT hold true anywhere else - although the differences MAY be minor.
  • Slide 5
  • Courtesy TCOON Web Site The relationships shown here are given reference to an arbitrary station datum. Following slides have changed this to make things relative to Mean Low Low Water via high level math (addition and subtraction!!) See slide #12 and #13 for definitions of these datums. NAVD 88 elevation updated 5/2013, stated accuracy is 0.028m (about 1 inch). These datums are marked preliminary until the 2013 levels are run.
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Confused? Lets Try an Example!
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • NOAA Tides & Currents Web Page
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • SIMPLE! Take two aspirin and call 713-690-4626, ask for Chris or Mike and have your credit card ready! Just joking about the credit card!
  • Slide 12
  • The following are provided for reference purposes - if you are feeling bold.
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Links http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/datum_options.html http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/tidal_datums_and_their_application s.pdf http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/datums/vertical/VerticalDatums.shtml http://www.cbi.tamucc.edu/cbi/data http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/
  • Slide 18
  • R2Sonic 2024Odom MB-1 Reson 7125 Geoacoustics Geoswath Edgetech 4600 Swath/Sidescan And new 2020 Why Multibeam?
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Bottom Elevation Contour Chart (Multibeam) Example #1
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Bottom Elevation Contour Chart (Single Beam) Survey Lines (Single Beam) Channel Centerline Dock Face
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Bottom Elevation Surface Chart (Multibeam)
  • Slide 27
  • Example #2
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Multibeam Surveys are faster to execute, especially for larger areas and in the case of busy docks. They give 100% bottom coverage (single beam surveys at 50 feet spacing give only 28%!) The data can still be sectioned and volumes calculated by the average end area method but we can now also use a full terrain modelling approach. New system can beam-steer and look up under docks, moored barges or shallow draft vessels (depending on space between the hull and bottom) Some systems also provide sidescan sonar type imagery from the amplitude returns (not as good as a specialist sidescan sonar but no co-location issues) More expensive than single beam (30 to 50%) Data takes longer to edit and produce final deliverables
  • Slide 31