96
University of California at Berkeley Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame Tony Yang and Andreas Schellenberg

Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

University of California at Berkeley Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation

Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

Tony Yang and Andreas Schellenberg

Page 2: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

2

Example of the hybrid simulation test. NEES suspended zipper brace frame test.

OpenSees Navigator Graphic user interface for OpenSees.

Example application Three span bridge, Two story Shear,…

Introduction

Page 3: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

3

6 m

4 m

4 m

4 m

Inverted-V Braced Frame Suspended Zipper

Page 4: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

4

Buffalo Shaking Table Test

Page 5: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

5

GT Quasi-Static Test

Experimental Testing Analytical Simulation

Page 6: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

6

CUB Hybrid Simulation Test

Page 7: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

7

Combine OpenSees with experimental elements Nonlinear buckling behavior accounted in both

analytical and experimental elements Analytical simulation of the brace Modeling the analytical brace using OpenSees Component testing of the brace sub-assembly

Hybrid simulation of the frame Experimental Testing Architecture New Experimental Framework Solution Algorithm

Challenge of the zipper frame test

Page 8: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

8

Analytical simulation of the brace

Modeling of the analytical brace

Page 9: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

9

Analytical simulation of the brace Brace behavior under cyclic displacement loading

Page 10: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

10

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 -200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

Disp

LocF

orc

IncSine load New2

LocForc(2,4)

Analytical brace Hysteresis loop (Analytical)

Page 11: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

11

Analytical simulation of the brace Modeling the analytical brace using OpenSees

Quasi-Static testing of the brace Component testing of the brace sub-assembly

Hybrid simulation of the frame Analytical model + experimental sub-assembly

Scope of the test

Page 12: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

12

Test Setup

Page 13: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

13

Instrumentation

Page 14: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

14

Instrumentation

Page 15: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

15

Instrumentation

Page 16: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

16

Quasi-Static Test

Page 17: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

17

Loading History

Page 18: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

18

Page 19: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

19

Damaged Specimen

Page 20: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

20

Movie – Out Of Plane Buckling

Page 21: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

21

Movie – Gusset Plate

Page 22: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

22

5%

5%

Page 23: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

23

Brace Axial Forces

0.75 % inter-story drift ratio

Page 24: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

24

Unbalanced Forces

Page 25: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

25

Beam Rotation

Page 26: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

26

Close Up View of the Braces

Page 27: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

27

More Photos

Page 28: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

28

OpenSees Model

Page 29: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

29

Brace Hysteresis

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150Brace 1 hysteresis

Nor

mal

ized

axi

l for

ce [%

]

ExperimentAnalytical

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150Brace 2 hysteresis

Nor

mal

ized

axi

l for

ce [%

]

Axial deformation/Lbrace [%]

ExperimentAnalytical

Page 30: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

30

Analytical simulation of the brace Modeling the analytical brace using OpenSees

Quasi-Static testing of the brace Component testing of the brace sub-assembly

Hybrid simulation of the frame Analytical model + experimental sub-assembly

Scope of the Test

Page 31: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

31

Equations of Motion

( ) ,Pr ,n n n n g nM u C u u u M uι+ + = −

Page 32: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

32

Solution Algorithm Newmark integration method

21 1

12n n n n nu u hu h u uβ β+ +

= + + − +

( )( )1 11n n n nu u h u uγ γ+ += + − +

γ and β are constant coefficients

When γ = 1/2 and β = 1/4 (average acceleration method) When γ = 1/2 and β = 1/6 (linear acceleration method)

Page 33: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

33

Solution Algorithm Newmark integration method

( )1 1 1 1 , 1Pr ,n n n n g nM u C u u u M uι+ + + + ++ + = −

( ) ( )

( )

( )

2

1

1 1 1 12

1 12

Pr , , , 0

n n n

n n n

n n n n

F u M u u u uh h

C u u u h uh

u u u u P

β β β

γ γ γβ β β

+

= − − − −

+ − − − − −

+ − =

Page 34: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

34

Experimental Testing Architecture

Page 35: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

35

Transform DOF (displacement)

Page 36: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

36

Transform DOF (displacement)

Equation 3

Page 37: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

37

Damaged Specimen (100% LA22YY)

Page 38: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

38

Movie – LA22YY(200%)

Page 39: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

39

Movie – Out Of Plane Buckling

Page 40: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

40

Hybrid Simulation Results

Page 41: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

41

Hybrid Simulation Results

Page 42: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

42

Hybrid Simulation Results

Page 43: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

43

Hybrid Simulation Results

Page 44: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

44

Analytical Verification

Page 45: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

45

OpenSees Verification

Page 46: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

46

OpenSees Verification

Page 47: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

47

OpenSees Verification

Page 48: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

48

Distributed Hybrid Simulation

Page 49: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

49

System evaluation of the suspended zipper frame Analytical simulation of the brace Modeling the analytical brace using OpenSees

Quasi-Static testing of the brace Component testing of the brace sub-assembly

Hybrid simulation test Analytical model + experimental sub-assembly

Summary

Page 50: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

50

Results of the hybrid simulation Excellent match between the hybrid simulation

results and analytical simulation. Good analytical brace model and experimental

testing. Solution algorithm and experimental testing

architecture works.

Conclusion

Page 51: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

51

Application of hybrid simulation test Can be used to test multiple sub-assemblies. Larger and more complex structural system. More extreme loading.

Conclusion cont.

Page 52: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

52

Behavior of the suspended zipper frame Behave as intended. Many redundancies. Brace buckled of out plane. Zipper column effective transferring. unbalanced

load. Inter-story drift ratio & permanent story drifts. Rotates the beam. Need to be braced. Axial forces in columns to the support.

Conclusion cont.

Page 53: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

53

Page 54: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

54

Stick Model

Beam Model

Moment Frame

Inverted-V Braced Frame

EBF Model Zipper Frame Shell & Plate

Page 55: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

55

Page 56: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

56

Page 57: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

57

Page 58: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

58

Page 59: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

59

Page 60: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

60

Page 61: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

61

Page 62: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

62

Page 63: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

63

Page 64: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

64

OpenSees Navigator

Define Material: Uniaxial Materials:

Steel01/Steel02 EPP/Elastic/Hysteric Hardening Material Concrete01/Concrete02/Concrete03 ….

nD Materials:

Elastic Isotropic Plane Stress ….

Page 65: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

65

OpenSees Navigator

Define Uniaxial Material: Steel01

Fy = 50 ksi

E = 29000 ksi

b = 0.05

Name : A50

Page 66: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

66

Page 67: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

67

Page 68: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

68

Page 69: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

69

Page 70: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

70

Page 71: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

71

OpenSees Navigator

Define Element: Line Element:

Truss Elastic Beam Column Nonlinear Beam Column Zero Length Element ….

Solid Element:

Quad Shell ….

Page 72: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

72

Define Force Beam Column Element

Page 73: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

73

Define Elastic Beam Column Element

Page 74: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

74

OpenSees Navigator Define:

Geometry Material

Section

Element

Loading

Recorder

Assign:

Element

Loading

Analysis Option

Page 75: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

75

To Run OpenSees

Steps:

1. Write OpenSees Input Files (writes TCL files)

2. Save OpenSees.exe Path (needs to be done only once)

3. Run OpenSees

Page 76: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

76

Mode Shape: 1st Mode

Animation Speed AnalysisCase Recorder Mode Magnification

Page 77: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

77

Mode Shape: 3rd Mode

Animation Speed AnalysisCase Recorder Mode Magnification

Page 78: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

78

Deformed Shape

Time Step AnalysisCase Recorder Order Magnification

Page 79: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

79

Response

Parameter AnalysisCase Recorder Node/Elem DOF

Page 80: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

80

Hysteresis Loops

Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis

Page 81: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

81

Hybrid Simulation Example

Experimental ChevronBrace

Element

Page 82: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

82

Define Experimental Control Templates:

-dSpace 1104

-xPC Target

(-SCRAMNET 150)

-BeamColumnSim

-ChevronBraceSim

Page 83: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

83

Define ExpControl: xPC Target

Page 84: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

84

Define Experimental Setup

Templates:

-OneActuator

-TwoActuators

-ThreeActuators

-ChevronBrace

-ChevronBraceJntOff

Page 85: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

85

Define ExpSetup: ChevronBrace

Page 86: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

86

Define Experimental Site Templates:

-LocalSite

-RemoteSite

-NEESExprSite

Page 87: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

87

Define ExpSite: RFS

Page 88: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

88

Define ExpElement: ChevronBrace

Page 89: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

89

Modify Analysis Options

Integrator Type:

Use AlphaOS Method for Hybrid Simulation

Solution Algorithm:

The AlphaOS Method requires a Linear solution algorithm

Page 90: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

90

Mode Shape: 1st Mode

Animation Speed AnalysisCase Recorder Mode Magnification

Page 91: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

91

Response

Parameter AnalysisCase Recorder Node/Elem DOF

Page 92: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

92

Application Examples 1) Three-Span-Bridge

4,8

3

7

2

6 1,5

42

54

108 108 108

Experimental BeamColumn

Properties of Model: • num. DOF = 12 (4 with mass) • Period: T1 = 0.918sec • Damping: ζ1 = 0.02 • ExpElement: EEBeamColumn2d • ExpSetup: ESOneActuator • ExpControl: ECxPCtarget

Page 93: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

93

Application Examples 2) Two-Story-Shear

Properties of Model: • num. DOF = 14 (6 with mass) • Period: T1 = 0.618sec T2 = 0.236sec • Damping: ζ1 = 0.02 • ExpElements: EEBeamColumn2d • ExpSetups: ESOneActuator • ExpControl: ECxPCtarget

1

3

5 6

2

4

7

8

10 11

9

12

108

108

216

Experimental BeamColumn

Page 94: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

94

Application Examples 3) Two-Story-Frame

Properties of Model: • num. DOF = 28 (4 with mass) • Period: T1 = 0.473sec T2 = 0.071sec • Damping: ζ1 = 0.02 • ExpElements: EEBeamColumn2d • ExpSetups: ESOneActuator • ExpControl: ECxPCtarget

1

3

5 6

2

4

7

8

10 11

9

12

54

54

108

Experimental BeamColumn

Page 95: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

95

A hybrid simulation test has been conducted. Close match between the analytical and

experimental results verifies the applicability of the experiment method.

Graphical user interface creates the OpenSees hybrid model and graphically displays results before, during and after a test. Three additional examples of hybrid simulation test presented.

Conclusion

Page 96: Hybrid Simulation Evaluation of the Suspended Zipper Frame

Thank you!

Development and operation of the nees@berkeley Equipment Site is sponsored by NSF George E. Brown Jr. NEES grants.

http://nees.berkeley.edu http://peer.berkeley.edu/~yang/NEESZipper/ http://peer.berkeley.edu/OpenSeesNavigator/