Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HUMR5140 Introduction to Human Rights Law
Autumn 2012
Lecture 3:
International Bill of Rights
Outline
1. Development of human rights in law:
Idealisation, positivisation, realisation
2. What is the “International Bill of
Rights”?
3. The typology of States’ obligations
4. “Absolute” vs. “relative” rights
5. Immediate vs. progressive realisation
Phase 1:
The development of human rights
Three phases
Normativisation
and realisation
Positivisation
Idealisation
Re-idealisation
Human Rights Law Enjoyment
of Life –
Rule of
Law
Fear and
Want –
Rule by
Power
Phase 1:
Idealisation
Phase 2:
Positivisation
Phase 3:
Realisation
Phase 2: Positivisation
The transformation of
ideals into normative
standards
Important step:
UDHR 1948
…but was it the first step?
Early norms pertaining
to conduct during
armed conflicts
From ancient times
to 1900
Early 20th Century
Phase 2: Positivisation
…but was it the first step?
Code of
Hammurabi,
1700 BC
Magna Carta,
1215
Peace of
Augsburg, 1555
Habeas Corpus
Act, 1679
English Bill of
Rights, 1688
US Declaration of
Independence,
1776
French «Rights of
Man», 1789
A necessary sidestep:
Three «generations» First generation:
• Civil and political rights
• Liberté
Second generation:
• Economic, social and
cultural rights
• Egalité
Third generation:
• Group and collective
rights
• Fraternité
Fourth generation?
Phase 2: Positivisation
Early 20th Century
Attempted positivisation
with the League of Nations
• Minority rights
• Right to health
• Anti-slavery
• Women’s rights
• Labour rights
Phase 2: Positivisation
20th Century Economic collapse Early 20th Century
Phase 2: Positivisation
20th Century Devastation of World War II
Dresden, Germany
London, UK
Shanghai, China
Manilla, The Philippines
Phase 2: Positivisation
20th Century Brutality of the State
Nanking massacre
Japanese forces burying prisoners alive
German forces detain and
kill undesirable citizens
German Program to
kill handicapped
people because they
were ‘costly’ to
Taxpayers – ‘life
unworthy of living’
Phase 2: Positivisation
20th Century The destructive power of
States demonstrated
USA Atomic Bombing of
Hiroshima in 1945
First Soviet Test of an
Atomic Bomb in 1949
First Chinese Test of an
Atomic Bomb in 1964
Phase 2: Positivisation
20th Century
Modern
positivisation
After World War II The UN Charter
San Francisco Conference
Drafting of the UN Charter (1945)
1st Session of the UN General Assembly
Central Hall in London (10 Jan 1946)
Phase 2: Modern
positivisation
After World War II The UN Charter
Determined … to reaffirm faith in
fundamental human rights
The purposes of the United Nations are … To achieve
international co-operation in … promoting and encouraging
respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all
without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion;
Preamble
Art. 1
Arts. 55
and 56
The United Nations shall promote … universal
respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental
freedoms for all without distinction
as to race, sex, language, or religion.
All Members pledge themselves to take joint and separate
action in co-operation with the Organization for the
achievement of the purposes set forth in Article 55.
Phase 2: Modern
positivisation
After World War II The Universal Declaration
of Human Rights (1948)
P.C. Chang from China, Eleanor Roosevelt from
USA, John Humphrey from Canada (of UN
Secretariat), Charles Malik from Lebanon,
Vladimir Koretsky from the USSR
Renè Cassin from France
The UN General Assembly
unanimously proclaimed the
UDHR as a ”common standard
of achievement”
Phase 2: Modern
positivisation
After World War II The Universal Declaration
of Human Rights (1948)
Content? Both CivPol and
EcoSocCul rights
Legal status? UNGA resolution,
legally non-binding
International
customary law
Art. 1: All human
beings are born
free and equal
Art. 2: The basic
principle of
non-discrimination
Arts. 3-21:
Civil and political
rights
Arts. 22-27:
Economic, social
and cultural rights ICCPR ICESCR
Bridged the gap between
CP and ESC rights
Phase 2: Modern
positivisation
• A “World Court for Human Rights”?
• The recognition of grave human rights violations as a justification for intervention
• Individual international responsibility for violations of human rights law
• The responsibility of non-state actors
• NCHR research project: The legitimacy of multi-level human rights judiciary
• The “legalisation” of international relations
• The fragmentation of human rights tribunals
• A focus on the “wrong” human rights…?
Positivisation and
realisation: Some
challenges and
developments