Upload
lakusaba
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
1/20
Seminar presented as part of HRP-013N-E.S.&HRM :Issues and Practice
Topic: "Employee involvement, social partnership andHRM-working together or just a new form of
management control?.
Adebiyi, Yomi
Agyei-Otoo, DouglasOsuntubo,Adebusola
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
2/20
Table of Contents
Introduction
HRM Concept
Social Partnership Concept
Employment Involvement
Critique and Conclusion
2
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
3/20
Introduction - Human resource management (HRM) is a relatively modern
label for the range of themes and practices involved in managing people. It is definedand described in a variety of (sometimes contradictory) ways.
Many people find HRM to be a vague and elusive concept - not least because it seemsto have a variety of meanings. Pinning down an acceptable definition can seem liketrying to hit a moving target in a fog.
3
Factors that contributed to the development of HRM
Started in the US( Harvard Business School)
Restructuring of industry and new types of workersDecline in trade union power
Thatcher philosophy: attraction to the US and American approach to
Decline in collectivism
Re- assurgency of managerial prerogative
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
4/20
Four Models
y Normative: The optimum utilisation of human recourses in pursuit of
organisational goals
y Descriptive - functional: Pluralist perspective
y Critical - evaluative model: Employer Power which is exploitative rather than
regulatory
y Descriptive behavioural: largely a collection of incidental techniques withoutmuch internal cohesion (Legge,1995)
4
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
5/20
Some Definitions of HRMy HRM is regarded as simply a notion of how people can best be managed in the
interest of the organisation.( Armstrong, 1994)
y HRM involves all management decisions and actions that affect the relationshipbetween the organisation and employees- its human resources.(Beer et al 1994)
y This slippery thing that mean different things to different people. (Legge,1995)
Defining Characteristics of HRMy Strategic Integration
y Commitment
y Flexibility
y Quality
5
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
6/20
Resulting in:
y Quality Management
y Quality Communication
y Sophisticated R & S Processes
y Changes in Organisational Culture
y Changes in IR/ER Approach/emphasis
HRM Hard and Softy Hard HRM focuses on the links between business and HR strategies and the crucial
importance of the tight fit between the employee and the employer
y Soft HRM focuses on the management of resourceful humans assuming the employees are
valued assets and a source of competitive advantage through their skills and abilities
y Soft HRM in Japanese organisations and other foreign owned companies, Public Sector
y Pick mix other private sector organisations
6
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
7/20
Critique of HRM
7
y In embracing HRM, managers may have to relinquish any claim to being the guardians of
"humane" human resource management. People will only come first when it economically
advantageous to pursue such a strategy (Keenoy, 1990).
y Keenoy (1990) suggests HRM are "managers of discontent".
As regulators of the employment relationship the role of HRM has frequently been seen as aone of managing the inherent tension and conflict between the imperatives of the market, the
organisational demands for control of employees and the individual needs of people in work.
Vaughan (1994) purports that HRM is as driven by the contradictions of controlling workerswhilst generating consent.
y Legge (1995) explains that there is not one language of HRM, but two, "soft" HRM and"hard" HRM. These are reconciled through the language of 'tough love', which seeks to co-opt
the assent of both those who may suffer as well as those who may benefit from its effects.Consequently downsizing is described as a strategy that sacrifices a few to save the majority
and employability disguises a loss of employment security.
y Argyris and Kaplan (1994) suggest mixed messages such as this are a
y dysfunctional defensive routine used to protect from embarrassment and inhibit the discussion
of the underlying causes of embarrassment. They also protect individuals from feelingresponsible for the consequences. This behaviour controls others, avoids confrontation and
maximizes safety. However, they also lead to ineffective decision and policy making.
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
8/20
8
HR and Employee Involvement in Practice
Marchington (2001) sees employee involvement as a feature of soft rather than hard HRM. In firmswith a hard orientation, Marchington considers that the 'numbers-driven', cost-cutting mentality
reduces involvement to a one-way communication channel aimed at
transmitting management decisions and propaganda to staff.
This contrasts with organizations that are true believers in employees as their 'greatest asset'
where there is a strategic commitment to sharing information and opinions and achieving aworkplace culture that meets business needs. Peccei and Rosenthal (2001)
examined attempts to engender desirable customer-oriented behaviours among employees in the
context of a major change initiative in a retail company.
The change programme followed (by now) orthodox management theory which assumed that
management behaviour, job design and values-based training would produce a feeling ofempowerment among employees, and that this sense of empowerment would lead to customer-
oriented behaviour.
A large-scale employee survey showed that staff who took a positive view of managementbehaviour and who had also participated in values-based training were more likely to feelempowered. In turn, Peccei and Rosenthal found a positive relationship between psychologicalempowerment and customer-oriented behaviour
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
9/20
9
HR , Organisational Climate & Employee Involvement
y According to Shadar, Kienzle and Rodwell , one of the key factors that may influenceemployees perceptions of involvement is organizational climate.
y The authors argue that employee involvement is composed of three essential variables,namely, participation in decision making, teamwork, and communications.
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
10/20
10
SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP
According to Marchington & Wilkinson (2008) academics definedpartnership to centre on co-operation for mutual gain On the other
hand (Braton & Gold, 2007) defines social partnership at the workplace
level as the term given to agreements to ensure flexibility in
employment relations in return for employee involvement.
Armstrong (2009) asserted that social partnership is a concept whereall stakeholders (employees, shareholders, customers, community and
government) involved in employment relations intend to work in one
accord to the benefit of all. He quoted (Ackers & Payne, 1998) to define
social Partnership as a stable, collaborative relationship between
capital and labour to ensure minimum level of social conflict and direct
employee involvement on decision making through strong collectivebargaining.
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
11/20
11
CHARACTERISTICSOFSP
It acknowledges that workers have different interest from mangers.
It encourages their representation and its believes such an approach can be effective in
regulating work and the labour market.
Partnership can be viewed at different levels eg. European, National, Sectoral andEnterprise.
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
12/20
12
LEVELS OF PARTNERSHIP
This can be seen at task, departmental, establishment or
corporate.
It advocates participation as an extension of employee citizenship
rights and not just business expedience
(Marchington & Wilkinson, 2005)
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
13/20
13
ANTI-PARTNERSHIP
On the contrary, the London Underground and the National Railway Network union have
explicitly rejected the social partnership in favour of the repeated threat and use of strikes onissues such as pay, working conditions, pensions and the effects of privatization (Capital and
Class).
The national union of Rail Maritime and Transport Workers is one the most militant andleft-Wing trade unions in Britain.RMT between 2000-2008
1.balloted not less than 50 different industrial action and engaged in 18 different strikes on
London Underground.
2.On the Railway Network there were 68 balloted industrial actions and engaged in 33different strikes. Such an approach has contributed to a growth of 37.3% (56,037 to 75,939)
from 1999-2007.
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
14/20
:
14
Employee Involvement
What is Employee Involvement?
Employee involvement is creating an environment in which people have animpact on decisions and actions that affect their jobs. It is a management and
leadership philosophy about how people are most enabled to contribute tocontinuous improvement and the
ongoing success of their work organization.
Susan M. Heathfield.
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
15/20
15
Marchington (2001) considers that EI became prominent in the 1980s as an attempt to findparticipative ways in which to manage staff.The context initially was reduced union power and an anti-corporatist Thatcher government,which resisted statutory blueprints and encouraged firms to evolve the arrangements whichbest suited them.
It was management initiated, often from outside the industrial relations sphere; and with
scant reference of trade unions.It was individualist, stressed direct communications with individual employees.Employee Involvement in its limited form could be characterised as a move away form youwill do this to this is why you will do this (Wilkinson et al 1993).EI imply a neo-unitarist win/win approach which is moralistic in tone and is represented as
squaring the circle of organisation needs for high levels of employee performance and
employees demand for autonomy and self-expression in work( Claydon &Doyle 1996)Guest(1986) states Involvement is considered to be more flexible and better geared to thegoal of securing commitment and shared interest.
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
16/20
16
Marching ton (2001) sees EI as feature of soft rather than hard HRM. Such organizationsare true believers in employees as their greatest asset where there is a strategic commitmentto sharing information and opinions& achieving a workplace culture that meets business
need. The UkWork and Employee Relations Survey(WERS) (Cully et al. 1999) showedthat even in firms that recognized trade unions, managers consulted individual
employees(57%) in preference to union representatives(36%). In fact , 41% of thecompanies surveyed did not have any union involvement but a mere 8% stated that they
never involved individuals employees. The 2004 WERS confirmed the growth in EIP andcommunication.
Management Theorists have put forward some reasons for adopting EI by the Senior
Management. They includeEthical, political and moral base, argument being that, in a democratic society, workers
should be involved in the decision-making process when outcome of those decisions impacton their lives. It therefore provides a socially acceptable management style.Economic reason, championed by the model of excellence school in North America, derives
form the utilitarian principle that EI improves the quality of decision making and productivity.
(Verma and Taras,2001) energises workers.
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
17/20
17
Behavioural- EI derives from the perennial managerial problems associated with perceived
dysfunctional behaviour: resistance to change, strikes, absenteeism and other forms ofconflict(Beer et al., 1984; Guest, 1986). EI is seen as a solution to these dysfunctional human
behaviours.Practical- An acknowledgment of the greater & more detailed knowledge that experienced
employees may have of specific process when compared with a manager who may be relativelynew or who has never been involved at a working level with those processes. Skilled workersmay be aware of implications that are invisible to the manager.Legal- Authority of managers may be constrained by an organisations own rules in the form
of company handbooks, job definitions, reporting paths & consultation procedures so thatthe involvement of employees in decision making cannot be avoided. Most companies have
employment regulations in place that rights of employees within a legal context. These rightsare set individually& collectively so that employers and managers do not have total discretion
over consultation & to a lesser extent involvement.
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
18/20
18
FORMSOF EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT
Effective EI comprises most if not all of the following elements,Effective & continuing 2-way communication between management and employees, especially
about the organisations objectives and its progress towards reaching them;
Financial Involvement includes share ownership plans, tax incentives;Upward problem solving designed to tap into employee knowledge & opinion ;Quality circles volunteers coming together to discuss problems associated with their work and
develop solutions ;Extended consultation such as suggestion schemes, staff attitude surveys, works committees ;
Cross-functional teams;
Self directed teams;Collective bargaining;Worker directors;
Works councils.Developing individuals through training, performance management, staff appraisals,Community development circles are also suggested such as projects like helping small businesses,
providing work experience to the community, helping to improve local environment by installinglitter bins, planting trees etc.
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
19/20
19
BENEFITS
Improved Performance and ProductivityImproved Quality and Customer Care- a 55% reduction in customer complaints wasachieved by a large manufacturing company; another increased on-time deliveries from
60% to 65%.
A more cooperative atmosphere in the workplace- reduced costs and increased profitsenabled many companies to make resources available to improve employees terms andconditions of employment.Reduced staff turnover-most companies reported an increase in employee satisfaction;Reduced lost time through absenteeism and disputes;
Added value through drawing on the skills and knowledge of all employees.
8/8/2019 Hrp 013n New Form Managing Seminar_main_2010 July 27
20/20
20
CONCERNSWITH EI
That it may produce greater work intensification, increased stress levels and redundancies;There is a fear that employers are exchanging strong union centred forms of participation
for EIP initiatives that are weak on power.Reflects management agenda
Means of information gathering in which is one way and may not be put to any useManagement led and controlled.In reality provides little opportunity to input into real decision -making.