Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Matty Kapadia and Rochelle SullivanFrom the Service Improvement Team
How to visualise work to gain clarity, consensus and eliminate waste
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
A Value Stream Map is a Lean technique to document, analyse and improve the flow of information or materials required to deliver a service.
“
”
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
What flows down the river?
Value stream mapping is a tool used to visually represent the flow of all elements of a process
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
A VSM helps us to pause, reflect and identify how our contribution affects the process as a whole.
Seeing the whole picture
If we rush to a solution, we may continue making the same mistakes.
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Value Stream Mapping – Why
See the entire
process end-to-end
Create a common language
Identify activities
and potential areas of waste
Identify what is of value to
the customer
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Benefits – the ‘why’
You’ll need…
Problem statement
Data - evidence
Goals – the ‘what’
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Admissions Process Improvement Project
SSuppliers
IInputs
PProcess
OOutputs
CCustomers
Who provides the inputs for the process
What is needed in order to complete these process
steps
The process steps The outputs which will be delivered for this process
Who benefits from this process
• Student
• Agents
• Slideroom
• Admissions
System
• Outlook email
• Educational
Institutions
• Faculty
Admissions team
• Central
Admissions team
• Academic
Selection
Committee
• Nexus
• Transcript
• Personal
Statement/folio
• Language test
• Course syllabus
• Grading scale
• Application Fee
• E-Application form
• Student Checklist
• GPA (grade point
average)
• Recognition of prior
learning Form
• Academic Selection
Committee
template
• Outcome letter
1. Student prepares and submits application
2. Central Admissions team triages application and sends to MSD
3. Faculty Admissions team assesses application and sends to Academic Selection Committee
4. Academic Selection Committee considers advanced standing and assesses application
5. Faculty Admissions team prepares offers for successful applicants
6. Manager, Faculty Admissions team reviews and releases offer
7. Applicant receives outcome letter
• Timely scholarship
outcome for student
• Outcome letter for
applicant
• Communication
(updates)
• Quality Students
• Diverse students
• Increased reputation
for Faculty
• Less issues to resolve
• Increased revenue for
University
• Decreased workload
for staff
• Applicants/
Students
• Agents
• Academics
• Faculty Admissions
Team
• External Relations
Team
• Central Admissions
team
• 13MELB/STOP 1
(Support services)
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Schedule for todayTime Session
9.00 am • Welcome and introduction (Sponsor)• Project introduction• Pain points (SI)• Value Stream Mapping intro and exercises (SI)
Quick Break
10.30am Value Stream Mapping Pt 1 (Project Lead & SI)• Customer, scope, objective• Identify where the process ends• Work backwards mapping out each step of the process• VA, NVA, NNVA analysis
Lunch
1.30 pm Value Stream Mapping Pt 2 (Project Lead & SI)• 8 types of waste (SI)• Identify types of waste• Estimate time taken per step• Calculate process efficiency• Identify owner of each step• Identify systems involved in each step• Review complete VSM• Review Pain points • Next Steps• Close (Sponsor)
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Who is your customer?
?
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Facilitation tips and tricks
• Wear comfortable clothes and shoes• Working with Post-it notes• Use of music and room set-up• Ice breakers• Car park• Blue-sky thinking• Pain points• Chocolate• Who’s in the room
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Admissions Process Improvement Project
SSuppliers
IInputs
PProcess
OOutputs
CCustomers
Who provides the inputs for the process
What is needed in order to complete these process
steps
The process steps The outputs which will be delivered for this process
Who benefits from this process
• Student
• Agents
• Slideroom
• Admissions
System
• Outlook email
• Educational
Institutions
• Faculty
Admissions team
• Central
Admissions team
• Academic
Selection
Committee
• Nexus
• Transcript
• Personal
Statement/folio
• Language test
• Course syllabus
• Grading scale
• Application Fee
• E-Application form
• Student Checklist
• GPA (grade point
average)
• Recognition of prior
learning Form
• Academic Selection
Committee
template
• Outcome letter
1. Student prepares and submits application
2. Central Admissions team triages application and sends to MSD
3. Faculty Admissions team assesses application and sends to Academic Selection Committee
4. Academic Selection Committee considers advanced standing and assesses application
5. Faculty Admissions team prepares offers for successful applicants
6. Manager, Faculty Admissions team reviews and releases offer
7. Applicant receives outcome letter
• Timely scholarship
outcome for student
• Outcome letter for
applicant
• Communication
(updates)
• Quality Students
• Diverse students
• Increased reputation
for Faculty
• Less issues to resolve
• Increased revenue for
University
• Decreased workload
for staff
• Applicants/
Students
• Agents
• Academics
• Faculty Admissions
Team
• External Relations
Team
• Central Admissions
team
• 13MELB/STOP 1
(Support services)
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Module Objectives
Customer Value-added Activities
• The customer would “pay” you to perform
• Changes the form, fit or function of the input
• Done right the first time
Value-added Analysis
Necessary Non-Value-added Activities
• Sustains the workplace ability to perform customer value-added activities
• Required by regulatory requirements
• Required by contract or other law and regulations
• Internal controls and mitigation to control risk
• Done right the first time
Non-value-addedActivities• Is this step required by a
customer?• Is this step required to
meet the risk tolerance?• Could this step be
eliminated?
Examples:• Inspection and checking• Monitoring work• Logging information• Checking calculations• Any type of rework• Moving and setup• Sorting work
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Ordering a beer on tapWhat are you willing to pay for?
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Eliminate the non-value add if possible
Value add Necessary Non-value add Non-value add
• Cold
• In a glass
• Good selection, good
advice
• Helpful, efficient,
accurate service
• Social atmosphere
• Check if over 18
• Check if too drunk
• Responsible service of
alcohol
• Tax invoice
• Waiting in line to order
• Logging amount of beer sold
• Re-pouring a beer
• Going out back to replace the
beer keg
• Inspection and checking keg
orders
• Cleaning glasses, clearing
tables
• Storage space for full and used
kegs
Optimise the value add and necessary non-value add
From the customer’s perspective
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Module Objectives
Customer Value-added Activities
• The customer would “pay” you to perform
• Changes the form, fit or function of the input
• Done right the first time
Value-added Analysis
Necessary Non-Value-added Activities
• Sustains the workplace ability to perform customer value-added activities
• Required by regulatory requirements
• Required by contract or other law and regulations
• Internal controls and mitigation to control risk
• Done right the first time
Non-value-addedActivities• Is this step required by a
customer?• Is this step required to
meet the risk tolerance?• Could this step be
eliminated?
Examples:• Inspection and checking• Monitoring work• Logging information• Checking calculations• Any type of rework• Moving and setup• Sorting work
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Defects Over-production WaitingNon-utilised
talent
Transportation Inventory MotionExtra processing
The 8 wastes of Lean
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
Module ObjectivesLooking for waiting time Example: Applying for a home loan
The more we can reduce the cycle time – while maintaining quality, the happier our customers will be
Application submitted
Approved by Manager
Entered into system
OutcomeGenerated
Loan pre-approval
Eligibility confirmed
Application approved
Waiting time = 23.6 days
Process time = 188 seconds
23.6 days
188 secs
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLC