10
How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from long-term intra-ring anatomy in Picea abies Daniele Castagneri 1, *, Patrick Fonti 2 , Georg von Arx 2 and Marco Carrer 1 1 Universit a degli Studi di Padova, Dept. TeSAF, Viale dell’Universit a 16, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy and 2 Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Zu ¨rcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf (ZH), Switzerland *For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 3 November 2016 Returned for revision: 15 November 2016 Editorial decision: 30 November 2016 Background and Aims During the growing season, the cambium of conifer trees produces successive rows of xylem cells, the tracheids, that sequentially pass through the phases of enlargement and secondary wall thickening before dying and becoming functional. Climate variability can strongly influence the kinetics of morphogenetic pro- cesses, eventually affecting tracheid shape and size. This study investigates xylem anatomical structure in the stem of Picea abies to retrospectively infer how, in the long term, climate affects the processes of cell enlargement and wall thickening. Methods Tracheid anatomical traits related to the phases of enlargement (diameter) and wall thickening (wall thickness) were innovatively inspected at the intra-ring level on 87-year-long tree-ring series in Picea abies trees along a 900 m elevation gradient in the Italian Alps. Anatomical traits in ten successive tree-ring sectors were re- lated to daily temperature and precipitation data using running correlations. Key Results Close to the altitudinal tree limit, low early-summer temperature negatively affected cell enlargement. At lower elevation, water availability in early summer was positively related to cell diameter. The timing of these rela- tionships shifted forward by about 20 (high elevation) to 40 (low elevation) d from the first to the last tracheids in the ring. Cell wall thickening was affected by climate in a different period in the season. In particular, wall thickness of late-formed tracheids was strongly positively related to August–September temperature at high elevation. Conclusions Morphogenesis of tracheids sequentially formed in the growing season is influenced by climate con- ditions in successive periods. The distinct climate impacts on cell enlargement and wall thickening indicate that dif- ferent morphogenetic mechanisms are responsible for different tracheid traits. Our approach of long-term and high- resolution analysis of xylem anatomy can support and extend short-term xylogenesis observations, and increase our understanding of climate control of tree growth and functioning under different environmental conditions. Key words: Cell size, cell-wall thickness, climate change, Norway spruce, quantitative wood anatomy, secondary growth, tracheid, tree ring, xylogenesis. INTRODUCTION The anatomy of xylem determines the ability of a tree to trans- port water from soil to leaves and to support its own structure. Recent studies linking tree physiology with wood anatomy have demonstrated that the morphology of the xylem cells affects functional properties such as hydraulic safety and efficiency (Lachenbruch and McCulloh, 2014; Schuldt et al., 2016). Therefore, modifications in xylem anatomy strongly determine the performance and survival of trees, and consequently forests’ vulnerability to climate change and their capacity to fix carbon (Anderegg, 2015; Sperry and Love, 2015; Pellizzari et al., 2016). Secondary growth, i.e. the formation of xylem cells through cambial activity, has been extensively investigated since the last century, providing detailed insights into the physiology that regu- lates plant cell development (Heyn, 1940; u zi cka et al., 2015). Experimental manipulations have additionally shown how inter- nal factors, e.g. hormones (Aloni, 1980), and external factors, e.g. temperature (Denne, 1971) and water availability (Hsiao, 1973), govern this process. However, the information gained was mostly limited to observations in controlled settings (such as in a greenhouse) performed on non-woody species or very young trees, being only partially indicative of growth mechanisms oc- curring in adult trees in complex and variable natural systems (Rathgeber et al., 2011; Wolkovich et al., 2012). Wood formation (xylogenesis) is known to be influenced by environmental conditions that vary in both space and time (Cuny et al., 2015). Restricted water availability generally limits tree growth in warm and dry areas, while low temperatures control growth at high latitudes and elevations (Rossi et al., 2013). However, the mechanisms behind the environmental influence on meristematic processes are still rather poorly understood. This knowledge is critical for a mechanistic understanding of the cli- mate control of tree growth [e.g. carbon source-limitation versus sink-limitation hypotheses (Ko ¨rner, 2015)] and for assessing leg- acy effects on future xylem functioning under changing climatic conditions (Sass-Klaassen et al., 2016). Studies monitoring xylogenesis (i.e. weekly cytological ob- servations of tree-ring formation) can provide important in- sights into environmental control of wood formation in adult trees. They have evidenced site-specific adaptation of xylogen- esis processes (Gri car et al., 2015) and latitude and elevation V C The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] Annals of Botany Page 1 of 10 doi:10.1093/aob/mcw274, available online at https://academic.oup.com/aob

How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis …intra.tesaf.unipd.it/people/carrer/2017_AoB.pdfHow does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis …intra.tesaf.unipd.it/people/carrer/2017_AoB.pdfHow does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from

How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season?

Insights from long-term intra-ring anatomy in Picea abies

Daniele Castagneri1,*, Patrick Fonti2, Georg von Arx2 and Marco Carrer1

1Universit�a degli Studi di Padova, Dept. TeSAF, Viale dell’Universit�a 16, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy and2Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Zurcherstrasse 111, 8903

Birmensdorf (ZH), Switzerland*For correspondence. E-mail [email protected]

Received: 3 November 2016 Returned for revision: 15 November 2016 Editorial decision: 30 November 2016

� Background and Aims During the growing season, the cambium of conifer trees produces successive rows ofxylem cells, the tracheids, that sequentially pass through the phases of enlargement and secondary wall thickeningbefore dying and becoming functional. Climate variability can strongly influence the kinetics of morphogenetic pro-cesses, eventually affecting tracheid shape and size. This study investigates xylem anatomical structure in the stemof Picea abies to retrospectively infer how, in the long term, climate affects the processes of cell enlargement andwall thickening.� Methods Tracheid anatomical traits related to the phases of enlargement (diameter) and wall thickening (wallthickness) were innovatively inspected at the intra-ring level on 87-year-long tree-ring series in Picea abies treesalong a 900 m elevation gradient in the Italian Alps. Anatomical traits in ten successive tree-ring sectors were re-lated to daily temperature and precipitation data using running correlations.� Key Results Close to the altitudinal tree limit, low early-summer temperature negatively affected cell enlargement.At lower elevation, water availability in early summer was positively related to cell diameter. The timing of these rela-tionships shifted forward by about 20 (high elevation) to 40 (low elevation) d from the first to the last tracheids in thering. Cell wall thickening was affected by climate in a different period in the season. In particular, wall thickness oflate-formed tracheids was strongly positively related to August–September temperature at high elevation.� Conclusions Morphogenesis of tracheids sequentially formed in the growing season is influenced by climate con-ditions in successive periods. The distinct climate impacts on cell enlargement and wall thickening indicate that dif-ferent morphogenetic mechanisms are responsible for different tracheid traits. Our approach of long-term and high-resolution analysis of xylem anatomy can support and extend short-term xylogenesis observations, and increase ourunderstanding of climate control of tree growth and functioning under different environmental conditions.

Key words: Cell size, cell-wall thickness, climate change, Norway spruce, quantitative wood anatomy, secondarygrowth, tracheid, tree ring, xylogenesis.

INTRODUCTION

The anatomy of xylem determines the ability of a tree to trans-port water from soil to leaves and to support its own structure.Recent studies linking tree physiology with wood anatomy havedemonstrated that the morphology of the xylem cells affectsfunctional properties such as hydraulic safety and efficiency(Lachenbruch and McCulloh, 2014; Schuldt et al., 2016).Therefore, modifications in xylem anatomy strongly determinethe performance and survival of trees, and consequently forests’vulnerability to climate change and their capacity to fix carbon(Anderegg, 2015; Sperry and Love, 2015; Pellizzari et al., 2016).

Secondary growth, i.e. the formation of xylem cells throughcambial activity, has been extensively investigated since the lastcentury, providing detailed insights into the physiology that regu-lates plant cell development (Heyn, 1940; Ru�zi�cka et al., 2015).Experimental manipulations have additionally shown how inter-nal factors, e.g. hormones (Aloni, 1980), and external factors,e.g. temperature (Denne, 1971) and water availability (Hsiao,1973), govern this process. However, the information gained wasmostly limited to observations in controlled settings (such as in a

greenhouse) performed on non-woody species or very youngtrees, being only partially indicative of growth mechanisms oc-curring in adult trees in complex and variable natural systems(Rathgeber et al., 2011; Wolkovich et al., 2012).

Wood formation (xylogenesis) is known to be influenced byenvironmental conditions that vary in both space and time (Cunyet al., 2015). Restricted water availability generally limits treegrowth in warm and dry areas, while low temperatures controlgrowth at high latitudes and elevations (Rossi et al., 2013).However, the mechanisms behind the environmental influenceon meristematic processes are still rather poorly understood. Thisknowledge is critical for a mechanistic understanding of the cli-mate control of tree growth [e.g. carbon source-limitation versussink-limitation hypotheses (Korner, 2015)] and for assessing leg-acy effects on future xylem functioning under changing climaticconditions (Sass-Klaassen et al., 2016).

Studies monitoring xylogenesis (i.e. weekly cytological ob-servations of tree-ring formation) can provide important in-sights into environmental control of wood formation in adulttrees. They have evidenced site-specific adaptation of xylogen-esis processes (Gri�car et al., 2015) and latitude and elevation

VC The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected]

Annals of Botany Page 1 of 10

doi:10.1093/aob/mcw274, available online at https://academic.oup.com/aob

Page 2: How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis …intra.tesaf.unipd.it/people/carrer/2017_AoB.pdfHow does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from

influences on the timing and duration of cambial activity(e.g. Moser et al., 2010; Rossi et al., 2014). However, despitethe strong inter-annual variability of cambial phenology(Treml et al., 2015), this process has usually been quantifiedwith just a few years (typically 1–5 in most studies) of continu-ous observations. In addition, studies monitoring xylogenesishave provided clues on how climate before and during thegrowing season affects the onset of cambial activity (Rossiet al., 2013) and impacts the kinetics of cell formation,influencing xylem cell morphological traits (Cuny et al., 2014).However, these observations lack the necessary long-term per-spective to thoroughly assess the responses of wood formationand structure to inter-annual climate variability (Boulouf Lugoet al., 2012). A long-term perspective can be obtained by theretrospective quantitative analysis of xylem anatomy in tree-ring series. Past investigations have shown that it is possibleto link cell anatomical features with inter-annual climate vari-ability (Fonti et al., 2010). Methodological advances (von Arxand Carrer, 2014; von Arx et al., 2016) now allow signifi-cantly longer (several centuries) and better replicated (twoto three orders of magnitude more cells) time series of xylemanatomical features than in the recent past to be processedand analysed efficiently, thus opening new investigationprospects.

Based on the assumption that tracheids record the weatherconditions influencing their formation, we investigated the long-term tracheid anatomical variation in the stem of mature Piceaabies (Norway spruce) trees along a 900-m elevation gradient inthe Italian Alps. The most conspicuous effect of increasing eleva-tion is an adiabatic decline of temperature, which further reduceslarge-scale environmental (e.g. photoperiod, and seasonality inprecipitation and temperature) and genetic variability. In theEuropean Alps, this is generally coupled to increased mean pre-cipitation (Korner, 2007). Elevation gradients are thus valuablesettings to assess responses to changing climate (Korner, 2007).Previous analyses at the same location had already shown a cli-mate influence on tree-ring width and potential hydraulic con-ductivity associated with the 900-m gradient (Castagneri et al.,2015). Here we make use of this setting to evaluate how climaticvariability controls the morphogenesis of two functionally impor-tant anatomical traits: tracheid size, resulting from the process ofcell enlargement, and wall thickness, which results from the suc-cessive deposition of the cell wall. Tracheid anatomy was inno-vatively assessed at intra-ring level, with the aim at evaluatinghow and when climate variability affects tracheid morphogenesiswithin the growing season. Given that (1) tracheid enlargementand wall thickening are two distinct processes (Vaganov et al.,2006), (2) tracheid enlargement is more sensitive to water avail-ability than other xylogenesis phases (Hsiao, 1973; Abe et al.,2003), and (3) the carbon-demanding latewood wall thickeningis more limited at higher elevation by the temperature-sensitiveprocess of carbon fixation (Petit et al., 2011; Rossi et al., 2013;Korner, 2015), we expect that these morphogenetic processes inP. abies are differently influenced by climate across elevation.Here we used an elevation gradient to evaluate the role of cli-mate in shaping tracheid diameter and wall thickness, and to ver-ify whether temporal shifts and duration of the influence ofclimate on morphogenesis change according to the length of thegrowing season, which is shorter at higher elevation (Korner,2007).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

Samples were collected in the Eastern Italian Alps along anortheast-facing slope at Croda da Lago (46�300 N, 12�070 E).The slope, ranging from 1200 m a.s.l. up to the tree limit at2150 m a.s.l., is covered by open, uneven-aged multi-layeredforest stands composed of Picea abies occurring exclusively ormixed with other conifers (Larix decidua, Pinus cembra, Pinussylvestris and Abies alba). The stands have not been managedfor decades or affected by major disturbances. The soils areshallow and calcareous and the climate of the region is rela-tively moist and cool. The average daily maximum (minimum)temperature is 20�8 (8�9) �C in July and 3�1 (�5�8) �C inJanuary (meteorological station of Cortina d’Ampezzo, 1230 ma.s.l., 1926–2012, <3 km from the area). Mean annual precipi-tation, occurring as snow during winter, is 1080 mm, and ismost abundant from May to November (Fig. 1).

Sample collection and processing

Increment cores were collected from three stands located at2100 (EL21), 1600 (EL16) and 1200 (EL12) m a.s.l. at a dis-tance of 1–2 km from each other. According to the standardsampling protocol for the analysis of tree-ring responses to cli-mate (Schweingruber et al., 1990), we selected 15–20 dominantand undamaged adult trees in each stand. For each tree, twocores (5�15 mm in diameter) were collected with an incrementborer (Haglof, Langsele, Sweden) perpendicularly to the slopeon opposite sides of the stem. To assign the annual rings to thecorresponding calendar year, the ring widths were measured tothe nearest 0�01 mm using TsapWin (Rinntech, Heidelberg,Germany) for visual cross-dating, and cross-dating quality waschecked using COFECHA (Holmes, 1983). Subsequent cell an-atomical measurements were then conducted for each site on aselection of eight cores from eight trees (Table 1), avoidingsamples with visible defects such as nodes, reaction wood orrotten and missing parts. The selected cores were divided intopieces 4–5 cm long to prepare transverse sections (15–18 lmthick) for anatomical measurements using standard protocols

30

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

20

Max

. tem

pera

ture

(°C

) Precipitation (m

m)

10

00 30 60 90 120 150 180

Day of the year210 240 270 300 330 360

FIG. 1. Annual course of maximum temperature and precipitation in the studyarea. In red, daily maximum temperature mean over 31-d moving windows witha daily step; in blue, precipitation sum over 31-d moving windows with a dailystep. Weather data were recorded from 1926 to 2012 at the meteorological sta-

tion of Cortina d’Ampezzo, 1230 m a.s.l., located �3 km from the study sites.

Page 2 of 10 Castagneri et al. — Climate influence on xylem morphogenesis as evidenced by intra-ring anatomy

Page 3: How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis …intra.tesaf.unipd.it/people/carrer/2017_AoB.pdfHow does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from

(von Arx et al., 2016). In short, micro-sections were cut with arotary microtome (Leica, Heidelberg, Germany), stained withsafranin (1 % in distilled water) and fixed on permanent slideswith Eukitt (BiOptica, Milan, Italy). Overlapping digital imageswere captured with a light microscope at 40� magnification(Nikon Eclipse 80 with distortion-free lenses) with a resolutionof 0�833 pixels mm�1, and stitched together with PTGui soft-ware (New House Internet Service B.V., Rotterdam, TheNetherlands) to obtain a single image of 2–3 mm width fromeach section. The images were then processed with the imageanalysis software ROXAS v2.0 (von Arx and Carrer, 2014),which provided the lumen size, wall thickness and relative posi-tion within the dated annual ring for each of the �4 millionmeasured tracheids. Analysis was restricted to the period cov-ered by weather records, i.e. 1926–2012.

Intra-ring anatomical series and chronologies

Diameter and wall thickness were assessed for each tracheidin the ring (Fig. 2). To analyse xylem anatomy at the sub-annualtime scale, each annual ring was divided into ten tangential sec-tors of equal width (Fig. 2). For each sector, we assessed the90th percentile of the size distribution of cell diameter (CD) andcell-wall thickness (CWT). For each core, we then built ten timeseries for both CD and CWT, which represented the inter-annualvariations of tracheid anatomical features at intra-ring level.

To assess the climate influence on xylem traits, we sought toemphasize high-frequency variation, related to inter-annual cli-mate variability, through the removal of low-frequency varia-tion not related to climate (Fritts, 1976). Indeed, anatomicaltime series usually show long-term trends, due to tree heightgrowth during ontogenesis (Fig. 3A) (Carrer et al., 2015). Wetherefore fitted a cubic smoothing spline with 50 % frequencycut-off of 30 years to each individual anatomical series, and cal-culated the detrended index as the ratio between the observedand fitted values for each annual ring (Cook and Kairiukstis,1990) (Fig. 3B). Chronologies of the anatomical features (2traits � 3 sites � 10 sectors ¼ 60 sector chronologies) werebuilt by calculating the bi-weight robust mean from thedetrended series, using the R package dplR (Bunn, 2008).

Statistical analyses and assessment of climate–anatomyrelationships

To evaluate the influence of elevation on xylem anatomicaltraits, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to

test differences in CD and CWT in each sector among the threesites. When elevation showed a significant effect, Tukey’s pair-wise comparisons were used to determine which group was sig-nificantly different from the others. Besides, to assessanatomical trait variations along the ring, one-way ANOVAwas applied between the ten sectors. Tukey’s pairwise compari-sons were used to identify significantly different groups.

The mean correlation coefficients between all possible com-binations of the eight series [r between trees (rbt)] was adoptedto assess the shared pattern across individual series buildingeach sector chronology (Fritts, 1976) with the R package dplR(Bunn, 2008). Furthermore, the (in)dependence of informationprovided by ring sectors separated by different distances wasevaluated for each anatomical feature and site by calculatingthe shared variance (coefficient of determination, coefficient ofdetermination, R2�100) among sector chronologies. All statisti-cal analyses were performed on anatomical parameters from1926 to 2012, corresponding to the period covered by theweather records from Cortina d’Ampezzo meteorological sta-tion (Fig. 1).

Climate influence on cell anatomical features was quantifiedby correlating each sector chronology with daily maximumtemperature and precipitation sum with Pearson’s correlationsusing 31-d windows slid at 1-d steps from 1 July of the previousyear to 31 October of the current year. Climate time series wereobtained using daily-resolved weather records from the Cortinad’Ampezzo meteorological station (Fig. 1). Besides this con-ventional approach with climatic data aligned to the calendardate [day of year (DOY) approach], we also calculated the cor-relations aligning the climatic data to the date when a specificdegree-day temperature sum is reached (DD approach). TheDD temperature sums of each year (McMaster and Wilhelm,1997) were calculated as:

Xm

j

Tmax þ Tmin

2

� �� 5

where j ¼ 1, 2, . . . m are days with a mean temperature >5 �C,which is widely used as the lower limit for plant growth(Grigorieva et al., 2010), and Tmax and Tmin are the daily maxi-mum and minimum air temperatures (�C), respectively. AsEL16 and EL21 are located at higher elevations than the meteo-rological station, for these two sites temperature was adjustedconsidering a lapse rate of 0�6 �C/100 m of elevation (Aueret al., 2005; Korner, 2007). For the alignment of the climaticdata, we considered seven DD thresholds (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100

TABLE 1. Characteristics of trees selected for ring anatomical measurements

Plot No. of samples Height Diameter Ring width No. of rings Estimated age(m) (cm) (mm) (years)

EL21 8 19�863�5 55�3614�2 0�9060�26 236646 263654EL16 8 29�163�1 57�667�9 0�8960�36 289653 301642EL12 8 36�661�6 70�368�9 1�8660�36 141612 149612

Values are mean 6 standard deviation of eight trees at site EL21 (2100 m a.s.l.), EL16 (1600 m a.s.l.) and EL12 (1200 m a.s.l.).Stem diameter was measured 1�3 m above the ground.Ring width is averaged over the period 1926–2012.No. of rings is the total number of rings in the core. Estimated age includes estimation of rings missing to the stem pith.

Castagneri et al. — Climate influence on xylem morphogenesis as evidenced by intra-ring anatomy Page 3 of 10

Page 4: How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis …intra.tesaf.unipd.it/people/carrer/2017_AoB.pdfHow does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from

and 120 DD). For each of these cases with newly aligned cli-matic data, moving correlations were calculated with the 31-dwindows as for the DOY approach. For both DOY and DDapproaches, correlation P values were adjusted for multiplecomparisons using the false discovery rate correction(Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Analyses were implementedin R (version 3.1.0, R Development Core Team, 2014).

RESULTS

Sub-annual anatomical variability and common pattern

Variations in cell anatomical features along the ring sectorswere consistent among elevations. Within the ring, CD steadily

decreased from sector 1 to 10, with a pronounced reduction inthe last three sectors (Figs 2 and 3, Table 2). Cell-wall thicknessshowed the opposite trend, with a sharp increase in the last sec-tors. In addition, the negative relationship between CD andCWT along the sectors was consistent at the three sites (EL21,r¼� 0�97, P< 0�001; EL16, r¼� 0�98, P< 0�001; EL12,r¼� 0�98, P< 0�001; Fig. 4). For all sectors, both CD andCWT were larger at EL12 than at the other two sites (Table 2).

The detrended anatomical series had a fairly strong commonpattern (rbt), revealing good synchronization of the inter-annualvariations in anatomical features within the same sector on dif-ferent trees. In general, for both CD and CWT, rbt increasedacross the annual ring (Table 2). The highest value (rbt¼ 0�56)occurred for CWT in the last sector at EL21.

A B6·0

5·0

4·0

3·0

CW

T (µm

)CD

(µm

)

2·0

1·0

01 2 3 4 5 6

Sector7 8 9 10

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

CDCWT

Cell wall thickness

Cell diameter

Growth direction

FIG. 2. Example of a tree ring split into ten sectors (A) and representation of the anatomical features measured on each single tracheid (B). In (A), the overlay curvesshow the intra-ring variation of the mean 90th percentile of cell diameter (CD) and cell-wall thickness (CWT) as obtained for the ten tree-ring sectors with equal

width. The coloured cells illustrate on a narrow strip how individual tracheids were assigned to the sectors.

1·2Sector 1

1·1

60A B

C

50

40

CD

(µm

)

30

20

1800 1850 1900Year

1950 2000

1·0

CD

(in

dex)

0·9

0·8

1·2Sector 10

1·1

1·0

CD

(in

dex)

0·9

0·8

1940 1960 1980Year

2000

Sector1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FIG. 3. Cell diameter (CD) time series. (A) Variability of CD along a single core, as grouped by ring sector. The shaded area indicates the investigated period(1926–2012). (B, C) Thirty-year spline-detrended CD series for sectors 1 (B) and 10 (C) for the eight trees measured at the 2100 m site over the period 1926–2012.

Thick lines indicate the mean ring-sector chronologies.

Page 4 of 10 Castagneri et al. — Climate influence on xylem morphogenesis as evidenced by intra-ring anatomy

Page 5: How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis …intra.tesaf.unipd.it/people/carrer/2017_AoB.pdfHow does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from

Among the ten sectors, anatomical chronologies were rela-tively independent of each other. For both CD and CWT, theproportion of shared variance in neighbouring sectors was high(inter-sector distance ¼ 1, Fig. 5). However, it sharply de-creased when considering more distant sectors (generally<25 % at inter-sector distance >3), indicating that anatomi-cal features of cells formed in different periods of the sea-son (not consecutive sectors) were quite independent of eachother.

Climate influence on xylem anatomy

Correlation analyses between inter-annual climate variabilityand sector chronologies revealed that different anatomical fea-tures showed distinct relationships with climate factors, mostlyduring spring and summer. Moreover, we observed temporalshifts in climatic responses along the ring, which reflect the sea-sonal changes in the timing of environmental constraints on cellformation.

At EL21, a positive correlation between CD and maximumtemperature occurred from mid-June in the first ring sectors toearly July in the last ones (P< 0�05 in sectors 1, 2, 3 and 5;P< 0�01 in sectors 6 and 10; P< 0�0001 in sectors 7–9; Fig.6A). This correlation increased markedly when considering theDD temperature sums. Specifically, when considering the 40-DD threshold, which over the study period occurred on averageon 19 June (corresponding to DOY 170), correlations improvedfor all the sectors (P< 0�001 in all sectors; Fig. 7). DuringAugust, there was a negative correlation with temperature(P< 0�05 in nine sectors; Fig. 6A). At EL16, the negative cor-relation with temperature was observed �15–30 d earlier thanat EL21, specifically around DOY 170 (late June, sectors 3–7,P< 0�05 to P< 0�01; Fig. 6C) to 215 (end of July, last sectors,P< 0�05; Fig. 6C). Positive correlations with precipitation oc-curred a few days before, specifically around DOY 160 (mid-June, sectors 3 and 4, P< 0�05; Fig. 6D) to 215 (July, last sec-tors, P< 0�05; Fig. 6D). At EL12, the negative correlation ofCD with temperature (P< 0�05 in sectors 4–0; P< 0�001 insectors 6 and 7; Fig. 6E) and positive correlations with precipi-tation (significant in all sectors; P< 0�001 in sectors 2, 6 and 7;Fig. 6F) were slightly stronger than at EL16, and occurred

60

50

EL12EL16EL21

CD

(µm

)

40

30

203 4 5

CWT (µm)6 7 8

FIG. 4. Relationship between CD and CWT in the ten ring sectors. Colours rep-resent the sector, from dark blue (sector 1) to dark purple (sector 10). Sites (see

key): EL21, 2100 m a.s.l.; EL16, 1600 m a.s.l.; EL12, 1200 m a.s.l.

TABLE 2. Mean 90th percentile of cell diameter (CD) and cell-wall thickness (CWT), and mean correlation between thedetrended time series (Rbt) of eight trees for tree-ring sector av-eraged over 1926–2012, at EL21 (at 2100 m a.s.l.), EL16

(1600 m a.s.l.) and EL12 (1200 m a.s.l.)

Sector CD CWT

EL21 EL16 EL12 EL21 EL16 EL12Mean (lm) Mean (lm)

1 A 50�6 c A 52�5 b A 59�2 a G 3�7 b HI 3�4 c HI 4�1 a

2 A 50�4 c AB 51�7 b A 58�7 a G 3�7 b H 3�3 c H 3�9 a

3 A 49�8 c B 50�9 b B 57�1 a G 3�8 b HI 3�4 c HI 4�0 a

4 B 48�4 c C 49�2 b C 55�6 a FG 3�9 b GH 3�5 c GH 4�1 a

5 C 46�9 c D 47�5 b D 54�5 a F 3�9 b FG 3�5 c F 4�2 a

6 D 45�3 b E 45�8 b E 53�1 a E 4�1 b E 3�6 c E 4�4 a

7 E 43�4 b F 44�0 b F 51�3 a D 4�3 b D 3�8 c D 4�6 a

8 F 40�1 b G 40�7 b G 47�6 a C 4�6 b C 4�2 c C 5�2 a

9 G 33�2 b H 33�5 b H 40�0 a B 5�2 b B 5�1 b B 6�4 a

10 H 22�8 b I 22�5 b I 28�3 a A 5�3 c A 5�6 b A 7�1 a

Rbt Rbt1 0�21 0�10 0�21 0�08 0�02 0�012 0�23 0�08 0�22 0�06 0�07 0�073 0�23 0�14 0�30 0�09 0�06 0�094 0�22 0�17 0�34 0�12 0�10 0�055 0�24 0�17 0�36 0�12 0�09 0�086 0�25 0�20 0�40 0�17 0�10 0�097 0�35 0�21 0�37 0�20 0�15 0�188 0�43 0�29 0�36 0�38 0�27 0�279 0�44 0�32 0�30 0�51 0�31 0�3110 0�43 0�29 0�11 0�56 0�26 0�17

Different upper-case letters on the left of the value indicate significant dif-ferences between sectors for the same site (column), according to ANOVAwith Tukey’s pairwise comparisons. Different lower-case letters on the rightindicate significant differences between the three sites EL12, EL16 and EL21,for the same sector (row).

75

A BCD CWT

50

Sha

red

varia

nce

(%)

25

01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Inter-sector distance1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

EL21EL16EL12

FIG. 5. Proportion of shared variance (R2�100) between ring-sector chronolo-gies for (A) cell diameter (CD) and (B) cell-wall thickness (CWT) at equivalentinter-sector distance (e.g. boxes at inter-sector distance 5 indicate the proportionof shared variance between sectors 1 and 6, 2 and 7, 3 and 8, 4 and 9, and 5 and10). Horizontal lines in the boxes indicate median values of shared variance,boxes the first and third quartiles, and notches the 95 % confidence interval ofthe median. Sites (see key): EL21, 2100 m a.s.l.; EL16, 1600 m a.s.l.; EL12,

1200 m a.s.l.

Castagneri et al. — Climate influence on xylem morphogenesis as evidenced by intra-ring anatomy Page 5 of 10

Page 6: How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis …intra.tesaf.unipd.it/people/carrer/2017_AoB.pdfHow does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from

10–15 d earlier. At this elevation, positive correlation with pre-cipitation emerged in the first sectors and remained quite stableacross the whole ring, with a time lag of 40–50 d from the firstto the last sectors. At all three sites, CD was weakly connectedto climatic variability before the growing season, with generallyunclear patterns except for a positive relationship with late Junetemperature at EL12 (P< 0�05 in sectors 8, 9 and 10), andFebruary precipitation at EL21 (P< 0�05 in sectors 1, 2, 3, 8and 10) (Supplementary Data Fig. S1).

Cell-wall thickness showed completely different relation-ships with climate compared with CD (Fig. 8). Temperatures inlate spring and/or summer were positively related to this fea-ture, while relationships with precipitation were weak at all ele-vations. May temperature was positively correlated with CWTfor the last three sectors at EL21 (P< 0�01 in sectors 8, 9 and10; Fig. 8A) and the central sectors at EL12 (P< 0 �01 insectors 4 and 5; Fig. 8E). Furthermore, a positive associationwith late-summer temperature emerged for the last foursectors, being stronger at EL21, particularly for the last three

sectors (r> 0�5, P< 0�0001; Fig. 8A), weaker at EL16 (r> 0�4,P< 0�05; Fig. 8C), and not significant at EL12 (Fig. 8E).Similarly to CD, this association increased at EL21 using theDD approach (r> 0�6; Fig. 7 compared with Fig. 8). Climaticconditions of the previous growing season and winter wereslightly related to CWT (Supplementary Data Fig. S1).

DISCUSSION

Intra-annual variability in xylem anatomy

This study demonstrated that the analysis of xylem anatomyalong tree-ring series can be used to assess the long-term cli-mate influence on xylem morphogenesis. Compared with previ-ous analyses of anatomical features considering the whole ringor earlywood and latewood sections (Fonti et al., 2013), our ap-proach aimed at improving the detail of results by increasingthe resolution at intra-seasonal level. Across the entire elevationgradient, both CD and CWT showed a substantial synchronous

Sec

tor

123456789

10

123456789

10

123456789

10

Day of the year (DOY)

Negative P value

<0·001 <0·05 n.s.

<0·0001 <0·01 <0·1 <0·1

<0·05 <0·001

Positive<0·01 <0·0001

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300Day of the year (DOY)

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300

EL21 EL21

EL16 EL16

EL12 EL12

Apr May

Temperature Precipitation

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

A B

C D

E F

FIG. 6. Correlations of the ten ring-sector chronologies of cell diameter (CD) with daily climate data. Mean daily maximum temperature and precipitation sums werecalculated over 31-d moving windows from DOY 100 (10 April) to DOY 300 (27 October) (x-axis) over the period 1926–2012 at the three sites: (A, B) EL21,2100 m a.s.l.; (C, D) EL16, 1600 m a.s.l.; (E, F) EL12, 1200 m a.s.l. Results are aligned to the centre of the 31-d window. Colours represent P values adjusted for

the false discovery rate. Non-significant correlations are not represented (white).

Page 6 of 10 Castagneri et al. — Climate influence on xylem morphogenesis as evidenced by intra-ring anatomy

Page 7: How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis …intra.tesaf.unipd.it/people/carrer/2017_AoB.pdfHow does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from

variability among trees (rbt; Table 2), although with differencesamong the ring sectors. This suggests that cell anatomy, andthus morphogenesis, is sensitive to environmental variability(Fritts, 1976), but this sensitivity can also vary over the courseof the growing season (Sass and Eckstein, 1995). The differentpatterns of rbt, with generally higher values for CWT towardsthe last ring sectors and with increasing elevation, also indicatethat not all anatomical traits are equally sensitive to climate.This is in line with previous observations showing different sen-sitivity to climate in different cell anatomical features, and be-tween earlywood and latewood (Martin-Benito et al., 2013;Szymczak et al., 2014).

The decreasing similarities with increasing distance betweenring sectors (Fig. 5) likely reflect changes in the environmentalinfluences that impact cell formation during the growing sea-son. This suggests that successive tracheid rows along the ringencode a distinct climate imprint throughout the growing sea-son, demonstrating the potential of splitting the ring into sectorsfor investigating the associations between cell morphogenesisand intra-seasonal climate.

Temporal match of intra-ring climate correlations with cambialactivity observations

Sector-based correlations showed that cell anatomical fea-tures were significantly affected by seasonal climate variability.

The timing of cell enlargement and wall thickening, recorded inprevious investigations on cambial activity, matches well withthe timing of most of the observed significant correlations.Indeed, significant correlations between CD and temperature athigh elevation started in early June for the first ring sectors,lasting to mid-July in the last sectors (Fig. 6). This timingmatches the most intense phases of cambial activity and cell en-largement observed for P. abies at similar elevation, a few kilo-metres from the study site (Rossi et al., 2008). Information oncambial activity in the same species under environmental con-ditions similar to those at the low-elevation sites are unfortu-nately not available. However, the observed lapse rate of 10–15 d for both the temperature and precipitation associationswith CD within the same sector from intermediate to low eleva-tion, and of 20–40 d for temperature associations in CD fromhigh to intermediate elevation, fits the lapse rate of �3–4 d per100 m in elevation reported for xylogenesis phases of Larix de-cidua in the Swiss Alps (Moser et al., 2010). These observa-tions indicate that the proposed approach properly capturesphenological shifts along elevation gradients.

Climate influence on CWT (Fig. 8) was evident in two dis-tinct periods: a moderate positive temperature effect at the be-ginning of the season, and a second one at the end of thesummer for the last three or four sectors, lasting for up to2 months. The latter, much stronger at high elevation, overlapswith the wall-thickening phase in the last part of the ring ob-served in P. abies at high elevation (Gindl et al., 2001; Rossiet al., 2008), and its duration is in line with current knowledgeon the duration of wall formation, which can last from 30 d(mild conditions) to 70 d (cold conditions) in latewood cells(Kirdyanov et al., 2003; Rossi et al., 2008, 2013; Cuny et al.,2013).

Intra-ring anatomy reflects climate impact on cell morphogenesis

Our retrospective analysis of the climate influence on cellfeatures provided indirect indications on xylem morphogenesisthat are in line with current knowledge, mainly derived frommore direct approaches based on much shorter periods, such asobservations of cambial activity (e.g. Cuny et al., 2014; Rossiet al., 2014) and diel stem radial variations (e.g. King et al.,2013; Steppe et al., 2015). In particular, our results indicate thatclimate drivers are diverse for different anatomical features, de-pending on the nature and timing of the underlying processesduring the growing season, and on the limiting conditions pre-vailing at different elevations.

Specifically, we interpret the positive influence of tempera-ture in June to early July on CD at the highest elevation as anindication that warm conditions promote the first phases of xy-lem formation (Lenz et al., 2013). In this context, temperatureat the onset of the growing season affects the production andtransport of hormones such as auxin and gibberellin (Schraderet al., 2003; Aloni et al., 2015) and the translocation of nutri-ents. Correspondingly, the important role of temperature in coldenvironments in the kinetics of cell differentiation and enlarge-ment has already been observed both empirically (Gri�car et al.,2006; Rossi et al., 2008; Petit et al., 2011; Lenz et al., 2013)and correlatively (Kirdyanov et al., 2003; Kalliokoski et al.,2012; Fonti et al., 2013; Rossi et al., 2014). Stronger and more

Sec

tor

Cell diameter

Cell wall thickness

123456789

10

Day aligned to temperature sums (DD)–60 –40 –20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Negative P value

<0·001 <0·05 n.s.

<0·0001 <0·01 <0·1 <0·1

<0·05 <0·001

Positive

<0·01 <0·0001

Sec

tor

123456789

10

FIG. 7. Correlations of the ten ring-sector chronologies of cell diameter (CD)and cell-wall thickness (CWT) at EL21 (2100 m a.s.l.) with degree-day (DD)-aligned temperature. Mean daily maximum temperature (1926–2012) was calcu-lated over 31-d moving windows aligned according to the DD approach.Temperature data span from 70 d before to 130 d after the day of the year whenDD temperature > 5 �C reached 40 (x-axis). Results are aligned to the centre ofthe 31-d window. Colours represent P values adjusted for the false discovery

rate. Non-significant correlations are not represented (white).

Castagneri et al. — Climate influence on xylem morphogenesis as evidenced by intra-ring anatomy Page 7 of 10

Page 8: How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis …intra.tesaf.unipd.it/people/carrer/2017_AoB.pdfHow does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from

defined associations emerged when the climatic data werealigned according to the DD temperature thresholds at high ele-vation (especially for CD in the first ring sectors; Figs 6 and 7),but not at lower elevations (see Cuny et al., 2015). These addadditional evidence and further confirm that late-spring temper-ature controls the onset of cambial activity and the kinetics ofcell formation in cold environments (Kirdyanov et al., 2003;Seo et al., 2008; Thibeault-Martel et al., 2008; Moser et al.,2010; Olano et al., 2013). However, we also observed water-related constraints on tracheid morphogenesis. At high eleva-tion, a negative temperature influence on CD emerged a fewweeks after the positive temperature stimulus. At lower eleva-tion, the negative effect of temperature on CD was stronger,better defined across the ring sectors, anticipated by a fewweeks, and associated with a positive effect of precipitation.Apparently, at low elevation, early summer temperature doesnot limit cell enlargement, resulting in generally larger tra-cheids compared with higher elevation. However, during dryand warm years, low soil water content and high tree transpira-tion rates decrease water availability, reducing the cell turgor

pressure necessary to stretch the primary cell wall of the form-ing cells (Hsiao, 1973; Taiz and Zeiger, 2006).

While our results support the hypothesis that the climate ef-fects on CD are directly connected to the processes shaping cellsize (i.e. cell enlargement), the responses encoded in CWTseem to be primarily related to the amount of carbon assimilatesreaching the cambial zone (Wolf et al., 2012). Coherently withstudies on maximum latewood density, we found correlationswith climate for the last ring sectors in relation to the conditionsat the beginning and towards the end of the growing season(Wimmer and Graber, 2000; Frank and Esper, 2005). The posi-tive effect of April–May temperature on CWT might relate tothe improved carbon assimilation during spring (source activ-ity) corresponding to an earlier onset of the growing season andmore intense assimilation activity. The late summer tempera-ture association is instead probably linked to carbon mobiliza-tion and deposition rates at the time of wall thickening (sinkactivity) (Hoch et al., 2002; Korner, 2015), which were appar-ently strongly related to temperature at high elevation. Our ob-servations support previous findings that carbon fixation and

Apr

A B

C D

E F

May

Temperature Precipitation

Jun Jul Aug

EL21 EL21

EL16 EL16

EL12 EL12

Sep Oct Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep OctS

ecto

r

123456789

10

123456789

10

123456789

10

Day of the year (DOY)Negative P value

<0·001 <0·05 n.s.

<0·0001 <0·01 <0·1 <0·1

<0·05 <0·001

Positive<0·01 <0·0001

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300Day of the year (DOY)

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300

FIG. 8. Correlations of the ten ring-sector chronologies of cell-wall thickness (CWT) with daily climate data. Mean daily maximum temperature and precipitationsums were calculated over 31-d moving windows from DOY 100 (10 April) to DOY 300 (27 October) (x-axis) over the period 1926–2012 at the three sites: (A, B)EL21, 2100 m a.s.l.; (C, D) EL16, 1600 m a.s.l.; (E, F) EL12, 1200 m a.s.l. Results are aligned to the centre of the 31-d window. Colours represent P values adjusted

for the false discovery rate. Non-significant correlations are not represented (white).

Page 8 of 10 Castagneri et al. — Climate influence on xylem morphogenesis as evidenced by intra-ring anatomy

Page 9: How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis …intra.tesaf.unipd.it/people/carrer/2017_AoB.pdfHow does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from

carbohydrate mobilization are constrained by temperature at thealtitudinal limit of a species (Hoch and Korner, 2003; Simardet al., 2013). Examples of this relationship are also given by ob-servations that the long-lasting wall thickening process can beslowed or interrupted by reduced temperatures at the end ofsummer (Gindl, 1999; Vaganov et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2013), inextreme cases resulting in rings characterized by thin walls(known as light rings; Filion et al., 1986) or unlignified walls(known as blue rings; Piermattei et al., 2014) in the last cells.

Concluding remarks and future prospects

Our study shows that xylem anatomy assessed through tree-ring partitioning provides both high-resolution and long-termindications on how, when and for how long climate drivers in-fluence the processes of xylem morphogenesis. Under differentconditions along an elevation gradient, climate either affectscell enlargement through regulation of the kinetics of the pro-cess (influenced by temperature) or by influencing the cell tur-gor pressure necessary for cell enlargement (related to wateravailability). Similarly, we have shown that the deposition ofthe cell wall in the second part of the ring is sensitive to thetemperature occurring both at the beginning of the growing sea-son, which seemingly promotes carbon assimilation, and at theend of the season, when deposition in the cell wall occurs.

Tree-ring anatomy provides a long-term perspective on treeresponses to climate, fundamental for soundly assessing forestresponses to ongoing climatic change (Reyer et al., 2015). Thiscan improve understanding of xylem formation, and help to as-sess changes over time in (1) growth phenology, (2) climaticsensitivity, (3) xylem functioning and (4) xylem plasticity ofdifferent species – all of them important topics for improvingour mechanistic understanding of how climate impacts xylemhydraulic and structural properties and ultimately treeperformance.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data are available online at https://academic.oup.com/aob and consist of the following. Figure S1: correla-tions of ring-sector chronologies with temperature and precipi-tation over all year round.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The study was supported by the University of Padova(Research Project D320.PRGR13001, Senior Research Grants2012). D.C. received a grant from PROFOUND COST actionfor a short-term scientific mission at the WSL (ECOST-STSM-FP1304-230215-053843). G.v.A. was supported bygrants from the Swiss State Secretariat for Education,Research and Innovation SERI (SBFI C14.0104 andC12.0100). This study profited from discussions within theframework of the COST Action STReESS (COST-FP1106).The authors are grateful to Enrico Marcolin, FrancescoNatalini, Giai Petit and Angela Luisa Prendin for their help inlaboratory work, and to two anonymous reviewers and thehandling editor, which helped to improve an earlier version ofthis manuscript.

LITERATURE CITED

Abe H, Nakai T, Utsumi Y, Kagawa A. 2003. Temporal water deficit and woodformation in Cryptomeria japonica. Tree Physiology 23: 859–863.

Aloni R. 1980. Role of auxin and sucrose in the differentiation of sieve and tra-cheary elements in plant tissue cultures. Planta 150: 255–263.

Aloni R. 2015. Ecophysiological implications of vascular differentiation andplant evolution. Trees 29: 1–16.

Anderegg WRL. 2015. Spatial and temporal variation in plant hydraulic traitsand their relevance for climate change impacts on vegetation. NewPhytologist 205: 1008–1014.

von Arx G, Carrer M. 2014. ROXAS – a new tool to build centuries-long tra-cheid-lumen chronologies in conifers. Dendrochronologia 32: 290–293.

von Arx G, Crivellaro A, Prendin AL, �Cufar K, Carrer M. 2016.

Quantitative wood anatomy –practical guidelines. Frontiers in PlantScience 7: 781.

Auer I, Matulla C, Bohm R, et al. 2005. Sensitivity of frost occurrence to tem-perature variability in the European Alps. International Journal ofClimatology 25: 1749–1766.

Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate – a practi-cal and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the RoyalStatistical Society Series B (Methodological) 57: 289–300.

Boulouf Lugo J, Deslauriers A, Rossi S. 2012. Duration of xylogenesis in blackspruce lengthened between 1950 and 2010. Annals of Botany 110:1099–1108.

Bunn AG. 2008. A dendrochronology program library in R (dplR).Dendrochronologia 26: 115–124.

Carrer M, von Arx G, Castagneri D, Petit G. 2015. Distilling allometric andenvironmental information from time series of conduit size: the standardiza-tion issue and its relationship to tree hydraulic architecture. Tree Physiology35: 27–33.

Castagneri D, Petit G, Carrer M. 2015. Divergent climate response onhydraulic-related xylem anatomical traits of Picea abies along a 900-m alti-tudinal gradient. Tree Physiology 35: 1378–1387.

Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA. 1990. Methods of dendrochronology: applications inthe environmental sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Cuny HE, Rathgeber CBK, Kiesse TS, Hartmann FP, Barbeito I, Fournier

M. 2013. Generalized additive models reveal the intrinsic complexityof wood formation dynamics. Journal of Experimental Botany 64:1983–1994.

Cuny HE, Rathgeber CBK, Frank D, Fonti P, Fournier M. 2014. Kinetics oftracheid development explain conifer tree-ring structure. New Phytologist203: 1231–1241.

Cuny HE, Rathgeber CBK, Frank D, et al. 2015. Woody biomass productionlags stem-girth increase by over one month in coniferous forests. NaturePlants 1: 15160.

Denne MP. 1971. Temperature and tracheid development in Pinus sylvestrisseedlings. Journal of Experimental Botany 22: 362–370.

Filion L, Payette S, Gauthier L, Boutin Y. 1986. Light rings in subarctic coni-fers as a dendrochronological tool. Quaternary Research 26: 272–279.

Fonti P, von Arx G, Garcia-Gonzalez I, et al. 2010. Studying global changethrough investigation of the plastic responses of xylem anatomy in treerings. New Phytologist 185: 42–53.

Fonti P, Bryukhanova MV, Myglan VS, Kirdyanov AV, Naumova OV,

Vaganov EA. 2013. Temperature-induced responses of xylem structure ofLarix sibirica (Pinaceae) from the Russian Altay. American Journal ofBotany 100: 1332–1343.

Frank D, Esper J. 2005. Characterization and climate response patterns of ahigh-elevation, multi-species tree-ring network in the European Alps.Dendrochronologia 22: 107–121.

Fritts HC. 1976. Tree rings and climate. London: Academic Press.Gindl W. 1999. Climatic significance of light rings in timberline spruce,

Picea abies, Austrian Alps. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 31:242–246.

Gindl W, Grabner M, Wimmer R. 2001. Effects of altitude on tracheid differ-entiation and lignification of Norway spruce. Canadian Journal of Botany79: 815–821.

Gri�car J, Zupancic M, Cufar K, Koch G, Schmitt U, Oven P. 2006. Effect oflocal heating and cooling on cambial activity and cell differentiation in thestem of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Annals of Botany 97: 943–951.

Gri�car J, Prislan P, de Luis M, et al. 2015. Plasticity in variation of xylem andphloem cell characteristics of Norway spruce under different local condi-tions. Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 730.

Castagneri et al. — Climate influence on xylem morphogenesis as evidenced by intra-ring anatomy Page 9 of 10

Page 10: How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis …intra.tesaf.unipd.it/people/carrer/2017_AoB.pdfHow does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from

Grigorieva E, Matzarakis A, Freitas C de. 2010. Analysis of growing degree-days as a climate impact indicator in a region with extreme annual air tem-perature amplitude. Climate Research 42: 143–154.

Heyn ANJ. 1940. The physiology of cell elongation. Botanical Review 6:515–574.

Hoch G, Korner C. 2003. The carbon charging of pines at the climatic treeline:a global comparison. Oecologia 135: 10–21.

Hoch G, Popp M, Korner C. 2002. Altitudinal increase of mobile carbon poolsin Pinus cembra suggests sink limitation of growth at the Swiss treeline.Oikos 98: 361–374.

Holmes RL. 1983. Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating andmeasurement. Tree Ring Bulletin 43: 69–78.

Hsiao TC. 1973. Plant responses to water stress. Annual Review of PlantPhysiology 24: 519–570.

Kalliokoski T, Reza M, Jyske T, M€akinen H, Nojd P. 2012. Intra-annual tra-cheid formation of Norway spruce provenances in southern Finland. Trees26: 543–555.

King G, Fonti P, Nievergelt D, Buentgen U, Frank D. 2013.

Climatic drivers of hourly to yearly tree radius variations along a 6 degreesC natural warming gradient. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 168:36–46.

Kirdyanov A, Hughes M, Vaganov E, Schweingruber F, Silkin P. 2003. Theimportance of early summer temperature and date of snow melt for treegrowth in the Siberian Subarctic. Trees 17: 61–69.

Korner C. 2007. The use of ‘altitude’ in ecological research. Trends in Ecology& Evolution 22: 569–574.

Korner C. 2015. Paradigm shift in plant growth control. Current Opinion inPlant Biology 25: 107–114.

Lachenbruch B, McCulloh KA. 2014. Traits, properties, and performance: howwoody plants combine hydraulic and mechanical functions in a cell, tissue,or whole plant. New Phytologist 204: 747–764.

Lenz A, Hoch G, Korner C. 2013. Early season temperature controls cambialactivity and total tree ring width at the alpine treeline. Plant Ecology andDiversity 6: 365–375.

Martin-Benito D, Beeckman H, Canellas I. 2013. Influence of droughton tree rings and tracheid features of Pinus nigra and Pinus sylvestris in amesic Mediterranean forest. European Journal of Forest Research 132:33–45.

McMaster G, Wilhelm WW. 1997. Growing degree-days: one equation, two in-terpretations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 87: 291–300.

Moser L, Fonti P, Buentgen U, et al. 2010. Timing and duration of Europeanlarch growing season along altitudinal gradients in the Swiss Alps. TreePhysiology 30: 225–233.

Olano JM, Almeria I, Eugenio M, von Arx G. 2013. Under pressure: how aMediterranean high-mountain forb coordinates growth and hydraulic xylemanatomy in response to temperature and water constraints. FunctionalEcology 27: 1295–1303.

Pellizzari E, Camarero JJ, Gazol A, Sanguesa-Barreda G, Carrer M. 2016.

Wood anatomy and carbon-isotope discrimination support long-term hy-draulic deterioration as a major cause of drought-induced dieback. GlobalChange Biology 6: 2125–2137.

Petit G, Anfodillo T, Carraro V, Grani F, Carrer M. 2011. Hydraulic con-straints limit height growth in trees at high altitude. New Phytologist 189:241–252.

Piermattei A, Crivellaro A, Carrer M, Urbinati C. 2014. The “blue ring”:anatomy and formation hypothesis of a new tree-ring anomaly in conifers.Trees 29: 613–620.

R Development Core Team 2014. R: a language and environment for statisticalcomputing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.

Rathgeber CBK, Rossi S, Bontemps J-D. 2011. Cambial activity related to treesize in a mature silver-fir plantation. Annals of Botany 108: 429–438.

Reyer CPO, Brouwers N, Rammig A, et al. 2015. Forest resilience and tippingpoints at different spatio-temporal scales: approaches and challenges.Journal of Ecology 103: 5–15.

Rossi S, Deslauriers A, Anfodillo T, Carrer M. 2008. Age-dependent xylogen-esis in timberline conifers. New Phytologist 177: 199–208.

Rossi S, Anfodillo T, Cufar K, et al. 2013. A meta-analysis of cambium phenol-ogy and growth: linear and non-linear patterns in conifers of the northernhemisphere. Annals of Botany 112: 1911–1920.

Rossi S, Girard M-J, Morin H. 2014. Lengthening of the duration of xylogene-sis engenders disproportionate increases in xylem production. GlobalChange Biology 20: 2261–2271.

Ru�zi�cka K, Ursache R, Hej�atko J, Helariutta Y. 2015. Xylem development –from the cradle to the grave. New Phytologist 207: 519–535.

Sass U, Eckstein D. 1995. The variability of vessel size in beech (Fagus sylva-tica L.) and its ecophysiological interpretation. Trees 9: 247–252.

Sass-Klaassen U, Fonti P, Cherubini P, et al. 2016. A tree-centered approachto assess impacts of extreme climatic events on forests. Frontiers in PlantScience 7: 1069.

Schrader J, Baba K, May ST, et al. 2003. Polar auxin transport in the wood-forming tissues of hybrid aspen is under simultaneous control of develop-mental and environmental signals. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the USA 100: 10096–101.

Schuldt B, Knutzen F, Delzon S, Jansen S, Muller-Haubold H, Burlett R,

et al. 2016. How adaptable is the hydraulic system of European beech in theface of climate change-related precipitation reduction? New Phytologist210: 443–458.

Schweingruber FH, Kairiukstis L, Shiyatov S. 1990. Sample selection. In:Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA, eds. Methods of dendrochronology: applicationsin the environmental sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 23–35.

Seo J-W, Eckstein D, Jalkanen R, Rickebusch S, Schmitt U. 2008. Estimatingthe onset of cambial activity in Scots pine in northern Finland by means ofthe heat-sum approach. Tree Physiology 28: 105–112.

Simard S, Giovannelli A, Treydte K, Traversi ML, King GM, Frank D,

Fonti P. 2013. Intra-annual dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in thecambium of mature conifer trees reflects radial growth demands. TreePhysiology 33: 913–23.

Sperry JS, Love DM. 2015. What plant hydraulics can tell us about responses toclimate-change droughts. New Phytologist 207: 14–27.

Steppe K, Sterck F, Deslauriers A. 2015. Diel growth dynamics in tree stems:linking anatomy and ecophysiology. Trends in Plant Science 20: 335–343.

Szymczak S, Hetzer T, Br€auning A, Joachimski MM, Leuschner H-H,

Kuhlemann J. 2014. Combining wood anatomy and stable isotope varia-tions in a 600-year multi-parameter climate reconstruction from Corsicanblack pine. Quaternary Science Reviews 101: 146–158.

Taiz L, Zeiger E. 2006. Plant physiology, 3rd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Thibeault-Martel M, Krause C, Morin H, Rossi S. 2008. Cambial activity and

intra-annual xylem formation in roots and stems of Abies balsamea andPicea mariana. Annals of Botany 102: 667–674.

Treml V, Ka�spar J, Ku�zelov�a H, Gryc V. 2015. Differences in intra-annualwood formation in Picea abies across the treeline ecotone, GiantMountains, Czech Republic. Trees 29: 515–526.

Vaganov EA, Hughes MK, Shashkin AV. 2006. Growth dynamics of conifertree rings: images of past and future environments. New York: Springer.

Wimmer R, Grabner M. 2000. A comparison of tree-ring features in Piceaabies as correlated with climate. IAWA Journal 21: 403–416.

Wolf S, Hematy K, Hofte H. 2012. Growth control and cell wall signaling inplants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63: 381–407.

Wolkovich EM, Cook BI, Allen JM, et al. 2012. Warming experiments under-predict plant phenological responses to climate change. Nature 485:494–497.

Xu J, Lu J, Bao F, Evans R, Downes GM. 2013. Climate response of cell char-acteristics in tree rings of Picea crassifolia. Holzforschung 67: 217–225.

Page 10 of 10 Castagneri et al. — Climate influence on xylem morphogenesis as evidenced by intra-ring anatomy