37
How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill

How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

How Disciplines Differ

Desmond

McNeill

Page 2: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

The challenge of interdisciplinarity

- Interdisciplinary research

- Interdisciplinary teaching

Page 3: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

What is interdisciplinary research?

• Multi-disciplinary: autonomy of the different disciplines; does not lead to changes in the existing disciplinary and theoretical structures;

• Inter-disciplinary: formulation of a uniform, discipline-transcending terminology or common methodology; cooperation within a common framework shared by the disciplines involved;

• Trans-disciplinary (also known as cross-disciplinary): research based on a common theoretical understanding and accompanied by a mutual interpenetration of disciplinary epistemologies.

(Source: OECD 1972)

Page 4: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

What is a discipline?Dictionary definition

“An academic discipline, or field of study, is a branch of knowledge which is taught or researched at the college or university level. Disciplines are defined and recognized by the academic journals in which research is published, and the learned societies and academic departments or faculties to which their practitioners belong.”

Page 5: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Working definition:

A discipline is:

- A rigorous way of studying the world.

Page 6: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

 

• It is rigorous (‘disciplined’)

• It is one way of studying/knowing/understanding

the world (there are many).

• It studies only one aspect, or part, of the world

Page 7: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Objects of study

• Material things

• Living things

• Individual human beings

• Groups of human beings

• … (e.g human artefacts)

Page 8: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Ways of studying them

• Observation

• Experimentation

• Dissection/analysis

• ….?

Page 9: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Where they are studied

• Field

• Laboratory

• Library/archives

• ……?

Page 10: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Ways of presenting results

• Description (text)

• Measurement (numbers)

• Depiction (photos, pictures, maps)

•  ….?

Page 11: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

The object of study: matter or meaning

• One may range disciplines across a spectrum:

• Physics – chemistry – economics – anthropology – literary studies

Page 12: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

’Naturalist’ approaches (emphasis on matter/individual agent)

Nature Physics Body Chemistry Mind Biochemistry Society economics

Page 13: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

’Social’ approaches (emphasis on meaning/structure)

Society Anthropology/sociology Mind Psychology Body Gender studies Nature Environmental philosophy

Page 14: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

NATURAL SCIENCES HUMAN SCIENCES

Phenomenon being Studied*

Explanation Explanation / Interpretation (thin description) (thin/thick description) Reductionist Holist Agent Structure (physics) (ecology) (economics) (anthropology) Laboratory Field ….. Field (Where) Quantitative Qualitative Quantitative Qualitative (How) (Predominant

method)

* e.g a rainbow, a wink, a factory

Page 15: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Rainbow (1)

Page 16: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Rainbow (2)

Page 17: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Wink (1)

Page 18: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Wink (2)

Page 19: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

:

"Thick Description”

• Geertz: "Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture", adopted the term from philosopher Gilbert Ryle

• ”Consider, he says, two boys rapidly contracting the eyelids of their right eyes. In one, this is an involuntary twitch; in the other, a conspiratorial signal to a friend. The two movements are, as movements, identical; …. Yet the difference, however unphotographable, between a twitch and a wink is vast; as anyone unfortunate enough to have had the first taken for the second knows. The winker is communicating, and indeed communicating in a quite precise and special way: (1) deliberately, (2) to someone in particular, (3) to impart a particular message, (4) according to a socially established code, and (5) without cognizance of the rest of the company. As Ryle points out, the winker has done two things, contracted his eyelids and winked, while the twitcher has done only one, contracted his eyelids. Contracting your eyelids on purpose when there exists a public code in which so doing counts as a conspiratorial signal is winking.”

Page 20: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Factory

Page 21: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

• ’Bagasse’ is what remains when sugar ise extracted from sugar cane.

• Is bagasse a product, a by-product, or waste?

Page 22: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Factory (2)

Page 23: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Value

• Value, in economics, is not a ‘natural’phenomenon. A commodity (in Marxian terms) is a material thing located in a social context.

Page 24: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Ways of seeing, Ways of knowing

There is a ’chasm’ between two different approaches. Moses & Knutsen call these:

- Naturalism and constructivism

and summarise the differences

(2007: 287)

Page 25: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching
Page 26: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Contrasts of approach

• Quantitative/qualitative• Entities/relations• Generalisation/context• Analytic/synthetic• Reductionist/holist• …..

 

 

Page 27: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Intellectual rigour

What constitutes rigour is decided by those who practice the discipline.

• Within a discipline, there is generally strong agreement as to what constitutes rigour.

• Between disciplines, there is often strong disagreement.

Page 28: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Why do research?

 

• Intrinsic reasons

• Instrumental reasons

Page 29: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Why do interdisciplinary research?

 

• Intrinsic reasons

• Instrumental reasons

Page 30: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

What is an appropriate level of ambition?

• Multi-disciplinary: for policy-oriented research

• Inter-disciplinary: for more basic research

• Trans-disciplinary: not possible to achieve?

Page 31: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Next lectures

Intro: Hal Wilhite

Social science: anthropology

Social sceince: economics

Natural science: biology

Humanities

Conclusion: Desmond McNeill

Page 32: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Categories

The above processes (description, measurement) involve:

- Selection and, almost always,

- Classification.

Page 33: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Even measurement usually involves classification.

In demography, ’total population’ is arguably based on a ‘natural’ distinction - between humans and non-humans.

But the division between children and adults is not purely ‘natural’.

Page 34: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

Categories: two examples

Zoology: 8 main taxonomic ranks: domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species.

Sociology: characteristics shared by members of a group may include interests, values, ethnic or social background, and kinship ties

Page 35: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching

In most cases, classification is not ‘natural’, but ‘social’ i.e. dependent on the shared meanings of a group of people.

Such classifications vary across different societies, or over time within a society.

Page 36: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching
Page 37: How Disciplines Differ Desmond McNeill. The challenge of interdisciplinarity -Interdisciplinary research - Interdisciplinary teaching