29
How am I Doing? School Librarian Self- Efficacy and Gauging Relationships with Other School Stakeholders Anthony Chow, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Dept. of Library and Information Studies The University of North Carolina at Greensboro

How am I Doing? School Librarian Self-Efficacy and Gauging Relationships with Other School Stakeholders Anthony Chow, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Dept. of

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

How am I Doing? School Librarian Self-Efficacy and Gauging Relationships

with Other School Stakeholders

Anthony Chow, Ph.D.Assistant Professor

Dept. of Library and Information StudiesThe University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Introduction Literature Method Results Discussion and Conclusions

Overview

2 of 28

A case study of four school libraries introduced strategic planning as a way to build consensus and increase communication among school stakeholders.

How do we measure the impact on the school librarian?

I created the School Librarian Self-Efficacy and Social Information Processing Scale

Introduction

3 of 28

Self-efficacy is defined as, “beliefs in one’s capabilities to mobilize the motivation, cognitive resources, and courses of action needed to meet given situational demands” (Wood & Bandura, 1989, p. 408)

GSE or General Self-Efficacy is defined as “one’s belief in one’s overall competence to effect requisite performances across a wide variety of achievement situations” (Eden, in press) or as “individuals’ perception of their ability to perform across a variety of different situations” (Judge, Erez, et al., 1998, p. 170)

New Generation Self-Efficacy Scale (Chen, Gully, & Eden, 2001) 8-item scale that measures self-efficacy

Literature

4 of 28

Social Information Processing Theory (Colucci & Rice, 2009) Social Information Processing Theory (SIP) (Rice,

1993; Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978) holds that Individual evaluations of Job Characteristics and Job

Satisfaction are a reflection of social influence factors, such as information, modeling, and cues regarding social consensus from three factors:

1. Communication behavior with others2. Social cues regarding job satisfaction attitudes3. Social cues regarding job characteristics attitudes

Literature (2)

5 of 28

How am I Doing?

School Librarian Self-Efficacy and Social Information Processing Scale

Communication

with Others

Social Cues

Regarding Job

Satisfaction

Attitudes

Social Cues

Regarding Job

Characteristics Attitude

s

Self-Efficacy

6 of 28

RQ1: What is the current self-efficacy and “social reality” of school librarians?

RQ2: Would introducing strategic planning positively impact school librarian self-efficacy and the three factors comprising one’s “social reality”?

RQ3: What is the impact of one’s social relationships with general self-efficacy?

Research Questions

7 of 28

Case studies of four school librarians Two elementary, one middle, and one high

school Pretest of all four using SESIPS Teacher survey (n=58) Parent survey (n=6)

Method

8 of 28

Results – Pretest of all four

In general

With peers

With subordinates

With school leaders

With teachers

With students

With parents

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00

Please rate your overall quality of communication with others:

9 of 28

In general

With peers

With subordinates

With school leaders

With teachers

With students

With parents

4.60 4.80 5.00 5.20 5.40 5.60 5.80 6.00

Please rate overall how satisfied you think people are with the job you are doing (take your best guess):

Results (2) – Pretest of all four

10 of 28

In g

ener

al

With

pee

rs

With

sub

ordi

nate

s

With

sch

ool l

eade

rs

With

teac

hers

With

stu

dent

s

With

par

ents

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

Please rate your overall quality of communication with others:Please rate overall how satisfied you think people are with the job you are do-ingPlease rate overall how well people understand what you do in your job:

Results (3) – Pretest summary of all four

11 of 28

The Tale of Two School Librarians

Your

co-

worke

rs

Your

sub

ordi

nate

s

Your

sch

ool l

eade

rs

Your

sch

ool's

teac

hers

Your

stu

dent

s

Your

stu

dent

s' pa

rent

s0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

Please rate your overall relationships with:

Please rate your overall rela-tionships with:

12 of 28

Librarian 1 – Pretty Confident!

SE Factor Average Rating

1. I will be able to achieve most of the goals that I have set for myself.

6.50

2. When facing difficult tasks, I am certain that I will accomplish them.

5.75

3. In general, I think that I can obtain outcomes that are important to me.

6.25

4. I believe I can succeed at most any endeavor to which I set my mind.

6.25

5. I will be able to successfully overcome many challenges.

6.25

6. I am confident that I can perform effectively on many different tasks.

6.00

7. Compared to other people, I can do most tasks very well.

6.25

8. Even when things are tough, I can perform quite well.6.25

13 of 28

14

Social cues suggest stakeholders are more satisfied….

In g

en

era

l

Wit

h p

ee

rs

Wit

h s

ub

ord

ina

tes

Wit

h s

cho

ol le

ad

ers

Wit

h t

ea

che

rs

Wit

h s

tud

en

ts

Wit

h p

are

nts

Please rate overall how satisfied you think people are with the job you are doing (take your best guess):

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

PrePost

15

Pre-teacher ratings (5.3 average; n=8)

I understand how best to use the school library.

The school library supports my teaching and instruction.

The school library supports my students’ coursework and assignments.

The school Library supplements my students’ overall learning.

My school library has an adequate supply of technology resources.

The available book collection of my library is adequate.

My overall satisfaction level with the school library is...

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00

Rate your overall satisfaction level with your school library on the following items on a scale of 1-7. (1=lowest satisfaction level, 10=highest satisfaction level)

I have begun to make a very positive impact on the staff, in general, as they have come to understand my role as a provider for quality, instructional technology resources. It has only been in the last month that I have been able to lead a professional development workshop. Two of my administrators were present for it and both expressed that they thought the session was well done. I believe it was the first time they really recognized my potential as an untapped resource. A few of the teachers were surprised that I invited the entire faculty to collaborate on lessons. They did not know that I would be willing to "teach".

Seeing an improvement with two groups, not so much for a third…

In g

en

era

l

Wit

h p

ee

rs

Wit

h s

ub

ord

ina

tes

Wit

h s

cho

ol le

ad

ers

Wit

h t

ea

che

rs

Wit

h s

tud

en

ts

Wit

h p

are

nts

Please rate overall how well people understand what you do in your job:

0

2

4

6

PrePost

16 of 28

A second librarian – great things are happening

In g

en

era

l

Wit

h p

ee

rs

Wit

h s

ub

ord

ina

tes

Wit

h s

cho

ol le

ad

ers

Wit

h t

ea

che

rs

Wit

h s

tud

en

ts

Wit

h p

are

nts

Please rate your overall quality of communication with others:

012345678

PrePost

17 of 28

In g

en

era

l

Wit

h p

ee

rs

Wit

h s

ub

ord

ina

tes

Wit

h s

cho

ol le

ad

ers

Wit

h t

ea

che

rs

Wit

h s

tud

en

ts

Wit

h p

are

nts

Please rate overall how satisfied you think people are with the job you are doing (take your best guess):

0

2

4

6

PrePost

Satisfaction is improving… ah that’s what she does!

18 of 28

Yo

ur

co-w

ork

ers

Yo

ur

sub

ord

ina

tes

Yo

ur

sch

oo

l le

ad

ers

Yo

ur

sch

oo

l's t

ea

che

rs

Yo

ur

stu

de

nts

Yo

ur

stu

de

nts

' p

are

nts

Please rate your overall relationships with:

0

2

4

6

8

PrePost

Relationships are also improving….

19 of 28

Pre-teacher Ratings (5.2 average; n=11)

I understand how best to use the school library.

The school library supports my teaching and instruction.

The school library supports my students’ coursework and assignments.

The school Library supplements my students’ overall learning.

My school library has an adequate supply of technology resources.

The available book collection of my library is adequate.

My overall satisfaction level with the school library is...

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00

Rate your overall satisfaction level with your school library on the following items on a scale of 1-7. (1=lowest satisfaction level, 10=highest satisfaction level)

20 of 28

1. I w

ill b

e a

ble

to a

chie

ve m

ost

of

the g

oals

that

I have s

et

for

myse

lf.

2. W

hen f

acin

g d

ifficult t

ask

s, I a

m

cert

ain

that

I w

ill a

ccom

plis

h t

hem

.

3. In

genera

l, I t

hin

k t

hat

I can o

bta

in

outc

om

es

that

are

im

port

ant

to m

e.

4. I belie

ve I c

an s

ucceed a

t m

ost

any e

ndeavor

to w

hic

h I s

et

my

min

d.

5. I w

ill b

e a

ble

to s

uccess

fully

overc

om

e m

any c

halle

nges.

6. I am

confident

that

I can p

erf

orm

eff

ectively

on m

any d

iffere

nt

task

s.

7. C

om

pare

d t

o o

ther

people

, I can

do m

ost

task

s very

well.

8. Even w

hen t

hin

gs

are

tough, I can

perf

orm

quite w

ell.

Please rate your overall confidence in the following:

01234567

PrePost

Self-efficacy and confidence is flowering!

21 of 28

Scale Composite Scores

  SL1 SL1

Pre Post Pre Post

SESIS 5.2 5.4 4.0 5.4

Teacher Satisfaction 5.33   5.19  

12 Questions22 of 28

Building a school library strategic plan Empowers librarians to establish an ideal

vision Encourages collaboration Active, assertive steps towards building a

collective vision for the future School Librarian Self-Efficacy and Social

Information Processing Scale provides a way of measuring impact and current social “reality”

Discussion and Conclusions

23 of 28

RQ1: What is the current self-efficacy and “social reality” of school librarians? Too early to tell – One continues to do well, the

other is doing really well Relationships with parents, leaders, and teachers

continue to lowest rated Need to increase sample size

Research Questions

24 of 28

RQ2: Would introducing strategic planning positively impact school librarian self-efficacy and “social reality”? Preliminary data suggests “yes” Both responding librarians have experienced

growth and improvement in the areas of communication and attitudes towards job satisfaction and job characteristics.

Again need to increase sample size

Research Questions

25 of 28

Just getting started My new book, Library Technology and User Services,

details the strategic planning process explicitly within the context of technology and user services.

I’m a systems designer and live by the motto, “Make your own luck” Create an ideal vision of what you want to become Work backwards securing the resources and means

necessary to accomplish your goals Work hard and you will be a lot closer to achieving that

vision then you are today !

Final Thoughts

26 of 28

I would be happy to: Provide you with our online strategic planning instrument

Email support if needed Provide you access to the self-efficacy and social

information diagnostic scale Just leave me your name and email address and we

will be in touch with you I just want your data (completely anonymous and

confidential) to help refine and validate the instruments so they are truly effective and worthwhile….

The slides will be available at anthonyschow.wordpress.com

Are you interested?

27 of 28

Colucci & Rice, 2009Chen, G., Gully, S., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a New General

Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods 2001; 4; 62

Eden, D. (in press). Means efficacy: External sources of general and specific subjective efficacy. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck,&H. Thierry (Eds.),Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Judge, T. A., Erez, A.,&Bono, J. A. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance, 11, 167-187.

Rice, 1993Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978Wood, R. & Bandura, A. (1989). Social Theory of Organizational

Management. Academy of Management Review, 1989, Vol. 14, No. 3, 361-384.

References

28 of 28

Anthony Chow, Ph.D. [email protected] anthonyschow.wordpress.com

29 of 28

Contact Me