Upload
emma-preston
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Housing market crises and economic crises
• IMF recently investigated 122 recessions in 21 OECD countries 1960 and 2007
• 28 recessions coincided with a severe housing market crisis– Recessions with housing market crisis are deeper and longer
• Cumulative output loss 3.7% vs 2.3% for normal recession
• Last one quarter longer
– Housing investments shrunk 8 to 12 quarters
• Effects far deeper than for equity market crises– GDP loss housing market crisis: 3,4% (pre) to 0,8% (post)– GDP loss equity market crisis: 4,0% (pre) to 2,6% (post)
• How is that possible?
Mechanism is saving and consumption
• House prices effects on consumption growth larger than equity price effects– House price rises seem(ed) more permanent– Banks are more willing to finance more and/or home owners willing
to save less
• 2001 - 2005 US housing wealth growth explains part of consumption growth– Effect is especially strong for young households. Older people are
more careful
• Development housing market explains quarter of Dutch economic growth 1995 - 2000 (DNB, 2003)
How does home ownership affect household behavior?Consumption effect housing much bigger than financial wealth
• Lettau and Ludvigson (2004)– Unexpected wealth shocks must be perceived as permanent to affect
consumption spending
• Case, Quigley, and Shiller (2005)– Look at macro data across US states and across OECD countries– Changes in housing wealth affect consumption more than changes in
financial (i.e. stock market related) wealth
• Bostic, Gabriel, and Painter (2005)– US housing wealth growth (2001-2005) explains 12% consumption growth– Effect especially big for non-durable consumption– Effect strongest for young people. Older people more careful
• Engelhardt (1995) and Skinner (1996)– Effect of US house wealth changes on saving is asymmetric– Gains in wealth decrease savings by 0.4 cent per dollar
Housing markets kept the world economy afloat between 2001 and 2003
• Crisis equity markets 2000-2003 comparable to ’29 …– US: loss in equity wealth 2000-2001 = $ 8 trillion– NL: loss in equity value 2000-2003 = 65% or € 574 billion
• … but that recession was relatively mild
• Housing markets delivered wealth compensation– US: gain in housing wealth 2001-2004 = $ 9.6 trillion – NL: gain in housing wealth 2000-2005 = 21%, or € 228 billion
What happens when house prices go down?
• Consumption effect is unfortunately larger for price falls than for price growth
• Saving goes up substantially
• Engelhardt (1996): asymmetric effect of house prices on US consumption in 1980s– Only price falls matter
• Skinner (1996): every dollar of house price fall leads to 10 cents in extra savings in the US
• Dutch Central Planning Bureau (2006) found effect of price falls to be 2.5 to 5 times as strong as price rises
Will European house prices fall across the board?
• Structural price falls sofar mostly in countries and regions with large over supply and/or massive fall in demand– (US), Spain, Ireland, UK
• “Every housing downturn begins with an excess supply of available dwellings” (Case and Quigley, 2008)
A scenario for years to come?Netherlands early ’80s: real price fall 48%
0,00
100,00
200,00
300,00
400,00
1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989
Nominale index
Reële index
House price developments in Europe (2)… but not all booms turn into busts …… and one market does not boom at all
A housing market with history: AmsterdamVolatile with booms and busts, but stationary in real terms
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
rents (1650=100) house prices (1650=100)
Components of crisis differ strongly by country
• Market sentiment still bad in many countries– Large hardware spending postponed, consumption still
reasonable in many countries
• Demografics is getting problematic in many regions in east and south– Central Europe, Club Med– Without large scale intervention, these markets are doomed
• Economies may get back into recession– Unemployment varies strongly across countries
• Interest rates (euribor, IRS) still very low– Liquidity premiums are falling
• Oversupply problematic in some countries– But not in most of Netherlands
Expected demographics: change in total populationLarge differences across Europe until 2050
Change total pop. 2010-2050
Demographics, Netherlands 1995-2050800.000 households to go
Bron: CBS
Aantal huishoudens (+ prognose)
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
8500
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
x1
00
0
Demografics also has positive sideOlder home owners ‘consume more house’
Bron: CBS
Demand increases with “human capital” – Higher education, income, and better health lead to more housing demand
Demand increase with age– Households only consume less house at end of life (80+)
Economy, construction and jobsDutch labor market still very strong
• Housing construction still very low• Job loss in construction sector (estimated): 50.000
– Inclusiding secondary job losses
– Started late 2009
• OECD’s biggest worry about Dutch labor market was structural tension
• Unemployment has not gone above 6%• Labor population set to shrink, further reducing probability of structural
unemployment
… but is it really that low?Dutch rate averaged 4.4% from 1814 to 1994
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
1814
1834
1854
1874
1894
1914
1934
1954
1974
1994
Source: Eichholtz and Koedijk (1996)
Credit crisis, Interest Rate and Construction
• Credit crisis influences both financing of new supply and demand– So effect on prices is unclear
• Financing of new construction– Rate is still low because of low government bond rate …– … and despite very high spreads– Availability of credit is the larger problem
Conclusions
• Housing markets can dampen crises, but can also make them more severe– Housing wealth drives consumption and saving
• The current housing crisis is not global or even European
• Is the Dutch housing market in a crisis?– Yes: no liquidity, no construction, no activity– No: prices have not really fallen
• Will prices fall in a big way? I think it’s unlikely …– Net supply is low– Mortgage rates not likely to go up much
• … but on the other hand– Demographics are turning sour– Government policy very uncertain– But economic news
Reading suggestions
• Hernando de Soto– The Mystery of Capital, Bantam Press, 2000
• Ed Glaeser– Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us
Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier , Penguin Press HC, 2011
Extra: Housing supply and spatial policyScarcity housing is not linked to population density
• International (EU) relationship between population density and ratio housing cost / income is 0.06
• Price elasticity of Dutch housing supply is zero
• Scarcity of housing land is political choice– Supply housing land 1981-2003 grew 39% in Belgium; 12% in
Netherlands– Ratio housing land / agricultural land (2000)
• Netherlands: 9.5%
• Denmark: 11.9%
• Belgium: 12.8%
– If the Netherlands would use the Belgian ratio, the supply of housing land would rise 31%
And what are the consequences?Residential land prices in Belgium and Holland, 2005
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
België
Nederl
and
Vlaand
eren
Provincie
Antw
erpen
Friesla
nd
Drenthe
Groninge
n
Zeelan
d
Flevolan
d
Brusse
l
Overijss
el
Limbu
rg
Noord-
Braban
t
Gelderl
and
Zuid-H
olland
Utrech
t
Noord-
Hollan
d
prij
s (€
/m2)