15
Kamila Diddle Senior Environmental Specialist June 10, 2016 Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1 1

Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

Kamila DiddleSenior Environmental Specialist

June 10, 2016

Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

1

Page 2: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

• 1958 Gulf American Corporation(GAC) began digging GG Canal

• 1968 Faka Union Canal dredging began• 1976 GGE Redevelopment Study Phase I• 1983 GG Estates Land Trust was established after the

bankruptcy of GAC• 1987 CC Natural Resources report on resource management

of undeveloped land• 1997 Golden Gate Area Master Plan• 1998 Dames & Moore report, Big Cypress Basin Watershed

Management Plan• 2006 Belle Meade Area Stormwater Management Master Plan• 2008 (Phase I) Horsepen Strand Conservation Area (HSCA)

Feasibility Study

How Did We Get Here Again?

2

Page 3: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

Northern Golden Gate

Estates Watershed

Wellfield Protection ZonesST/W-1ST/W-2ST/W-3ST/W-4

!.

!.

!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.

!.!.!.!.!.!.

!.!.!.

!.

!.!.

!.!.

!.!.

!.

!.!.

!.!.

!.!.

!.!. !.!.

!.!.

!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!.

!.!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.!.!.!.!.!.

!.!. !.!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.

!.!.

!.!.!.

!.

!.!.

!.!.

!.!.!.!.

!.!.

!.!.

!.

!.!.!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.!.

!.!.!.!.!.!.!.

!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.

!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

Wells!. City of Naplesy p!. Collier County

1yr 2yr5yr20yr

3

Page 4: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

4

Page 5: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

5

Page 6: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

• Project managed by Collier Soil & Water Conservation District

• Prepared by Biological Research Associates • Cost = $162,000 (with FDEP & the SFWMD both

giving $81,000 each)• Objective: Feasibility of reconnecting HSCA to

provide stormwater treatment, flood protection, water quality treatment and habitat restoration for NGGE stormwater management function and hydration. Rehydration of historic wetlands and evaluate the potential for a local mitigation banking opportunity.

• GGE was at 35 – 40% buildout at the time of Phase I

HSCA Feasibility Study

6

Page 7: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

Study Area

7

Page 8: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

• Comparison of historic vs current wetlands – Loss of 2,386 acres of jurisdictional wetlands

• Water surface levels were evaluated for changes from historic to current levels

• Cross sectional evaluation showed decrease in water depths in most areas but in some locations there were increase in water depths

Task 1:HSCA Utilization as storm/surface water system

8

Page 9: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

9

Page 10: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

PHASE I :HORSEPEN STRAND

CONSERVATION AREA (HSCA)

10

NGGE Phase I wetland

footprint in 1940’s vs 2007

1940’s wetland footprint

2007 wetland footprint

Lost wetlands2007 wetland footprint1940’s wetland footprint

Areas with High loss

Page 11: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

Determine how to reconnect flowways to establish maximum, natural and unrestricted continuous flow of storm/surface waters• East/West roads are

barriers impeding flow• Current cross drains

are not sufficient and create bottleneck area

Determine base natural conditions• Storage in Winchester

increased since 1940, due to the damning effects of I75 but still showed capacity for more water storage

Task 2

11

Task 3

Page 12: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

Task 4

12

Task 5Determine how much storm/surface water could be diverted into the flowway from NGGE• Volumes could not be

determined • Recommended water

be diverted from Miller and FakaUnion Canal to regions north of 10th

Ave SE

HSCA Land Use Map

Page 13: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

Evaluate findings from HSCA as to benefits to the NGGE community for storm/surface water management• Reconnection of the

entire length more difficult than focusing on strategic areas

• The Strand and Winchester head could be rehydrated by redirecting flow from roadside swales and away from the canals

Task 6

13

Task 7Determine jurisdiction status of the flowwayunder the regulations of the USACOE and State of FL• HSCA was comprised

of 57% wetlands– with 11,465/12,065 acres

with being federally jurisdictional

Page 14: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

• The first clear visual of where the actual flow-way was historically

• Identified areas that could hold additional water • Wetland B (North Belle Meade) greatest

opportunity to provide a regional resource • Reported an overall loss of wetlands from 1940

to 2007 (about 11%)• Wetlands north of 10th Ave SE showed

decreased water volumes with the south region showing increasing trends

• 22 land types identified and mapped

Summary of HSCA Phase 1

14

Page 15: Horsepen Strand Conservation Area Phase 1

15