Upload
water87550
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Honey and Mumford.doc
1/8
Honey and Mumfords learning style questionnaire (LSQ)
- recognizes four types of styles
Learning style Description Caracteristics
Refectors
!e"ectors li#e to stand $ac# to ponder e%periences and o$ser&e
tem from many di'erent perspecti&es ey collect data* $ot +rst
and and from oters* and prefer to tin# a$out it torougly $efore
coming to any conclusion e toroug collection and analysis of
data a$out e%periences and e&ents is ,at counts so tey tend to
postpone reacing de+niti&e conclusions for as long as possi$le
eir pilosopy is to $e cautious ey are tougtful people ,o
li#e to consider all possi$le angles and implications $efore ma#ing a
mo&e
Careful
ood listener
Holds $ac# from participation
Metodical
Does not .ump to conclusions
Slo, to decide
oroug and tougtful
Theorists
eorists adapt and integrate o$ser&ations into comple% $ut
logically sound teories ey tin# pro$lems troug in a &ertical*
step-$y-step logical ,ay ey assimilate disparate facts into
coerent teories ey tend to $e perfectionists ,o ,on/t rest
easy until tings are tidy and +t into a rational sceme ey li#e to
analyze and syntesize ey are #een on $asic assumptions*
principles* teories models and systems tin#ing eir pilosopy
poses rationality and logic 01f it/s logical it/s good0 Questions tey
8/10/2019 Honey and Mumford.doc
2/8
frequently as# are2 0Does it ma#e sense30 0Ho, does tis +t ,it
tat3 45at are te $asic assumptions30 ey tend to $e detaced*
analytical and dedicated to rational o$.ecti&ity rater tan anyting
su$.ecti&e or am$iguous
Disciplined
1ntolerant of su$.ecti&e* intuiti&e ideas
Logical
Lo, tolerance of uncertainty* am$iguity
6$.ecti&e
7arental in approac
7ro$ing ,en questioning
!ational
!estricted in lateral tougt
Activists
8cti&ists in&ol&e temsel&es fully and ,itout $ias in ne,
e%periences ey en.oy te ere and no, and are appy to $e
dominated $y immediate e%periences ey are open-minded* not
s#eptical* and tis tends to ma#e tem entusiastic a$out anyting
ne, eir pilosopy is 01/ll try anyting once0 ey tend to act
+rst and consider te consequences after,ards eir days are +lled
,it acti&ity ey tac#le pro$lems $y $rainstorming 8s soon as te
e%citement from one acti&ity as died do,n tey are $usy loo#ing
for te ne%t ey tend to tri&e on te callenge of ne,
e%periences $ut are $ored ,it implementation and longer term
consolidation
9le%i$le
ets $ored ,it consolidation
Happy to gi&e tings a try
6pen minded
6ptimistic a$out cange
!uses into action ,itout preparation
a#es immediate o$&ious action
a#es unnecessary ris#s
8/10/2019 Honey and Mumford.doc
3/8
:nli#ely to resist cange
Pragmatists
7ragmatists are #een on trying out ideas* teories and tecniques to
see if tey ,or# in practice ey positi&ely searc out ne, ideas
and ta#e te +rst opportunity to e%periment ,it applications ey
are te sort of people ,o return from management courses
$rimming ,it ne, ideas tat tey ,ant to try out in practice ey
li#e to get on ,it tings and act quic#ly and con+dently on ideas
tat attract tem ey tend to $e impatient ,it ruminating and
open ended discussions ey are essentially practical* do,n-to-
eart people ,o li#e ma#ing practical decisions and sol&ing
pro$lems
;usinessli#e
gets to te point
Does not li#e teory
1mpatient ,it ,a Mumford* ?@@AB Co+eld et
al* AB
8/10/2019 Honey and Mumford.doc
4/8
3.0 Your Learning Style
Honey and Mumford (?@EA) de&ised an in"uential self-test* ,ic
indicates ,eter you are predominantly an acti&ist* a re"ector* a
teorist* or a pragmatist ere are ,e$sites ,ere you can ta#e a
test
F
;ut you ,ill pro$a$ly get .ust as good an idea a$out your learning
style (and tose of your colleagues) $y reading ,at eac type li#es
and loates
3.1 Activists
8cti&ists learn $est from acti&ities in ,ic tere are2
G
e, e%periences and callenges from ,ic to learn
G Sort Iere and no, tas#s in&ol&ing
Competiti&e team,or# and pro$lem-sol&ing
G
J%citement* cange and &ariety
G Iig &isi$ility tas#s suc as cairing meetings* leadingdiscussions and
7resentations
G
Situations in ,ic ne, ideas can $e de&eloped ,itout constraints
of policy and structure
G
6pportunities for .ust Ia&ing a go
8cti&ists learn least from* and may react against* acti&ities ,ere2
G
8/10/2019 Honey and Mumford.doc
5/8
8/10/2019 Honey and Mumford.doc
6/8
8/10/2019 Honey and Mumford.doc
7/8
G
Ha&e to participate in situations empasizing emotions and feelings
G
8re in&ol&ed in unstructured acti&ities ,ere am$iguity anduncertainty are ig
G
8re as#ed to act or decide ,itout a $asis in policy* principle or
concept
G
8re faced ,it a otcpotc of alternati&e or contradictory
tecniques or metods ,itout e%ploring any in dept
G
Dou$t tat te su$.ect matter is metodologically sound
G
9eel out of tune ,it oter participants* for e%ample ,en tey are
,it lots of acti&ists
3.4 Pragmatists
7ragmatists learn $est from acti&ities ,ere2
G ere is an o$&ious lin# $et,een te su$.ect matter and a Ireal
life pro$lem
G
ey are so,n tecniques for doing tings ,it o$&ious practical
ad&antages
G
ey a&e te cance to try out and practice tecniques ,it
coacing or feed$ac# from a credi$le e%pert
G
ey see a model tey can emulate* or e%amples K anecdotesG
ey are gi&en tecniques currently applica$le to teir o,n ,or#
G
ey are gi&en immediate opportunities to implement ,at tey
a&e learned
G
ey can concentrate on practical issues* suc as dra,ing up action
plans or gi&ing tips to oters 7ragmatists learn least from* and may
react against* acti&ities ,ere2
8/10/2019 Honey and Mumford.doc
8/8
G
e learning is not related to an immediate need tey recognize
G
6rganizers of te learning seem distant from realityG
ere are no clear guidelines
G
ey feel people are going round in circles rater tan getting to
te point
N
G
ere are political* organizational* managerial or personal o$stacles
to implementation
G
ere is no apparent re,ard from te learning acti&ity* for e%ample
iger gradesO