Upload
niel
View
31
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Homeland Security Standards Database (HSSD). Presented by Bob Hager October 21, 2009. HSSD background. Goal: provide one-stop access to standards information related to HS. Launched in 2004 with DHS funding HSSP developed initial list of standards Portal built on ANSI NSSN database - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Presented by
Bob HagerOctober 21, 2009
Homeland Security Standards Database (HSSD)
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 2
HSSD background
Goal: provide one-stop access to standards information related to HS. Launched in 2004 with DHS funding HSSP developed initial list of standards Portal built on ANSI NSSN database ANSI on-going roles:
Infrastructure / interface Standards identification Classification Data exchange with other HS standards resources, e.g. RKB Coordinate and facilitate improvements to all of the above
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 3
Features of www.hssd.us
Search on keyword or document number Advanced search, including filtering by SDO Classification-based searches – select one or more
categories from hierarchical classification scheme Alerting Links from Responder Knowledge Base
(https://www.rkb.us/)
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 4
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 5
Standards Portfolio
Cyber
Emergency Preparedness and Response
Chemical Countermeasures
Biological Countermeasures
Radiological & Nuclear
Countermeasures
High Explosives Countermeasures
Conformity Assessment
Incident Management
Communications
Training
Personal Protective Equipment
Urban Search and Rescue Robots
Geospatial Information Standards
Threats
Borders & Transportation
Biometrics
RFID
X-Ray
Customs
Information Analysis and Infrastructure
Protection
Modeling, Simulation, and
Analysis
Heating, Ventilation, and Air
Conditioning
Sensors
Structures
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 6
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 7
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 8
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 9
The numbers
NSSN 300,000 records 950 SDOs
HSSD 5,000 records (1.5% of total) 130 SDOs (14% of total)
SDO concentration – the long tail Top 10% of SDOs by record count = 75% of total records
High concentration of international/foreign standards represented
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 10
Top 10% (13) of HSSD SDOs
Rec Count % of Total
ISO ISO 1,006 20.31%
US DoD US DOD 448 9.04%
NFPA National Fire Protection Association 446 9.00%
CEN European Committee for Standardization 310 6.26%
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
305 6.16%
IEC IEC 238 4.80%
ASTM ASTM International 177 3.57%
DIN Deutsches Institut fur Normung 169 3.41%
SAI Standards Australia 133 2.68%
NATO NATO 128 2.58%
KSA Korean Standards Association 126 2.54%
ITI (INCITS) National Committee for Information Technology Standards
122 2.46%
UL Underwriters Laboratories 107 2.16%
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 11
Selection challenges
How broad or narrow should the inclusion criteria be? In general, we’ve been told to err on the side of inclusion,
although this approach risks diluting value Degree of inclusion challenge depends on topic – e.g., some
SDOs should/could be included wholesale
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 12
Selection challenges - examples
Water quality General water treatment and vs. emergency water supply treatment “Chemicals used for treatment of water intended for human
consumption - Hexafluorosilicic acid”? Medical
Limiting to emergency medical equipment/processes “Tracheal tubes and connectors”?
Ships and Marine Technology Yes: “Signs and plates for fire fighting, life-saving appliances and
means of escape” But Yes or No? “Radio communication equipment and systems -
Digital interfaces - Serial data instrument network”
HSSP PlenaryOctober 21, 2009 Slide 13
Next steps
Seek input on approach to inclusion/exclusion Engage subject matter experts – more proactive
identification of HS standards, including classification SDO advisory committee? Taxonomy refinement RKB – enhance automation, improve metadata richness Functionality/interface improvements? “Richness” of data – i.e., additional fields Document delivery?