Upload
mirela-mehic
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/25/2019 Hippokratia 16 303 2
1/5
HIPPOKRATIA 2012, 16, 4: 303-307
Mechanisms responsible for the emergence of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomo-
nas aeruginosaMeletis G1, Exindari M2, Vavatsi N3, Soanou D4, Diza E5
1Department of Clinical Microbiology, Veroia G. Hospital, Veroia, Greece2Department of Microbiology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece3Depertment of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece4Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hippokration G. Hospital, Greece5Department of Clinical Microbiology, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa)is an opportunistic pathogen associated with a range of nosocomial infections.
This microorganism is noted for its intrinsic resistance to antibiotics and for its ability to acquire genes encoding resis-
tance determinants. Among the beta-lactam antibiotics, carbapenems with antipseudomonal activity are important agents
for the therapy of infections due to P. aeruginosa. The development of carbapenem resistance among P. aeruginosa
strains is multifactorial. Plasmid or integron-mediated carbapenemases, increased expression of efux systems, reduced
porin expression and increased chromosomal cephalosporinase activity have all been dened as contributory factors.
Phenotypic tests and molecular techniques are used for the characterization of the resistance determinants. The isolation
of carbapenem resistant strains is alarming and requires the implementation of strict infection control measures in order
to prevent the spread of carbapenemase encoding genes to unrelated clones or to other bacterial species. Hippokratia
2012, 16, 4: 303-307
Key wordsPseudomonas aeruginosa, carbapenem resistance, carbapenemases, efux systems, OprD
Corresponding author: Meletis Georgios, Veroia General Hospital, Papagou District, Veroia, Greece, e-mail:[email protected] tel:
+306974282575, fax: +302381022841
REVIEW ARTICLE
Introduction
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is an im-
portant cause of nosocomial infections that can be par-
ticularly severe in immunocompromised patients. These
pathogens are common causative agents of pneumonia,
bacteremia, urinary tract, skin and soft tissue infections.
The increasing isolation in healthcare settings ofP. aerug-
inosastrains non-susceptible to most anti-pseudomonal
agents is due to a number of factors, including its innate
resistance to a variety of antimicrobial agents, its ability
to acquire resistance determinants and the increased use
of antibiotics, which promotes the selection of resistant
clones. Carbapenems have a broad spectrum of antibacte-
rial activity and are used as last resort drugs for the treat-
ment of infections caused by multiresistantP. aeruginosa
isolates. This extraordinary microorganism however, of-
ten possesses the necessary mechanisms to overcome the
activity of almost all the available antibiotics.
Carbapenem use forP. aeruginosainfections
Carbapenems are the most effective antimicrobial
agents against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria
including P. aeruginosa. Carbapenems bear a penemic
together with the beta-lactam ring and, like all other be-
ta-lactams, they inhibit bacterial cell wall synthesis by
binding to and inactivating Penicillin Binding Proteins
(PBPs). This unique molecular structure offers them their
exceptional stability to many beta-lactamases including
AmpC and most of the extended spectrum beta-lactama-
ses (ESBLs).
Seven antibiotics belong to the carbapenem family
(Figure 1), each one presenting particular characteristics
that inuence their way of administration and their use-
fulness as anti-pseudomonal agents.
Imipenem, for example, is susceptible to renal dehy-dropeptidase I and is administered in combination with
cilastatin which acts as a dehydropeptidase I-inhibitor.
Panipenem is a carbapenem antibiotic that was devel-
oped in Japan in 1993 and is available to date only in the
Asian market. Similar to imipenem, panipenem is used in
combination with betamipron in order to overcome the
inactivating effect of dehydropeptidase I1.
Meropenem is stable to dehydropeptidase I inactiva-
tion but is less efcient than imipenem against gram-pos-
itive microorganisms. On the other hand, meropenem is
more active against gram-negative bacteria and especial-
ly against P. aeruginosabecause it passes more swiftly
through the OprD porin.
7/25/2019 Hippokratia 16 303 2
2/5
304 MELETIS G
The Asian biapenem has a similar molecular structure
to imipenem bearing a methyl group in 1B position2. It
shows a broad spectrum of activity especially against an-aerobes and is stable to dehydropeptidase I inactivation.
Ertapenem has longer half-life and has been intro-
duced in Europe and North America as the one-daily-
dose carbapenem for the treatment of community ac-
quired infections. Even though it is efcient against En-
terobacteriaceae, it shows little or no activity against P.
aeruginosaandAcinetobacterspp. The large ertapenem
molecule has higher afnity for theP. aeruginosaefux
systems and cannot pass easily through the porins of non-
fermenters3.
Doripenem like the other carbapenems, has a broad
spectrum of activity and has been proven to perform bet-
ter againstP. aeruginosathan imipenem and the same as
well as meropenem3. Studies showed that the in vitro ef-
fect of doripenem againstP. aeruginosais more efcient
than that of the other carbapenems4; however, carbapen-
em-resistantP. aeruginosastrains are non-susceptible to
all antibiotics of this category3.
Tebipenem, the newest carbapenem is under develop-ment in Japan. Tebipenem is the active form of tebipenem
pivoxil and is formed by the addition of a new side chain
in position 2C of the biapenem molecule5. Tebipenem is
the carbapenem with the highest biocombatibility and can
be administered per os. Despite its advantages, tebipenem
like ertapenem, is not active againstP. aeruginosa.
From just beta-lactam resistance to carbapenem
resistance
P. aeruginosa exhibits intrinsic resistance to sev-
eral beta-lactam antibiotics and may acquire additional
resistance mechanisms due to mutational events or the
acquisition of transferable genetic elements. Intrinsically,P. aeruginosaexpresses chromosomally-encoded induc-
ible AmpC beta-lactamase6and several important efux
pump systems7 that export antibiotics,biocides, dyes, de-
tergents, metabolic inhibitors, organic solvents and mol-
ecules involved in bacterial cell to cell communication.
Carbapenem resistance mechanisms have immerged
under the pressure of carbapenem use in clinical settings
and may be classied as enzymatic, mediated by carbap-
enemases (beta-lactamases hydrolyzing carbapenems
among other beta-lactams), and non enzymatic8. Carbap-
enem resistance however, develops frequently due to the
concomitant presence of more than one mechanisms9,10.
Carbapenemases inP. aeruginosaisolates
Beta-lactamases are classied according to a structur-
al11and a functional12classication. Amblers structural
classication comprises four molecular classes: A) The
Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL) that are
inhibited by clavulanic acid, B) the Metallo-Beta-Lac-
tamases (MBL), C) the Cefalosporinases (AmpC) and
D) the Oxacillinases (OXA). Classes A, C and D share
a common characteristic: Their enzymes bear serine in
their active center whereas the MBLs bear Zn2+. Serine
enzymes cleave the amide bond of the beta-lactam ring
thus inactivating the antibiotic, while MBLs catalyze the
same chemical reaction, using one or two divalent Zn
2+
cations13. More precisely, the MBL active site orients and
polarizes the beta-lactam bond to facilitate nucleophilic
attack by zinc-bound water hydroxide.
All types of transferable carbapenemases, except
SIM-114 (Seoul imipenemase), have been detected in P.
aeruginosaisolates around the world. Among them, the
MBLs are considered as the most clinically important for
P. aeruginosa. Most genes encoding MBLs are found as
gene cassettes in integrons and are transferable15. Further-
more, more resistance genes for other antibiotic classes
can be present in the same integrons contributing thus in
the development of a multi-drug resistant phenotype16.
IMP (active on imipenem) and VIM (Verona in-
Figure 1: Carbapenem antibiotics.
7/25/2019 Hippokratia 16 303 2
3/5
HIPPOKRATIA 2012, 16, 4 305
tegron-encoded metallo--lactamase) type MBLs are
spread through all continents after their rst identica-
tion in Japan17and Italy18respectively while other metal-
lo-enzymes have been detected sporadically. SPM-1 (Sao
Paolo metallo--lactamase) has caused serious outbreaks
in Brazil19
and has also been recently found in Basel20
in an isolate recovered by a patient previously hospital-
ized in Brazil. GIM-1 (German imipenemase) and AIM-1
(Australian imipenemase) have been reported from Ger-
many21 and Australia22 and did not spread elsewhere
whereas the rst and to date only report for NDM-1 (New
Delhi Metallo--lactamase) in P. aeruginosawas made
from Serbia23.
Beta-lactamases of P. aeruginosa with carbapen-
emase activity are classied- apart from class B- in the
remaining three enzymatic classes as well. Ambler class
A carbapenemase KPC (Klebsiella pneumoniaecarbap-
enemase)was rst reported in P. aeruginosa isolates in
Colombia24
and unlikely to KPC-producing Klebsiellapneumoniae, KPC-producingP. aeruginosa did not reach
other continents except Latin America. Due to their high
rates of carbapenem hydrolysis, KPCs make powerful re-
sistance determinants that do not need additional mecha-
nisms such as efux or impermeability. Enzymes GES/
IBC (Guiana extended spectrum) / (Integron-borne cefa-
losporinase) of the same enzymatic class possess carbap-
enemase activity which may become clinically important
when combined with diminished outer membrane per-
meability or efux over-expression. For P. aeruginosa,
GES-2 has been reported in South Africa25and IBC-2 in
Greece26.
Class C beta-lactamases are not carbapenemases.They posses however a low potential of carbapenem hy-
drolysis and their overproduction combined with efux
systems over-expression and/or diminished outer mem-
brane permeability has been proven to lead to carbap-
enem resistance27.
Finally, class D carbapenemases like OXA-19828are
rare forP. aeruginosaand do not have the same clinical
impact as forAcinetobacter baumannii29.
Detection of carbapenemases may be performed by
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specic primers
for each carbapenemase-encoding gene. Phenotypic as-
says however are also used for class A and B enzymes.
Ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) is a polyami-no carboxylic acid that binds metal ions like Zn2+and can
inactivate the metallo-beta-lactamases. EDTA is used
for the detection of class B enzymes by a carbapenem-
EDTA disc synergy test or the comparison of the inhi -
bition halo of a carbapenem and a carbapenem+EDTA
disc. For the detection of class A carbapenemases a dou-
ble disc synergy test may be performed using clavulanic
acid with carbapenems, aztreonam and third generation
cefalosporins. Especially for P. aeruginosa cloxacillin
(200g cloxacillin/1ml) is dissolved into Mueller-Hinton
agar to eliminate any possible AmpC beta-lactamase in-
terference30.
Efux pumps over-expression
Efux pump systems are an extremely important
cause of multi-drug resistance for P. aeruginosa. They
are tripartite systems that are composed by 1) a protein
transporter of the cytoplasmic membrane that uses en-
ergy in the form of proton motif force to transport drugsand other substances through the inner membrane, 2) a
periplasmic connective protein and 3) an outer membrane
protein component with a barrel conguration. This way,
the most commonly observed pump system, MexAB-
OprM (Multidrug efux system AB- Outer membrane
protein M), consists of the MexB pump, the MexA linker
lipoprotein and the OprM exit portal31.
MexAB-OprM together with MexXY-OprM act syn-
ergistically with low outer membrane permeability con-
ferring intrinsic multi-drug resistance to P. aeruginosa.
In addition to this intrinsic resistance, these and some
other additional systems (MexCD-OprJ, MexEF-OprN,
MexJK-OprM, MexVW-OprM) promote acquired multi-drug resistance as a consequence of hyper expression of
the efux genes by mutational events32. Substrates for
these efux pumps are commonly quinolones, antip-
seudomonal penicillins, cefalosporins, aminoglycosides
and meropenem while imipenem and ceftazidime are not
usually affected. However, when efux pump over-ex-
pression coexists with low outer membrane permeability
resistance to other carbapenems develops as well33.
The CCCP-test is used for the phenotypic detection
of efux pumps over-expression34. Carbonyl cyanide m-
chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) is a pump inhibitor that
can be added in Mueller-Hinton agar during its prepara-
tion. The strain is inoculated in an agar plate with CCCPas well as in a plate without CCCP, and a meropenem disc
is placed for both inoculations. The result is considered
positive if the inhibition zone of meropenem is wider in
the agar plate with CCCP than the one in the plate with-
out pump inhibitor.
In PCR, primers for mexB and mexY can be used
to detect MexAB-OprM and MexXY-OprM systems re-
spectively although the efux pumps over-expression is
certied performing reverse transcriptase real time PCR
that shows the presence and also the quantitative expres-
sion of mRNAs from these genes35.
Diminished outer membrane permeabilityCarbapenems enter into the periplasmic space of P.
aeruginosathrough the OprD outer membrane porin for-
merly known as D2 porin. The porin loss probably by a
mutational event of the OprD gene leads to imipenem re-
sistance36. Furthermore, in strains with OprD downregu-
lation37, reduced susceptibility to meropenem is observed
while other beta-lactams are not affected31. Diminished
expression or loss of the OprD porin is rather frequent
during imipenem treatment38.
A carbapenem resistant, beta-lactam susceptible
phenotype is characteristic for diminished expression
of OprD even though such phenotypes will not be ob-
served among multi-resistant isolates. Traditionally, the
7/25/2019 Hippokratia 16 303 2
4/5
306 MELETIS G
loss of OprD is determined by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-
Polyacrylamide Gel Electroforesis (SDS-PAGE) for the
separation of the membranes proteins39while later stud-
ies use reverse transcriptase real time PCR with specic
primers for the OprD gene40.
Concluding remarks
Nosocomial infections due to multi-drug resistant
P. aeruginosa are a signicant cause of morbidity and
mortality in hospital settings. P. aeruginosastrains har-
boring carbapenem resistance mechanisms compromise
severely the selection of appropriate treatments because
of the fact that carbapenem resistance is commonly asso-
ciated with resistance to other antibiotic classes. Conse-
quently, the detection of carbapenem-resistant strains and
the implementation of strict infection control measures
become critical for limiting the spread of the underlying
resistance mechanisms.
Conict of interest
The authors declare no conicts of interest.
References1. Papp-Wallace KM, Endimiani A, Taracila MA, Bonomo RA.
Carbapenems: past, present, and future. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother. 2011; 55: 4943-4960.
2. Aldridge KE, Morice N, Schiro DD. In vitro activity of biapen-
em (L-627), a new carbapenem, against anaerobes. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother. 1994; 38: 889893.
3. Zhanel GG, Wiebe R, Dilay L, Thomson K, Rubinstein E, Ho-
ban DJ, et al. Comparative review of the carbapenems. Drugs.
2007; 67: 1027-1052.
4. Mushtaq S, Ge Y, Livermore DM. Doripenem versus Pseudomo-
nas aeruginosa in vitro: activity against characterized isolates,mutants, and transconjugants and resistance selection potential.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004; 48: 3086-3092.
5. Yamada M, Watanabe T, Baba N, Takeuchi Y, Ohsawa F, Gomi
S. Crystal structures of biapenem and tebipenem complexed
with penicillin-binding proteins 2X and 1A from Streptococcus
pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008; 52: 2053-
2060.
6. Livermore DM. beta-Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resis-
tance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995; 8: 557-584.
7. Livermore DM. Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resis-
tance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: our worst nightmare? Clin
Infect Dis. 2002; 34: 634-640.
8. Poole K. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance to the max. Front
Microbiol. 2011; 2: 65.
9. Hammami S, Ghozzi R, Burghoffer B, Arlet G, Redjeb S. Mech-
anisms of carbapenem resistance in non-metallo-beta-lactamase-
producing clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from a
Tunisian hospital. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2009; 57: 530-535.
10. El Amin N, Giske CG, Jalal S, Keijser B, Kronvall G, Wretlind
B. Carbapenem resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aerugi-
nosa: alterations of porin OprD and efux proteins do not fully
explain resistance patterns observed in clinical isolates. APMIS.
2005; 113: 187-196.
11. Ambler RP. The structure of beta-lactamases. Philos Trans R Soc
Lond B Biol Sci. 1980; 289: 321-331.
12. Bush K, Jacoby GA, Medeiros AA. A functional classication
scheme for beta-lactamases and its correlation with molecular
structure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995; 39: 1211-1233.
13. Sacha P, Wieczorek P, Hauschild T, Zrawski M, Olszaska
D, Tryniszewska E. Metallo-beta-lactamases of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa--a novel mechanism of resistance to beta-lactam an-
tibiotics. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2008; 46: 137-142.
14. Lee K, Yum JH, Yong D, Lee HM, Kim HD, Docquier JD, et
al. Novel acquired metallo-beta-lactamase gene, bla(SIM-1),
in a class 1 integron from Acinetobacter baumannii clinical
isolates from Korea. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005; 49:
44854491.
15. Walsh TR, Toleman MA, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Metallo-be-ta-lactamases: the quiet before the storm? Clin Microbiol Rev.
2005; 18: 306-325.
16. Sianou E, Kristo I, Petridis M, Apostolidis K, Meletis G, Miya-
kis S, et al. A cautionary case of microbial solidarity: concurrent
isolation of VIM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escheri-
chia coli and Enterobacter cloacae from an infected wound. J
Antimicrob Chemother. 2012; 67: 244-246.
17. Watanabe M, Iyobe S, Inoue M, Mitsuhashi S. Transferable
imipenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother. 1991; 35: 147151.
18. Lauretti L, Riccio ML, Mazzariol A, Cornaglia G, Amicosante G,
Fontana R, et al. Cloning and characterization of blaVIM, a new
integron-borne metallo-beta-lactamase gene from a Pseudomo-
nas aeruginosa clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
1999; 43: 15841590.
19. Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lac-tamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007; 20: 440-458.
20. Salabi AE, Toleman MA, Weeks J, Bruderer T, Frei R, Walsh
TR. First report of the metallo-beta-lactamase SPM-1 in Europe.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54: 582.
21. Castanheira M, Toleman MA, Jones RN, Schmidt FJ, Walsh TR.
Molecular characterization of a beta-lactamase gene, blaGIM-1,
encoding a new subclass of metallo-beta-lactamase. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother. 2004; 48: 46544661.
22. Yong D, Bell JM, Ritchie B, Pratt R, Toleman MA, Walsh TR,
et al. A novel subgroup Metallo--lactamase (MBL) AIM-1
emerges in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) from Australia. In:
Abstracts of the 47th Interscience Conference on AAC, Chicago,
IL, Abstract C1-593. American Society for Microbiology. Wash-
ington, DC, USA, 2007: 75.
23. Jovcic B, Lepsanovic Z, Suljagic V, Rackov G, Begovic J, Topi-sirovic L, et al. Emergence of NDM-1 Metallo--Lactamase in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Serbia. Antimi-
crob Agents Chemother. 2011; 55: 3929-3931.
24. Villegas MV, Lolans K, Correa A, Kattan JN, Lopez JA, Quinn
JP. First identication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates pro-
ducing a KPC-type carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 51: 1553-1555.
25. Poirel L, Weldhagen GF, Naas T, De Champs C, Dove MG, Nor-
dmann P. GES-2, a class A beta-lactamase from Pseudomonas
aeruginosa with increased hydrolysis of imipenem. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother. 2001; 45: 2598-2603.
26. Mavroidi A, Tzelepi E, Tsakris A, Miriagou V, Soanou D,
Tzouvelekis LS. An integron-associated beta-lactamase (IBC-2)
from Pseudomonas aeruginosais a variant of the extended-spec-
trum beta-lactamase IBC-1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001; 48:
627-630.27. Quale J, Bratu S, Gupta J, Landman D. Interplay of efux sys-
tem, ampC, and oprD expression in carbapenem resistance of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother. 2006; 50: 1633-1641.
28. El Garch F, Bogaerts P, Bebrone C, Galleni M, Glupczynski Y.
OXA-198, an acquired carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D beta-
lactamase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother. 2011; 55: 4828-4833.
29. Brown S, Amyes S. OXA (beta)-lactamases in Acinetobacter:
the story so far. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006; 57: 1-3.
30. Jiang X, Zhang Z, Li M, Zhou D, Ruan F, Lu Y. Detection
of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in clinical isolates of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;
50: 2990-2995.
31. Bonomo RA, Szabo D. Mechanisms of multidrug resistance in
7/25/2019 Hippokratia 16 303 2
5/5
HIPPOKRATIA 2012, 16, 4 307
Acinetobacter species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Infect
Dis. 2006; 43 suppl 2: S49-S56.
32. Poole K. Multidrug efux pumps and antimicrobial resistance
in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and related organisms. J Mol Mi-
crobiol Biotechnol. 2001; 3: 255-264.
33. Schweizer HP. Efux as a mechanism of resistance to antimi-
crobials in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and related bacteria: unan-swered questions. Genet Mol Res. 2003; 2: 48-62.
34. Pournaras S, Maniati M, Spanakis N, Ikonomidis A, Tassios PT,
Tsakris A, et al. Spread of efux pump-overexpressing, non-
metallo-beta-lactamase-producing, meropenem-resistant but
ceftazidime-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a region
with blaVIM endemicity. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005; 56:
761-764.
35. Yoneda K, Chikumi H, Murata T, Gotoh N, Yamamoto H, Fu-
jiwara H, et al. Measurement of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mul-
tidrug efux pumps by quantitative real-time polymerase chain
reaction. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005; 243: 125-131.
36. Horii T, Muramatsu H, Morita M, Maekawa M. Characterization
of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with urinary
tract infections during antibiotic therapy. Microb Drug Resist.
2003; 9: 223-229.
37. Farra A, Islam S, Strlfors A, Srberg M, Wretlind B. Role of
outer membrane protein OprD and penicillin-binding proteins in
resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem and mero-
penem. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008; 31: 427-433.
38. Carmeli Y, Troillet N, Eliopoulos GM, Samore MH. Emergenceof antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of
risks associated with different antipseudomonal agents. Antimi-
crob Agents Chemother. 1999; 43: 1379-1382.
39. Maniati M, Ikonomidis A, Mantzana P, Daponte A, Maniatis
AN, Pournaras S. A highly carbapenem-resistant Pseudomo-
nas aeruginosa isolate with a novel blaVIM-4/blaP1b integron
overexpresses two efux pumps and lacks OprD. J Antimicrob
Chemother. 2007; 60: 132-135.
40. Gutirrez O, Juan C, Cercenado E, Navarro F, Bouza E, Coll P,
et al. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem
resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Spanish
hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 51: 4329-4335.