Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
High Times: Can Employers Say “No” to Legal
Marijuana and What If They Don’t?
2017 NAPABA CONVENTION
Presented By
Arooj Sheikh
Emily Patajo (Moderator)
Jeffrey Sun
Amanda Fu
Assistant General Counsel at Oath Inc.
Legal Counsel at Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
Corporate Counsel at Varian Medical Systems
Littler Mendelson, P.C.
2
• State Legalization of Marijuana
– Recreational Use
– Medical Use and Limited Medical Use
• Federal Laws Regarding Marijuana Use
• Employer Issues with Medical Marijuana
– Americans with Disabilities Act and corresponding state laws
– Family and Medical Leave Act
– Lawful off-duty conduct statutes
– Duty to provide a safe workplace
Agenda
3
• State Legalization of Marijuana
–Recreational Use
–Medical Use and Limited Medical Use
High Times: Can Employers Say “No” to Legal Marijuana
and What If They Don’t?
4
• Legalization of marijuana has swept across the United States
• The majority of states and the District of Columbia have
legalized marijuana and/or cannabidiol
Legalization of Marijuana
5
Pros of Marijuana Legalization
6
• Medical
– Pain control
– Multiple sclerosis
– Nausea
– Epilepsy
– Traumatic brain injury/concussions
– Alzheimer’s disease
– Bipolar disorder
– Arthritis
– AIDS/HIV
– Glaucoma
– Certain irritable bowel syndromes
• Economic
– New jobs for packaging
– Horticulture
– Commercial leasing
– Warehousing
– Cuisine
– Marketing
– New jobs for government regulators, transporters, etc.
Cons of Marijuana Legalization
7
• Medical
– Too much THC can lead to psychosis
– Anxiety
– Depression
– Cyclic vomiting syndrome
– Medical uncertainty
– Altered brain development in children
– Dependence
– Impaired coordination
– Altered judgment
– Short term memory loss
• Economic
– “Cash only” business
– Traffic accidents and fatalities
– “Doping” down America
• Alaska
• California
• Colorado
• District of Columbia
• Maine
• Massachusetts
• Nevada
• Oregon
• Washington
States Permitting Recreational Marijuana
8
• None of the recreational marijuana statutes in these states contain employment
protections for recreational marijuana users
• None of these states have limited an employer’s right to enforce a zero-tolerance
marijuana policy
States Permitting Recreational Marijuana
9
States Permitting Use of Medical Marijuana
10
• Alaska
• Arizona
• Arkansas
• California
• Colorado
• Connecticut
• Delaware
• District of Columbia
• Hawaii
• Illinois
• Maine
• Maryland
• Massachusetts
• Michigan
• Minnesota
• Montana
• Nevada
• New Hampshire
• New Jersey
• New Mexico
• New York
• North Dakota
• Ohio
• Oregon
• Pennsylvania
• Rhode Island
• Vermont
• Washington
• A low-THC form of cannabis is currently legal in:
• Alabama
• Florida
• Georgia
• Iowa
• Kentucky
• Louisiana
• Mississippi
• Missouri
States With Limited Marijuana Use Laws
11
• North Carolina
• South Carolina
• Tennessee
• Texas
• Utah
• Virginia
• Wisconsin
• First state to legalize marijuana for medicinal purposes
• 1996 California Compassionate Use Act – legalized marijuana use for patients
and their designated primary caregivers to possess and cultivate marijuana for
their personal medical use with recommendation and/or approval of California
licensed physician
• An applicant or employee who uses medical marijuana is not protected as a
qualified individual under the Fair Employment and Housing Act
California
12
• Recently legalized marijuana for recreational use
– In November 2016, Proposition 64 passed legalizing adult possession and
cultivation of recreational marijuana for California residents and visitors older
than 21 years
California
13
• Limited protections for employees who use recreational marijuana in the
workplace.
• Employers can maintain a drug-free workplace
• Employers are not required to permit the use, consumption, possession, transfer,
display, transportation, sale, or growth of marijuana in the workplace
• Employers can have policies prohibiting marijuana use by employees and
prospective employees
California
14
• First state to legalize marijuana for recreational use
• An employer is not required to permit or accommodate the use, consumption,
possession, transfer, display, transportation, sale, or growing of marijuana in the
workplace
• An employer can have policies restricting the use of marijuana by employees
• Moreover, an employer who occupies, owns or controls a property can prohibit or
otherwise regulate the possession, consumption, use, display, transfer,
distribution, sale, transportation, or growing of marijuana on or in that property
Colorado
15
Federal Laws
Regarding
Marijuana Use
16
• Controlled Substances Act
– Use, possession, and sale of marijuana – medical and recreational – is illegal
and considered a federal crime
– Views marijuana as a substance for which there are no currently accepted
medical uses
Federal Law
17
• Under the Obama Administration, the United States Attorney General relaxed
federal enforcement of criminal marijuana laws.
• President Donald Trump has sent mixed messages on his views regarding
marijuana.
Federal Law
18
• Americans with Disabilities Act
and corresponding state laws
• Family and Medical Leave Act
• Lawful off-duty conduct
statutes
• Duty to provide a safe
workplace
Employer Legal Issues with Medical Marijuana
19
Americans with
Disabilities Act
(“ADA”)
20
• Individuals “currently engaging in the illegal use of drugs” – including
Schedule I marijuana – are not protected under the ADA
– Exception: “Illegal use of drugs” does not include the use of a
Schedule I drug taken under supervision by a licensed health care
professional
• Employers may adopt reasonable policies/procedures to ensure that
employees are not engaging in the “illegal use of drugs”
Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)
21
•Former/recovering addicts must be accommodated under the ADA;
these individuals must be engaged in the interactive process
•Drug addicts may suffer from a disability under the ADA, provided that
they are not currently using drugs/marijuana
Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)
22
• Must also accommodate employees with a
disability who is a medical marijuana user
– Engage in interactive process
– Find out if there are medicines or therapies
that might also alleviate symptoms
– If there are, you may be able
to require the employee to pursue those
alternatives
Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)
23
•There are risks with accommodating/not accommodating
employees
•Accommodating: impaired individuals may compromise safety;
liability concerns to third parties; risk of dealing with law
enforcement activity
•Not Accommodating: discrimination lawsuits; bad press
Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)
24
State Anti-
Discrimination and
Accommodation Laws
25
• Arizona
• Connecticut
• Delaware
• Illinois
• Maine
• Minnesota
• Nevada
• New York
• Pennsylvania
• Rhode Island
State Accommodation Laws
26
• Medical marijuana laws contain anti-discrimination or reasonable accommodation
provisions addressed to employers
• These laws do not require:
–Employer to permit a medical marijuana user to possess or use marijuana or
marijuana products on site.
–Accommodate a medical marijuana user by ignoring a positive test result.
State Accommodation Laws
27
• For example, in New York, being a certified patient qualified as having a
“disability” under the state human rights law. Under this law, it is an unlawful
discriminatory practice for an employer to refuse to provide reasonable
accommodations to the known disabilities of an applicant or employee in
connection with a job or occupation sought or held.
• The medical marijuana law does not prohibit an employer from enforcing a policy
prohibiting employees from performing employment duties while impaired by a
controlled substance
• Law does not require a person or entity to do any act that would put it in violation
of federal law or cause it to lose a federal contract
New York
28
• California
• Colorado
• Oregon
• Michigan
• Montana
• Washington
State Laws Not Requiring An Accommodation
29
•Retail employee in Michigan was legally using marijuana to deal with pain caused
by sinus cancer and an inoperable brain tumor
•Employee claimed he never used medical marijuana while on duty
•He was terminated for testing positive for marijuana use
•A federal appellate court, examining Michigan’s medical marijuana law, upheld a
lower court’s decision that the law did not protect employees from disciplinary
action due to their medical marijuana use, so the employee could be fired for
failing a drug test in violation of the employer’s drug testing policy
Case Against Retailer in Michigan
30
Hypotheticals
31
• Employee says: “I’ve been on medical marijuana, I stopped using it,
but I’m addicted and I’ve entered rehab.” What now?
– ADA – protected as long as not currently engaging in illegal drug
use
– But illegal drug use in the weeks and months before the
employee’s request for accommodation will disqualify the
employee from ADA protection
Hypothetical
32
• Mary Jane comes to work high. When confronted, she whips out a Registry Card. What now?
– Employer need not accept medical marijuana explanation
– Follow your policy
– ADA
• No Protection for current users of illegal drugs
• Possible direct threat if safety-sensitive job
Hypothetical
33
• Mr. Blunt comes to work waving his
Registry Card. What now?
– Nothing illegal in having a card
– Viewing him as an illegal drug user?
• Could raise a perceived disability
issue
Hypothetical
34
Lawful Off Duty
Statutes
35
• Coats v. Dish Network, L.L.C., decided by the Colorado Supreme
Court on June 15, 2015
– Mr. Coats, a quadriplegic customer service rep, holds a license to use
medical marijuana in Colorado. He used off the employer’s premises,
and claims he was never under the influence of marijuana at work
– Mr. Coats tested positive for marijuana pursuant to a random drug
test and he was fired for violating his employer’s drug policy
Lawful Off-Duty Use Statutes
36
• Issue: Whether Colorado’s Lawful Activities statute protected Mr.
Coats from being terminated for using medical marijuana off-duty
where such use is lawful under Colorado law?
• Held: Dish Network did not violate Colorado’s lawful activities statute
by terminating the employee because medical marijuana use is not
lawful activity under federal criminal law, and the Colorado lawful
activities statute does not make any distinction between lawful
activities under state or federal law
Lawful Off-Duty Use Statutes
37
Family and
Medical Leave
Act (“FMLA”)
38
• Treatment for substance abuse (including marijuana abuse) may be
considered a “serious health condition” under the FMLA, provided
that conditions for inpatient care and/or continuing treatment are met
• Treatment for substance abuse does not prevent the employer from
taking an adverse employment action against an employee
Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
39
Workplace Policies
40
• Applies to federal contractors with $150,000+ contracts and federal grant money
of any amount
• Requires employer to publish a DFWP policy that prohibits, among other things,
use or possession in the workplace
• Requires employers to report drug-related crimes occurring in the workplace
• If employers do not comply, their contracts and/or grant money are at risk
• ADA states that an employer may require employees to behave in a manner that
meets federal Drug-Free Workplace Act requirements
– The unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a
controlled substance is prohibited in person’s workplace; and
– The employee must abide by the terms of that statement
Drug Free Workplace Policies
41
• Institute policy that requires employees to
disclose use of medications that may impair
their ability to work if this request is job-related
and consistent with business necessity
• If an employee tests positive for marijuana,
confirm that employee is prescribed marijuana
Drug Testing Policy Recommendations
42
Questions?
43
Thank You!
44