Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
High thermal conductivity of bulk epoxy resin by bottom-up
parallel-linking and strain: a molecular dynamics study
Shouhang Li1,2,#, Xiaoxiang Yu2,3,#, Hua Bao1,* , Nuo Yang2,3,*
1 University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China 2 State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P. R. China 3 Nano Interface Center for Energy (NICE), School of Energy and Power Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P. R. China
Abstract
The ultra-low thermal conductivity (~0.3 Wm-1K-1) of amorphous epoxy resins
significantly limits their applications in electronics. Conventional top-down methods e.g.
electrospinning usually result in aligned structure for linear polymers thus satisfactory
enhancement on thermal conductivity, but they are deficient for epoxy resin polymerized
by monomers and curing agent due to completely different cross-linked network structure.
Here, we proposed a bottom-up strategy, namely parallel-linking method, to increase the
intrinsic thermal conductivity of bulk epoxy resin. Through equilibrium molecular
dynamics simulations, we reported on a high thermal conductivity value of parallel-linked
epoxy resin (PLER) as 0.80 Wm-1K-1, more than twofold higher than that of amorphous
structure. Furthermore, by applying uniaxial tensile strains along the intra-chain direction,
a further enhancement in thermal conductivity was obtained, reaching 6.45 Wm-1K-1.
Interestingly, we also observed that the inter-chain thermal conductivities decrease with
increasing strain. The single chain of epoxy resin was also investigated and, surprisingly,
its thermal conductivity was boosted by 30 times through tensile strain, as high as 33.8
Wm-1K-1. Our study may provide a new insight on the design and fabrication of epoxy
resins with high thermal conductivity.
# S.L. and X.Y. contributed equal to this work. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected] (HB); [email protected] (NY)
Introduction
Epoxy resins are classical thermoset polymers widely used in coatings, adhesives and
electronic packaging for their excellent thermal mechanical properties and high electrical resistance
[1]. However, most of epoxy resins have very low thermal conductivity on the order of 0.1 Wm-1K-
1 [2] owing to the existence of entanglement, voids etc. [3]. In some special situations, for example,
aerospace and flexible electronics fields, heat dissipation is becoming a crucial issue and the epoxy
resin with higher thermal conductivity is desirable [4]. The general strategy to increase the thermal
conductivity of polymers is doping materials with high thermal conductivities, such as ceramics [5-
8], metals [9], carbon nanotubes [10] and graphene [11]. Adding fillers increases the cost. More
importantly, the fillers will degrade the original electrical and mechanical properties of polymers
and affect the performance of the relevant products. Thus, it is necessary to enhance the intrinsic
thermal conductivity of epoxy resin.
The heat transport properties of cross-linked epoxy resin (CLER) are well revealed
theoretically and experimentally. Varshney et al. [12] calculated the thermal conductivity of CLER
employing both equilibrium molecular dynamics method (EMD) and non-equilibrium molecular
dynamics method (NEMD) and the thermal conductivity value is determined to be in the range of
0.30-0.31 Wm-1K-1 at 300 K. By using EMD method, Kumar et al. [2] found the positive
temperature dependence of thermal conductivity. Kline et al. [13] measured the thermal
conductivity of epoxy resin and found the thermal conductivity value goes from 0.23 Wm-1K-1 to 0.27
Wm-1K-1 when the temperature raises from 275 K to 375 K. The heat dissipation ability of epoxy resin
is similar to other polymers and it cannot meet the stringent requirement in relevant fields.
In the past decades, researchers found that polymers with highly ordered structures have
appreciable thermal conductivities. Chen and Henry [14, 15] found that the thermal conductivity of
polyethylene single chain can be even divergent which is several orders of magnitude larger than
that of amorphous bulk PE. The amazing discovery reveals that the intrinsic thermal conductivities
of polymers have not been fully excavated. Luo [16-19] and his cooperators found that polymer
nanofibers with intrinsically ordered backbones, strong backbone bonds, and strong dihedral angles
could be the high thermal conductivity candidates. The aligned polymers have very high thermal
conductivities is also verified by experiments. Shen et al. [3] found the thermal conductivity of
ultra-drawn polyethylene nanofibers can be as high as ~104 Wm-1K-1 at 300K. Xu et al. [20] found
polyethylene film consists of nanofibers with crystalline and amorphous regions owns high thermal
conductivity of 62 Wm-1K-1. Cao et al. [21] investigated on the thermal conductivity of polyethylene
nanowire arrays and they found the value of the nanowire array with the diameter of 100 nm can
reaches 21.1 Wm-1K-1 at 80 ℃. Singh et al. [22] measured the thermal conductivity of chain-
oriented amorphous polythiophene and the value can be as high as ~4.4 Wm-1K-1 at room
temperature.
To attain ordered structure in epoxy resin, some arisen technology [23]and materials [24] based
on top-down methods were adapted to enhance thermal conductivity. Akatsuka et al. [25] measured
the thermal conductivity of liquid-crystalline epoxy resin with macroscopic isotropic structure at
30°C and the value can be as high as 0.3 - 0.96 Wm-1K-1. The exact value depends on the type of
monomer and curing agent. Correspondingly, Koda et al. [26] calculated the thermal conductivity
of liquid crystalline epoxy resins at 300K using molecular dynamics and they got the value of 0.37
- 0.96 Wm-1K-1, which is consistent with the experimental results. Zeng et al. [27] measured the
thermal conductivity of the epoxy resin fibers made by electrostatic spinning technology and they
found the value can be as high as 0.8 Wm-1K-1. In their following work [28], they found the thermal
conductivity of epoxy resin fibers increases on decreasing the fiber diameter.
However, it should be noted that the conventional epoxy resin is amorphous cross-linked
network prepared by the polymerization of monomers and curing agents, which is different from
those amorphous linear polymers consisting of many chains. The top-down methods mentioned
above like electrospinning could be applied to straighten many unconnected chains and achieve the
long-range alignment. Nevertheless, for epoxy resin, top-down methods could only construct short-
range ordered structure, and also fail to avoid crosslinking and long-range disorder [28], thus form
network structure giving rise to strong intra-molecule phonon scatterings in heat transport
contributed by covalent bonding. This is the dominant reason why top-down methods based on
cross-linking does not work well in enhancement of thermal transport in epoxy resin. Therefore,
how to carefully design the linking structure with long-range alignment and better understanding of
heat transport mechanism in epoxy resin remains to be explored.
In this work, to further enhance the intrinsic thermal conductivity, we propose a bottom-up
linking strategy to construct parallel-linked epoxy resin (PLER). The procedure is similar to the
bottom-up manufacture technology, molecular layer deposition (MLD), which can be used to make
high quality polymer films [29, 30]. At the same time, the effects of morphology on the thermal
conductivity of epoxy resin are investigated. We first studied the relationship between the degree of
crosslinking and thermal conductivity of amorphous cross-linked network. Then we calculated the
thermal conductivities of bulk PLER and the strain effects are discussed. In addition, the intrinsic
thermal conductivity of PLER single chain is presented.
Model and Simulation details
The commonly used monomer and curing agent of epoxy resin are EPON-862 (di-glycidyl
ether of bisphenol F) and DETDA (diethylene toluene diamine), respectively. The corresponding
chemical structures are shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b). The two end carbon atoms in EPON-862 and the
two nitrogen atoms in DETDA are reaction sites and they can form a new covalent bond as shown
in Fig. 1(c). Several methods have been proposed to construct crosslinking atomic model of epoxy
resin network, for which the properties can be consistent with experiments [31-33]. In this work, we
employed the methods described in the Ref. [33], and the relaxed cross-linked network is shown as
the Fig. 1(d). In order to build ordered epoxy resin structure, we also changed the conventional
crosslinking method and proposed a new parallel-linking method, which is similar to the principle
of MLD. MLD is widely used to manufacture polymer films with high quality [29, 30]. The polymer
films are fabricated by stacking molecules on substrates layer by layer. The schematic of MLD is
shown in Fig. 1(e). For parallel-linking model, the monomer and curing agent form different
molecular layers. Then one monomer reacts with one curing agent and then we could get one cross-
linked segment, as shown in Fig. 1(c). Several molecular layers replicate along the chain direction
(z axis) and then we could get the stacked semi-crystal structure, as shown in Fig. 1(f). In this study,
there are 4 chains on x and y axes for bulk PLER, respectively.
The molecular dynamics simulations are performed at the temperature of 300K using the
Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator (LAMMPS) package[34]. According
to the former simulations [2, 12], the consistent valence force field (CVFF) [35, 36] is accurate
enough to characterize the thermal properties of epoxy resins and therefore it was employed to
describe the interatomic interactions in this work. As Kumar et al. [2] pointed out, the simulation
results can be consistent with the experiments when the long-range interactions are included. Thus,
both van der Waals (vdW) force and electrostatic force are included in our simulation. The exact
formula of CVFF force field is:
2 2
0 0
12 6
1 1, 0
1 cos
14
2
total bb
N Ni j
i j i j j iij ij ij
E K r r K K d n
q q
r r r
. (1)
The terms on right hand side of Eq. (1) stand for bond force, angle force, dihedral force, vdW
force and Coulomb interaction, respectively. The Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential parameters across
different types of atoms were calculated by using the Lorentz-Berthlot mixing rules (i.e., ��� =
����������, ��� = ��� + ���/2). The cutoff distance of the 12-6 LJ potential for all structures was
set to 9 Å . All potential parameters are available in Ref. [35] and [36].
The calculation of heat flux is a critical step in EMD method. The heat flux is defined as:
1 1
2i i ij i j ij
i i j
J e v f v v xV
, (2)
where V is the volume of the simulation cell, i and j are the indexes of atoms, ei is the total energy
of atom i, iv and jv are atom velocities of atom i and j, ijf is the force between atom i and j,
ijx
is
the relative position of atom i and j.
We can obtain the thermal conductivity by directly integrating heat current autocorrelation
function (HCACF), namely
0
2 00
3 B
VJ J d
k T
, (3)
where T is the system temperature, Bk is the Boltzmann constant,
0 is the integral upper limit of
HCACF, which is also called correlation time. The angular bracket denotes an ensemble average.
The velocity Verlet algorithm [37] is employed to integrate equation of motion, and the time
step is set as 0.25 fs. The initial structures are first minimized by standard conjugate-gradient energy-
minimization methods in LAMMPS. After that, the system runs in the isothermal-isobaric ensemble
(NPT) for 250 ps to relax the whole system at the given temperature and pressure. Then it runs
another 250 ps in the canonical ensemble (NVT) at the given temperature 300 K. Later on, it runs
in the microcanonical ensemble (NVE) for 250 ps for further relaxation. Finally, it runs at least
another 2.5 ns in NVE, during which the heat current is recorded at an interval of 2.5 fs. To achieve
better ensemble average, we obtained the final results on the average of at least 4 independent
simulations with different initial conditions. All the aforementioned simulation parameters were
carefully checked to ensure the results were converged [38].
Note that the thermal conductivities were averaged over three orthogonal directions for CLER
to get better statistics as they were considered to be isotropic in nature for cross-linked network
structure. For parallel-linked bulk and single chain structures, the thermal conductivity on the z axis
is different from that on the other two axes due to anisotropy. For these anisotropic cases, we
calculate the thermal conductivities on the three axes separately.
Fig. 1. (a-b) Chemical structures of monomer EPON-862 and curing agent DETDA. (c) One cross-
linked segment of epoxy resin, consisting of carbon (blue), hydrogen (green), oxygen (red) and nitrogen
(purple). (d) The relaxed cross-linked epoxy resin. (e) An illustration of MLD method. (f) An illustration
of PLER structure.
Results and Discussions
We first calculated the thermal conductivity of CLER with 50% degree of crosslinking and the
results are depicted in Fig. 2(a) as an illustration of the EMD method. HCACF fluctuates
dramatically for 1 ps, which means the strong reflection of heat current, and then decays to zero
rapidly within 3ps for the sake of strong phonon scatterings in CLER, thus giving rise to the quick
convergence of integral, i.e., thermal conductivity value. In practical usage of CLER, degree of
crosslinking raises with the increase of curing reaction time, so CLER could have different degrees
of crosslinking [39]. Therefore, we further investigated the thermal conductivity of amorphous
CLER with respect to degree of crosslinking. As Fig. 2(b) shows, the value is in the range of 0.32 -
0.35 Wm-1K-1. It is comparable to the previous simulation [12] and experiment results [40], which
validates our calculations results about epoxy resins. We can see that degree of crosslinking has little
impacts on thermal conductivity of CLER. It is quite different from polyethylene [41] whose thermal
conductivity increases with degree of crosslinking. This is attributed to the different contributions
of heat transport in these two kinds of cross-linked polymers. Cross-linking bridges the separated
molecules in polymers and thus paves the way for heat transport by covalent bonding interactions
while it almost has no influences on heat transport by nonbonding interactions. For linear polymer
chains, bonding interactions are main contributors [41], so crosslinking further improves the heat
transport. However for epoxy resin, it has been verified that nonbonding interactions are the most
predominant among different interactions contributions to thermal conductivity [12]. Accordingly,
crosslinking has little effects on heat transport in epoxy resin.
Fig. 2. (a) Normalized heat current autocorrelation function (black line) and thermal conductivity (red
line) of cross-linked epoxy resin with 50% degree of crosslinking. (b) Thermal conductivity of cross-
linked network epoxy resin as a function of degree of crosslinking.
To show the enhancement on thermal conductivity by bottom-up parallel linking, we performed
further simulation on bulk PLER. Due to the well-known simulation size effects of EMD, we
performed convergence test with different simulation domain sizes. The thermal conductivity values
of systems with 1, 2, 4, 8 segments along chain are calculated and the results are shown in Fig. 3
(a). It can be seen that the simulation domain size effect is not significant for bulk PLER. We use 8
segments as the length of simulation system in the subsequent simulations for bulk PLER. The
converged thermal conductivity along intra-chain (z axis) direction (κz) at 300K is 0.80 Wm-1K-1,
which is twofold higher than that of CLER. Our results are comparable with the thermal conductivity
of highly ordered liquid-crystalline epoxy resins as Koda et al. [26] reported. Unlike common liquid
epoxy resin, the relaxed PLER owns long-range ordered structure, as shown in the inset of Fig. 3(a).
Besides, there is no bonding interactions between chains, which can further decrease the intra-chain
scatterings. It is noteworthy that the thermal conductivity value can be even further enhanced if
monomer and curing agent with stronger backbone are employed in PLER. The thermal
conductivities along inter-chain (x and y axes) directions (κx and κy) are ~ 0.25 Wm-1K-1, which are
close to that of CLER. This is to be expected because the nonbonding interactions are the main
contributors for heat transport along x and y directions, while the bonding interactions dominate
heat transport along z direction. It can be seen that PLER owns strong anisotropy due to semi-crystal
structure (the inset of Fig. 3 (a)), which is much more ordered than amorphous bulk CLER in Fig.
1 (d). However, the thermal conductivity value of PLER is still much smaller than that of bulk
aligned PE [18, 42-44] . Previous studies suggested that the thermal conductivities of nanowires and
nanoribbons can be decreased with the increasing number of kinks and folds [45-47]. There is also
buckling in chains of the relaxed bulk PLER, which indicates that semi-crystalline structure still
owns low degree of crystallinity and it can induce intra-chain phonon scatterings, which is also
observed in other bulk aligned buckled polymers [48].
Fig. 3. (a) Thermal conductivity of PLER as a function of number of segments in the chain
direction. The inset is a side-view of the relaxed bulk PLER (16 chains are allocated with different
colors). (b) The thermal conductivities of stretched PLER with respect to different strains. (c)
XRD patterns of different epoxy resin structures. (d) The radial distribution function g(r) as a
function of radius r of PLER with different strains. The dash line and dot dash line are the radiuses
where peaks in g(r) of PLER without strain and with 0.15 strain locate, respectively.
For further improvement of thermal conductivity, we studied the thermal conductivities of bulk
PLER with uniaxial tensile strains [49]. Figure 3(b) shows the strain dependence of thermal
conductivity along different directions. It can be seen that κz increases dramatically with tensile
strain. When the strain is smaller than 0.15, κz increases slowly with strain. Then it increases
significantly for larger strain. The value of κz reaches 6.45 Wm-1K-1 with 0.50 strain, which is around
20 times larger than that of the bulk CLER. However, κx and κy decrease from 0.25 Wm-1K-1 to 0.12
Wm-1K-1. Similarly, Zeng et al. [27] found the thermal conductivity of fibrous epoxy on the through-
plane decreases with the strain rising. We did not compute the cases with even larger strain for the
confinement of computational ability for the well-known size effects of EMD method.
In order to quantitatively describe the morphologies of CLER, pristine PLER and stretched
PLER, we compared the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of three different structures, as it can
reflect the crystallinity of structure. The XRD intensity is calculated based on a mesh of reciprocal
lattice nodes defined by entire simulation domain using a simulated radiation of wavelength lambda
[34, 50]. As presented in Fig. 3(c), the XRD patterns show significant differences among these three
structures. As we can see, stretched PLER shows several discrete peaks, and PLER without strain
has fewer peaks. CLER shows many broad continuous peaks. The phenomenon indicates that the
stretched PLER has a higher crystallinity of structure compared to the structure without strain, while
the latter owns more ordered structure compared to the amorphous cross-linked network. There are
less phonon scatterings in more ordered structures. That is why the stretched PLER has the highest
thermal conductivity among the three structures. Besides, the XRD pattern of PLER with 0.15 strain
is similar to that with 0.50 strain. It elucidates that the crystallinity of PLER with strain larger than
0.15 is higher than the ones with smaller strains which results in the saltation of κz at the strain 0.15.
We analyzed the inter-chain radial distribution function (RDF) of stretched PLER to further
understand the negative strain dependence of inter-chain thermal conductivity. The heat transfer
along inter-chain directions is dominated by nonbonding interactions, which are related to the atom
distribution around the reference atom. We choose all the atoms in an isolate chain as the reference
atoms of RDF. The distance from a reference atom to the atom in other chains is defined as � =
�(� − ��)� + (� − ��)
� + (� − ��)�. The RDF is recorded as �(�) =
��
��[(����)����]
, where r is
the distance between reference atoms and other atoms, and � is the number of atoms with a
distance of �(� < � < � + ��) to the reference atoms [18], �� is set to be 0.2 Å. The results are
shown in Fig. 3 (d). It can be seen �(�) decreases with the increase of strain. This demonstrates
that the reduction of density around the reference atoms and then the decrease of atomic interactions
on x and y axes because nonbonding interactions are the leading contributors of heat propagation
on these two axes. Hence, the interactions on x and y axes would be smaller for stretched PLER
with larger tensile strains and then κx and κy would be lower. The differences of �(�) are more
significant when the strain is larger than 0.3. Corresponding, κx and κy are decrease dramatically.
To gain insights into how the inter-chain nonbonding interactions impact on the thermal
conductivity of PLER, the single chain structure (Fig. 4 (a)) was investigated which can avoid such
inter-chain phonon scatterings, and help us obtain the upper limit thermal conductivity of epoxy
resin. In this study, a sufficiently large vacuum space was introduced artificially to ensure that the
single chain is isolate and there are no other chains interacting with it. The relaxed chain length
obtained from the bulk PLER is used for isolated single chain at the same temperature. We deformed
the foregoing relaxed single chain and bulk structure with corresponding strains and we could get
the stretched structures. The thermal conductivity of unstretched PLER single chain structure is
shown in Fig. 4 (b). The converged value is ~ 1.13 Wm-1K-1 on z axis, which is about threefold
higher than that of amorphous cross-linked network and larger than that of bulk PLER. The
converged length of single chain structure is much larger than the bulk PLER, which can also verify
that the absence of inter-chain interactions could reduce the phonon scatterings and facilitate the
propagation of the long-wavelength phonons. We also calculated the thermal conductivity of
stretched PLER single chain. The tensile strain increases from 0 to 0.80 and it can have strong effects
on the morphology of the single chain and greatly affect κz of PLER single chain, as shown in Fig.
4 (a). The values increase by 30 times, from ~ 1.13 Wm-1K-1 to ~ 33.82 Wm-1K-1. The variation
trend of thermal conductivity with strain is analogous to that of stretched bulk PLER: The thermal
conductivity increases slowly with small strain and then increases linearly when the strain is higher
than 0.15. As shown in Fig. 4(a), the morphology of single chain with 0.15 strain is straighter than
that of unstretched structure and this phenomenon is more significant in the structure with 0.30
strain. The thermal conductivity still keeps the increasing trend with strain raising. This implies the
thermal conductivity of bulk PLER could be further enhanced through decreasing both intra-chain
and inter-chain phonon scatterings.
Fig. 4. (a) Epoxy resin single chains with 0.15 and 0.30 strain. (b) The thermal conductivities of
single chain with respect to different number of segments. (c) The thermal conductivities of
stretched single chain as a function of strains.
Conclusions
In summary, we performed equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the
thermal conductivities of cross-linked and parallel-linked epoxy resins as well as epoxy resin single
chain. Our results show that the thermal conductivity of cross-linked epoxy resin is in the range of
0.32 - 0.35 Wm-1K-1 and the degree of crosslinking has little effects because the nonbonding
interactions are the main contributors in heat transport. We proposed a bottom-up parallel-linking
method, which is shown to be efficient and the along-chain thermal conductivity of bulk parallel-
linked epoxy resin structure can be enhanced more than twofold compared to the cross-linked
network structure due to the much more ordered morphology. The thermal conductivity can be
boosted with the increasing strain, and reaches a value as high as 6.45 Wm-1K-1 with 0.50 strain.
The thermal conductivity firstly increases slightly and then increases significantly with the strain
raising. X-ray diffraction pattern shows that deformed parallel-linked epoxy resin owns perfect
crystalline structure, which explains the surprising high thermal conductivity. The thermal
conductivity on x and y axes would decrease with the increase of strain for degraded nonbonding
interactions. For parallel-linked single chain, the thermal conductivity is about threefold higher than
that of cross-linked network and the value can be enhanced greatly by 30 times, reaching as high as
~ 33.82 Wm-1K-1 when strain reaches 0.80. The stretched structures own higher thermal
conductivities than that of unstreched one due to more ordered morphology and the suppression of
both inter-chain and intra-chain phonon scatterings. The results may provide a meritorious guide on
the design and fabrication of epoxy resin with high thermal conductivity.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 51676121
(HB), 51576076 (NY) and 51711540031 (NY), and the Hubei Provincial Natural Science
Foundation of China No. 2017CFA046 (NY). Simulations were performed with computing
resources granted by HPC () from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and the National
Supercomputing Center in Tianjin (NSCC-TJ).
References
[1] F.-L. Jin, X. Li, and S.-J. Park, Synthesis and application of epoxy resins: A review, Journal of
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 29 1 (2015).
[2] A. Kumar, V. Sundararaghavan, and A. R. Browning, Study of temperature dependence of
thermal conductivity in cross-linked epoxies using molecular dynamics simulations with long range
interactions, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 22 025013 (2014).
[3] S. Shen, A. Henry, J. Tong, R. Zheng, and G. Chen, Polyethylene nanofibres with very high
thermal conductivities, Nature Nanotechnology 5 251 (2010).
[4] N. Burger, A. Laachachi, M. Ferriol, M. Lutz, V. Toniazzo, and D. Ruch, Review of thermal
conductivity in composites: Mechanisms, parameters and theory, Progress in Polymer Science 61 1
(2016).
[5] S. Yu, S. Yang, and M. Cho, Multiscale modeling of cross-linked epoxy nanocomposites to
characterize the effect of particle size on thermal conductivity, Journal of Applied Physics 110 124302
(2011).
[6] Y.-X. Fu, Z.-X. He, D.-C. Mo, and S.-S. Lu, Thermal conductivity enhancement with different
fillers for epoxy resin adhesives, Applied Thermal Engineering 66 493 (2014).
[7] C. Chen, Y. Tang, Y. S. Ye, Z. Xue, Y. Xue, X. Xie, and Y.-W. Mai, High-
performanceepoxy/silica coated silver nanowire composites as underfill material for electronic
packaging, Composites Science and Technology 105 80 (2014).
[8] C. Chen, H. Wang, Y. Xue, Z. Xue, H. Liu, X. Xie, and Y.-W. Mai, Structure, rheological,
thermal conductive and electrical insulating properties of high-performance hybrid
epoxy/nanosilica/AgNWs nanocomposites, Composites Science and Technology 128 207 (2016).
[9] W. Zhou, Effect of coupling agents on the thermal conductivity of aluminum particle/epoxy
resin composites, Journal of Materials Science 46 3883 (2011).
[10] F. H. Gojny, M. H. G. Wichmann, B. Fiedler, I. A. Kinloch, W. Bauhofer, A. H. Windle, and
K. Schulte, Evaluation and identification of electrical and thermal conduction mechanisms in carbon
nanotube/epoxy composites, Polymer 47 2036 (2006).
[11] S. H. Song, K. H. Park, B. H. Kim, Y. W. Choi, G. H. Jun, D. J. Lee, B. S. Kong, K. W. Paik,
and S. Jeon, Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Epoxy–Graphene Composites by Using Non‐Oxidized
Graphene Flakes with Non‐Covalent Functionalization, Advanced Materials 25 732 (2013).
[12] V. Varshney, S. S. Patnaik, A. K. Roy, and B. L. Farmer, Heat transport in epoxy networks: A
molecular dynamics study, Polymer 50 3378 (2009).
[13] D. E. Kline, Thermal conductivity studies of polymers, Journal of Polymer Science Part A:
Polymer Chemistry 50 441 (1961).
[14] A. Henry and G. Chen, High thermal conductivity of single polyethylene chains using
molecular dynamics simulations, Physical Review Letters 101 235502 (2008).
[15] A. Henry and G. Chen, Anomalous heat conduction in polyethylene chains: Theory and
molecular dynamics simulations, Physical Review B 79 14 (2009).
[16] T. Zhang, X. Wu, and T. Luo, Polymer Nanofibers with Outstanding Thermal Conductivity
and Thermal Stability: Fundamental Linkage between Molecular Characteristics and Macroscopic
Thermal Properties, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 118 21148 (2014).
[17] T. Zhang and T. Luo, High-contrast, reversible thermal conductivity regulation utilizing the
phase transition of polyethylene nanofibers, ACS Nano 7 7592 (2013).
[18] T. Zhang and T. Luo, Morphology-influenced thermal conductivity of polyethylene single
chains and crystalline fibers, Journal of Applied Physics 112 094304 (2012).
[19] T. Zhang and T. Luo, Role of Chain Morphology and Stiffness in Thermal Conductivity of
Amorphous Polymers, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 120 803 (2016).
[20] Y. Xu, D. Kraemer, B. Song, Z. Jiang, J. Zhou, et al., Nanostructured Polymer Films with
Metal-like Thermal Conductivity, arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.06416 (2017).
[21] B.-Y. Cao, Y.-W. Li, J. Kong, H. Chen, Y. Xu, K.-L. Yung, and A. Cai, High thermal
conductivity of polyethylene nanowire arrays fabricated by an improved nanoporous template wetting
technique, Polymer 52 1711 (2011).
[22] V. Singh, T. L. Bougher, A. Weathers, Y. Cai, K. Bi, et al., High thermal conductivity of chain-
oriented amorphous polythiophene, Nature Nanotechnology 9 384 (2014).
[23] M. Harada, M. Ochi, M. Tobita, T. Kimura, T. Ishigaki, N. Shimoyama, and H. Aoki, Thermal‐
conductivity properties of liquid‐crystalline epoxy resin cured under a magnetic field, Journal of Polymer
Science Part B: Polymer Physics 41 1739 (2003).
[24] Z.-M. Huang, Y.-Z. Zhang, M. Kotaki, and S. Ramakrishna, A review on polymer nanofibers
by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites, Composites Science and Technology 63
2223 (2003).
[25] M. Akatsuka and Y. Takezawa, Study of high thermal conductive epoxy resins containing
controlled high‐order structures, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 89 2464 (2003).
[26] T. Koda, T. Toyoshima, T. Komatsu, Y. Takezawa, A. Nishioka, and K. Miyata, Ordering
simulation of high thermal conductivity epoxy resins, Polymer Journal 45 444 (2012).
[27] X. Zeng, L. Ye, K. Guo, R. Sun, J. Xu, and C.-P. Wong, Fibrous Epoxy Substrate with High
Thermal Conductivity and Low Dielectric Property for Flexible Electronics, Advanced Electronic
Materials 2 1500485 (2016).
[28] X. Zeng, Y. Xiong, Q. Fu, R. Sun, J. Xu, D. Xu, and C. P. Wong, Structure-induced variation
of thermal conductivity in epoxy resin fibers, Nanoscale 9 10585 (2017).
[29] T. Yoshimura, S. Tatsuura, and W. Sotoyama, Polymer films formed with monolayer growth
steps by molecular layer deposition, Applied Physics Letters 59 482 (1991).
[30] H. Zhou and S. F. Bent, Fabrication of organic interfacial layers by molecular layer deposition:
Present status and future opportunities, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces,
and Films 31 040801 (2013).
[31] C. Wu and W. Xu, Atomistic molecular modelling of crosslinked epoxy resin, Polymer 47
6004 (2006).
[32] V. Varshney, S. S. Patnaik, A. K. Roy, and B. L. Farmer, A molecular dynamics study of epoxy-
based networks: cross-linking procedure and prediction of molecular and material properties,
Macromolecules 41 6837 (2008).
[33] N. B. Shenogina, M. Tsige, S. S. Patnaik, and S. M. Mukhopadhyay, Molecular Modeling
Approach to Prediction of Thermo-Mechanical Behavior of Thermoset Polymer Networks,
Macromolecules 45 5307 (2012).
[34] S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, Journal of
Computational Physics 117 1 (1995).
[35] J. R. Maple, U. Dinur, and A. T. Hagler, Derivation of force fields for molecular mechanics
and dynamics from ab initio energy surfaces, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America 85 5350 (1988).
[36] P. Dauberosguthorpe, V. A. Roberts, D. J. Osguthorpe, J. Wolff, M. Genest, and A. T. Hagler,
Structure and energetics of ligand binding to proteins: Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase ‐
trimethoprim, a drug‐receptor system, Proteins 4 31 (1988).
[37] W. C. Swope, H. C. Andersen, P. H. Berens, and K. R. Wilson, A computer simulation method
for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules:
Application to small water clusters, The Journal of Chemical Physics 76 637 (1982).
[38] X. Y. Mi, X. Yu, K. L. Yao, X. Huang, N. Yang, and J. T. Lu, Enhancing the Thermoelectric
Figure of Merit by Low-Dimensional Electrical Transport in Phonon-Glass Crystals, Nano Letters 15
5229 (2015).
[39] D. Xin and Q. Han, Study on thermomechanical properties of cross-linked epoxy resin,
Molecular Simulation 41 1081 (2014).
[40] S. Ganguli, A. K. Roy, and D. P. Anderson, Improved thermal conductivity for chemically
functionalized exfoliated graphite/epoxy composites, Carbon 46 806 (2008).
[41] G. Kikugawa, T. G. Desai, P. Keblinski, and T. Ohara, Effect of crosslink formation on heat
conduction in amorphous polymers, Journal of Applied Physics 114 034302 (2013).
[42] X. Yu, C. Deng, X. Huang, and N. Yang, Enhancing thermal conductivity of bulk polyethylene
along two directions by paved crosswise laminate, arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01540 (2016).
[43] Q. Liao, Z. Liu, W. Liu, C. Deng, and N. Yang, Extremely High Thermal Conductivity of
Aligned Carbon Nanotube-Polyethylene Composites, Scientific Reports 5 16543 (2015).
[44] N. Shulumba, O. Hellman, and A. J. Minnich, Lattice Thermal Conductivity of Polyethylene
Molecular Crystals from First-Principles Including Nuclear Quantum Effects, Physical Review Letters
119 185901 (2017).
[45] N. Yang, X. Ni, J.-W. Jiang, and B. Li, How does folding modulate thermal conductivity of
graphene? Applied Physics Letters 100 093107 (2012).
[46] J.-W. Jiang, N. Yang, B.-S. Wang, and T. Rabczuk, Modulation of thermal conductivity in
kinked silicon nanowires: phonon interchanging and pinching effects, Nano Letters 13 1670 (2013).
[47] L. Yang, J. Chen, N. Yang, and B. Li, Significant reduction of graphene thermal conductivity
by phononic crystal structure, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 91 428 (2015).
[48] A. B. Robbins and A. J. Minnich, Crystalline polymers with exceptionally low thermal
conductivity studied using molecular dynamics, Applied Physics Letters 107 201908 (2015).
[49] C. Shao, X. Yu, N. Yang, Y. Yue, and H. Bao, A review of thermal transport in low-dimensional
materials under external perturbation: effect of strain, substrate, and clustering, Nanoscale and
Microscale Thermophysical Engineering 21 201 (2017).
[50] H. Ma and Z. Tian, Effects of polymer topology and morphology on thermal transport: A
molecular dynamics study of bottlebrush polymers, Applied Physics Letters 110 091903 (2017).