Upload
shen-liu
View
212
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
High-level expression of bioactive recombinant humanlysozyme in the milk of transgenic mice using a modifiedhuman lactoferrin BAC
Shen Liu • Xiangqing Li • Dan Lu • Shengzhe Shang •
Meili Wang • Min Zheng • Ran Zhang • Bo Tang •
Qiuyan Li • Yunping Dai • Ning Li
Received: 31 March 2011 / Accepted: 6 July 2011 / Published online: 30 July 2011
� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
Abstract Transgenesis has been used for express-
ing human lysozyme (hLZ) in the milk of livestock to
improve their disease resistance. Here we describe a
human lactoferrin (hLF) BAC as a candidate vector
for high-level expression of hLZ in the milk of
transgenic mice. Using recombineering, hLF genomic
DNA in the hLF BAC was replaced by the hLZ gene
(from the ATG start codon to the TAA stop codon),
and flanking regions of the hLF gene (a 90-kb 50 and
a 30-kb 30) were used as transcriptional control
elements for hLZ expression. When this construct
was used to generate transgenic mice, rhLZ was
highly expressed in the milk of four transgenic mouse
lines (1.20–1.76 g/L), was expressed at a lower level
in one additional line (0.21 g/L). rhLZ from the milk
of these transgenic mice exhibited the same antibac-
terial activity as native hLZ. Our results suggest a
potential approach for producing large amounts of
hLZ in the milk of livestock.
Keywords Recombinant human lysozyme (rhLZ) �Recombineering � Human lactoferrin bacterial
artificial chromosome (hLF BAC) � Transgenic mice �Milk
Introduction
Since the production of the first transgenic mice
(Gordon et al. 1980), considerable progress has been
made in applying transgenic technology to livestock
for agriculture, mainly resulting in increases in
disease resistance (Whitelaw and Sang 2005), growth
rate (Hammer et al. 1985; Pursel et al. 1989), carcass
composition (Lai et al. 2006), milk production
(Brophy et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2008), and wool
production (Bawden et al. 1998) as well as reduced
environmental impact (Golovan et al. 2001). Regarding
disease resistance, genetic modifications offer several
possible strategies, including transfer of interfering
RNAs and genes for major histocompatibility com-
plex, T-cell receptors, and specific disease resistance
(Muller and Brem 1991; Whitelaw and Sang 2005). A
prominent example is the demonstration that trans-
genic dairy cattle expressing lysostaphin acquired
resistance to the mastitis-causing bacteria Staphylo-
coccus aureus (Kerr et al. 2001; Wall et al. 2005).
Lysozyme is an antimicrobial molecule that con-
fers disease resistance and shows strong antimicrobial
activity towards gram-positive bacterial species.
Electronic supplementary material The online version ofthis article (doi:10.1007/s11248-011-9536-4) containssupplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
S. Liu � X. Li � D. Lu � S. Shang � R. Zhang �B. Tang � Q. Li � Y. Dai � N. Li (&)
State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, China
Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
e-mail: [email protected]
M. Wang � M. Zheng
GenProtein Biotech Ltd., Beijing 100193, China
123
Transgenic Res (2012) 21:407–414
DOI 10.1007/s11248-011-9536-4
In higher animals, lysozyme exists naturally in avian
egg whites and biological fluids including tears,
saliva, and milk. Lysozyme functions by hydrolyzing
the glycosidic b-(1-4) linkage between N-acetylmu-
ramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine of the peptido-
glycan polymer in the bacterial cell wall (Maidment
et al. 2009). Among the different types of lysozyme,
human lysozyme (hLZ) has a relatively high anti-
bacterial activity, about three times higher than that
of egg white lysozyme. hLZ as a nonspecific immune
factor in human milk plays important roles in
protecting against bacteria, viruses and fungi
(Lee-Huang et al. 1999; Nakajima et al. 1997). When
added to infant formula, hLZ takes part in passive
immunity and reduces microbial infections in the
gastrointestinal tract of breast-fed infants (Lonnerdal
2003; Huang et al. 2002). Human milk has abundant
lysozyme (0.4 g/L), while the milk of other species
contains lower concentrations of lysozyme (e.g., 0.13
and 0.065 mg/L in cows and pigs, respectively)
(Chandan et al. 1964; Maga and Murray 1995). It
has been reported that recombinant hLZ (rhLZ)
produced by transgenic rice significantly improves
the feed efficiency of poultry (Humphrey et al. 2002).
Recently, rhLZ from transgenic dairy goats has been
shown to inhibit the growth of bacteria that cause
mastitis (Maga et al. 2006a). In addition, the
consumption of pasteurized goat milk containing
rhLZ has the potential to improve gastrointestinal
health and is protective against an enteropathogenic
Escherichia coli (EPEC) infection in young weaned
pigs (Brundige et al. 2008). Thus, the expression of
rhLZ in milk may enhance resistance to mastitis in
cows and protect young pigs as pigs used in Brundige
et al. (2008) were weaned from diarrheal disease.
Our previous work has shown that the plasmid
pBC-hLZ using goat b-casein gene promoter can be
used to express bioactive rhLZ in the milk of
transgenic mice, and the highest level was up to
1.4 g/L, albeit at very different levels among indi-
viduals (Yu et al. 2006). This construct was also
transfected into primary female porcine fetal fibro-
blasts, and transgenic cloned pigs were generated, but
the expression of rhLZ was very low (0.32 mg/L) (Li
et al. 2009; Tong et al. 2010). Similar results were
obtained with transgenic cattle expressing rhLZ
(25.96 mg/L) (Yang et al. 2011). Thus, optimization
of the hLZ expression construct is required. We also
screened a series of transgenic mice expressing a
BAC clone for expression of human lactoferrin
(hLF), and this BAC clone allowed consistent
expression of high levels of recombinant human
lactoferrin (rhLF) in the milk of transgenic mice
(highest expression reached 8 g/L) (Liu et al. 2004).
Four years later, somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT)
was used to produce transgenic cloned cows that
secrete rhLF at high levels (2.5 and 3.4 g/L) (Yang
et al. 2008). Thus, we speculate that the hLF BAC
construct is a candidate expression vector that will
allow high levels of hLZ expression.
In this study, the hLF locus of the hLF BAC
construct was replaced with the 4.8-kb hLZ gene by
recombineering. The 90-kb 50 and 30-kb 30 flanking
regions of the hLF gene were used as the transcrip-
tional control elements for hLZ expression. A neo-
mycin resistance gene that works in both prokaryotic
and eukaryotic expression systems was inserted in
front of the 50 flanking region of the hLF BAC as the
selectable marker for SCNT. Transgenic mice were
generated with this construct, and rhLZ was
expressed at high levels (1.20–1.76 g/L) in the milk
of four transgenic lines. Only one line expressed
rhLZ at low levels (0.21 g/L). The rhLZ from
transgenic milk exhibited the same antibacterial
activity as native hLZ. Our results suggest a potential
approach for producing large amounts of hLZ in the
milk of livestock that could be purified as a
nutraceutical.
Results
Construction of pBAC-hLF-hLZ-Neo
expression vector
Figure 1 shows the strategy for replacing 28.9 kb of
hLF genomic sequence with 4.8 kb of hLZ genomic
DNA on the hLF BAC. The procedure of modifying
the pBAC-hLF-hLZ-Neo construct was divided into
three distinct steps, which were each verified by PCR
and sequencing with the primers listed in Table S1.
The first step is a replacement of hLF coding
sequence with the one for hLZ, thus the targeting
construct pMD19-hLZ-Zeo was linearized and elec-
troporated into competent SW102 cells containing
hLF BAC for recombination. Ten zeocin resistant
clones were picked and verified by PCR with hybrid
primers P1 (Table S1), which bind to the hLF 50
408 Transgenic Res (2012) 21:407–414
123
flanking regions and hLZ genomic sequence, respec-
tively. All ten clones produced a band of the expected
length (703 bp). No product was amplified from
unmodified hLF BAC (Fig. S1a). The PCR-positive
SW102 bacterial cells were made competent for the
next procedure. In the second step, the neomycin
resistance cassette, which allows stably transfected
eukaryotic cells to be selected using G418 and
expresses kanamycin resistance in E. coli, was
inserted into the hLF BAC as a selectable marker
for future SCNT. Recombineering was performed and
verified as described above. The amplified products
were 2,541 bp for BAC clones that recombination
occurred at the correct location, and 1,960 bp for the
negative control (Fig. S1b). In the final step, the
zeocin cassette flanked by two direct repeat FRT sites
was removed after transient expression of FLP
recombinase in E. coli strain SW102. PCR analysis
was performed across the recombination site, and the
amplified products of positive clones were found to
be 1,129 bp, about 1 kb smaller than the negative
control because of the deletion of a zeocin cassette
(Fig. S1c). P4 primers were prepared for digoxigenin
(DIG)-labeled probes for Southern blot analysis
(Table S1). The final modified pBAC-hLF-hLZ-Neo
construct contained a 90-kb 50 flanking region of the
hLF gene, the 4.8-kb hLZ genomic fragment with a
single FRT site retained, a 30-kb 30 flanking region of
the hLF gene, and a Neo cassette for future SCNT.
Generation of transgenic mice using modified
BAC clone
Circular pBAC-hLF-hLZ-Neo BAC DNA was micro-
injected into pronuclei of fertilized eggs, and trans-
genic mice were generated by standard microinjection
(Hogan et al. 1994). Two female (no. 32, 39) and three
male (no. 26, 30, 35) transgenic founders were
obtained from 41 mice analyzed by PCR (Fig. 2a;
efficiency = 12.2%). Southern blotting was further
used to confirm that the transgenes were integrated
into the genome of transgenic mice. A 637-bp DIG-
labeled DNA probe was produced by PCR using
pBAC-hLF-hLZ-Neo construct DNA as a template
Fig. 1 Diagrammatic representation of BAC modification.
The recombineering procedure was divided into three distinct
steps. In step 1, the 4.8-kb hLZ genomic sequence (from the
ATG start codon to the TAA stop codon) flanked by two
homology arms was obtained by PCR, and a Zeo cassette
flanked by two FRT sites for positive selection was ligated into
intron 2 of the hLZ gene. The linear targeting substrate DNA of
the hLZ-Zeo gene was electroporated into competent SW102
cells containing hLF BAC. In step 2, a Neo cassette was
flanked by two loxP sites and designed to be inserted into the 50
genomic DNA of hLF BAC for drug selection of cultured
somatic cells. In step 3, the Zeo cassette was excised by
transformation of a helper plasmid encoding the FLP recom-
binase, and a single FRT site was retained after recombination.
The positions of primers (P1, P2, P3, and P4) used for PCR
verification or Southern blot probes are indicated by arrows
Transgenic Res (2012) 21:407–414 409
123
and a PCR reaction mixture containing DIG-dUTP.
The result of Southern analysis was consistent with
that of PCR (Fig. 2b). Upon sexual maturity, the
transgenic founders were mated with wild-type mice,
and all founders transmitted the transgenes to their
offspring.
Expression of rhLZ
Transgene expression in transgenic female mice was
assessed by RT-PCR using RNA isolated from
lactating mammary glands (day 13) and seven other
tissues (heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, stomach,
and intestine) of two lines (F1 generation of line 26
and 39). The mouse GAPDH gene was used as a
control for mRNA extraction and loading. The
primers Exon1-2-F and Exon4-R (Table S1) were
designed based on the hLZ coding sequences and
yielded a 322-bp PCR product. The forward primer
was designed to cross one intron. Strong amplification
was obtained with mRNA from lactating mammary
glands, whereas very low levels of transcripts were
detected in heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, and
intestine, and no transcript was detected in stomach
(Fig. 2c). Both line 26 and 39 had shown the same
pattern of mRNA expression.
High expression of rhLZ in milk
of transgenic mice
To characterize rhLZ expression, F0 females and F1
females from F0 male were used, and milk samples
from all transgenic females were collected during
mid-lactation (days 9–16). Samples were diluted and
analyzed by western blot analysis. Milk from wild-
type mice was used as a negative control, and 0.5 lg
natural hLZ standard was used as a positive control.
Most transgenic lines showed a strong signal at
14.7 kDa, indicating high-level expression of rhLZ in
milk; no band was observed in the negative control
Fig. 2 Molecular characterization of transgenic mice. a PCR
detection of transgenic founders. M 100-bp DNA ladder, PCpositive control using pBAC-hLF-hLZ-Neo construct, NCnegative control; transgenic founders numbered 26, 30, 32,
35, and 39. The amplified products are 703 bp for the hLF-
hLZ hybrid gene. b Southern blot analysis of transgenic
founders. EcoRI-digested genomic DNA was hybridized with
digoxigenin-labeled probe of amplified hLZ fragments. PCpositive control, NC genomic DNA of non-transgenic mice as a
negative control. c RT-PCR analysis transgene expression in
transgenic mouse tissues. The 322-bp product was abundant in
lactating mammary gland of transgenic mice, and weak signal
was detected in six out of seven other tissues. M 100-bp DNA
ladder; M mammary gland tissue of transgenic line 26 on day
13 of lactation; H heart, Li liver, Sp spleen, Lu lung, K, kidney,
St stomach, I intestine, NC mammary gland tissue of non-
transgenic mouse. The mouse GAPDH gene was used as a
positive control for mRNA extraction and loading
410 Transgenic Res (2012) 21:407–414
123
(Fig. 3). The concentration of rhLZ was further
quantified by ELISA, which showed that four of the
five transgenic lines had high-level, consistent
expression of rhLZ ranging from 1.2 to 1.74 g/L.
By both western blotting and ELISA, only no. 32 had
a low level of expression (0.2 g/L; Table 1).
Assessment of rhLZ antibacterial activity
Two methods were used to analyze the bactericidal
activity of rhLZ in M. lysodeikticus, because this
organism is very sensitive to lysozyme. The lysoplate
method is a convenient method for analyzing bacte-
ricidal activity and for roughly estimating the
expression level of rhLZ in the milk. Milk samples
were spotted on individual circles of quantitative
filter paper, which were placed on an agar plate
containing M. lysodeikticus. After incubation at 28�C,
transparent zones around the filter paper circles
indicate lysis of the bacteria. Transparent zones
around filters containing natural hLZ standard or milk
from transgenic mice were clearly visible after
incubation for 36 h (Fig. 4). No transparent zone
was formed with milk from a non-transgenic mouse.
The activity of rhLZ can be roughly compared by
measuring the diameter of the clear zone. Consistent
with the western blotting and ELISA results, a
smaller zone of transparency was seen for line 32.
Milk samples were quantitatively examined using
a turbidometric assay. In this assay, the enzymatic
activity of hLZ is determined by monitoring the
reduction in turbidity of a suspension of M. lys-
odeikticus cells at 450 nm. A standard curve was
established using hen egg-white lysozyme (HEWL)
ranging from 1,000 to 8,000 U/lL, and then the rhLZ
activity of milk samples were quantified. The
antibacterial activity in milk from four transgenic
lines ranged from 3,137 to 3,498 U/lL; the level for
line 32 was considerably lower (872 U/lL; Table 1).
Milk from non-transgenic mice and the natural hLZ
standard showed activity of 155 ± 194 U/lL and
1,528 ± 275 U/lL, respectively.
Discussion
The hLF-hLZ hybrid BAC was constructed to induce
high expression of rhLZ in mammary glands. This
vector was designed for high-level, consistent expres-
sion in the milk of transgenic mice and yielded the
highest level of rhLZ expression reported to date.
Considerable effort to optimize levels of protein
expression has concentrated on overcoming chromo-
somal position effects and increasing the length of the
Fig. 3 Western blot detection of recombinant hLZ expressed
in milk of transgenic mice. Milk samples were diluted 1:10 in
PBS, and 3 lL of each sample was separated by SDS–PAGE
under reducing conditions. PC, 0.5 lg natural hLZ standard
(Sigma; 14.7 kDa); NC, milk of non-transgenic mice as a
negative control; 32 and 39 are milk from female founder mice;
30-11, 30-13, 35-17, and 26-22 are milk from different female
F1 offspring of male founders
Table 1 Expression of rhLZ in milk of transgenic mouse lines
Line Sex of founder rhLZ expression
levela in F0 (g/L)
rhLZ expression
levela in F1 (g/L)
Antibacterial
activityb (U/lL)
Germ line
transmission
26 Male 1.74 ± 0.15 3,498 ± 285 Yes (5/10)
30c Male 1.36 ± 0.01
1.33 ± 0.07
3,228 ± 253
3,137 ± 125
Yes (2/10)
32 Female 0.21 ± 0.01 872 ± 145 Yes (1/9)
35 Male 1.25 ± 0.06 3,397 ± 253 Yes (7/13)
39 Female 1.20 ± 0.18 3,329 ± 222 Yes (1/8)
a The concentration of rhLZ was quantified by ELISA in female founders or in F1 female offspring from male foundersb Antibacterial activity was determined by turbidometric assayc The line 30 founder mouse fathered two female offspring (F1: 30-11 and 30-13)
Transgenic Res (2012) 21:407–414 411
123
regulatory elements. An hLF bacterial artificial
chromosome was chosen as a candidate expression
vector. Artificial chromosomes generally contain all
the regulatory elements necessary for exogenous gene
expression as well as specific sequences such as
scaffold/matrix-attachment regions and locus control
regions or insulators that are likely to overcome
positional effects and thus increase transgene expres-
sion (Giraldo and Montoliu 2001). Three types of
artificial chromosomes are commonly used in trans-
genic studies: yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs),
BACs, and P1-derived artificial chromosomes
(PACs). BACs are considered the best type of
expression vector because they can adapted to most
protocols, can accommodate genomic inserts up to
300 kb, have a low frequency (\5%) of chimerism,
and are more stable (Giraldo and Montoliu 2001).
Transgenic mice created using a goat lactalbumin
BAC showed position-independent and copy number-
related expression (Stinnakre et al. 1999). Our
previous results also demonstrated that the hLF
BAC provided high-level, consistent expression of
rhLF in transgenic mice and cattle (Liu et al. 2004;
Yang et al. 2008). Thus, we chose hLF BAC as the
candidate vector for high expression of rhLZ in the
mammary gland.
Mammary gland transgenesis of hLZ was first
reported by Maga et al. (1994). rhLZ was expressed
in the milk using either 20 kb of bovine as1-casein
promoter, resulting in concentrations that varied from
0.25 to 0 0.71 g/L (Maga et al. 1995), or 3.7 kb of
bovine b-casein promoter, resulting in no detectable
mRNA expression in mammary tissue. A possible
reason for this was that the latter construct lacked
some essential regulatory elements. Usually, 20 kb of
promoter is sufficiently long to contain all regulatory
elements required for high-level expression. How-
ever, a possible disadvantage of the former construct
is that a cDNA was used rather than genomic DNA,
which can lower hLZ expression because introns
increase transcriptional efficiency (Brinster et al.
1988). In 2006, hLZ-expressing transgenic goats
were generated by standard pronuclear microinjec-
tion, and the expression level of rhLZ in the milk was
0.27 g/L, or 68% of the level found in human milk
(Maga et al. 2006b). In our laboratory, transgenic
hLZ mice produced milk at levels up to 1.4 g/L (Yu
et al. 2006), but the level of expression was not
similar among different lines. hLZ-expressing trans-
genic pigs or cows generated by SCNT also had very
low expression levels (Tong et al. 2010). One reason
for the transgene expression variability may be
attributed to a chromosomal position effect (Clark
et al. 1994), although two chicken b-globin insulators
were used. A second reason may be that the goat
b-casein promoter in the pBC1 vector was only
Fig. 4 Lysoplate assay for lytic activity of rhLZ against
M. lysodeikticus. Small white circles are 6-mm quantitative
filter papers spotted with 10 lL of 1:10 diluted milk sample.
Transparent zones around the quantitative filter papers indicate
bacterial lysis. PC0.5, 0.5 lg natural hLZ standard; PC1.0,
1 lg natural hLZ standard; NC, milk of non-transgenic mice as
a negative control; 32 and 39 are milk from female founder
mice; 30-11, 30-13, 35-17, and 26-22 are milk from different
female F1 offspring of male founders
412 Transgenic Res (2012) 21:407–414
123
4.1 kb, which works well in transgenic mice but may
be not long enough to contain all the mammary
regulatory regions in pigs or cows.
In this study, hLF genomic DNA in the hLF BAC
was replaced by the full-length hLZ gene by
recombineering, and the resulting circular BAC was
used to generate transgenic mice. The overall
efficiency of transgenesis was 12.2%, which is
comparable to that of standard DNA constructs
(5–20%) and of linearized BACs (Liu et al. 2004).
Our results were consistent with the findings of others
(Van Keuren et al. 2009). The transmission of the
transgenes was detected by analyzing tail DNA. Of
the 50 F1 pups tested, 16 were positive for transgene
(Table 1).
The amount of rhLZ in the milk was quantified by
ELISA, which showed that four out of five transgenic
mouse lines had a high level of expression, demon-
strating that this BAC vector provided very consistent
expression. Only line 32 showed low expression. No
direct relationship was observed between the trans-
gene copy number and the amount of rhLZ (Supple-
mentary material 2), which is inconsistent with a
previous finding (Stinnakre et al. 1999). Our results
indicate that the pBAC-hLF-hLZ-Neo construct con-
tained long-range regulatory elements and partially
overcame any chromosomal positional effects when
integrated into the mouse genome. Furthermore, the
use of genomic DNA likely enhanced the expression
level of rhLZ compared to cDNA.
Transgene expression in transgenic female mice
was assessed by RT-PCR in mammary gland and
seven other tissues. hLZ transcripts were abundant in
mammary gland tissue of lactating mice, but weak
signals were also detected in most other tissues
tested. This ectopic expression was not unexpected
because the hLZ gene was under the control of the
hLF promoter, the activation of which is constitutive
but is differentially regulated through multiple sig-
naling pathways (Teng 2002). More experiments will
be needed to examine whether the ectopic expression
of hLZ affects the health of transgenic animals.
A well-known property of lysozyme is its lytic
activity against gram-positive bacteria, especially
M. lysodeikticus cells. Therefore, the lytic activity
of rhLZ was assayed in M. lysodeikticus cells by both
turbidometric and lysoplate assays, and rhLZ dis-
played a level of lytic activity that was about two
times higher than that of 1 lg natural hLZ standard.
This indicates that the rhLZ generated by this
expression vector is a good candidate for an antimi-
crobial agent in milk of transgenic animals.
In conclusion, we have successfully generated
transgenic mice expressing high levels of rhLZ in
milk. Our results suggest a potential approach for
producing large amounts of hLZ in the milk of
livestock.
Acknowledgments We would like to thank Drs. Yaofeng
Zhao, Sen Wu, Jia Tong, Guangbin Zhou, Jianwu Wang, Tian
Yu, Jin He and Jianxiang Xu for revising the manuscript,
Hongxing Chen for his discussions on BAC modification, and
Min Zhang, Rui Fang, Mingjun Bi, Zubin Cao, Zhisheng Chen
and Junna He for excellent technical assistance. This work was
supported by ‘‘863’’ High-Tech Research Development
(Project Grant No. 2009AA10Z110 and 2010AA10A103).
References
Bawden CS, Powell BC, Walker SK, Rogers GE (1998)
Expression of a wool intermediate filament keratin
transgene in sheep fibre alters structure. Transgenic Res
7(4):273–287
Brinster RL, Allen JM, Behringer RR, Gelinas RE, Palmiter
RD (1988) Introns increase transcriptional efficiency in
transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85(3):836–840
Brophy B, Smolenski G, Wheeler T, Wells D, L’Huillier P,
Laible G (2003) Cloned transgenic cattle produce milk
with higher levels of beta-casein and kappa-casein. Nat
Biotechnol 21(2):157–162
Brundige DR, Maga EA, Klasing KC, Murray JD (2008)
Lysozyme transgenic goats’ milk influences gastrointes-
tinal morphology in young pigs. J Nutr 138(5):921–926
Chandan RC, Shahani KM, Holly RG (1964) Lysozyme con-
tent of human milk. Nature 204:76–77
Clark AJ, Bissinger P, Bullock DW, Damak S, Wallace R,
Whitelaw CB, Yull F (1994) Chromosomal position
effects and the modulation of transgene expression. Re-
prod Fertil Dev 6(5):589–598
Giraldo P, Montoliu L (2001) Size matters: use of YACs,
BACs and PACs in transgenic animals. Transgenic Res
10(2):83–103
Golovan SP, Meidinger RG, Ajakaiye A, Cottrill M, Wie-
derkehr MZ, Barney DJ, Plante C, Pollard JW, Fan MZ,
Hayes MA, Laursen J, Hjorth JP, Hacker RR, Phillips JP,
Forsberg CW (2001) Pigs expressing salivary phytase
produce low-phosphorus manure. Nat Biotechnol
19(8):741–745
Gordon JW, Scangos GA, Plotkin DJ, Barbosa JA, Ruddle FH
(1980) Genetic transformation of mouse embryos by
microinjection of purified DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
77(12):7380–7384
Hammer RE, Pursel VG, Rexroad CE Jr, Wall RJ, Bolt DJ,
Ebert KM, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL (1985) Production of
Transgenic Res (2012) 21:407–414 413
123
transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection.
Nature 315(6021):680–683
Hogan B, Beddington R, Costantini F, Lacy E (1994) Manip-
ulating the mouse embryo, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor
Huang JM, Wu LY, Yalda D, Adkins Y, Kelleher SL, Crane M,
Lonnerdal B, Rodriguez RL, Huang N (2002) Expression
of functional recombinant human lysozyme in transgenic
rice cell culture. Transgenic Res 11(3):229–239
Humphrey BD, Huang N, Klasing KC (2002) Rice expressing
lactoferrin and lysozyme has antibiotic-like properties
when fed to chicks. J Nutr 132(6):1214–1218
Kerr DE, Plaut K, Bramley AJ, Williamson CM, Lax AJ,
Moore K, Wells KD, Wall RJ (2001) Lysostaphin
expression in mammary glands confers protection against
staphylococcal infection in transgenic mice. Nat Bio-
technol 19(1):66–70
Lai LX, Kang JX, Li RF, Wang JD, Witt WT, Yong HY, Hao
YH, Wax DM, Murphy CN, Rieke A, Samuel M, Linville
ML, Korte SW, Evans RW, Starzl TE, Prather RS, Dai YF
(2006) Generation of cloned transgenic pigs rich in
omega-3 fatty acids. Nat Biotechnol 24(4):435–436
Lee-Huang S, Huang PL, Sun YT, Huang PL, Kung HF, Blithe
DL, Chen HC (1999) Lysozyme and RNases as anti-HIV
components in beta-core preparations of human chorionic
gonadotropin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(6):2678–2681
Li QY, Wei HX, Guo Y, Li Y, Zhao R, Ma YF, Yu ZQ, Tang
B, Zhang L, Dai YP, Li N (2009) Production of human
lysozyme-transgenic cloned porcine embryos by somatic
nuclear transfer. Prog Natural Sci 19(6):699–704
Liu Z, Zhao C, Fan B, Dai Y, Zhao Z, Wang L, Zheng M, Feng
J, Chen Y, Duan Y, Li N (2004) Variable expression of
human lactoferrin gene in mice milk driven by its 90 KB
upstream flanking sequences. Anim Biotechnol 15(1):
21–31
Lonnerdal B (2003) Nutritional and physiologic significance of
human milk proteins. Am J Clin Nutr 77(6):1537S–1543S
Maga EA, Anderson GB, Huang MC, Murray JD (1994)
Expression of human lysozyme mRNA in the mammary-
gland of transgenic mice. Transgenic Res 3(1):36–42
Maga EA, Murray JD (1995) Mammary gland expression of
transgenes and the potential for altering the properties of
milk. Biotechnology (NY) 13(13):1452–1457
Maga EA, Anderson GB, Murray JD (1995) The effect of
mammary gland expression of human lysozyme on the
properties of milk from transgenic mice. J Dairy Sci
78(12):2645–2652
Maga EA, Cullor JS, Smith W, Anderson GB, Murray JD
(2006a) Human lysozyme expressed in the mammary
gland of transgenic dairy goats can inhibit the growth of
bacteria that cause mastitis and the cold-spoilage of milk.
Foodborne Pathog Dis 3(4):384–392
Maga EA, Shoemaker CF, Rowe JD, BonDurant RH, Anderson
GB, Murray JD (2006b) Production and processing of
milk from transgenic goats expressing human lysozyme in
the mammary gland. J Dairy Sci 89(2):518–524
Maidment C, Dyson A, Beard J (2009) A study into measuring
the antibacterial activity of lysozyme-containing foods.
Nutr Food Sci 39(1):29–35
Muller M, Brem G (1991) Disease resistance in farm animals.
Experientia 47(9):923–934
Nakajima H, Muranaka T, Ishige F, Akutsu K, Oeda K (1997)
Fungal and bacterial disease resistance in transgenic
plants expressing human lysozyme. Plant Cell Rep
16(10):674–679
Pursel VG, Pinkert CA, Miller KF, Bolt DJ, Campbell RG,
Palmiter RD, Brinster RL, Hammer RE (1989) Genetic
engineering of livestock. Science 244(4910):1281–1288
Stinnakre MG, Soulier S, Schibler L, Lepourry L, Mercier JC,
Vilotte JL (1999) Position-independent and copy-number-
related expression of a goat bacterial artificial chromo-
some alpha-lactalbumin gene in transgenic mice. Biochem
J 339:33–36
Teng CT (2002) Lactoferrin gene expression and regulation: an
overview. Biochem Cell Biol 80(1):7–16
Tong J, Wei H, Liu X, Hu W, Bi M, Wang Y, Li Q, Li N
(2010) Production of recombinant human lysozyme in the
milk of transgenic pigs. Transgenic Res 20(2):417–419
Van Keuren ML, Gavrilina GB, Filipiak WE, Zeidler MG,
Saunders TL (2009) Generating transgenic mice from
bacterial artificial chromosomes: transgenesis efficiency,
integration and expression outcomes. Transgenic Res
18(5):769–785
Wall RJ, Powell AM, Paape MJ, Kerr DE, Bannerman DD,
Pursel VG, Wells KD, Talbot N, Hawk HW (2005)
Genetically enhanced cows resist intramammary Staphy-lococcus aureus infection. Nat Biotechnol 23(4):445–451
Wang J, Yang P, Tang B, Sun X, Zhang R, Guo C, Gong G,
Liu Y, Li R, Zhang L, Dai Y, Li N (2008) Expression and
characterization of bioactive recombinant human alpha-
lactalbumin in the milk of transgenic cloned cows. J Dairy
Sci 91(12):4466–4476
Whitelaw CB, Sang HM (2005) Disease-resistant genetically
modified animals. Rev Sci Tech 24(1):275–283
Yang P, Wang J, Gong G, Sun X, Zhang R, Du Z, Liu Y, Li R,
Ding F, Tang B, Dai Y, Li N (2008) Cattle mammary
bioreactor generated by a novel procedure of transgenic
cloning for large-scale production of functional human
lactoferrin. PLoS One 3(10):e3453
Yang B, Wang J, Tang B, Liu Y, Guo C, Yang P, Yu T, Li R,
Zhao J, Zhang L, Dai Y, Li N (2011) Characterization of
bioactive recombinant human lysozyme expressed in milk
of cloned transgenic cattle. PLoS One 6(3):e17593
Yu Z, Meng Q, Yu H, Fan B, Yu S, Fei J, Wang L, Dai Y, Li N
(2006) Expression and bioactivity of recombinant human
lysozyme in the milk of transgenic mice. J Dairy Sci
89(8):2911–2918
414 Transgenic Res (2012) 21:407–414
123