51
Higgs to at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Higgs to at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Higgs to at ATLAS

Sinéad Farrington

8th December 2014

Page 2: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick2

The Higgs Boson

• Professor Peter Higgs• Emeritus Professor at Edinburgh

• Also Brout, Englert, Kibble, Guralnik,

Hagen

• Devised a mechanism to account

for the generation of mass

• Predicts one new particle, the Higgs boson• Specifically to give mass to W/Z bosons• Yukawa couplings allow the same

particle to give mass to up- and down-type

fermions• Unseen until 2012

Page 3: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

How to look for Higgs at the LHC?

• We didn’t know the Higgs Boson’s mass (not predicted directly by the theory)

• Very different composition of PRODUCTION and DECAY mechanisms depending on mass

Page 4: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Were there any clues?

Most likely Higgs mass:

95+30-24 GeV

(from indirect evidence)

Mass > 115 GeV

(direct evidence until 2012)

• Yes!

Page 5: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Many ways to search for the Higgs

Most likely mass ranges

PRODUCTION DECAY

Page 6: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Standard Model Higgs Production

6

Page 7: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

New Boson: Status until Nov 2013

• Observed by its decay to ZZ*, , WW* bosons (CMS and ATLAS)

• Combined mass from ZZ, : 125.5±0.2+0.5-0.6 GeV

• Spin/CP measurements agree with SM expectation of JP=0+

7

Page 8: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

New Boson: Status until Nov 2013

• Signal strength =SM

• All consistent with 1

8

• Evidence for Vector Boson Fusion and gg fusion production

•CMS data gives the same picture•Properties are compatible with SM Higgs Boson

Page 9: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

New Boson

9

Page 10: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Nobel Prize

• Prize motivation: "for the theoretical discovery of a mechanism that contributes to our understanding of the origin of mass of subatomic particles, and which recently was confirmed through the discovery of the predicted fundamental particle, by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN's Large Hadron Collider”

• Today’s seminar is about the search for the Higgs boson decaying to tau lepton pairs

• Another step in this “confirmation”

10

Page 11: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

New Boson: Decay to Fermions

• Status until Nov 2013 (evaluated at 125 GeV)• Tevatron H to bb: 2.8 • CMS H to bb: 2.1 • CMS H to : 2.85 • ATLAS H to : 1.1

• Search for Higgs to fermions decay important part of knowing whether we have seen the SM Higgs

• Does the New Boson couple to fermions?• Indirect evidence from gg fusion through top loop • Furthermore: Couple to leptons?

• If yes, are we sure the same particle is responsible for boson and all fermion decays?

• Yukawa

11

PRL 109, 071804 (2012)

CMS-HIG-13-012-003

CMS-HIG-13-004

Page 12: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Standard Model Higgs (at 125 GeV)

12

Page 13: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick13

H+

-

e+/+

e/

h- (K/h-h+

e-/-

e/

h+ (K/h-h+

H

• Perform the search in all combinations of decays• Involves all lepton identification methods• Additionally for the Vector Boson Fusion mechanism, require jets• Neutrinos lead to missing energy (MET)

• Complex signatures!

Lepton-lepton 12.4%

Lepton-hadron 45.6%

Hadron-hadron 42.0%

Page 14: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

ATLAS dataset

• High pile-up conditions, challenging environment

• Analysed • 20.3 fb-1 of 8 TeV data• 4.3 fb-1 of 7 TeV data

14

Page 15: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Stability of electron ID

• Efficiency of electron identification quite stable versus number of primary vertices

15

Page 16: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Stability of Hadronic tau ID

• Hadronic tau’s identified by multivariate method (boosted decision tree)

• Shower shape, decay length, etc

• Tau Energy Scale (TES) derived from Z mass distribution

16

Page 17: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Missing Transverse Energy

17

• Multiple neutrinos in ditau decays• MET resolution is an important aspect of mass reconstruction

Page 18: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

ATLAS H to Analysis

• Does the same boson observed to decay to WW*, ZZ*, , couple to leptons?

• Try to answer this with a multivariate analysis (BDT)• Data blinded

• BDT trained to distinguish SM Higgs signal samples from backgrounds

18

Page 19: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Triggers and preselection• Lepton-lepton

• Single and di-lepton triggers• N(lepton)=2, N(jet pt>40GeV)≥1

• Mll and MET cuts to suppress Drell-Yan and multijet

• Lepton-hadron• Single lepton triggers• N(lepton)=1, N(tau)=1

• MT<70 GeV cut to suppress W+jets

• Hadron-hadron• Di-tau triggers• N(tau)=2

• MET>20GeV, R(tt) and cuts suppress multijets

• Apply preselection• Train BDT on remaining events• Validate background modelling on these events

19

Page 20: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Analysis Categories• Vector Boson Fusion (54-63% of signal, rest is gg)

• Two forward jets with leading pt>40-50 (30-35) GeV, (jj)> 2

• Boosted (gg fusion is ~ 71-74% of the signal, rest is gg,VH)• Pt(H)>100 GeV

• Veto events with b-tags in lep-lep and lep-had• Suppress top background

• In had-had use “rest” of events to constrain backgrounds

20

Page 21: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Backgrounds

• Backgrounds estimated using data directly or MC normalised to control regions

21

Z dominant background, modelled by data

Fake e/: W+jets, top, QCD multijet modelled by data

Others: MC for Dibosons, H WW

Data normalisation for Z ee/ and top

Page 22: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Z Background

• Embedding method• Harvest Z events from data• Replace the muons with simulated taus• Gives a hybrid Z event

• Advantages• Take from data: MET resolution, pile-up, jets, Z kinematics, VBF

W/Z backgrounds modelled in data

22

Page 23: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Backgrounds from “fakes”

• Estimated from data• e or fakes estimated from sample of anti-isolated leptons• Hadronic tau fakes estimated

• In lep-had channel from sample with hadronic tau failing ID• In had-had channel from events which do not have opposite sign ’s

23

Page 24: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Top Background

• Shape from MC; normalisation from b-tagged control region

• Normalisation performed separately for boosted/VBF categories• Validation regions defined to check shapes

• Mll>100 GeV (lep-lep)

• HT>350 GeV (lep-had)

24

Page 25: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

BDT Input variables

25

Page 26: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Pre-fit steps

• Check modelling of all input variables• And the modelling of the correlations among them

• Control regions are fitted simultaneously with signal regions to constrain

• Z ee/ + jets in lep-lep, lep-had• Top in lep-lep, lep-had• W+jets in lep-had• Fakes in lep-lep• QCD(multijet) in had-had

• Fit performed in 60-100 and 140+ GeV sidebands• Provides check of background model, especially Z

26

Page 27: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Di-tau mass• Mass reconstruction not straightforward, owing to

neutrinos in the final state

• Use likelihood method (Missing Mass Calculator, MMC) using all measured kinematics and their resolutions and tau mass constraint

• This variable is included in the BDT, mass resolution:

27

Page 28: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Control regions

28

Page 29: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

The Fit

29

Page 30: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Post-fit distributions

30

lep-lep had-had lep-had

Page 31: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Systematic Uncertainties

• Signal strength SM

• Dominant theory uncertainty: matching, t and b quark treatment

• Dominant expt uncertainty: background normalisations

31

Page 32: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Results

• ATLAS observes significant excess of data events in high S/B region

• Expected significance at 125 GeV is 3.5 • Observed significance at 125 GeV is 4.5

32

Page 33: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Results

• ATLAS observes significant excess of data events in high S/B region

• Expected significance at 125 GeV is 3.5 • Observed significance at 125 GeV is 4.5

33

Page 34: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Compatibility with 125 GeV

• Weight each event by ln(1+S/B) for corresponding bin in BDT score

• Excess is consistent with SM Higgs at 125 GeV

• Signals at 110, 125, 150 are shown for the best fit at 125 GeV

34

Page 35: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Crosscheck Analysis

• Cut based analysis performed as a crosscheck (8 TeV data only)

• Expected significance: 2.5σ

• Observed significance 3.2σ

35

Page 36: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Couplings

• Signal seen in all channels and both production mechanisms

36

Page 37: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Couplings

• Consistent with SM within one sigma

37

Page 38: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

ATLAS Channels

• Combine this picture with the ATLAS H result

• Expected limit 8.2xSM• Observed 9.8xSM

• If the Higgs coupled universally to leptons, we would have already observed H

• So we know that Higgs couples to fermions, but not universally

38

Page 39: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Summary

• ATLAS has observed evidence for decay of a particle consistent with the SM Higgs boson

• 4.5 standard deviation significance

• CMS also produced evidence at a similar time (3.4 )

39

Page 40: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Outlook

• Run 2 will yield• Higher luminosity and energy• Higgs cross section increases:

• But Z cross section only increases by ~1.8x

• Challenges for triggering• Spin/CP measurements in fermions• H bb observation?• H observation?

40

Production mode

ggF VBF VH ttH

(14TeV)/(8TeV)

2.6 2.6 2.1 4.7

Page 41: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

VBF Higgs to ?

41

Page 42: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

H to

• H to is the newest of the evidence modes at ATLAS and CMS

• Projections have been made by both experiments extrapolating analyses to the future

• CMS evaluate two scenarios:• 1: leave systematic uncertainties the same• 2: Halve theory uncertainty; scale others by luminosity

42

Luminosity (fb-1) (%) [scenario 1,2]

300 [8,14]

3000 [5,8]

Page 43: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

H• ATLAS recent result uses Boosted Decision Tree

• Perform projections from a

simple cut based analysis• Assume no improvement in

theory uncertainty(!)• Assume experimental challenges

(pile-up, trigger) compensate for

increased signal:background cross section• Pessimistic?

43

ATLAS-CONF-2013-108

300fb-1 3000fb-1

Uncertainty All No theory All No theory

0.22 0.16 0.19 0.12

Page 44: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick44

Higgs seen at CERN

Page 45: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Many ways to search for the Higgs

Most likely mass ranges

PRODUCTION DECAY

Page 46: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick46

H+

-

e+/+

e/

h- (K/h-h+

e-/-

e/

h+ (K/h-h+

H

Page 47: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

H • Experimental signature

• Electron or muon with neutrinos (missing energy)• Electron or muon identified fairly cleanly

• Hadrons • Large rate for tau leptons to

decay this way

• Experimental challenges (significant)• Difficult to differentiate these signatures from

backgrounds• Production of generic jets of hadrons• Z+jet production, W+jet production, pairs of top quarks

Page 48: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

H challenges

• Background sources calibrated with several control regions

Page 49: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Future

• Key properties of this new boson will take some time to ascertain

• This was always anticipated• In fact we are fortuitous in nature’s choice for the Higgs mass –

all decay modes are accessible at this point

• Key to characterising this particle are• Production and decay rates• Spin: first measurements made public last week!• Mass (to greater precision)

• Switch from search mode to precision physics

Page 50: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick50

What does a Higgs event look like?

ET

H+

-

e+/+

e/

h- (K/h-h+

e-/-

e/

h+ (K/h-h+

•Distinctive signature

•Reconstruct each element

Page 51: Higgs to  at ATLAS Sinéad Farrington 8 th December 2014

Sinead Farrington, Sinead Farrington, University of WarwickUniversity of Warwick

Jets

• Jets are an important part of VBF signature

51