17
Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

Hidden Biases v An Open Mind

Andrew GreenUniversity of Toronto Faculty of Law

Nov 5, 2015

Page 2: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

R. v. Fearon (SCC 2014)

• Two men, one with distinctive handgun, rob a jeweler

• Kevin Fearon arrested – Officer found cellphone on him – looked through texts

Page 3: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

R. v. Fearon (SCC 2014)

• Two men, one with distinctive handgun, rob a jeweler

• Kevin Fearon arrested – Officer found cellphone on him – looked through texts

• No warrant – Fearon claimed search of his phone was illegal

“We did it”

Page 4: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

R. v. Fearon (SCC 2014)Search was legal Search was illegal

Page 5: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

R. v. Fearon (SCC 2014)Search was legal Search was illegalAppointed by: Appointed by:

Progressive Conservatives

Conservatives

Conservatives

Conservatives

Liberals

Liberals

Conservatives

Page 6: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

Two Views of How Judges Make Decisions

Legal: “Judges are like umpires. Umpires don’t make the rules; they apply them … It’s my job to call balls and strikes and not to pitch or bat”

Chief Justice John Roberts, US Supreme Court

Political: “More and more people think that what’s important to us is political and that this is nine junior varsity politicians.”

Justice Stephen Breyer, US Supreme Court

Page 7: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

United States Supreme Court2010-2012

Democratic Appointee Republican Appointee0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Liberal Voting Rate

Liberal Voting Rate

Page 8: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

United States Supreme Court

Union Civil Rights Criminal Procedure

Tax0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Democratic AppointeeRepublican Appointee

Page 9: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

What about the Supreme Court of Canada?

Liberal Appointee Conservative Appointee0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Liberal Voting Rate

Liberal Voting Rate

Page 10: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

How about Charter cases?

All Charter Criminal Equality Non-equality0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Liberal AppointeesConservative Appointees

Page 11: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

Design Matters

• Courts, like tribunals, have different designs that affect the influence of biases

• Most basic: How are tribunal members appointed?

• Focus on:– Who do you sit with on a panel?– How do training and norms help?

Page 12: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

Who do you sit with on a panel?Three Judge Federal Court of Appeals Panels

RR RD DD0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Republican AppointeeDemocratic Appointee

Page 13: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

Who do you sit with on a panel?Probability of Plaintiff Winning

Sexual Harassment Sex Discrimination0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

All MaleAt Least One Female

Page 14: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

Training and Norms

• The Wildlife Environment Protection Act prohibits ‘littering, disposing or depositing any form of garbage, refuse, junk or other debris’ on land designated as a national wildlife preserve.

• 400 ten-gallon reusable plastic dispensers of drinking water along 50 mile stretch of wildlife preserve on US-Mexico border.

• Participants received one of these sets of facts:– The defendants are construction workers who placed the dispensers

along stretch of border where they were constructing ‘border fence’ to keep out illegal immigrants.

– The defendants are immigration aid workers who left the water to be consumed by undocumented migrant farm workers who face high risk of dehydration attempting to cross border.

Page 15: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

The Defendants DID Litter

Immigrant Aid Construction Workers0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

PublicJudges

Page 16: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

The Defendants DID Litter

Immigrant Aid Construction Workers0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

"Liberal" Public"Conservative" Public"Liberal" Judges"Conservative" Judges

Page 17: Hidden Biases v An Open Mind Andrew Green University of Toronto Faculty of Law Nov 5, 2015

Hidden Biases v An Open Mind

• Tribunal Design Matters– Appointments– Composition of Panels– Training and Professionalism