Upload
fatima-washington
View
35
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Heavy Flavor Upgrades for STAR and PHENIX at RHIC Jim Thomas Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory With correspondence from Axel Drees, SUNYSB Characterization of the QGP with Heavy Quarks Physikzentrum, Bad Honnef June 25-28, 2008. Motivation: Heavy Flavor Energy Loss, v 2 , s. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1Jim Thomas
Heavy Flavor Upgrades for STAR and PHENIXat RHIC
Jim ThomasLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
With correspondence from Axel Drees, SUNYSB
Characterization of the QGP with Heavy QuarksPhysikzentrum, Bad Honnef
June 25-28, 2008
2Jim Thomas
Motivation: Heavy Flavor Energy Loss, v2,
Surprising results - - challenge our understanding of the energy loss mechanism - force us to re-think about the collisional energy loss - Requires direct measurements of C- and B-hadrons.
1) Non-photonicelectrons decayedfrom - charm andbeauty hadrons
2) At pT ≥ 6 GeV/c,
RAA(n.e.) ~ RAA(h±)
contradicts naïve
pQCD predictions STAR PRL, 98, 192301 (2007)
3Jim Thomas
Essential Ingredients
• Direct measurement of C and B hadrons requires– High Luminosity
– Excellent PID
– Excellent spacial resolution at the event vertex
– Large Acceptance, High Rate and High Efficiency Tracking
4Jim Thomas
News from RHIC: Stochastic Cooling Works
• Stochastic cooling works at RHIC– van der Meer method
• Measure at one point and send the control signal across cord of the ring
– First time accomplished with a bunched beam
• Longitudinal cooling of one ring gave a 20% increase in Luminosity
• Goals– Longitudinal cooling achieved in one
ring in 2007
– Longitudinal cooling in the other ring in 2008
– Transverse cooling in one ring in ‘09
– Transverse cool the other in ’10 or ’11
• Goals– 50 x 1026 (not 80 x 1026 )
• Electron cooling is out …Goal: Align the arrival times of the packets in the two beams
5Jim Thomas
STAR Solenoidal field
Large Solid Angle TrackingTPC’s, Si-Vertex Tracking
RICH, EM Cal, TOF
Measurements of Hadronic observables using a large acceptance spectrometer
PHENIXAxial Field
High Resolution & Rates2 Central Arms, 2 Forward Arms TEC, RICH, EM Cal, Si, TOF, -ID
Leptons, Photons, and Hadrons in selected solid angles (especially muons)
Heavy Flavor Upgrades for STAR and PHENIX
6Jim Thomas
STAR Upgrades
• Full Barrel MRPC TOF to improve PID
• DAQ Upgrade (order of magnitude increase in rate)
• High precision Heavy Flavor Tracker near the vertex
• Mid Rapidity Muon Trigger & Tracker
7Jim Thomas
The TOF Upgrade
• Multiplate RPC technology
• Beautiful electron ID
• 85 ps timing resolution after slewing corrections
• Each tray has 72 channels
• 90 full trays this year, with new electronics
• Funded by the DOE & CNSF
• Construction and install in 2008, and 2009
8Jim Thomas
Multi-Gap Resistive Plate Chamber TOF
State-of-art MRPC: -0.9 < < 0.9, 0 < < 2, r = 220cm 6 gaps, 3x6cm2 pad;
23K channels, 120 modules
Most significant collab. to date between USA & China in HEP detector research
1 tray in runs 2-75 trays in run 8
~75% in run 9100% in run 10
9Jim Thomas
Improving the “Time” in Time-of-Flight
Run8: 76M pp events TOF+TPX
• 2001: No timing devices (except Time Projection Chamber)
• 2002:
BBC (~1ns), ZDC (200ps)
• 2002-2008:
TOF tray+VPD (<100ps)
• 2008 TOF t: 81ps
10Jim Thomas
TPC FEE and DAQ Upgrade – DAQ 1000
• Faster, smaller, better … ( 10x )
• Current TPC FEE and DAQ limited to 100 Hz
• Replace TPC FEE with next generation CERN based chips … 1 kHz readout
• Make the FEE smaller to provide space for a forward tracking upgrade
• Further improvements by only archiving “associated” clusters – build on L3 algorithms … 5 kHz !
11Jim Thomas
• Four steps to an order of magnitude increase in data acquisition rates
• TPC FEE (BNL&LBL)
• TPC RDO (BNL)
• DAQ Transmitter (CERN)
• DAQ Receiver (CERN)
Dual CERN D-RORC with fibers on the board
Mezzanine DDL
Single D-RORC with 1 fiber mezzanine
ALICE FEE & DAQ
12Jim Thomas
The Heavy Flavor Tracker
4 layers of Si at mid rapidity, 2 PXL + 1 IST + 1 SSD (existing)
• A new detector
– 18 m silicon pixelsto yield 6 m space point resolution
– 436 M pixels– Strasbourg MAPS chips
• Direct Topological reconstruction of Charm
– Detect charm decays with small c, including D0 K
• New physics
– Charm collectivity and flow to test thermalization at RHIC
– Charm Energy Loss to test pQCD in a hot and dense medium at RHIC
CBM/MAPS: See related posters by C. Dritsa and Selim Seddiki
13Jim Thomas
Concept of HFT Layers
Graded Resolution from the Outside – In Resolution()
TPC pointing at the SSD ( 23 cm radius) ~ 1 mm
SSD pointing at IST ( 14 cm radius) ~ 400 m
IST pointing at Pixel-2 ( 8 cm radius) ~ 400 m
Pixel-2 pointing at Pixel-1 (2.5 cm radius) ~ 70 m
pixel-1 pointing at the vertex ~ 40 m
Purpose of intermediate layers to get increasing resolution power with increasing hit-densities, so the high resolution hits in the inner pixel’s can be found, assigned and displaced vertices determined.
SSDSSD
ISTIST
PIXELPIXEL
Numbers quoted above are for a Kaon at 750 MeV/cA pion at 1 GeV/c would achieve ~ 25 m at the vertex
14Jim Thomas
Inner layer
Outer layer
End view
ALICE style carbon support beams (green)
2.5 cm radius
8 cm radius
Since modified to increase Sensor Clearances
‘D-Tube Duct and Support
The Pixel Detector surrounds the vertex with Si
A thin detector using 50 m Si to finesse the limitations imposed by MCS
See Poster by J. Kapitan and J. Thomas
15Jim Thomas
D0 Reconstruction Efficiency
- Central Au+Au collisions: top 10% events. - The thin detector allows measurements down to pT ~ 0.5 GeV/c.
- Essential and unique!
16Jim Thomas
Charm Hadron v2
- 200 GeV Au+Au minimum biased collisions (500M events). - Charm collectivity drag/diffusion constants medium properties!
17Jim Thomas
Even the c
Simulations of the most challenging 3-body decays are encouragingso far
This capability, which will be provided uniquely at RHIC by the HFT, is crucial for determining whether the baryon/meson anomaly extends toheavy quark hadrons
18Jim Thomas
A more complete view of the STAR Upgrade plan
Run08 Run10Run09 Run12Run11 Run13 Run15Run14
FMS complete:d+Au and p+pdata from Run 8
DAQ1000 completeImmediate improvementof 300% in sampled luminosity for rare probes(e.g. jets in p+p)
Increase in Au+Au luminosity to50 x 1027 cm-2 sec-1
U+U available from EBISDOE investment ~ $7M
HFT partial implementation
HFT completefull topological PID forc, b mesonsDOE investment : upperlimit of range ~ $14.7M
Planned LHC1st heavy ion run
DOE investment ~ $400k
DOE investment ~ $1900k
TOF complete:
PID information for > 95% of kaons
and protons in the STAR acceptance
Clean e± ID down to 0.2 GeV/c
DOE investment ~ $4900k
Chinese investment ~ $2700k
FGT complete:
Accurate charge sign determination
for W’s, DOE investment ~ $1900k
19Jim Thomas
Nose Cone Calorimeter
Silicon VTX and FVTX
MuTrig Station 1
MuTrig Station 2
MuTrig Station 3
Future PHENIX Subsystems
20Jim Thomas
PHENIX Upgrade Plan for Heavy Flavor
– A vertex detector to detect displaced vertices from the decay of mesons containing charm or bottom quarks.
• A powerful addition to PHENIX because currently there is no tracking inside the magnetic field
– A forward calorimeter to provide photon+jet studies over a wide kinematic range.
– A muon trigger upgrade to preserve sensitivity at the highest projected RHIC luminosities.
21Jim Thomas
Pixel barrel (50 m x 425 m)Strip barrels (80 m x 3 cm)Endcap (extension) (75 m x 2.8 mm)
1 - 2% X0 per layer
barrel resolution < 50 m endcap resolution < 150 m
Silicon Vertex Tracker (VTX)
VTX barrel ||<1.2
Pixel Detectors at R ~ 2.5 & 5 cm Strip Detectors at R ~ 10 & 14 cm
Endcap 1.2<||<2.7
22Jim Thomas
• VTX characteristics– 2 inner pixel layers (50x425 m2) to measure DCA
radial position at 2.5 and 5 cm with ~ 1.2% X/X0
– 2 out strip-pixel (80x1000 m2) for p measurement and tracking
at 10 and 14 cm with ~ 3.% X/X0
• DCA resolution: given mostly by inner layer– Sufficient single hit resolution (~15 m)
– Close to beam axis to reduce effect of multiple scattering
||<1.2 ~ 2|z|cm
PHENIX Barrel VerTeX Detector
%10~15.0~p
TmBdl p
2
212
212
21
22
22
212
sin)(
r
rr
rrmsDCA
detector ~ 30 m ms ~ 30 m
D
e
beam
X
DCA, distance of closest approach
23Jim Thomas
Expected RAA(ce) and RAA(be) with VTX
Decisive measurement of RAA for both c and b
PHENIX VXT ~ 2 nb-1
RHIC II increases statistics by factor >10
24Jim Thomas
Expected v2(be) and v2(ce) with VTX
Decisive measurement of v2 for both c and b
PHENIX VXT ~2 nb-1
RHIC II increases statistics by factor >10
25Jim Thomas
Forward Upgrade Components
• Endcap Vertex Tracker – silicon pixel detectors
• Nosecone EM Calorimeter– W-silicon (42 X/X0)
– shower max
– tail catcherCerenkov
NoseconeCalorimeter
U-Tracker
Muon fromhadron decays
Muon from W
TailCatcher
D-Tracker
Silicon endcap
• Muon trigger– U-tracker (MuTr or new)
– D-tracker (timing with RPC’s)
– Cerenkov
charm/beauty & jets: displaced vertex
-jet,W,c: calorimeter
W and quarkonium: improved -trigger rejection
26Jim Thomas
• FVTX characteristics– Cover both muon arms with 4 pixelpad layers/endcap– 2 coverage in azimuth and 1.2 < | | < 2.4– ≥ 3 space points / track – DCA resolution < 200 µm at 5 GeV – Maximum Radiation Length < 2.4%– Fully integrated mechanical design with VTX
PHENIX Forward VerTeX Detector
27Jim Thomas
Tracking and DCA Resolution with the FVTX
prompt
Muon acceptanceD
CA
r-z
res
olut
ion
(cm
)
Momentum (GeV)
General performance– 3 or more planes hit per track
– Central Au+Au occupancy < 2.8%
– Good matching between FVTX and muon tracker
– Sufficient DCA resolution (<200 m) to separate prompt, heavy quark, and -K decays.
28Jim Thomas
Charmonium Spectroscopy with the FVTX
Measurement of ‘ in central Au-Au collisions
• Remove -K decaysBackground rejection factor 4
• Improve mass resolution:170 MeV 100 MeV
Au-Au
p-p
29Jim Thomas
Nose-Cone Calorimeter
• Replace existing PHENIX “nose-cones” (hadronic absorbers for muon arms) with Si-W calorimeter (Tungsten with Si readout)
• Major increase in acceptance forphoton+jet studies
• Prototype silicon wafer – 3 different versions of
“stri-pixel” detectors for the pre-shower and shower max layers
• Extended physics reach – q/q polarizations
via spin dependent W-production
– Small x-physics in d-A
– Extended A-A program
– high pT phenomena: 0 and -jet
30Jim Thomas
W-silicon sampling calorimeter
EM1 EM2 HAD
NCC characteristics (DOE funding FY08)40 cm from interaction point, 20 cm depth2 coverage in azimuth and 0.9 < < 3.0W-silicon sampling calorimeter
1.4 cm Moliere radius
42 X0 and 1.6 abs
Lateral segmentation 1.5x1.5 cm2
3 longitudinal segments
2x2 tracking layers with 500 m strips separation for overlapping showers
%1/
%23
GeVEEE
PS tracking layers
Main objective: direct photon and measurements
PHENIX Forward EM Calorimeter (NCC)
31Jim Thomas
η=1-1.5
η=1.5-2
subtracted spectrum
subtracted spectrum
mμμγ-mμμ (GeV/c2)
Central Cu+Cu collisions
S/B ~10%
S/B~2%
γ
μμ
J/ in muon arm, in NCCConditional acceptance 58% if J/ detected
Determine invariant mass and subtract combinatorial background
Proof of principle MC simulationpp should work, CuCu probable
Full MC simulation in progress
/JC
Charmonium spectroscopy with the NCC
32Jim Thomas
RHIC 2 nb-1
With NCC/FVTX
RHIC 2 nb-1
W/O NCC/FVTX
RHIC 20 nb-1
With NCC/FVTX
Quarkonium Spectroscopy w/ Forward Upgrades
’
cJ
S)
S)
Reference model based on consecutive melting without regeneration(Note: This results in small ’, C yields, other models like regeneration model will give similar yields for J/, ’, C !)
33Jim Thomas
Timeline of PHENIX upgrades2008 2012
RHIC
2010
Inner pixel layers
cooling era for “RHIC II”
2014
Outer strip layers
Construction
VTX
Large acceptance tracking ||<1.2
Displaced vertex at mid rapidity
FVTX Displaced vertex at forward y
Physics
NCC Forward photon detection
34Jim Thomas
Summary
• The study of heavy flavor production provides key information to understand the properties of quark matter
• The scientific program at RHIC is rich and diverse– Rare probes and high pt phenomena are a rich source of new discoveries
– Strangeness, Charm, and Beauty are likely to yield even more new discoveries
– We have promising spin program that is making critical and unique measurements
• The scientific program at RHIC will keep getting better– The performance of the accelerator is improving each due to a carefully
planned set of upgrades.
– STAR will explore charm, beauty, and higher pt spectra at ever increasing data acquisition rates.
– PHENIX will add sophisticated PID and tracking near the vertex.
• These upgrades will yield exciting new physics results
Guaranteed
36Jim Thomas
Key Experimental Probes of Quark Matter
• Rutherford experiment atom discovery of nucleus
SLAC electron scattering e proton discovery of quarks
penetrating beam(jets or heavy particles)
absorption or scattering pattern
QGP
Nature provides penetrating beams or “hard probes”and the QGP in A-A collisions
Penetrating beams created by parton scattering before QGP is formed High transverse momentum particles jetsHeavy particles open and hidden charm or bottom Calibrated probes calculable in pQCD
Probe QGP created in A-A collisions as transient state after ~ 1 fm
37Jim Thomas
Hard Probes: Open Heavy FlavorStatus
– Calibrated probe?
• pQCD under predicts cross section by factor 2-5
• Charm follows binary scaling
– Strong medium effects
• Significant charm suppression & v2
• Upper bound on viscosity ?
• Bottom potentially suppressed
– Open issues:
• Limited agreement with energy loss calculations!
• What is the energy loss mechanism?
• Are there medium effects on b-quarks?
Electrons from c/b hadron decays
Answers require direct observation of charm and beauty
Progress limited by: no b-c separation decay vertex with silicon vertex detectors
statistics (BJ/) increase luminosity
38Jim Thomas
Hard Probes: Quarkonium
Status– J/ production is suppressed
• Large suppression
• Similar at RHIC and SPS
• Larger at forward rapidity
• Ruled out co-mover and melting scenarios
• Consistent with melting J/ followed by regeneration
– Open issues:
• Are quarkonia states screened and regenerated?
• What is the regeneration (hadronization) mechanism?
• Can we extract a screening length from data?
• Recent Lattice QCD developments: Quarkonium states do not melt at TC
J/
Deconfinement Color screening
Answers require “quarkconium” spectroscopy
Progress limited by:statistics (J/, Y) increase
luminosity statistical significance (’) mass resolutionphoton detection (C) forward calorimeter
39Jim Thomas
Detection of decay vertexwill allow a clean identification of charm and bottom decays
m cGeV m
D0 1865 125 D± 1869 317
B0 5279 464 B± 5279 496
Direct Observation of Open Charm and Beauty
D Au
e,
AuD
X
J/
B
X
K
ee
Heavy flavor detection with VTX and FVTX in PHENIX:
• Beauty and low pT charm via displaced e and/or -2.7<<-1.2 ,|<0.35 , 2.7<<1.2 • Beauty through displaced J/ ee () -2.7<<-1.2 ,|<0.35 , 2.7<<1.2 • High pT charm through D K |<0.35
40Jim Thomas
Heavy flavor detection with the VTX
• Results of simulation of Au+Au collision.
• After a 2 cut, D0 decays clearly separated from bulk of hadrons
D
e
beam
X
DCA, distance of closest approach
3<pT<4 GeV/c
~ 40m
42Jim Thomas
Heavy Ion RAA with FVTX
• Mechanisms for heavy/light quark suppression poorly understood
• Clear distinction among models, e.g. I.Vitev’s radiative, collisional and dissociative energy loss predictions
44Jim Thomas
Future Quarkonium Spectroscopy with PHENIX
• RHIC II luminosity upgrade– Electron cooling and stochastic cooling
– Increase integrated luminosity 2 nb-1 to 20 nb-1 per run
precision measurements of RAA and v2 for J/
• FVTX: Track muons to primary vertex, – reject decay background (K)
– Improved mass resolution clean and significant ‘
– Background Rejection Upsilon at mid rapidity
– Rapidity dependence J/, ’, and
• FVTX: Detected displaced vertex for charm and beauty decays– Precise charm and beauty reference
• NCC: add photon measurement at forward rapidity– Measurement of C →J/ γ possible
46Jim Thomas
PHENIX Central Arm Upgrades
• Enhanced Particle ID– TRD (east) – Aerogel/TOF (west)
• Vertex Spectrometer– flexible magnetic field– VTX: silicon barrel vertex tracker– HBD
High pT phenomena: , K, p separation to 10 GeV/c
charm/beauty: TRD e/ above 5 GeV/c
charm/beauty: displaced vertex
e+e- continuum: Dalitz rejection
HBD
VTXHBDVTX
TRD
Aerogel/TOF
47Jim Thomas
Improving STAR’s muon capabilities
Simulations
Install a large area mid-rapidity muon telescope. Allows detection of:
Di-muon pairs:Quarkonia, QGP thermal radiation,Drell-Yan
Single muons : Heavy flavor semi-leptonic decays
Advantage over e:No conversion, Less Dalitz decay, Less radiative losses to detector material
+-
e+e-
48Jim Thomas
The Muon Trigger Detector concept
48
Prototype Installed in RUN 7-8
Long MRPC Technology with double-end readout. 20x larger than ToF modules
HV: 6.3 KV
gas: 95% Freon + 5% Isobutane
10 gas gaps: 250 m
time resolution: ~60 ps
spatial resolution: ~1cm
Place scintillators outside magnet covering iron bars
Muon efficiency: 35-45%Pion efficiency: 0.5-1% Muon-to-Hadron Enhancement Factor: 100-1000 (including track matching, ToF, dE/dx)
49Jim Thomas
Hadron Rejection and Muon Trigger
Iron bars
•Muon penetrates iron barsOther particles are stopped
•Good Time Resolution (60ps)rejects background (>100)
•1 hit per 5 head-on Au+AuDimuon trigger (>25)
•Large coverage: diameter of 7 meters
J/ trigger, separate +- states
Full Hijing AuAu event