Heaven and Plane Earth

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. AndGod made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, and to rule over theday and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. And the evening and the morning were the fourth day. (Genesis 1:1-10, 14-19)

Almost all nations, from the beginning of recorded history until the 17th century, believed that we live on a flat motionless earth with a firmament above, where the sun, moon and stars were located, as evidenced by ancient drawings. There was no reason to believe anything other as this agreed withobservable reality and with the Bible.Now almost all people are convinced that we live on the surface of a spinning ball, orbiting a much larger sun, at an incredible speed, somewhere in an unimaginably huge universe. What is the evidence for this belief, which is not supported by our senses and does not agree with the Bible, as its early propagators like Copernicus were well aware. Why was it so criticized by the early reformers like Luther and Calvin and many others after them? On the following pages we will look at the history of this theory which most consider to be unquestionable fact.

Author and journalist George Orwell wrote in 1946: “It is apparent that my reasons for thinking thatthe earth is round are rather precarious ones. Yet this is exceptionally elementary piece of information. On most other questions I should have to fall back on the expert much earlier, and would be less able to test his pronouncements. And much the greater part of our knowledge is at thislevel. It does not rest on reasoning or on experiment, but on authority. And how can it be otherwise, when the range of knowledge is so vast that the expert himself is an ignoramus as soon as he strays away from his own specialty? Most people, if asked for prove that the earth is round, would not even bother to produce the rather weak arguments I have outlined above. They would start off by saying that “everyone knows” the earth to be round, and if pressed further, would become angry... This is a credulous age.”

But this was before we flew up into 'space' and clearly proved that we live on a rotating ball earth. However until June 2015 after 50 years in 'space' we had just one alleged photo of the earth from space from 1972, which is also in all the textbooks (the other images are admitted composite CGI renderings and realistic paintings). Let us have a look at the history of the globe and 'space'. It is a story that has everything – drama, comedy, deceit, tragedy, and mystery. It is a story of the battle of truth versus lies, reality versus theory and its significance can hardly be overstated.

Early s peculation From the dawn of human history until the 17th century virtually all people believed the earth to be aflat, motionless plane with a firmament sky above in which rotate the heavenly bodies. This belief was probably first challenged by the Greek philosopher and mathematician Pythagoras about 500 years before Christ. He taught that the perfect shape is spherical and that the gods therefore created a spherical earth. Pythagoras believed that “the number is the essence of things” and founded his school on levels of initiation, similarly to most 'illumination' groups. “Followers of Pythagoras created numerical mysticism and excelled at combining science and mysticism.” (Mysticism and Logic, Bertrand Russell). Many concepts of occult numerology and geometry can be traced back to Pythagoras, and so he is to this day revered by cultists and 'Illuminati'. Albert Pike (foremost US free-mason of his time) wrote of Pythagoras: “He invented the term philosopher and designated himself as the first philosopher. Astronomy which he taught was astrology: his science of numbers was founded upon kabalistic principals. All is hidden in numbers.” (Morals and Dogma, p.626).In the third century b.c. Aristarchus of Samos took this theory further when he postulated that the earth rotates around the sun. In the second century b.c. Hipparchus discovered how to measure distance by triangulation (trigonometry), which we use to this day. If we know the distance of 2 points A and B and 2 angles of the object from A and B, whose distance we are measuring, we can complete the triangle and so determine the length of all its sides.For Hipparchus to be able to measure the distance to the stars he needed 2 points on the earth far enough apart with an observer at each end, who would measure the angle to a star at exactly the same time. This was not so easy at that time, so he did not carry out any measurement. He simply made the fateful assumption that the stars are too far for their distance to be measured - “the stars are extremely distant”.This theory was accepted again without testing by the Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy. At this time another scholar Eratosthenes allegedly made an important measurement. He knew that the sun was directly overhead at the summer solstice at Aswan and he apparently knew the distance from Aswanto Alexandria. He measured the angle of the sun at Alexandria and allegedly thus determined the size and curvature of the earth. However, this interpretation of his experiment with 2 unknowns presupposes the earth to be spherical. For this it would first have to be shown that the earth's, and especially water's, surface is not level but convex and explained why the sun's rays are not parallel (as they should be with a very large and distant sun) but crepuscular (suggesting a close and small sun). This Eratosthenes did not in any way explain and simply (and it might be added: illogically) presumed that the difference in the shadows length was due to the curvature of the earth.

While some Greek philosophers were speculating about a spherical earth ordinary people continued to believe in a still, flat earth. The flat earth model with a firmament remained the norm for another 1 400 years until the time of Nicholas Copernicus, when perception about our earth slowly began to change. This was at a time when the Renaissance was at its height in Europe and the ruling classes were returning to the pre-christian cultures of Greece and Rome. It was time to dust of the theories of the Greek philosophers.

Copernicus“The scientific revolution (beginning with Copernicus) outshines everything since the rise of Christianity and reduces the Renaissance and Reformation to the rank of mere episodes, mereinternal displacements, within the system of medieval Christendom... it transformed the wholeconcept of the physical universe and the structure of life itself. It looms so large as the real origin of the modern world and of the modern mentality that our customary periodization of European history has become an anachronism and an encumbrance.” (Historian Herbert Butterfield,Origins of Modern Science)

In the 16th century Nicholas Copernicus presented the brave new theory of heliocentrism. He was inspired mainly by Greek philosophers and initiates of sacred geometry and mathematics

Pythagoras, Philolaus, and probably also the first heliocentrist Aristarchus (although he does not mention him). Paradoxically, Copernicus argued that it is unreasonable to assume that all the heavenly bodies rotate around the earth, as they are extremely distant and large. He was therefore again assuming the original unproven speculation of Hipparchus to be correct, and said that the earth is a spherical heavenly body rotating around a much larger sun. Copernicus however never claimed his model to be anything more than a theory as he had no real proof for the globe and heliocentrism. For him, as for the Greek philosophers and others who followed in their theoretical footsteps, the whole matter was mainly about sacred geometry and creating a mathematical construct for the model of rotating spheres in space. Copernicus writes that his model is mainly for mathematicians and in his book “On the revolutions of the heavenly spheres”, he writes: “In the first place we must see that the cosmos is spherical.(!) This is either because this shape is the most perfect, complete in itself, or it is the most spacious andso most suitable to hold all things.”Copernicus' above mentioned book was primarily a philosophical work based on hermetism (hidden knowledge for the initiated, whose language are symbols and pictures). His model of the universe was merely a theoretical construct. The problem was that this theoretical exercise of Copernicus was taken and began to be presented as reality. The magic show had begun and no one probably yet knew where it would lead.

Copernicus was afraid of the reaction to his revolutionary theory and did not publish his work until literally on his deathbed. He was very reluctant to even do this but was persuaded by cardinal Schonberg, bishop Giese of Kulm, and his devoted student Rheticus. “Rheticus' work, “Epistolae deTerrae Motu”, in support of Copernicus model, was published anonymously and after his death. In itRheticus tries to reconcile the Copernican model with the Bible using St. Augustine's principal of accommodation. Both Copernicus and Rheticus were well aware of the conflict of the new cosmology with the Bible, and used the method of accommodation to try to reconcile the two. So Copernicus published his theory at the urging of catholic priests and Rheticus, and his heliocentric theory was not challenged by the catholic church for almost a hundred years, giving it time to freely spread among the European intelligentsia. The Catholics themselves admit that “the initial opposition against the Copernican system was from Protestant theologians for biblical reasons.” (Catholic encyclopedia)

Theory versus reality“Do you suppose is is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy? The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that? (1984,chapter 3, George Orwell)

If I want to determine the dimensions and shape of the floor of a room will I study the ceiling and the lights on the ceiling and from that determine the shape of the floor? Considering that astronomers' theories are dependent on the form of the earth one would expect that they would first check its shape. Firstly it is therefore necessary to measure the alleged curvature of the earth's surface, which is mainly water. This can be done very simply with the aid of binoculars. As Samuel Rowbotham ('Parallax') wrote in the 19th century: “Before we give up our conviction that the earth is flat someone must prove that the surface of water is convex and not level.” (Zetetic Astronomy – Earth not a Globe, 1881).Zetetic (from the Greek zeteo) means directly verifiable, observable as opposed to “theoretic”, which is a method based on speculation and imagination.Rowbotham carried out his experiment on six miles of perfectly straight canal in England called The Old Bedford Level. With a binocular fixed about 20 cm above the water surface he observed a boat rowing away from him for the whole six miles. On the globe earth the boat should have been behind 731 cm of curvature at 6 miles. We do not even have to go with binoculars to a large body of water as everywhere on earth we can see much further than we would

be able to on a globe of the stated size.The simple formula for determining the curvature of the earth over distance should be basic information we all learn at school. Why is this not so? It is after all a question of simple geometry. In our technological age why are there not hundreds, thousands of experiments demonstrating the earth's curvature? Has any professional institution even attempted to carry out this simple experiment with a laser beam for example? Why is it not a basic part of the curriculum of every geography student? It seems that since the mythical Eratosthenes the globe is a given and is not to be measured under any circumstances!

Kepler and GalileoCopernicus' heliocentric theory with a rotating earth was further promoted by Johannes Kepler and Galileo Galilei. The whole theory was dependent on the original and still unproven speculations thatearth is a sphere in space, the sun is larger than earth and the stars are extremely far (and therefore huge). All this before Galileo constructed one of the first binoculars!

The Moon and the planets ('wandering stars') appeared to these astronomers to be spherical and so they presumed that the earth must also be a spherical heavenly body. They also pointed out the curved shadow that appears on the moon when it is eclipsed as proof of a spherical earth. But there have been many eclipses of the moon with the sun still visible in the sky, disproving the theory that it is the earth causing the eclipse. Over fifty such eclipses have been recorded since the 15th century, as documented by F.H. Cook in his book “The Terrestrial Plane”.

Kepler was born in 1571 in Germany to a mother who was later tried for witchcraft and a father, mercenary, who soon left his family. However, he was a bright student at school and in 1594 he received a teaching job in a Lutheran school in Graz. There he managed to avoid persecution duringthe catholicization of Europe thanks to protection from the Jesuits, who recognized his talent as an astronomer. He was not only devoted to astronomy and mathematics but also astrology and constructed at least 800 horoscopes. In 1600 Kepler came to Prague and became an assistant to Tycho Brahe, and after his death the king's court mathematician and astrologer.Tycho Brahe was the most diligent and systematic astronomer of his time and accumulated the greatest amount of information about the stary sky. He maintained that the earth is motionless as there is no measurable parallax (change in the position of stars during the alleged orbit of the earth).Concerning the theory of spherical heavenly bodies he was reported to have said: “There are no spherical bodies in the sky... Those imagined by the experts exist only in their minds to help them model their movement, and with the aid of geometry determine their motion numerically through arithmetics.” Brahe died after a banquet at the king's court less than a year after Kepler's arrival. Kepler than took all of his meticulous observations.For Kepler, as for Copernicus and their Greek predecessors, cosmology was mainly a philosophical and ideological matter based on geometric shapes and 'sacred' mathematics of Pythagoras. Practical observations and experiments were secondary to them. After all, they didnot yet even have binoculars when they were forming their theories.“Kepler considered his greatest contribution to science to be his “Cosmic mystery” book in which he explains the motion of the then six known planets on the basis of the five Platonic solids. Although it was crazy it actually determined all his work in astronomy. Cosmic mystery led Kepler to discoveries to which he was drawn as if by magic. It is truly peculiar that this mystic and astrologer became the founder of physical astronomy.” (Blind Watchers of the Sky, p.54, Oxford University Press).

Galileo Galilei was probably the most well known proponent of the Copernican heliocentrism. When he came to Rome in 1611, to present his 'discoveries', he received a warm welcome. His greatest discovery was the observation of the alleged moons of Jupiter. He said that these moons

rotate around Jupiter because they sometimes disappear, which he attributed to their movement behind the planet. For this discovery, which he presented as proof of globular earth and heliocentrism, he was named an honorary professor at Pisa and Padova universities. His other observations were not very compatible with the heliocentric theory, so he postulated that the ocean tides are proof of the rotation of the earth. For these (and several other more practical discoveries) Galileo is also called 'the father of science'!In 1616 the catholic church ordered him to stop teaching heliocentrism. Galileo did not comply so he was imprisoned in his home for the last 11 years of his life. There he continued to teach and write right up to his death in 1642. The whole story of how the obscurant Catholic church persecuted the brave pioneer Galileo is mostly a myth which served to popularize Galileo and heliocentrism. The catholic church was for a long time officially against heliocentrism, while its double edged sword – the militant and also scholarly Jesuits became big proponents of this theory. Using the classic Hegelian dialectic (later described by the German philosopher Hegel) the catholicshad both sides of the dispute under their control.

The theory of spherical planet earth and heliocentrism was undoubtedly brave, but the exact opposite of the Occam's razor principle, which states that among competing hypothesis the one requiring the least presumptions should be chosen. The first and foremost assumption was that the earth is not a motionless plain but a spherical body (planet) in empty space. What was the evidence for the globe earth? Ships disappearing on the horizon hull first (but this is a simple matterof perspective and with binoculars they are seen whole again), curved shadow on the moon during its eclipse (but there have been many eclipses with the sun and moon both visible in the sky), and Eratosthenes' measurement with 2 unknowns, which presumed curvature of the earth and not prove it. On the other hand evidence against a rotating globe earth and for flat, motionless earth is numerous and can be tested experimentally. In 1895 hundred such proofs were presented by W. Carpenter in his book “100 Proofs that the Earth is not a Globe”. More recently Eric Dubay provided 200 proofs in his book “200 Proofs Earth is not a Spinning Ball”. Furthermore theoretical model of the earth as a rotating ball derived from observing the sky (determining the shape of the floor from the lights on the ceiling) brought with it a whole number of bizarre problems. What force caused the motion of the allegedly huge heavenly bodies, amongst which the astronomers now placed the earth itself – the terra firma below our feet? What force holds the oceans and the atmosphere on a rotating ball, whilst allowing us free movement and birds flight? (Ponder this magic trick for a while). For answers the heralds of the new world would have to wait for another theorizing 'genius' - Isaac Newton.

In 1670 a French Jesuit priest and astronomer Jean Picard was the first person who supposedly measured the size of the earth with adequate accuracy. He did not actually measure the curvature but again presumed it with the aid of the mathematical formulas of Snellius. (Alleged curvature for a hundred miles is 6 666 feet)

The JesuitsA very important role in the field of astronomy and the new cosmology was played by the Jesuits. Itwas the Jesuits who saw Copernicus' potential and offered him protection in the anti-reformation persecutions when he was just a teacher in a Lutheran school in Graz. After Copernicus very reluctantly published his theories, upon persuasion of the above mentioned catholic bishops, the Jesuits began producing one astronomer after another. It was quite strange that a military style orderwhich was infamous for its brutal persecution of protestants, was also so interested in the newly emerging sciences and particularly astronomy. The list of prominent astronomers from the 16th century onwards is full of Jesuits. Even our Gregorian calender was put together by a Jesuit astronomer Christopher Clavius.Jesuit missionaries educated natives all over the world in the new cosmology. While they could no

longer stop the spread of Bibles amongst ordinary people (even though they tried), they started to teach a different picture of the world than the one we find in the Bible. The earth was allegedly no longer a firmly fixed plain, the immovable center of God's creation, but a wondering planet somewhere in infinite space. This led to doubts about the accuracy and reliability of the Bible. Why would the Jesuits support this?The greatest threat for the power structure of the catholic church were christians who knew and believed the Bible (mainly the emerging protestants). By casting doubt on the biblical description ofthe creation right at the beginning of the Bible, they increased people's reliance on the priests and the Pope who alone knew how to correctly 'interpret' the Bible.While people accepted the biblical cosmology of the earth as the unmoving plain with a firmament above (“separating the waters from the waters”) there could be little doubt about God the Creator. Ifthe Bible was wrong or inaccurate about the very beginning - the creation, then it could be wrong about anything else. The Jesuits eventually managed to get the Copernican version of creation to the big bang theory. It was the Jesuit educated catholic priest Georges Lemaitre, who was the first to formulate the expanding space theory and the 'big bang'. When the priest and scientist (also former employee of CERN) Andrew Pinsent was recently asked how he can be a priest and believe in the big bang theory, he answered: “We invented it! Well father Georges Lemaitre did and everybody should know about him.” So apparently everything came from an explosion of a 'super-atom'. This is now acknowledged by the pope, himself a Jesuit. The Hegelian dialectic has reached its goal.

The Protestants“The world has just as many myths today as it had 3 000 years ago. Can we help if the humanists and Bible critics have swallowed every myth we have today while rejecting the truth as myth?” (Astronomer Gerardus D. Bouw, Ph.D.)

Protestant reformers like Luther or Calvin pointed out that the new theory did not make any sense and went against God's word. “There was mention of a certain new astrologer who wanted to prove that the Earth moves and not the sky, the sun and the moon. This would be as if somebody were riding on a cart or in a ship and imagined that he was standing still while the earth and trees were moving. So it goes now. Whoever wants to be clever must invent something special and it must be the best! The fool wants to turn the whole of astronomy upside-down. I believe the Holy Scriptures, for Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, and not the earth.” (Luther's 'Tischreden').“We Christians must be different than philosophers (scientists) in our thinking. If something is beyond our understanding, like the waters above the heavens, we must believe the Scriptures and admit our lack of knowledge, rather than wickedly deny them or presumptuously interpret them in conformity with our understanding.” (Luther's Works, Vol.1 – Lectures on Genesis)“The Christian is not to compromise so as to obscure the distinction between good and evil, and is to avoid the errors of those dreamers who have a spirit of bitterness and contradiction, who reprove everything and prevent the order of nature. We will see some who are so deranged, not only in religion but who in all things reveal their monstrous nature, that they will say the sun does not move, and that it is the earth which moves and turns. When we see such minds we must indeed confess that the devil posses them, and that God sets them before us as mirrors, in order to keep us in his fear.” (Calvin and Copernicus: the Problem Reconsidered, Robert White)

The theory that the earth rotates and goes around the sun was and is contrary to the Bible, which speaks of a motionless earth and a moving sun. Reformers like Luther and Calvin understood this, and not only they but also the founders of the new cosmology. So they used the principle of accommodation, introduced by St. Augustine, to try to explain away the new theory in the context of God's word. When even the protestants let themselves gradually be convinced that 'science' had proved that the

Bible was wrong right at its beginning in its description of the creation and that God does not actually always mean what he says, then the gate was wide open to all the following theories and 'isms'. All was now possible. The earth was no longer the center and the only place of God's creation, but only a tiny, insignificant dot in an endless cosmos, in which there are surely other inhabited worlds. The proponents of this new world were patient. This huge change could obviouslynot take place during one generation and general schooling was needed as well as the most powerfultool of the propagandists of the new age without God – film and the TV screen with its virtual reality.

Newton and magical gravityAlmost a hundred years before Newton, Kepler postulated that there must be some unknown force holding the earth and the heavenly bodies in their place (orbits). Now a new genius came on the scene and said that this force is gravity. Gravis in Latin means heavy and this force indeed had to bevery 'heavy' because it was meant to explain everything – how the oceans stay on a rotating sphere, while we can move freely, how the atmosphere magically sticks to the surface of the ball planet in the vacuum of space, how the planets and the moon orbit, etc. Newton said that gravity is the force by which all physical bodies attract each other and this force decreases with distance in an inverse square relationship.Gerrard Hickson in his book “Kings dethroned: a history of the evolution of astronomy from the time of the roman empire up to the present day” (1922), writes: “That does not tell us much. No reason is given why they do so, or should do so.” We know and can prove that any thing heavier (denser) than air falls down to the ground. It is a simple question of weight, density. But a force is something altogether different than weight – it is an active energy.This force could not be measured or experimentally proven in any way. It is just a speculative 'explanation' of the Copernican theory and even Newton was not altogether satisfied with it. He never claimed it to be anything more than a theory. He knew that no mathematician would approve his theory, so he made up a new branch of mathematics, called fluxions, to prove his theory. This became calculus which deals with 'infinitesimals', which have never been observed.David Wardlaw Scott in his book “Terra Firma” (1902) writes: “Gravity is derived from the Latin word heavy, and heavy has been the trouble it has caused modern astronomers by its not acting according to the laws defined for it by their Delphic oracle Sir Isaac Newton. It was first introduced to the public as a mere hypothesis, but, by degrees, became to be considered as a law, though it did not behave according to the principles set out for it by Newton. The small moon refused to circle around the great sun, nor would even a splinter of wood be attracted by an iron mountain. Gravitation refused to explain the motion of the moon and Newton was never able toconstruct any equations which would fit. His successor Clairant, after much effort, also gave up.”Professor W.B. Carpenter in 1890 wrote: “We have no proof, and, in the nature of things, can never get one, of the assumption of the attractive force exerted by the Earth, or by any other bodies of the Solar system, upon other bodies at a distance. Newton himself strongly felt that theimpossibility of rationally accounting for action at a distance through an intervening vacuum, was the weak point of his system... The doctrine of universal gravitation is no more than a speculative theory.”In a letter to Dr. Bentley on 25.2.1692 Newton wrote: “That gravitation should be a property of matter, so that one body acts upon another at a distance through a vacuum, is for me such an absurdity, that I believe that no man, who has the capacity to think, could ever think it.” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)So the inventor of the phantom force of gravity himself admits that gravity as a property of matter isa big absurdity.“Gravitation is only a subterfuge, employed by Newton in his attempt to prove that the Earth revolves around the Sun... He draped his idol with the tawdry tinsel of false science, knowing well how to beguile the thoughtless multitude. Gravitation is a clever illustration of the art of hocus-pocus – heads I win, tails you lose. Newton

won his fame, and the people lost their senses.” (Terra Firma, chapter 1, D.W. Scott)Gravitation is a theory, a single word, which is supposed to explain everything which does not makesense on a rotating globe earth, where there is no real up or down any more, just a relative up and down. Before Newton people still knew that things fall down to earth simply because they are heavier (denser) than air. On a rotating ball such a simple explanation is no longer adequate. A rotating globe earth in free space was however still only a hypothesis without a single real proof. Newton did not bring any proof at all for this theory, just pulled magical, hypothetical gravity out of the hat, which was supposed to explain all the mysteries of the new cosmology.Newton's main work “Principia” begins with the word “If”, and the whole book is full of “ifs”. If the Earth is a ball floating in a vacuum then we really have some difficult explaining to do. (And that is an understatement). How do you explain it? Well, you actually don't. Magical gravity and some new mathematics do it all for you.With this 'explanation' Newton definitely leaves experimental (zetetic) science behind and confirms the domination of theoretical science of the Greek school, placing one hypothesis upon another, supported by a play with numbers after the example of Pythagoras.

J.W. Goethe wrote of Newton: “It may boldly be asked where can the man be found, possessing the extraordinary gifts of Newton, who could suffer himself to be deluded by such hocus-pocus, if he had not in the first instance willfully deceived himself. Only those who know the strength of self-deception, and the extent to which it sometimes trenches on dishonesty, are in a condition to explain the conduct of Newton and of his school. To support his unnatural theory Newton heaps fiction upon fiction, seeking to dazzle where he cannot convince. In whatever way or manner may have occurred this business, I must still say that I curse this modern history theory of Cosmology, and hope that perchance there may appear, in due time, some young scientist of genius, who will pick up courage enough to upset this universally disseminated delirium of lunatics.” (Cosmos, Vol.1)

Still just a speculative theoryOur scientific publications and text books (dominated by secular humanists) try to convince us that Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo proved heliocentrism. The fact is that they did no suchthing – they merely managed to build a mathematical model to support their theories. Geologist, naturalist and explorer Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859) wrote: “I have known for a long time that we have no proof for the Copernican system... but I dare not be the first to challenge it.” He was “afraid of the ridicule of the unthinking masses.” (The Earth Stands Fast, C. Schoeppfer).At the beginning of the 19th century Dr. Woodhouse, professor of astronomy at Cambridge, wrote: “If our premises be disputed and our facts challenged, it is found that the whole range of astronomy does not contain proof of its accuracy.”

So when the globe earth and heliocentrism established itself on the 'firm foundations' of several generations of indoctrination, fortified by the “ridicule of the unthinking masses”, it was ready to pass the baton to Darwin and the theory of evolution, and continue towards the goal of pushing Godand the Bible into the land of myth. Copernican heliocentrism was the first direct attack against the reliability of the Bible and became the foundation for all subsequent major atheistic theories. The Darwinian theory of evolution would naturally have no chance on the old biblical model of the earth. The attack was against the very beginning of the Bible and creation, and right at a time when for the first time in history the Bible was becoming available to the common people, thanks to the invention of the printing press. One era of darkness ended but at the same time another era of darkness was beginning, where the real origin of man was being hidden and a new picture of the world was being created.

At first the new cosmology obviously had more opponents than proponents, but gradually over time

that was changing. The opposition was significantly reduced when the Anglican church accepted thetheory and it began to be taught in schools. However, criticism never entirely died down. It was interesting that the catholic church long held to the geocentric model with the globe earth. A false and misleading dispute was therefore set up between the geocentric and heliocentric models. This diverted attention away from the real question: “Is earth a ball floating in space?”The architects of the new reality knew that especially the question of a flat earth must be relegated into the category of 'primitive and absurd', as it is fairly easy to prove that the earth is not a ball of a diameter of 12 700 km. Who of us knows or knew the simple formula for the earth's alleged curvature? Who has thought about how far the horizon should be and how far we should see? (For example during good visibility I can see hills just 500 metres above my elevation more than 100 kmaway, which should be well below the horizon on a globe.) From the earliest age the globe and endless space are presented to us as unquestionable fact and herein lies the whole trick.

Confrontation with realityOn one hand we therefore had a developing hypothetical theory of planet earth in infinite space withnothing for proof except mathematical equations and the unprovable gravitation force. On the other hand is the visible and actual reality in which sailors for example use the proven and accurate 'planesailing' navigation over any distance. Sailors simply do not account for any curvature, but when they do (did), they would always be off, and the more so the further south of the equator. When captain Cook or later James Clark Ross attempted to circumnavigate Antarctica they sailed 50 to 60 000 miles. The British ship Challenger also circumnavigated Antarctica and measured 69 000 miles! (It should be no more than 13 000 miles on the globe).

“A limit He hath placedon the waters, unto the boundary of light withdarkness”Job 26:10

Similarly surveyors, engineers and architects also do not account for any supposed curvature of the earth. Ship canals, railways, bridges and tunnels are always drafted on an overall level, even for distances of hundreds of kilometers. Engineer, W. Winckler was published in the Earth Review stating about the alleged curvature, “As an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this absurd allowance is only permitted in school books. No engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I have projected many miles of railways and many more of canals and the allowance has not even been thought of, much less allowed for. The Manchester Ship Canal Company wrote: “It is customary in railway and canal construction for all levels to be referred to a datum which is nominally horizontal and is shown on all sections. It is not the practice in laying out public works to make allowances for the curvature of the earth.”The Suez canal is 161 km long and without any locks. When constructed no curvature was taken into account. It was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea-level. On a globe earth the horizontal curvature would be 2 km!

It is really key to realize that after almost 500 years of theorizing about the globe, no one has yet managed to measure the alleged curvature. Any real, practical measuring of the curvature, with the aid of a laser for example, seems to be taboo. (Try to find such a measurement from any official institution).Everywhere on earth we can see for distances which would be simply impossible on a globe. It is most evident across water, proving that water is indeed level and not convex. For example across Lake Michigan the Chicago skyline can be seen at 100 km distant, when the alleged curvature is 784 meters. Many have taken photographs of this and with the aid of a zoom proved that it cannot be a mirage (as claimed by a TV commentator).

In 1824 Encke was apparently the first man to make a serious attempt to measure the distance to thesun. Not however, logically by triangulation as that would produce a completely different distance than that assumed and required by the heliocentric model, which required the distance to be enormous. So he used the transit of Venus observed 50 years earlier and from that extrapolated the distance to the sun to be 97 000 000 miles! Yes, astronomical science was boldly advancing –

further from logic and reason and closer to 'scientism', which naturally only the scientists could understand.

How on earth can the sun form a hotspot from a distance of156 000 000 km?How can the horizon still be at eye level on a ball planet at a height of 30 km?

At the end of the 19th century there was still some lively debate going on about the shape of the earth. Samuel Rowbotham ('Parallax') was largely responsible for this as he convincingly defended the still, flat earth at many lectures as witnessed by newspaper articles of that day. The mainstream of the ever growing scientific establishment was however long firmly going in another direction – cosmology was firmly in the hands of theorists. Several generations had already gone through global, space indoctrination at school. The main proof of the ball earth was a globe in every class and mathematical equations.

In mid 19th century Darwin's theory of evolution came onto the scene and that was directly tied and dependent on the heliocentric model with a huge universe. The age old biblical still, flat earth “founded upon the deep” with a “firmament dividing the waters from the waters” was of course totally incompatible with the evolution theory. The model of the world which was believed by all from time immemorial was discarded and placed into the primitive and ridiculous category. The rotating globe earth and infinite space was presented as proved and tested fact to all fromthe earliest age. The children had to be taught this 'truth' very early as later on they would hardly accept this uncritically. Children after all do not go to school to learn to think, but to learn the the prepared 'facts'. (Real thinkers is the last thing that the ruling elites want). The main weapon against anyone who would challenge the new cosmology was ridicule, as is mostly the casein the absence of real proof. The architects of the new cosmology, globalists, had all the trump cardsin their hands – money, media, power. This was an age of progress - freeing ourselves from God andthe Bible, and the Copernican heliocentrism was the foundation stone.The people needed to be dissuaded from faith in God so that the new sciences and social engineers could move people to where they wanted – that is a materialistic world-view and impulsive behavior. The whole education system is to a large degree indoctrination into the evolutionary and materialistic world-view. It is indoctrination into the religion of 'scientism', which has its laws defined by 'high priests' such as Copernicus, Newton, Darwin, Einstein. They define the dogmas (mere theoretical constructs), which must be accepted by all who want to be acknowledged members of the so called scientific community. It in turn is closely linked to governments and large international companies, who finance it. Professors are professing priests who have the job of rightly instructing (indoctrinating) succeeding generations and potential members of the scientific community (religion). If any dissent is tolerated then it is only within welldefined boundaries. Rockefeller owned “Encyclopedia Britannica” reveals the basic condition for any would be scientists, with the following comment concerning the Copernican heliocentrism: “The lesson for future scientists (!) is that if a theory requires specific origin or world-view, then it is not acceptable.” The elitists (parasites) have to keep people believing in the globe in an endless universe, as it is essential for deceiving people and keep them on the materialistic, impulsive level,

where they are most easily controlled.

“The big lie is always more persuasive than the small lie, as the masses will more readily fall victim to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.” (Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol.1, chapter 10)

Why did Copernicus take the earth out of the center of creation? (And if it wasn't him it would havebeen someone else). British writer Anthony Burgess wrote: “While the Earth is at the center of the universe the Christian story of salvation has validity. When astronomy changed this then the whole of the Christian history lost the only context within which it made sense.” (Earth Chauvinism)Christians may think such an opinion to be too far fetched. However, over the last few centuries we have grown used to basically ignoring the obvious discrepancy between the Bible narrative and the Copernican cosmology. We have simply taken the astronomer's and mathematician's word over God's word. Yes the Bible is primarily a book about God, his relationship with man, and salvation. But we cannot approach it with the attitude that it can only be taken at its word concerning the spiritual, and when it comes to the material, we can interpret it loosely, according to man'slatest theories. God does not use words as carelessly as we do (and I am not speaking of the poetic passages of the Bible here). The Bible is either true and accurate from beginning to end, or we cannot rely on it anywhere. It does not give us the choice to pick and choose like other books, which make no claim to be God's infallible truth. The christian church exists to defend and promote this truth (all aspects of it), however unpopular that may be. “Keep that which is committed to thy trust, and avoid profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called” (1.Tm. 6:20). Why did the Jewish scribes have to copy the scriptures letter perfect? We have long since lostthis holy respect for God's word.

At the end of the 19th century Copernican heliocentrism was still just a theoretical construct without a single real proof, built upon the speculations of the Greek and Renaissance scholars.It had however already been taught in schools for 200 years as fact and still the only 'proof' were a school globe and mathematical equations. With Newton and the magical, invisible, and unmeasurable gravity the whole theoretical construct began to live a life of its own and in mid 19th century gave rise to the theory of evolution.“It seems that since Copernicus man is on a slippery slope – now he is sliding faster and faster awayfrom the center – into what? Into nothingness? Into a penetrating feeling of his own nothingness? …All science now has the goal of dissuading man from his former respect to himself, as if it had been but mere bizarre conceit.” Friedrich Nietzsche (Genealogy of Morals, 1887)Even some proponents of the new cosmology realized how purely hypothetical the whole construct was, but the alternative in the form of the old (and biblical) model was simply unacceptable. It is key to realize that this was not primarily about objective and logical finding of the true reality, but about promoting a certain ideology of a world without a Creator – more specifically the biblical Creator.So when in the second half of the 19th century several experiments were carried out to measure the motion of the earth, but the results were negative, it terrified many in the growing scientific community.

Last calls from reality The first of these experiments which recorded no motion of the earth was the Michelson-Morley experiment. Albert Michelson admitted: “The result goes directly against the explanation which presumes that the earth is moving.” (American Journal of Science, Vol.22, 1881, p.125). Fitzgerald and Lorentz then designed a modification of the measuring apparatus so that 'more favorable results' would be achieved.'Airey's failure' was an experiment which was supposed to measure the movement of the earth against the stars. But instead it clearly showed that it is the stars that move and not the earth (hence 'Airey's failure'). We can test this ourselves just with the aid of a torch and camera and time-lapse photography of the night sky. If it was the earth that moved then the stars would necessarily leave light trails against the direction of the earth's alleged rotation (in the same direction as the apparent motion of the stars. But in reality we see the opposite happening, clearly showing that it is the stars that move and not the earth. (This can be tested with the torch and camera).The Sagnac experiment was another pointing at the non-movement of earth and the existence of ether. Other experiments testing the assumed motion of the Earth were carried out by Nordmeyer 1903, but also failed to demonstrate any motion. It is of no surprise that these experiments are not taught in schools.

At the beginning of the 20th century things were therefore not looking good for the generally accepted model of the universe. However it would of course be very naive to think that now almost the whole of the scientific establishment would throw in the towel and cry out that the whole theory had probably been a mistake. Whole new fields of science were already founded on the evolutiontheory, which stood on the Copernican model, including social sciences (like psychology of Sigmund Freud reducing man practically to the impulsive level of an animal) and the destructive Marxism/communism, which was already prepared to start deadly revolutions.

The historian Bernard Jaffe reveals how it is, when he writes: “The data was almost unbelievable... Only one conclusion was possible – that the earth is still... But that of course would be absurd.” (Michelson and the Speed of Light, 1960, p.76).

Reality could not be allowed to stop progress and emancipation from God and the Bible. The theorists were not about to give up. After several years of speculations about the ether and space it was proposed in 1911 (by Ormoff, Onspensky, and Mingelsky) that light from the stars does not travel to us in a straight line. In other words the stars are not where they appear to be. They also reached the conclusion that all is in motion including the sun and the whole of our galaxy. It was however a patent office clerk, a certain Albert Einstein, who was to become the savior of the whole theoretical construct. The return to reality was to be postponed yet longer until further notice. This virtual, theoretico-physical reality could reach its conclusion only in the age of rockets, film, modern digital technologies and virtual reality – at the end of our age.

“For manipulation to be successful, it should remain invisible. The success of manipulation is guaranteed when the manipulated believe that everything happens naturally and inevitably. In short, manipulation requires a false reality in which its presence will not be felt.” (G. Schiller, Professor of University of California)

Mr Genius and Relativity ('No more experiments and reality please')Gerrard Hickson in his already mentioned book writes: “The theory of relativity is so complicated that when it first came to the public notice it was said that there were probably no more than twelve people in the world capable of understanding it. It is about as far removed from ordinary “fact” and “plain English” as it is possible for anything to be. The thing is elusive, abounding in inference, suggestion, half-truth and ambiguity. It is a superfine effort of the imagination seeking to

maintain an impossible theory of the universe in defiance of every fact against it.”In the words of Einstein himself, when he was presenting his theory at Princeton University: “What we mean by relative motion in general sense is perfectly plain to everyone. If we think of a wagon moving along a street we know that it is possible to speak of the wagon at rest, and the street in motion, just as well as it is to speak of the wagon in motion and the street at rest. That, however, is avery special part of the ideas involved in the principle of Relativity.”Hickson continues: “That would be amusing if we read it in a comic paper, but when Professor Einstein says it in a lecture at the Princeton University, we are expected not to laugh – that is the only difference. It is silly, but I may not dismiss the matter with that remark, and so I will answer quite seriously, that it is only possible for me to speak of the street moving while the wagon remainsstill – and to believe it – when I cast away all the experience of a lifetime and am no longer able to understand the evidence of my senses, which is insanity. Such self-deception as this is not reasoning, it is the negation of reason, which is the faculty of forming correct conclusions fromthings observed, judged by the light of experience.This introduction by Einstein serves very well to illustrate the kind of illusion that lies at the root of Relativity. Throughout the whole of his theories there is evidence that Einstein was thinking almost entirely of their application to astronomy, but it was inevitable that this should involve him with physics, so that he had then to engage upon a series of arguments intended to show how his principles would work out on the plane of general science. The first may be said to be the motive that inspired him, while the second consists of complications and difficulties which he could not avoid.It is a Case of Appeal, where Einstein appeals in the name of a convicted Copernican Astronomy against the judgment of Michelson-Morley, Nordmeyer, physics, fact, experience, observation and reason.”

Einstein is like a gambler who has placed all his money on one card – it is all or nothing – either they will believe me or laugh at me. It is basically the same as Copernicus and Newton. But it is notsuch a risk as may seem as the cards are stacked in his favour. The judge and jury have been bought and they will take any alibi. The original father of lies and master of deceit (whose greatest trick was to convince people that he does not exist at all) is the ruler of the present age and Einstein with his nonsensical theory was just another chapter in his continuing deception. Biblical truth about our world had to remain hidden and most people were very willing to accept anything that made the Bible and God seem irrelevant.“Under the general heading of Relativity, Einstein includes an assortment of new ideas – each of which depends upon another – and each of which contributes to support the whole. He says that light is a material thing, has weight, and so is subject to the law of gravitation, so that it bends in space and consequently no star is where we see it. Every method which is based upon the geometry of Euclid and the triangulation of Hipparchus will fail to discover the distance to a star, because its real position is no longer known. Wherefore, Einstein has invented a new kind of geometry in order to calculate the positions of the stars, by what is nothing more or less than metaphysics.We have always been accustomed to measure things by the three dimensions of Euclid – length, breadth and thickness, but Einstein (thinking of astronomy), says that “Time is a Fourth Dimension”, and proposes that henceforth things should be measured on the understanding that theyhave four dimensions – length, breadth, time, and thickness. The introduction of time as a fourth proportion of things makes it necessary for him to invent a number of new terms, and also to change some that we already know and use, thus, for example - “space” is changed to “continuum,” while a “point” is called an “event.”

Ernest Rutherford, considered the founder of nuclear physics, thought Einstein's theory to be a joke,and when asked why no Anglo-Saxon understands it, he replied: “No. They have too much sense forthat.”There have been many experiments which were supposed to prove relativity, bending of time-space,

gravitational waves, etc. The results never confirmed any of these theoretical phenomena and were either 'adjusted', or simply ignored. Until now that is.On 11.2.2016 the magicians of the theoretical universe, seeing that their construct is under attack from an increasing number of people, announced a 'groundbreaking discovery'. For the first time in history they apparently detected gravity (gravitational waves) with the super sensitive LIGO apparatus. As proof we were shown a digital animation of gravitational waves. Their prophet Einstein predicted gravitational waves in 1916 and now they arrived from the collision of two black holes 1.3 billion years ago – just in time for the celebration of the 100 year anniversary of Mr Genius. Even Einstein allegedly doubted that we would ever be able to detect them. And what a surprise – finally success. Scientists the world over are apparently celebrating. Gravity and relativity proved at last. Congratulations!What is perhaps most interesting about this story is that on 12.1.2016 Stuart Clark (science editor ofThe Guardian newspaper) wrote an article about how the four managers of LIGO discovered a way to simulate gravitational waves and had already deceived the whole team of scientists at LIGO in 2010. They had already written a report about the historic discovery of gravitational waves, and 300of them met in California in March 2011, to decide where and how to announce the results. It was not until this conference that they were told by the managers that it was just a “blind injection” of data to test the ability of the team to recognize real data. Well, the whole team of scientists was fooled and only the four managers knew what happened. (And let's not forget that huge governmentgrants are at stake, not just big egos, and results are expected).

In summary, relativity is necessary for preserving at least the appearance that all is well with the spinning globe and endless space. It is, however, just a cheap trick, smuggled in with clever propaganda about history's greatest genius, who is mischievously sticking out his tongue at us. He isa clown, entertaining us with amusing witticisms, which sometimes reveal that the joke is on us: “If the facts don't fit the theory, then change the facts.”

Nevertheless, after Copernicus, Newton, Darwinand others the scientific establishment had anotherhigh priest, whose 'laws' were added to the existinglaws to be obeyed by all members of thetheoretical, pseudo scientific community.Hickson further writes: “Details of it represent animmense amount of labour of a refined character,the whole thing is very imaginative, and the workof an artist in fine-spun reflections. It finds favourwith those who like mental gymnastics andhair-splitting argument, and are fond of marvelousfigures.But I can conceive that in the course of time thisRelative Phantasmagoria might come to beregarded as science, and be taught as such to thechildren of the near future, and that is to beprevented only by dealing with it now. Time is not in any way related to the three dimensions of all objects. It is independent of them and so cannot be used as a fourth dimension. Dimensions are concrete and finite, while time is abstract and infinite.The principle of relativity is supposed to illustrate that we cannot rely on any deductions about the heavenly bodies because we are on the surface of the Earth and our motion is along a different trajectory and at different speed than any heavenly body. After admitting that electro-magnetic laws do not alter according to the system in which they occur – that is to say – after admitting that these laws act the same all the world over, he proceeds to argue

precisely the contrary: “The motion of each locality on the earth is constantly changing from hour tohour, but no corresponding changes occur in electromagnetic action.”So Einstein argues that electro-magnetic currents must, in reality, vary their speed, and so adapt themselves to the changing conditions in such a manner as to “seem the same to the observer as if he had not changed his position.”Unfortunately he is unable to show any reason why electro-magnetic action should do this remarkable thing, for he treats it as a thing that had intelligence, as if it willfully acted in a manner calculated to deceive the observer. When reduced to its essence, this argument proves to be no morelogical than the idea that the street might be moving while the wagon was at rest.”It is truly a desperate attempt to explain the Copernican model, but the explanation does not make any sense on the practical level and is even full of contradictions on the mathematical, theoretical physical level, as is well demonstrated by the astronomer and mathematician Stephen Crothers (and others). Einstein himself admits that: “To the extent that mathematical laws refer to reality, they are uncertain, and to the extent that they are certain, they do not refer to reality.”Einstein reveals to us that it all is just a game to him, when he says, that the imagination is more important to him than reality. He also said that “since the mathematicians have got a hold of the theory of relativity, I don't understand it myself.” (Maybe he did not understand it right from the beginning).A real scientists, inventor and genius of the 20th century, Nikola Tesla, who gave us alternating current, amongst other things, writes on Relativity: “The theory is like a beggar clothed in purplewhom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are meta-physicists rather than scientists.Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved.”

Eventually a few months before his death Einstein wrote in a letter to a friend: “I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept (continual structures). In which case nothing remains of my whole castle in the air, including gravitational theory and the rest of modern physics.”To complete this theoretico-physical charade all that was needed now was an astrophysicist with thevoice of a robot.

Geo-centrist Robert Sungenis wrote: “If you want to believe that length shrink when an object moves, time changes in the process, and its mass increases, just so you can explain the anomalies ofMichelson's experiment, that's your privilege. I will just continue to believe proved reality, ie. Motionless earth.”

But most scientists accepted Relativity gladly. They could leave the world of practical experiments and physical reality and devote themselves to pure mathematical formalism. It gave them an excuse to ignore all the evidence for a motionless earth. The well known physicist Herbert Ives admitted that the only way to continue believing in Relativity was to “ignore the evidence.”

“Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.” (Nikola Tesla)

Consider the alleged motion of the earth. 1 600 km/h rotation at the equator, but 0 km at the poles, and yet Antarctica is the windiest continent. The atmosphere is allegedly perfectly synchronized so that these tremendous differences are canceled out. Gravitation not only magically holds the whole atmosphere as if glued, but has the strength to hold the oceans on a rotating ball while allowing us free and easy movement. Gravitation amazingly acts on each thing just right. It is indeed a mighty magician who has enchanted us and to whom we have given up our reason. Gravitation is like a worldwide hypnosis trigger word.We are also told that earth is flying at 107 000 km/h around the sun and then 650 000 000 km/h trough space. Hmm... but no one feels this fantastic motion, but we do feel a summer breeze.

“Our credulity, though enormous, is not boundless... astronomers tell us that the sun is nearly a hundred million miles away and that Betelgeuse is ten times as big as the whole universe... and a host of other marvel mongers whose credulity would have dissolved the Middle Ages in a roar of skeptical merriment.In the Middle Ages people believed that the earth was flat, for which they had at least the evidence of their senses. We believe it to be round, not because as many as one per cent of us could give the physical reasons for so quaint a belief, but because modern science has convinced us that nothing that is obvious is true, and that everything that is magical, improbable, extraordinary, gigantic, microscopic, heartless, or outrageous is scientific.” (George Bernard Shaw, from the opening of a play called 'Saint Joan')

Gravitation must be preserved because, as Stephen Hawking explained in 'his' hypnotic computer generated voice: “Because there is a law such as gravity the universe can and was created by itself from nothing.” End of argument – for who can argue with a genius human robot.

Believe usAll that we see and can prove testifies to a motionless, level earth... all experiments... navigation tools (including of course the gyroscope)... engineers, pilots all work and fly on a flat earth. In reality we simply count on a still, flat earth and see and feel a still, flat earth. But science tells us notto believe our senses and instead believe scientists as they are apparently more clever than we are and it is apparently primitive and dumb to rely on our eyes, senses and real experiments. They have installed put rotating balls into our heads, with the earth as just a tiny dot in an endless universe. It is like a virus which gnaws in our subconscious – are we really on a spinning ball? Doesn't God describe a different world? But we are not most of us conciously aware of such questions any more and just marvel at the size of it all. But is it reality? A child lives with many illusions about the world and as it grows it sheds those illusions. Sometimes it is painful, but it is a part of growing up. Most people live with big illusions about this world and how it functions, and as Nietzsche wrote: “Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth,because they do not want to loose their illusions.” Yes ignorance is really bliss and while it is certainly not necessary or possible to know everything, if your world-view does not allow you to believe what you see with your eyes and feel with your senses, then there is probably a problem with your world-view. We very light-heartedly hand over our thinking to the priests of science and other authorities and cease to think for ourselves. That is very dangerous for many reasons. Every totalitarian system wants to control the people's minds through their version of the world, their version of the origin of man, their version of history, and therefore their version of the present and future. The Copernican cosmology is presented as proven fact – scientific, but hardly anything is further from the truth thanthis belief. The kabalist HaKanna already in the first century used a 42 letter name of god to work out the age

of the universe, which is only about 1 billion more than the present estimate. Another kabalist Nachmanides in the 13th century wrote about a rotating earth, relativity, and expanding universe.

The battle for man's heart and soul takes place on the spiritual level and is projected into the material. What we think of our origin determines everything else, hence the effort to hide our real origin and real world – as described in the Bible.Copernican cosmology has tricked us into thinking that the lights we see in the sky are huge, extremely distant, rotating celestial bodies. Earth is just a speck of dust orbiting one of countless suns. There could be thousands, millions of planets like earth. We are nothing special. Could it be an effort to separate us from our Creator and in the end present us with false creators who will arrive from somewhere out there? Will those who believe the global, space, virtual reality propaganda be deceived? Who will they listen to if and when it happens? Scientists, 'experts', the pope, media mainstream? Who is for now the prince of this world and rules the air (airwaves)?

Propaganda and mind manipulationEvery lie needs continuously repeated propaganda and this the modern cosmology has plenty, especially in this era of film, television, mass media and computer generated graphics. We are told about our reality before we can think for ourselves and it is made clear to us that clever, progressivepeople long ago overcame the old uninformed and superstitious view of the world – it was science and scientists who brought us real and accurate knowledge. However, when the few arguments for the rotating globe are studied, it is very quickly revealed how nonsensical and weak they are. (Manyintelligent, thinking people like Luther, Goethe, Humboldt, Tesla, Rowbotham, Shaw, Orwell and others, knew this). Therefore the authorities have stepped up their spinning globe, space propagandaand will try to keep the flat earth in the category of dumb conspiracy theories. There is nothing else they can do because open discussion is highly dangerous for the globe. They have to keep it on the psychological level.

Certain words and phrases are like set traps meant to switch off critical thinking. One of these is of course “conspiracy theory”, which is a phrase first formulated by the CIA in 1967 to discredit all explanations of 'events' other than the 'official' government explanation. The file was under the heading “psych” - short for “psychology operations.” It is like something straight out of Orwell's novel “1984” and on most people this simple trick really works. The authorities also here rely on the intellectual laziness of the average person and unwillingness to differ from the mainstream majority opinion. 'Flat earth' is another phrase which is meant to turn of critical thinking because it has been connected to an archaic, primitive view of the world which we have clearly proven to be wrong. The heliocentric model on the other hand has been connected to the idea of scientific and technological progress as an inseparable part of the evolution and progress of our knowledge. Flat earth with a firmament above is connected to the primitive and superstitious dark ages. It is pure psychology and mind manipulation, which is, and always has been, the main specialty of those in power.The less real proof and evidence there is the more powerful and all-pervasive must the propaganda and psychological manipulation be. With the advent of television the powers-that-be had at their disposal the most powerful weapon to date and finally the opportunity of everyday propaganda of the iconic globe and 'outer space'.

As Schiller wrote: “manipulation requires a false reality in which its presence will not be felt.” Endless universe with spinning planets and stars is that false reality which enables the elitists (parasites after the example of the devil and demons) most of the other manipulation, without even people noticing it. It is the matrix with which stands and falls this whole new world order, which theelitists have been preparing for so long and towards which they are pushing the whole world. The fall of Babylon will eventually be fast and shocking. Even now it is already shaking in its

foundations as the false reality on which it stands is being revealed. The propaganda of the globe and space has allegedly increased fourfold since the beginning of 2015. That is obviously not just by chance.

The 'elitist' globalists (builders of the new Babylon) have the advantage of having almost all the media in their hands (just the internet remains relatively free, but for how long?) and as the temporary victors they present their version of history and reality. They have their agenda and goals with one main goal of uniting the whole world under one totalitarian rule, just as we read in the Bible. It is nothing new under the sun.Just a few generations after the flood Nimrod was already trying to unite the world with the tower of Babel in open rebellion against God. Then it was fairly obvious what was happening as people knew they were on a flat enclosed world, which has its Creator. The rebels led by Nimrod were building a tower to get to God, whom they saw as a tyrant, and kill him.The rebellion of the luciferians (new age Nimrods) is now more insidious, as it is hidden in a false reality, in the matrix of the globe earth in an endless cosmos.

Encyclopedia Britannica (also considered as a final authority on things scientific) simply states the earth as a planet orbiting the sun as a fact. If you wanted some evidence for this 'fact' then do not look for it in the 29 volumes of this publication as you will apparently not find it there. Would you like some proof that the earth is really a spherical planet in space, besides the one alleged photo from NASA from 1972? Some measurement of the curvature? Well, good luck! The composite and artists' images of globe earth should all have “measuring strictly forbidden” written in capital letterson them. The mythical Eratosthenes already measured the curvature over 2 000 years ago, so let's move on! We need to spin it now and send it around that bright light in the sky. A few mathematical equations will prove it for now and we'll wait who comes up with what later. Gravity – eureka! We have proof! Well actually you can't prove or test gravity in any way, but there is new maths for it and it apparently works. So sailors navigate as if on total level (plane sailing), engineers design railways and canals on an overall level, the motion of the sun on the arctic circle 360 degrees around the observer absolutely contradicts the heliocentric model. The Polaris star has remained in the same position for centuries, millenia, as have all the constellations which remain the same although distances of stars supposedly vary enormously. The sun's rays diverge pointing at a very close sun which also often decreases in size as it sets and increases as it rises – again absolutely beyond any logical explanation in the heliocentric model. We could go on and on with the evidence as for example EricDubay did providing 200 proofs for a flat earth.

The BibleThe difference in the way the Bible describes the creation, and the way it is described and accepted by almost all today, is strikingly different. I feel shamed that I have until recently believed a cosmology which is so obviously at odds with the Bible and common sense, without properly

checking it. The problem is that we have considered it to be so certain that hardly any has given it a real critical evaluation and investigation. As christians we either ignore or lamely excuse the fact that the Bible speaks about a different earth and heavens. We think (or at least I did) that when the Bible speaks about physical things we don't have to take God's word so seriously because it's not as important as the spiritual things. It's as if we thought that in Genesis God gave us a simplified version of creation – for children – which the clever scientists later corrected.In actual fact it is these scientists which have made us loose our minds when we have believed themthat we live on a spinning ball shooting through an imaginary space. God is now clearly showing us just what nonsense we will believe if we do not put His word before that of men. If we let God's word speak to us plainly as it is, without our preconceived notions, then we will find outthe truth.

Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass? (Job 37:18)It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in (Is. 40:22)And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day. (Jos. 10:13)It is he who builds his chambers in the heavens, and has founded his vault on the earth (Amos 9:6)Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; (Job 38:4-6)For the pillars of the earth are the LORD'S, and he hath set the world upon them. (1.Sam. 2:8)Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever. (Ps. 104:5)To him that stretched out the earth above the waters (Ps. 136:6)Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them (Mt. 4:8)Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, (Rev. 1:7)And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth (Rev. 7:1)

That is just a few of the many passages that speak about the form of creation. There are one, or perhaps two verses, which are sometimes used as some kind of proof of globe earth. The above mentioned Isaiah 40:22, where the Hebrew word chug is used, which means circle and not ball, which we see in Isaiah 22:18 and it is a different Hebrew word. Sometimes Job 26:7 is cited where it says that the earth hangs on nothing. Yes the earth really does not hang on anything but is firmly set on pillars founded upon the deep. (For a detailed account of the earth from the view of the Bible a good place to go is www.testingtheglobe.com).

Pseudo-science cosmology and all who have a stake in it will never convict themselves. That can and is being done only by independent researchers. The ability of godless men to deceive themselves and others is almost endless. There are also many expert liars in this field of the type of higher ranking free-masons and Jesuits, who serve their master Lucifer for his purposes.

I understand that unbelievers have a problem grasping the magnitude of the deceit – how could the whole world be so deceived? They are underestimating the ability of the master deceiver (especiallyif they don't believe he even exists) and overestimating the ability and honesty of fallen man. Christians however should be much more skeptical and cautious towards anything which is

presented as scientific fact but does not agree with the Bible. That is certainly the case of the heliocentric model with its endless universe. This was known by the Protestant reformers, and Copernicus himself knew that his theory went against the Scriptures. After generations of indoctrination today's christians have long ceased to realize this and just basically ignore this fact. But God has now once again brought this truth to the forefront.“He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him” (Pr. 18:13)“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.” (1.Th. 5:21) God has given us eyes and a brain so that we use them and not hand over to theorizing physicists, astronomers and space agencies, which all have occult symbolism in their logos. “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.” (Ef. 5:11)God gradually reveals his truths, and this one was hidden to almost all for several centuries, until very recently. Now God has brought this truth into the light through many truth seekers.

Ideas which we have deeply fixed since early childhood, and which are reinforced at every step and reflected in a thousand ways, are very difficult to shake of. They are like a part of us, our identity, and we hold on to them even when we are presented with clear evidence testifying against them. As Mark Twain insightfully wrote: “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled.” But reality has a tendency to be very persistent and eventually will catch up with you. It is the same with God's word – it remains true and reliable independently of man's theories which come and go.

Virtual reality“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy which is so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realizationof the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.” (J. Edgar Hoover, Director of the FBI, Elks Magazine, August 1956)

One of the first films ever made was “Journey to the Moon” from 1902. It is also considered to be one of the most influential films of the history of cinematography. Film is the most powerful propaganda tool today and for the last hundred years. Science-fiction and space genre was very popular from the start. The era of flight was beginning but until the 1950s man never got high enough to really check if what had been theorized and agreed on about three centuries before was true or not. Until about 50 years ago people believed that they live on a rotating ball planet floating in space because they had been told by their parents and teachers and because there was a globe in every classroom. There was no real proof. Is earth a sphere in free space, as the planets appeared to some astronomers? In the words of Mark Sargent: “That is when things got really strange.”

After the war the Americans and Russians concentrated on rocket development. They both got as many German scientists as they could lay their hands on irrespective of whether they were active Nazis or not. The US 'imported' about 3 200 German scientists under Operation Paper Clip and many of them, including the foremost rocket engineer Wernher von Braun were instrumental in founding NASA. The roots of NASA and the 'space program' go back to Jet Propulsion Laboratories and rocket engineer Jack Parsons, whose role model was the infamous occultist, magician and satanist Alister Crowley. Rocket development after him was led by the former Nazi Wernher von Braun.The occultists like to hide their witchcraft in plain sight in symbols and words. NASA is a Hebrew word meaning to take up, carry, go up. But it also has a negative meaning: mislead, deceive, enchant. The logos of NASA and other space agencies are full of occult symbolism and its astronauts and managers are usually Freemasons and proud of it too.

By 1957 both US and Russia had rockets capable of reaching heights where it was possible to check

and document the shape of the earth. However, instead of showing us all, after 400 years of theorizing, how the earth is sphere, they started firing rockets with nuclear warheads straight up at the sky. The names given to these experiments were very telling – operation Dominic and Fishbowl (with Dominic meaning God's). The footage from these mad experiments (along with footage of sprites and elves phenomenon) is very interesting suggesting there is really a solid dome above us.Meanwhile in 1959 an unprecedented agreement about Antarctica took place, where initially 10 countries signed an agreement, making it a highly restricted and strictly controlled area. Soon more than 40 other countries signed, and that even after admiral Byrd had already described it as a land full of valuable natural resources. The agreement bans any independent exploration and is not open to any review until 2041! Why is this frozen desert with no flora or fauna, except penguins, protected as no other area of the world? Why was it protected before anyone had ever heard of 'protecting the environment'? Has anyother agreement between so many nations lasted longer than this one? Antarctica is obviously not what the powers-that-be want us to believe.In the same year of 1959 Van Allen allegedly discovered dangerous radiation belts encircling the earth and it looked as though man would not be going anywhere very high very soon. However, NASA very soon forgot about the Van Allen radiation belts as they fixed their gaze on the moon.

Even before NASA was founded in 1958, there was already a close connection between Hollywood and the rocket program, especially through the close co-operation and friendship of Walt Disney and Wernher von Braun.

The fairytale myth of space exploration wasalways a specialty of Hollywood and it wasmasterfully used by NASA as a tool ofpropaganda. An illusion of a space race withthe Soviets was created while at the toplevels both camps were co-operating. Theyhad after all one common goal and that wasto hide reality, which most of all looked likethe biblical version of creation and form ofthe world, in which believed all the ancientcivilizations (including ours until Copernicusand Newton). The last thing that the world'srulers want, whether they call themselvescapitalists or communists, is for the real form of the world to become known and the greatest proof of God Creator to come to light. The whole of the Copernican evolutionary-materialistic virtual reality would be revealed as the deceptive lie that it is. The emperor would have no clothes. The time for revelation had not yet come.The powerful of this world are united by the Luciferian ideology which sees God as a restrictive tyrant and Lucifer as the one bringing the real light – 'enlightenment', so that man can become god independent of the Creator. It is the same old lie from the garden of Eden.

Today we are bombarded with global/space propaganda at every step. Animation of the rotating globe is in the news bulletins of every TV channel. We are always being reminded that space is real and unimaginably big and we unimaginably small. There are thousands of films and documents about space reinforcing the idea that the twinkling lights in the night sky are actually huge stars thousands and millions of light years distant. Is it reality? Can we tell the difference between real and virtual reality or between photo and painting? How is it even remotely possible that after about 50 years in space and all those alleged satellites we have only one alleged photo of earth from spaceand the others are admitted composites and paintings? Where is the footage of rotating earth from space? Why do multiple identical clouds appear in the images? How can the colours be so sharp

through the whole thickness of the atmosphere. And maybe the most absurd curiosity – the continents appear as in the Mercator world map from 1569, where they are admittedly distorted because it was a map primarily designed as a navigation tool for sailors. The Peters Projection world map from 1974 is apparently a more accurate depiction of our world. But it is verydifferent from the Mercator projection and we are not used to it. Is this the reason why earth from space looks like a map from 1569 designed as a navigation tool for sailors? Well, after all, we are used to it.

In 1990 the Galileo space probeallegedly sent us a 24 hour time-lapserotation of the earth. The problem isthat the clouds do not move at allduring these 24 hours and NASA isnow distancing itself from this obviousfake. It is now 2016 and we still haveno real footage of the whole rotatingearth from space! We have no photosof satellites in space, just paintings andCGI. The only real footage that NASAand other space agencies have shownus is rockets going up and thensideways and disappearing from view.As Max Malone and others havepointed out during all that allegedtime in space and thousands of hours of footage there is not a single time, not once!, where the camera pans around at least a 180 degrees!Depicting earth from space is obviously a big problem for space (fake) agencies of which more and more people are becoming aware. Hence the recent upsurge in the space and globe earth propaganda.

The incredible journey46 years ago man apparently landed on the 384000 km distant moon six times without a hitch.(The 7th was a real Hollywood drama). Sincethen he has not gone further than allegedly some 550 km above earth. The alreadymentioned Van Allen radiation belts are provingto be a real problem after all and NASA hasrecently admitted that it has still not solved thisproblem and it remains the main obstacle forhuman space travel. Well, back in the good old days of late 60s and early 70s it seemed to present no problem,so why not use the tried and tested technology of almost half-a-decade ago? Well, theyapparently lost all the plans of the Saturn rockets and almost everything else to do with the moon trips, including all the film footage and telemetry data – all 700 boxes! No, that is not a joke. NASA admitted thisafter a year of fruitless searching and Reuters

wrote about it on 15.8.2006. So no one can check now what magic tricks NASA used to get the 760 000 km there and back (through the deadly Van Allen radiation belts too) and land perfectly in conditions they had never tested or experienced before, while they never managed to get even close to a safe landing on earth. Anyway, it was obviously going to be much easier to land on a heavenly body, with no atmosphere, in conditions they never could, and never did, recreate on earth! And they had different crews every time, so it wasn't beginners luck just once, but six times over. (Experience obviously counted for nothing at NASA). They had the pioneering spirit in those days and all the astro-boys wanted to give it a try and have their 15 minutes of fame on that shiny moon.

Anyway, the lunar (lunacy) landings have been taken apart in a hundred different ways by now and whoever wants to continue believing these evil, lying con-men will do so irrespective.The moon in fact is in all probability not a solid heavenly body at all. It gives off its own light with the opposite properties of sun's light. It is a silvery light which actually cools the air (by 1 to 4 degrees C) and is septic. The sun's light is golden, warming and antiseptic.“And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth” (Gn. 16,17)Secondly, spherical bodies are not good reflectors of light – they reflect it in all directions – so especially at long distances the reflective phenom