Upload
others
View
13
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
1
HEAT TRANSPORTEXPERIMENTS IN JET:
STIFFNESS AND NON-LOCALITY
V. Parail, P. Manticaa , W. Suttropb andcontributors to the EFDA-JET
workprogramme.
EURATOM-UKAEA Fusion Association, CulhamScience Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, United Kingdoma)Istituto di Fisica del Plasma, Euratom/ENEA-CNR,Milano, Italyb)Max-Plank-Institut fur Plasmaphysik, EURATOM-Association, D-85740-Garching, Germany
Outline� Fast transient phenomena in JET-
experimental observations;� Concept of turbulence non-locality;� Profile stiffness as an alternative
approach to fast transient phenomena;� Conclusions
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
2
I. Fast Transient Phenomena onJET- Experimental Observations
� An unusually fast heat pulse, generatedby L-H transition, has been first reportedin 1993 (S. Neudachin et al., 20th EPSConference, Lisbon, 1993)
Time (s)
JG96
.139
/6c
Pulse No: 31078
Te (
kev)
13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
ρ = 0.33
ρ = 0.50
ρ = 0.66
ρ = 0.76ρ = 0.80
ρ = 0.60
ρ = 0.40
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
3
� Two unusual features of this heat pulse:
I. A very fast (sometimes beyond
experimental resolution) propagation of the
temperature rise;
II. Heat pulse amplitude does not decay
(sometimes even rise) in the core
quickly attracted attention of theoreticians
and modellers.
� Since then JET and many other
tokamaks have reported a number of
heat and cold pulses with the similar
features;
� Some tokamaks (starting from TEXT, K.
Gentle,1993) reported cold pulses which
change polarity in the core;
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
4
Cold pulse triggered by a shallowpellet injection
5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4
t [s]
ρ=0.19
ρ=0.87
51084
1
3
5
7
5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4
t [s]
ρ=0.12
ρ=0.91
ρ=0.28
ρ=0.36
ρ=0.45
ρ=0.64
ρ=0.84
51084
0
2
4
6
8
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
5
Cold pulse triggered by type-IELM
Time (s)
JG96
.139
/4c
Pulse No: 30592
11.76 11.80 11.84 11.88 11.92
Te
(kev
)
ρ = 0.50
ρ = 0.66
ρ = 0.70
ρ = 0.74
ρ = 0.81
ρ = 0.84
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
6
Cold pulse caused by noble gaspuffing into ELM-free H-mode
7
5
3
1
3
2
1
16.0 16.2 16.4 16.6
ρ ≈ 0.4
ρ ≈ 0.9
16.8Time (s)
Pra
d (W
att)
x10
6T
e (e
V)
x103
17.0 17.2 17.4
JG99
.126
/1c
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
7
Cold pulse in plasma with ITBA very recent example shows that coldpulse leads to erosion of the ITB(P.Mantica, EPS 2001)
Weak ITB can becompletely destroyedby the cold pulse
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5
t (s)
ρ=0.2
ρ=0.8
51581
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1ρ
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1ρ
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
8
� Two unusual features of these heat
pulses:
I. A very fast (sometimes beyond
experimental resolution) propagation of
the onset of the temperature rise;
II. Heat pulse amplitude does not
decay (sometimes even rise) in the core
quickly attracted attention of
theoreticians and modellers.
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
9
Let us compare experimental resultswith the prediction from a simplediffusive model with the constant χ :
0
4
8
12
1
3
5
7
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1ρ-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1ρ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3
t (s)
ρ=0
ρ=1
DTmax
1
3
5
7
5.8 5.9 6 6.1 6.2 6.3
51084
t [s]
ρ=0.19
ρ=0.87
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
10
� The difference in the speed of coldpulse propagation and in the radialprofile of the cold pulse amplitude isobvious.
� How can we explain such a fast, non-diffusive kind of cold pulse propagation?
� Two possible explanations are beingconsidered by theoreticians at present:
� Non-local turbulence paradigm(streamers),� Stiff local transport paradigm
(avalanches).
Non-local turbulence.� Non-local turbulence as a mean of a
fast L-H transition in JET has beenproposed in (J.G. Cordey et al., NF1995) and implemented in an empiricalJETTO transport model (M. Erba et al.,PPCF, 1997);
� Since then the model has beensuccessfully applied to a number oftransient phenomena.
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
11
� The physics mechanism of theturbulence non-locality originates from:
� Toroidal coupling of unstable vortices,� Inverse non-linear cascade of unstable
modes into long wave length part of thewave spectrum;
� Both mechanisms lead to a formation oflong radially correlated structures(strimmers), which can explain fast non-local change in transport coefficientsduring transient phenomena (F.Romanelli, F. Zonca, PF, 1993; V. Parailet al., NF 1997; Y. Kishimoto et. al.,IAEA, 1998; K. Itoh, S.-I. Itoh, 2001);
� JET transport model assumes that thesource of the turbulence localised nearthe separatrix, so that
sepe
eisBohm T
TqcC
∇⋅⋅⋅≈ 2ρχ
� Next slide shows an example of L-Htransition simulation with JET model;
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
12
Time (s)
JG96
.139
/6c
Pulse No: 31078
Te (
kev)
13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
ρ = 0.33
ρ = 0.50
ρ = 0.66
ρ = 0.76ρ = 0.80
ρ = 0.60
ρ = 0.40
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
13
Time (s)
JG96
.139
/6c
Pulse No: 31078
Te
(kev
)
13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
ρ = 0.33
ρ = 0.50
ρ = 0.66
ρ = 0.76ρ = 0.80
ρ = 0.60
ρ = 0.40
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
14
Profile stiffness.� Profile stiffness is a known concept,
based on theoretical finding that bothelectron and ion anomalous transportincreases rapidly when some plasma
parameters (i
i
T
T∇in case of ITG) exceed
certain limit (F. Romanelli, F. Zonca, PF1993; A. Dimits et. Al., PP 2000);
� Generally, transport coefficient with aprofile stiffness has the following form:
∇−∇
×
∇−∇⋅⋅+=
criti
i
i
i
criti
i
i
iTiiresii
T
T
T
TH
T
T
T
Ta
R
VC
2ρχχ
� Usually R
VC Tiires
i⋅<<
2ρχ , therefore
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
15
transport changes rapidly in the region
criti
i
i
i
T
T
T
T ∇≈∇;
A.Dimits et al., Phys. Plas., 2000
10
12
8
6
4
2
00 5 10 15 20
χ iL n/
ρi2 v
ti
JG01
.337
-1c
R/LTclinR/LTexpt
R/LTi
LLNLGK
Fit to LLNLGK
U. Col GK
1994 IFS/PPPL
1997 PPPL GFL
1998 PPPL GFL
Sydora GK
Weiland QL-ITG
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
16
The figure allows concluding:
� Temperature profile keeps the sameshape in case when heating powerexceeds critical level;
� Core temperature depends on theedge temperature rather than on thelevel of transport;
� Cold pulse can propagate rapidly (likeavalanche) with the characteristic χ
PBi
criti
iTiiHPi T
Ta
R
VC χρχ >>∇⋅⋅≅
2
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
17
� Profile stiffness is a recognisedconcept, which has been found inpractically every tokamak;
0 1 2 3 40.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
q
[M
W/m
]e,
⊥2
∇ T / T [1/m]
JET
ICRH + NBI heating
ρ = 0.4
� The question is whether this conceptcan explain all experimentally observedfast transient phenomena, or we stillneed a non-local transport on the top;
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
18
Profile stiffness vs. non-locality� Before going to a detailed comparison
of two concepts, let us look at somerecent result of cold pulse modellingwhich uses stiff transport models
(J. Kinsey, 2000-01)
� Three theory based transport models(MMM-95, IFS/PPPL and GLF-23) havebeen used to simulate the same recentcold pulse from JET;
5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4
t [s]
ρ=0.19
ρ=0.87
51084
1
3
5
7
5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4
t [s]
ρ=0.12
ρ=0.91
ρ=0.28
ρ=0.36
ρ=0.45
ρ=0.64
ρ=0.84
51084
0
2
4
6
8
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
19
IFS/PPPL
GLF 23
MMM-95
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6 6.1
t [s]
ρ=0.
ρ=0.76
51084 IFS-PPPL1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
6 6.1
t [s]
ρ=0.
ρ=0.76
51084 IFS-PPPL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6 6.1
t [s]
ρ=0.
ρ=0.8
51084 GLF231
2
3
4
5
6
7
6 6.1t [s]
ρ=0.
ρ=0.8
51084 GLF23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6 6.1
t [s]
ρ=0.
ρ=0.8
51084 MM951
2
3
4
5
6
7
6 6.1
t [s]
ρ=0.
ρ=0.8
51084 MM95
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
20
Now we can try to answer the question:“Can we explain all fast transientphenomena by a stiff local transport orwe still need a non-local transport?”
� Stiff models should have a problemreproducing L-H transition (theperturbation should actually reducetransport rather than increase it);
� It will be difficult to reproduceexperimentally observed asymmetry inpropagation of the cold pulse, triggeredat the edge and in the core;
ω (Hz)
χ eff (
m2
/ sec
)
JG96
.139
/13c
00
10
20
30
10 20 30 40
χst
χcp
JET, 1994
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
21
� Very fast cold pulse propagationrequires extremely high level of stiffness,which has only a limited support from thetheory;
Conclusions
� Fast transient phenomena found onJET and other tokamaks make a bigimpact on a theory of plasma turbulence.
� It led to a development of a non-localapproach to plasma turbulence(streamers) as well as to a developmentof stiff local transport models(avalanches);
� A single theoretical model able toreproduce all experimentally observedphenomena (both steady state andtransient) has yet to be found;
� Most probably such a model will be acombination of stiff transport withelements of non-locality in it.
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
22
3.4
3.6
5.0
5.2
3.2
3.0
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.811.48 11.50 11.52 11.54 11.56
Time (s)
Te
(keV
)
JG96
.292
/3c
R = 3.7m
R = 3.4m
R = 3.0m
Pulse No: 31341
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
23
5.4
5.6
5.8
6 ρ =0.2
51554
4.3
4.5
4.7
4.9 ρ =0.3
2.8
3
3.2
3.4 ρ =0.4
2.4
2.6
2.8
3 ρ =0.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3 ρ =0.6
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1 ρ =0.7
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
47.4 47.5 47.6 47.7 47.8
ρ =0.8
t [s]
5.3
5.5
5.7
5.9 ρ =0.22
51554
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8 ρ =0.33
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8 ρ =0.44
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.1 ρ =0.57
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.5 ρ =0.69
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1 ρ =0.76
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
47.4 47.5 47.6 47.7 47.8
ρ =0.84
t [s]
ρ30 i
ITC-12 and APFA’01, December11-14, 2001, Toki, Japan
24