Upload
ann-bruce
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Heart Failure Heart Failure JCAHO Core Measure ProjectJCAHO Core Measure Project
Heart Failure Core Measure Team
Opportunity For ImprovementOpportunity For ImprovementJCAHO identified standardized, evidence based
performance measures “Core Measures” for adult patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of Heart Failure(HF).
The Core Measures support the HF Guidelines defined by the ACC/AHA.
Retroactive chart reviews indicated an opportunity for improvement in process and outcome for each of the HF Core Measures.
LUMC needed to establish a process to meet the JCAHO requirements for reporting quality data.
JCAHO HF Core MeasuresJCAHO HF Core Measures Discharge instructions regarding activity, diet, follow-up,
medications, symptoms worsening, and weight monitoring documented.
Left ventricular function assessment documented.
ACE inhibitor prescribed at discharge for LV systolic dysfunction if no documented contraindication.
Adult Smoking Cessation advice/counseling provided if patient has smoked in last 12 months.
Most Likely Causes for the Most Likely Causes for the Improvement OpportunityImprovement Opportunity
Inconsistent documentation of thought processes, findings, and education provided to patients
All physicians and nurses not aware of the HF guidelines
All physicians and nurses not aware of the resources available to them to assist in provision of and documentation of the highest standard of heart failure care.
Solutions ImplementedSolutions Implemented Task force was formed for strategic planning of data collection and
reporting of the core measures to JCAHO (2/03)
Graduate student piloted the data collection (3/03)
Telemetry/HTU/CCU nurses were educated about the project and need for their assistance. Use of the HF Discharge Instruction form was encouraged.
HF discharge progress note addendum was developed and implemented . (9/03)
Solutions ImplementedSolutions Implemented MIDAS data entry was presented to nursing staff as a clinical ladder
opportunity, and volunteers were trained.
Physicians were encouraged to utilize standardized HF admission orders available in EMR protocols. Physicians were asked to complete the HF discharge progress note addendum
Discharge Progress note addendum was revised to include use of ARB as potential contraindication to ACE Inhibitors
Patient list expanded based on ICD-9 HF codes from DRG 127 (1/04)
Consistent Use of the Heart Failure Discharge Instruction Form by Consistent Use of the Heart Failure Discharge Instruction Form by Nursing Staff Led to Improvement in Discharge InstructionsNursing Staff Led to Improvement in Discharge Instructions
LUHS Heart Failure Patients Receiving Discharge Specific Instructions Prior To DischargeRegarding Activity Level, Diet, Discharge Medications, Follow-up Appointment, Weight
Monitoring, and What to do if Symptoms Worsen
Date
Pilot 1
Sep-0
3(n=
28)
Oct-03
(n=4
8)
Nov-0
3(n=
38)
Dec-0
3(n=
47)
Jan-
04(n
=42)
Feb-0
4(n=
33)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
UCL
Mean
LCL
Nu
rsin
g In
serv
ice
Pro
ges
s N
ote
Ad
den
du
m In
itia
ted
Incr
ease
Use
of
HF
Ord
er S
et
Pe
rce
nt
of
LU
HS
He
art
Fa
ilure
In
pa
tien
ts R
ece
ivin
g A
ll S
ix D
isch
arg
e I
nst
ruct
ion
s
LUHS Heart Failure Patients Receiving Discharge Specific Instructions Prior To DischargeRegarding Activity Level, Diet, Discharge Medications, Follow-up Appointment, Weight
Monitoring, and What to do if Symptoms Worsen
Pilot 1
Mar
-Apr
200
3(n=
26)
Sep-0
3(n=
28)
Oct-03
(n=4
8)
Nov-0
3(n=
38)
Dec-0
3(n=
47)
Jan-
04(n
=42)
Feb-0
4(n=
33)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
UCL
LUHS Mean = 55%
LCL
Nu
rsin
g In
-ser
vice
Pro
gre
ss N
ote
Ad
den
du
m I
nit
iate
d
Incr
ease
Use
of
HF
Ord
er S
et
National Mean Q12003 = 31%
With Use of the Discharge Progress Note Addendum, Documentation of With Use of the Discharge Progress Note Addendum, Documentation of LVF Peaked to a Level of Excellence LVF Peaked to a Level of Excellence
Rat
e of
LU
HS
Hea
rt F
ailu
re In
patie
nts
Rec
eiin
g LV
F A
sses
smen
t
LUHS Heart Failure Inpatients Receiving Left Ventricular Function Assessment
Date
Pilot 1
Mar
-Apr
200
3(n=
29)
Sep-0
3(n=
31)
Oct-03
(n=4
8)
Nov-0
3(n=
44)
Dec-0
3(n=
55)
Jan-
04(n
=53)
Feb-0
4(n=
42)
0.80
0.82
0.84
0.86
0.88
0.90
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.98
1.00 UCL
Mean
LCL
Incr
ease
Use
of
HF
Ord
er S
et
Nu
rsin
g In
serv
ice
Pro
ges
s N
ote
Ad
den
du
m In
itia
ted
Rat
e of
LU
HS
Hea
rt F
ailu
re In
patie
nts
Rec
eivi
ng L
VF
Ass
essm
ent
LUHS Heart Failure Inpatients Receiving Left Ventricular Function Assessment
Pilot 1
Mar
-Apr
200
3(n=
29)
Sep-0
3(n=
31)
Oct-03
(n=4
8)
Nov-0
3(n=
44)
Dec-0
3(n=
55)
Jan-
04(n
=53)
Feb-0
4(n=
42)
80%
82%
84%
86%
88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%UCL
LUHS Mean = 96%
LCL
Incr
ease
Use
of
HF
Ord
er S
et
Nu
rsin
g In
-ser
vice
Pro
gre
ss N
ote
Ad
den
du
m In
itia
ted
National Mean Q12003 = 84%
Opportunity Exists in Smoking Cessation CounselingOpportunity Exists in Smoking Cessation CounselingR
ate
of
LU
HS
HF
In
pa
tien
t S
mo
kers
Re
ceiv
ing
Sm
oki
ng
Ce
ssa
tion
Co
un
selin
g
LUHS Heart Failure Inpatient Smokers Receiving Smoking Cessation Counseling
Date
Pilot 1
Mar
-Apr
200
3(n=
4)
Sep-0
3(n=
6)
Oct-03
(n=1
0)
Nov-0
3(n=
4)
Dec-0
3(n=
10)
Jan-
04(n
=7)
Feb-0
4(n=
7)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 UCL
Mean
LCL
Nu
rsin
g In
serv
ice
Pro
ges
s N
ote
Ad
den
du
m In
itia
ted
Incr
ease
Use
of
HF
Ord
er S
et
Pe
rce
nt
of
LU
HS
HF
In
pa
tien
t S
mo
kers
Re
ceiv
ing
Sm
oki
ng
Ce
ssa
tion
Co
un
selin
g
LUHS Heart Failure Inpatient Smokers Receiving Smoking Cessation Counseling
Pilot 1
Mar
-Apr
200
3(n=
4)
Sep-0
3(n=
6)
Oct-03
(n=1
0)
Nov-0
3(n=
4)
Dec-0
3(n=
10)
Jan-
04(n
=7)
Feb-0
4(n=
7)0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%UCL
LUHS Mean = 58%
LCL
Nu
rsin
g In
-ser
vice
Pro
gre
ss N
ote
Ad
den
du
m In
itia
ted
Incr
ease
Use
of
HF
Ord
er S
et
National Mean Q12003 = 47%
Opportunity Exists in Prescribing ACEI for LVSDOpportunity Exists in Prescribing ACEI for LVSDor for Better Documentation of Contraindications or for Better Documentation of Contraindications
Pe
rce
nt
of
HF
In
pa
tien
ts w
ith L
VS
D R
ece
ivin
g A
CE
I P
resc
riptio
n a
t D
isch
arg
e
LUHS Heart Failure Inpatients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and No Known ACE Inhibitor Contraindications Receiving ACE Inhibitor at Discharge
Janu
ary-
04
Febru
ary-
04
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Further Study/ActionFurther Study/ActionEncourage use of HF Discharge Instruction form, Progress
Note addendum and standardized HF admission orders. – Continue improvement in discharge instructions– Improve documentation of ACE Inhibitor contraindications to
improve reported outcomes.– Continue exceptional Left Ventricular Function Assessment
performance.
Continue education of staff to improve performance, process, and outcome.