Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Health Canada’sHealthy Eating StrategyMaking the healthier choice, the easier choice
Nutrition Symbols, Other Labelling Provisions, Partially Hydrogenated
Oils and Vitamin D in Canada Gazette, Part I
March 1, 2018
Introduction of moderator
2
Élaine De Grandpré
Manager
Bureau of Nutritional Sciences
Food Directorate
Outline
Introduction (5 minutes)
Proposed regulations on front-of-package nutrition labelling (25 minutes)
Questions (10 minutes)
Other proposed amendments and transitional provisions (25 minutes)
▪ Amendments to nutrition and health claims
▪ Amendments to vitamin D fortification
▪ Consequential amendments related to the prohibition of partially hydrogenated oils
▪ Amendments to high-intensity sweetener labelling
▪ Transitional provisions
Conclusions and next steps (5 minutes)
Questions (10 minutes)
3
Introduction of speaker
4
Susan SinclairSenior Project Coordinator
Bureau of Nutritional Sciences
Food Directorate
Health Canada
Proposed Regulations on Front-of-Package Nutrition Symbols
5
1. Provide consumers with quick and easy guidance on foods
that are high in sodium, sugars and/or saturated fat
186
FOP nutrition symbol objectives
2. Encourage manufacturers
to offer foods lower in
sodium, sugars and/or
saturated fat
Proposed FOP symbol options
7
Proposed FOP symbol options
Thresholds for use
Basis for thresholds
The amount of a food that will be used as a basis for the thresholds is proposed to be the largest (in grams) of:
• the reference amount;
• the serving size that appears in the Nutrition Facts table; or
• 50 g of the food*
* if its serving size and reference amount are less than 50 g or mL and the % DV of the nutrient in a serving and reference amount of the food is 5% or more
** Daily Values for children aged 1 to 4 years are lower than those for the general population
9
Sodium Sugars Sat Fat
Prepackaged foods 15% DV
(350 mg)
15% DV
(15 g)
15% DV
(3 g)
Foods intended solely for children 1 to 4
years of age**
15% DV
(230 mg)
15% DV
(8 g)
15% DV
(1.5 g)
Proposed thresholds for requiring a FOP nutrition symbol
B.01.350
Thresholds for use
10
Basis
Reference amount:250 mL
Serving size in the NFt:200 mL
50 g of the food
Basis
Reference amount:30 g
Serving size in the NFt:45 g
50 g of the food
B.01.350
Foods with small reference amounts
On back of package:
Use Serving Size
Per tbsp• 11 g of
sugars (11% DV)
11
B.01.350(2)(a)Does the product contain ≥ 5% of the DV per serving or reference amount of a nutrient of concern?
Use 50g
Per 50 g • 28 g of
sugars (28% DV)
(< 50 g or 50 mL)
Yes No
Foods with small reference amounts
On back of package:
12
B.01.350(2)(a)
Use Serving Size
Per tsp• 55 mg of
sodium (2% DV)
Does the product contain ≥ 5% of the DV per serving or reference amount of a nutrient of concern?
Use 50g
Per 50 g • 520 mg of
sodium (23 % DV)
Yes No
(< 50 g or 50 mL)
Exemption from the small reference amount adjustment (for saturated fat)
13
B.01.350(3)
Examples include:
Nuts / nut butters Seeds Vegetable oils
“if no more than 30% of the total fat content of a prepackaged product is composed of saturated fat and trans fat, the percentage of the daily value of saturated fat is calculated on the basis of the amount of saturated fat, by weight, per serving of stated size or per reference amount, whichever is greater”
If the sugar and/or sodium threshold is met, an FOP symbol will be
required on these foods
Use the greater of serving size or reference amount
Does the product contain ≥ 5% of the DV per serving or reference amount of saturated fat?
Use 50g
Yes No
Is the total fat content of the product 30% saturated fat or less?
Yes
No
Definitions - B.01.001(1)
Prepackaged Meal [revised]: a single-serving prepackaged product that requires no preparation other than heating and that contains a minimum of one reference amount of food from specific food categories (specified in the regulations) and is represented or sold as a meal
Main Dish [new]: a prepackaged product that requires no preparation other than heating and that contains a reference amount of food from each of at least two categories of food (specified in the regulations) and is represented or sold as a major component of a meal, other than beverages and desserts
Prepackaged meals and main dishes
Sodium Sugars Sat Fat
30% DV
(690 mg)
30% DV
(30 g)
30% DV
(6 g)
Thresholds - B.01.350
Exemptions from carrying an FOP symbol
Foods exempt from the requirement to display a Nutrition Facts tableFor example:
• foods sold at farmers’ markets• raw, single cut meats, poultry and fish
Foods for which there is evidence for health protection either for the general population, or for vulnerable subpopulationsFor example:
• fruits and vegetables without added ingredients • plain milk (2%, 3.25%)• whole eggs, fresh or in liquid, frozen or dried form• individual rations for use in military operations
Foods on which the FOP nutrition symbol would be redundantFor example:
• sugar• maple syrup• table salt
B.01.350(3)-B.01.350(5)
15
Prohibitions from carrying an FOP symbol
16
A prepackaged product intended solely for infants six months of age
to less than one year of age (Division 25)
A formulated liquid diet
A human milk substitute (Division 25)
A food represented as containing a human milk substitute (Division 25)
A food represented for use in a very low energy diet
Other Division 24 regulated products will be required to carry an FOP
symbol. These include:
Meal replacements
Nutritional supplements
Prepackaged meals and foods sold by weight reduction clinics
B.01.350(6)
Symbol size and principal display surface
B.01.352 and table following
17
B.01.352 and table following
Symbol size and principal display surface
Presentation of FOP symbolB.01.351 - B.01.354
19
Directory of Nutrition Symbol Formats
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consultation-front-of-package-nutrition-labelling-cgi/directory-of-nutrition-symbol-formats.html
[Range: 1.5 mm – 3.5 mm]
Buffer zone
20
B.01.355(3),B.01.355(4)
Language
B.01.351(2)
21
B.01.355 (1)(b), B.01.355 (2)
Location of nutrition symbol
22
B.01.355(1)(a)
Location of nutrition symbol
23
Assortments and packaged ingredients
Prepackaged product that contains an assortment of foods:
➢ The nutrition symbol or symbols must clearly indicate, for each food, the nutrients that meet or exceed the applicable threshold
Prepackaged product that contains separately packaged ingredients or foods that are intended to be consumed together:
➢ The nutrition symbol must display the nutrients that meet or exceed the applicable threshold for the product as a whole
B.01.353 - B.01.354
24
Claims placement
Nutrition symbol must be on the top 25% of this package’s principal display panel (PDP)
Other claims/statements must be made on the bottom 65% of this package’s PDP
25
B.01.301(4), B.01.311(6), B.01.357(1), B.01.501.1(1), B.01.600.1(1), D.01.001.2(1)
Claims placement
Nutrition symbol must be in the right-most 25% of this package’s
PDP
Other claims/statements must be displayed on the
left 65% of this package’s PDP
26
B.01.301(4), B.01.311(6), B.01.357(1), B.01.501.1(1), B.01.600.1(1), D.01.001.2(1)
Claims size
27
As displayed in the Directory of Nutrition Symbol Formats
B.01.301(5), B.01.311(7), B.01.357(2), B.01.501.1(2), B.01.600.1(2), D.01.001.2(2)
Proposed Amendments to Nutrition Claims and Statements
28
Nutrient content claims
Table of Permitted Nutrient Content Statements and Claims B.01.513
The table following section B.01.513 will be repealed from the FDR and incorporated by reference as the Table of Permitted Nutrient Content Statements and Claims.
Amendments to certain nutrient content claims and health claims
Claim Section of FDR
Sugars-related nutrient content claims
Table of Permitted Nutrient Content Statements and Claims: Items 37, 37.1, 40 and 40.1
Addition of synonyms to 3 “free of” claims
Table of Permitted Nutrient Content Statements and Claims: Items 18, 22 and 37
Beverages with 0-0.5% alcohol B.01.502(2)(j)
Foods intended solely for young children
B.01.502(2)(g), B.01.503(2), B.01.601(1)(c)(i)
Foods represented for use in a sodium restricted diet
B.01.508
Sugars-related nutrient content claims
30
No added sugars
Current status
“No added sugars" claim is intended to be used on foods which do not contain added sugars, ingredients containing added sugars, or ingredients that contain sugars that functionally substitute for "added sugars“
Proposal
Update condition to align with the recent changes to the labelling of sugars in the list of ingredients and the proposed FOP nutrition labelling initiative
Sugars-related nutrient content claims
Claim Health Canada proposal Rationale
Free of sugars Change condition from “free of energy” to “low in energy”
Allow claim on foods contributing small amounts of energy to align with Canada’s major trading partners
Unsweetened (allowed on foods that do not contain sweeteners)
Move from B.01.509 to the new Table and Repeal of B.01.509
Necessary to move the claim to the new Table as the table following B.01.513 will be repealed from the FDR
Low in sugars New claim for foods with≤5 g sugars (5% Daily Value or DV) per serving and per reference amount*
Encourage the availability of more foods that would help Canadians limit their intake of sugars
*If the reference amount is 30 g or 30 mL or less, the food must contain ≤5 g sugars per 50 g and if the food is a pre-packaged meal, it must contain ≤5 g sugars per 100 g
31
Current status
Quantitative declarations (0 g) is permitted outside of the Nutrition Facts table, even when the food doesn’t meet all the conditions of use for the “free of” claims for:
– saturated fat
– trans fat
– sugars
Proposal
Health Canada is proposing to add the following synonyms to the "free of" claims for the respective nutrients:
"0 g (naming the nutrient)"
"zero g (naming the nutrient)"
"0 gram (naming the nutrient)"
"zero gram (naming the nutrient)“
Addition of synonyms to three “free of” claims
32
Current status
There are restrictions on the representation of the amount of alcohol in beverages containing less than 0.5% alcohol
Proposal
Replace the current B.01.502(2)(j) with “a representation that characterizes the amount of alcohol in a beverage”
Beverages with 0-0.5% alcohol
33
B.01.502(2)(j)
Foods intended solely for young children
Current status
References to "food intended solely for children under two years of age" in the FDR do not reflect the change in age range for young children published in the 2016 nutrition labelling regulations
Proposal
Amend applicable sections of the regulations to reflect the new age range: i.e., “food intended solely for children under four years of age”
34
B.01.502(2)(g), B.01.503(2), B.01.601(1)(c)(i)
Claims affectedCurrent
requirementHealth Canada
proposal
• Protein related nutrient content claims: source, excellent, more [B.01.503(2)(a)-(c)]
• No added sodium or salt [B.01.503(2)(d)]
• No added sugars [B.01.503(2)(e)]
• Health claim prohibition [B.601(1)(c)(i)]
Food intended solely for children under two years of age
Food intended solely for children under four years of age
• Starch content claim [B.01.502(2)(g)]
Food intended solely for children under two years of age
Food intended solely for infants six months of age or older but less than one year of age
35
Foods intended solely for young children
B.01.502(2)(g), B.01.503(2), B.01.601(1)(c)(i)
Current status
A food for use in a sodium-restricted diet may use claims such as “free of sodium or salt”, “low in sodium or salt”, “reduced in sodium or salt”, or “lower in sodium or salt”
Proposal
Add a provision that, when a food is required to carry a nutrition symbol referring to “high in” sodium, it will not be permitted to represent the food for use in a sodium-restricted diet, even when the food may make a claim about “reduced in sodium or salt”, or “lower in sodium or salt”
Foods represented for use in a sodium restricted diet
36
B.01.508
Proposed Updates to theLabelling of Four
High-Intensity Sweeteners
37
Regulatory context
• High intensity sweeteners, which are used as “sugar substitutes”, are regulated as food additives in Canada
• As food additives, their use is subject to pre-market approval to ensure that they are safe and that they achieve the claimed technical effect
• As with any food additive, the presence of sweeteners must be indicated in the food’s list of ingredients (LOI)
Current labelling requirements
Declaration on
the principal
display panel
Aspartame
content in mg
per serving
Statement to
the effect that
aspartame
contains
phenylalanine
39
New labelling requirements
Declaration on the
principal display
panel is no longer
required
The mandatory
statement appears in
bold and at the end
of the LOI, making it
more noticeable and
easier to locate.
Aspartame remains
in the list of
ingredients (LOI),
but its quantity is
no longer required
40
Why the change?
• These sweeteners have an established history of safe use in Canada
• Other high-intensity sweeteners and ingredients of concern (e.g., priority allergens) are not subject to such additional labelling requirements
• Health-based rationale exists for additional labelling for aspartame, but not for the other three sweeteners
➢ The mandatory declaration in the list of ingredients is sufficient to identify the presence of these sweeteners
• Technical challenges to label design, particularly for small or irregularly-shaped packages
• Canada is inconsistent with other regulatorsUSA, UK, EU, and Australia/New Zealand do not require a PDP declaration or declaration of content in mg for any sweeteners
Prohibiting Partially Hydrogenated Oils:
Consequential Amendments
42
Current regulatory context
• September 15, 2017: Health Canada published a regulatory Notice of Modification (NOM) confirming its decision to prohibit the use of partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs) – the main source of industrially produced trans fats in foods.
• The prohibition will be implemented on September 15 2018, by adding PHOs to Part 1 of the incorporated List of Contaminants and Other Adulterating Substances in Foods.
Consequential amendments
• Certain consequential amendments to the Food and Drug Regulations are needed to ensure coherence between the prohibition provided in the incorporated list and related provisions prescribed in the Food and Drug Regulations.
• Types of amendments:
– Prescribe definitions
– Repeal references to PHOs from certain regulatory provisions
– Amend references to hydrogenated/hydrogenation to specify “fully” hydrogenated / “full” hydrogenation
Proposed Amendments to Vitamin D Fortification
45
Increasing vitamin D in the food supply will help bring us closer to our public health goal for Canadians:
➢ To promote adequate bone health, by minimizing risk of deficiency without incurring risk of excessive intakes
Vitamin D fortification
Background on vitamin D
• Helps the body use calcium and phosphorus to maintain strong bones and teeth
• Obtained from food and supplements and can be made by the body after exposure to sunlight
➢ Fortified foods, primarily milk, are the major dietary source
• Meeting current intake recommendations through food is challenging
• ~20% of Canadians at risk of inadequacy ~8% are at risk of deficiency
➢ Rates higher in subpopulations at risk
46
Food Provisions Current Vitamin D
ProposedVitamin D
Milk
B.08.003-005B.08.007B.08.010-014B.08.016-020B.08.023B.08.026B.08.029
0.9 to 1.2 µg per 100 mL
[300 to 400 IU per Reasonable Daily
Intake]
2 µg per 100 mL
or
5 µg per 250 mL (250 mL = reference amount or serving)
Margarine B.09.016 13.3 to 17.5 µg per 100 g
[530 to 690 IU per 100 g]
26 µg per 100 g
or
2.6 µg per 10 g(10 g = reference amount or serving)
Vitamin D fortification
Proposed FDR amendments
47
Vitamin D levels in milk Vitamin D levels in margarine
Current2.3 µg/250 mL
Proposed5 µg/250 mL
Current1.3 µg/10 g
Proposed2.6 µg/10 g
Daily value45% 100% 25% 50%
5 µg (former)
20 µg (new)13% 25% 8% 13%
Representation of the %DV in the Nutrition Facts table
Vitamin D fortification
Vitamin D fortification
Two-phased Fortification Strategy
↑ Mandatory levels of vitamin D in:
MILKand
MARGARINE
Consider permitting optional addition of vitamin D to suitable vehicles based on popularity of consumption in subpopulations
at risk
Permit fortification of YOGURT and fortified
PLANT BASED BEVERAGEat the same level being proposed
for milk
Phase1
Phase2
A
B
Approach recognizes the important contribution of milk and margarine to those who consume them
Approach recognizes the increasing popularity of yogurt and the consumption of fortified plant based beverages as an alternative to milk
Approach recognizes the diversity of dietary patterns
49
(As needed)
Coming Into Force & Transitional Provisions
50
Milestones and next steps
FEBRUARY 10, 2018
Notice of Proposal published: Nutrition Labelling - Table of Permitted Nutrient Content Statements and Claims
FEBRUARY 10 – APRIL 26, 2018
Nutrition Symbol online consultation
WINTER-SPRING, 2018
FOP consumer research
Notice of Modification published: FOP nutrition symbol
Notice of Modification published: Nutrition Labelling - Table of Permitted Nutrient Content Statements and Claims
FEBRUARY 10, 2018
Publication in Canada Gazette, Part I: Nutrition symbols, other labelling provisions, partially hydrogenated oils and vitamin D
APRIL 26, 2018
Canada Gazette, Part I consultation period closes
SPRING-SUMMER, 2018
Additional stakeholder engagement
Project Milestones Partially Hydrogenated OilsClaimsFront-of-package labelling
51
SEPTEMBER 15, 2017
Notice of Modification: Prohibiting the Use of Partially Hydrogenated Oils (PHOs) in Foods
Vitamin D
SEPTEMBER 15, 2018
PHO Prohibition comes into force DECEMBER 2022
Transition period ends
FALL 2018
Publication in Canada Gazette, Part II: Nutrition symbols, other labelling provisions, partially hydrogenated oils and vitamin D
SPRING 2020
Amendments to vitamin D fortification come into force
Front-of-package nutrition labelling consultation
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consultation-front-of-package-nutrition-labelling-cgi.html
Front-of-Package Nutrition Symbol Consumer Consultation
https://www.healthyeatingconsultations.ca/
Thank you for your participation
52
For more information