Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Health hazards arising from global transport of goods
Xaver Baur1, Lygia T. Budnik2, Stefan Kloth2, Alexandra M. Preisser2, Heidi Schwarzenbach3
1 Institute for Occupational Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité‐School of Medicine Berlin, Germany. [email protected]
2 Institute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine, Department of Occupational Health, School of Medicine, University of Hamburg, Germany
3 Department of Tumor Biology. School of Medicine, University of Hamburg,
Charité – University Medicine BerlinInstitute for Occupational Medicine
Prof. Dr. med. X. Baur
International transport of consumer goods has increased
during the last two decades
Importing countries require that freight containers should be fumigated by methyl bromid or heat-treated in order to hinter the word wide pest
distribution (IPSM 15)
Hamburg 9 Millionen TEU(2015:18 Millionen)
Rotterdam:11 Millionen TEU
Hazard identification
Container fumigation in India
A crew member was found dead in his cabin one day after a cargo fumigation
BUDNIK
17.11.2004Port workers to be tested for methyl bromide levelsFour Nelson widows, whose husbands died from the degenerative brain
disorder motor neurone disease after years of working for businesses based at the port, are calling for the inquiry. „
Fatalities: pulmonary edema, hemorrhages throughout the body, shrunken brain cells, heart, liver, kidney damage (4 days after 30 min exposure)
Chronic Disorders: mainly respiratory and neurological
Databank www.EOMsociety.orgPatients with Fumigant Intoxications
Aim of our study:
evaluate possible health risks due to toxic chemical residues in containers to:
seafarers, dock workers, container unloaders: transport/warehouse/ storage room workers, controlling bodies (inspecting bodies, customs, water police etc.), and bystanders.
Exposure in container atmosphere could be associated with increased health risk for those entering the container
LTBLTB
BUDNIK
Air measurement of closed container units (ports of Rotterdam and Hamburg)
2006-2012: ~ 5000 Container Units
• field studies (on site devices)• validated lab analyses (TD-GCMS)(also screen for adopted MeBr alternatives)
X. Baur, B. Poschadel, L.T. Budnik Occup. Environ. Med., 67 (2010) 207-212L.T. Budnik, S. Fahrenholtz, S. Kloth, X. Baur J. Environ. Monit. 12 (2010) 936-942.
ChinaSE Asia
Indian Subcontinent
South AmericaEurope & N‐ America
Middle East Africaothers
most
least
Percentage of fumigant residues (for at least one of seven major fumigants and/or toxic industrial chemicals)
Highest concentrations found (single units):
methyl bromide: 750,000 ppb (750 x occupational exposure limit)phosphine: 1,100,000 ppb (11,000 x occupational exposure limit)1,2 dichloroethane: 450,000 ppb (450 x occupational exposure limit)(ethylene dichloride)benzene: 800,000 ppb (800 x occupational exposure limit)toluene: 110,000,000 ppb (2,500 x occupational exposure limit)
70 % exceed community exposure levels chronic RELs, OEHHA
35 % exceed occupational exposure limits acute RELs, NIOSH
0.6 % exceed IDLH (Immediately Dangerous for Life or Health, NIOSH)
products fromfumigated container
products fromfumigated container
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 10000 20000 30000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 3000 6000 9000 12000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
propylene dichloride
propylene dichloride
propylene dichloride
propylene dichloride
Measurement data of 4 shoe containers
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 200000 400000 600000 800000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene dichloridetetrachloro-methane
carbon disulfidechloropicrin
benzene toluene
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 40000 80000 120000 160000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 10000 20000 30000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 200 400 600 800 1000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 25000 50000 75000 100000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 3000 6000 9000 12000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 20000 40000 60000 80000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
ethylene dichloridemethyl bromide
methylene chloride propylene
tetrachloro-methanecarbon disulfide
chloropicrinbenzene
toluene
05000
10000150002000025000
Sulfuryldifluorid
Methylbromid
Schwefelko
hlenstoff
1,2-Dichloret
hanBenzolToluol
Chlorpikrin XChlormethan
Dichlorm
ethan
1,1-Dichloret
han
Trichlormethan
Tetrachlorm
1,2-Dic
1 day in the emission chamber
Cocoa butterCocoa butter
ppb
methyl bromide
24,161 ppb= 94 mg/m3
(mit Headspace‐Analyse GC‐MS)
7.6 mg methyl bromide/ g product
additional analysismethyl bromide in the product
Findings (I)• Fumigation is becoming a standard procedure,
especially in Asia• Fumigated containers are usually not de-fumigated• Other fumigants than methyl bromide are used • Usually no labeling
There is a need for a panel of suitable effect biomarkers for detection of such endangering chemical exposures
Budnik et al., 2013 PLoS ONE 8(5)
. Cell‐free DNA may provide information from intoxicated organs
Data from: Budnik et al., 2013 PLoS ONE 8(5)
Exposure was associated with elevated serum levels of circulating 79 bp mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA‐79)
serum mtDNA‐79 level serum mtDNA‐79 level
All exposed vs ControlsMeBr exposed vs Controls
Data from: Budnik et al., 2013 PLoS ONE 8(5)
serum mtDNA integrity
p=0.0158
serum mtDNA-230 levelp=0.005
The increased integrity of mtDNA (mtDNA-230/mtDNA-79) in exposed individuals implicates apoptotic processes.
Findings (II)Findings (II)
Our findings• show enhanced hemoglobin adducts and cell free
mtDNA levels (esp. -79) in workers exposed to halogenated hydrocarbon pesticides
• corraborate the data showing increased mtDNA in patients exposed to low levels of benzene (<100 ppb)
Our findings• show enhanced hemoglobin adducts and cell free
mtDNA levels (esp. -79) in workers exposed to halogenated hydrocarbon pesticides
• corraborate the data showing increased mtDNA in patients exposed to low levels of benzene (<100 ppb)
• indicate that mitochondrial DNA has a potential to serve as a biomarker recognizing vulnerable risk groups after exposure to toxic/carcinogenic chemicals
• indicate that mitochondrial DNA has a potential to serve as a biomarker recognizing vulnerable risk groups after exposure to toxic/carcinogenic chemicals
Conclusion: Urgent need for action- to rise awareness of enterprises and endangered
workers- to measure before entering an import container (or
ventilate for at least 6 hours)- to improve regulations at national and international
levels- for controls and sanctions if regulations are not
followed- for medical surveillance of exposed workers- for detailed ongoing studies on the changing toxic
airborne load of import containers and freightand the potential health risk especially of vulnerable consumers
Foto
: Jan
a Fi
sche
r, Zf
AM
Internet search from: 28.05.2009AgriSeek.com