Upload
nicholas-ray
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Health Care Transition and Glycemic Control in Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes
Katharine Garvey MD MPH
Children’s Hospital Boston Transition SymposiumBoston, MA
April 27, 2012
Background• Focus on U.S. health care transition for type 1 diabetes
(T1D)• Recent projects
– Qualitative focus group analysis of young adults with T1D currently receiving adult care at specialty clinic
– Survey of young adults with T1D currently receiving adult care at specialty clinic
Focus of today’s presentation
– Survey of young adults with T1D who previously received pediatric diabetes care at tertiary care center
– National survey of adult endocrinologists
Type 1 Diabetes • An intensive level of daily
self-management is required for optimal control in type 1 diabetes (T1D)
• Patient is truly at the center of his/her care
• Young adults with type 1 diabetes are at high risk for poor diabetes outcomes
Current Diabetes Transitions??
Pediatric Care
Faith, Trust, and Pixie Dust
Adult Care
Slide courtesy of Nissa Askins
Transition in Type 1 DiabetesTransition in Type 1 Diabetes• Studies in Canada and Europe have shown
– Significant delays in care– Decreased adult follow-up visits– Increased post-transition DM hospitalizations– Patient dissatisfaction with transition process
• Emerging work in transition readiness assessment, transition coordination in pediatrics
• Few data on transition quality or post-transition outcomes
• Few U.S. data
Specific Aims – Survey Study• Describe characteristics of health care transition in a
large group of young adults with type 1 diabetes
• Evaluate the association between health care transition factors and glycemic control
• Determine patient-related and health-care related factors associated with glycemic control
Hypotheses
• Young adults with inadequate transition preparation are more likely to report a prolonged gap between pediatric and adult diabetes care
• Young adults with inadequate transition preparation are more likely to have suboptimal current glycemic control
Methods• Developed an 85-item survey to evaluate the
transition experiences of young adults with T1D
• Survey developed based on – Extensive literature search of published transition data,
both in T1D and other chronic illnesses
– Qualitative data from focus groups of young adults with T1D
– Conceptual model
– Content validity via expert review
– Cognitive testing with young adult T1D patients
Survey Domains
• Diabetes history• Characteristics of pediatric vs. adult diabetes care• Reasons for transition• Transition timing, preparation, satisfaction,
barriers• Current support system, diabetes self-care• Demographics
MethodsMethods• Inclusion Criteria:
– Current age 22-30 years old – T1D diagnosed at < 18 yrs old & while in pediatric care– Now followed in the Adult Clinic at the Joslin Diabetes
Center
• Survey sent in 3 mail waves between January and March 2011
• Electronic web option, reminder phone calls• Token gift + iPad2 incentive
Results
11
Survey Sent to n = 512
Completed Surveys n = 258
Denominator n = 484
Response Rate = 53%
12 undeliverable + 16 ineligible
Respondent Characteristics
Characteristic Mean ± SD or %
Current age 26.7 ± 2.4 years
Male 38%
Caucasian 92%
Diabetes duration 16.7 ± 5.5 years
Age at transition to adult diabetes care 19.5 ± 2.9 years
Most recent HbA1c (measured) 8.1 ± 1.3
Highest education ≥ college 81%
Private insurance 90%
Results
"Most Important" Reason for Transition
28
25
17 16
12
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Too old forpediatrics
Providersuggestion
College Didn't like pediprovider
Moved Parent suggestion
% R
esp
ond
ents
Results
Time Lapse Between Pediatric and Adult Diabetes Care
18
47
23
84
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
≤ 3 months 4-6 months 7-12 months 13-24 months > 24 months
% R
espo
nden
ts
35% over 6 months
Results
18
40
23
116
2
19
41
1913
62
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
≤7% 7.1-8.0% 8.1-9.0% 9.1-10.0% 10.1-12.0% >12%
% R
espo
nden
ts
A1c
Respondent A1c Values
Pre-Transition A1cMost Recent A1c
ADA Target < 7%
Results
Transition Preparation
78
69
61
4946
1410 9
0
25
50
75
100
Pedi visitswithout parent
Discussscreening tests
Discussindependentmanagement
Adult providerrec
Adult providercontact info
Transitionvisit
Meet newadult provider
beforetransition
Writtentransitionmaterials
% R
espo
nden
ts
• 8 survey items were developed to assess specific transition preparation
Transition Preparation
• “Yes” responses to all of the specific preparation items were highly correlated (p<0.05) with overall report of “mostly” or “completely” prepared
• This overall question was used as a dichotomous variable in analyses
Results
57
24
38
26
2
13
21
37
27
0
10
20
30
40
50
Completely Un Mostly Un Neutral Mostly Completely
% R
espo
nden
ts
Preparation and Satisfaction
PreparedSatisfied
*Mostly/Completely prepared/satisfied are highly correlated, p < 0.0001
Gaps Between Pediatric/Adult Care
Factors Associated with a Prolonged Gap > 6 months Between Pediatric and Adult CareVariable Multivariate model
Odds Ratio [95% CI]
Mostly/Completely prepared for transition 0.47 [0.25,0.88]
Pediatric A1c in year prior to transition (%) 1.18 [0.95,1.48]
Age at transition (years) 0.95 [0.86,1.06]
Education = college or greater 1.08 [0.48,2.43]
Male 0.98 [0.53,1.82]
≥ 3 pediatric visits in year prior to transition 0.35 [0.19,0.63]
Young Adult HbA1c
* Also conducted sensitivity analysis in those who transitioned in the last 3 years
Variable Multivariate modelBeta (S.E.), p-value
Mostly/Completely prepared for transition -0.18 (0.16), p = 0.27
Pediatric A1c in year prior to transition (%) 0.49 (0.06), p < 0.0001
Age at transition (years) -0.008 (0.03), p = 0.77
Current Age (years) -0.08 (0.03), p = 0.025
Education college or greater -0.53 (0.21), p = 0.01
Male -0.14 (0.16), p = 0.38
Married 0.06 (0.21), p = 0.77
Living with parents -0.28 (0.23), p = 0.24
Living alone 0.13 (0.23), p = 0.56
Medicaid 0.17 (0.30), p = 0.57
Limitations• Non-response bias• Recall bias• Generalizability – highly educated, relatively
advantaged population who have found their way to JDC
• Unmeasured factors associated with transition and A1c in young adulthood, e.g. self-determination, resilience
Conclusions• Report of suboptimal preparation for transition is
associated with a prolonged > 6 month gap between pediatric and adult care
• Surprisingly, in multivariate analyses, transition preparation is not significantly associated with young adult HbA1c– Strong influence of pre-transition A1c, level of education
• Data suggest that “typical” transition preparation activities do not have a major positive influence
• Future work should examine interventions to– Empower patients to transition more effectively– Improve provider handoffs and young adult-centered care in
pediatric and adult diabetes clinic settings
Acknowledgements• Harvard Pediatric Health Services Research
Fellowship (AHRQ T32 HS000063-17)• Jonathan Finkelstein MD, MPH• Howard Wolpert, MD• Joseph Wolfsdorf MB, BCh• Erinn Rhodes MD, MPH• Ken Kleinman PhD• Lori Laffel MD, MPH• Meg Beste, BA