View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
1/24
HEALTH CARE IN DANGERMAKING THE CASE
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
2/24
International Committee of the Red Cross
19, avenue de la Paix
1202 Geneva, Switzerland
T +41 22 734 60 01 F +41 22 733 20 57
E-mail: [email protected] www.icrc.org
ICRC, August 2011
Front cover: Atef Safadi An ambulance flls with tear gas shot into it during a demonstration.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
3/24
HEALTH CARE IN DANGERMAKING THE CASE
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
4/244
A VITAL CONCERN OF
THE INTERNATIONAL
RED CROSS AND RED
CRESCENT MOVEMENT
During the aternoon o 7 January 2009, personnel
rom the International Committee o the Red Cross
(ICRC) and the Palestine Red Crescent Society made
a shocking discovery in a house in the Zaytun neigh-
bourhood o Gaza City: our young children crouched
beside the lieless bodies o their mothers. The house
had been shelled our days earlier, yet the ambulance
teams had not been permitted to reach the victims. By
the time they arrived, twelve corpses lay on the oor o
the room and the children were too weak to stand. Sol-
diers at a nearby checkpoint had oered no assistance
to the injured and ordered the ambulances to turn back
once they reached the devastating scene. The ambu-
lance crews disobeyed and rescued the survivors.
Less than one month later, in northern Sri Lanka, the
Puthukkudiyiruppu hospital in the Vanni region was
shelled, killing and wounding many o the 500 patients
seeking treatment in the last unctioning hospital o
the war-torn north. The hospital compound sustainedtwo direct hits and had to be evacuated. The patients
were transerred to a community centre that had no
potable water.
In September o the same year, soldiers entered the
Ghazi Mohammed Khan Hospital in the Wardak prov-
ince o Aghanistan late one night, searching or a
wounded enemy combatant. Unsuccessul in their
search, they rounded up the sta and ordered them to
report the presence o enemy ghters seeking treat-
ment. When the sta reused, citing medical ethics,
the soldiers threatened them at gunpoint, saying
they would be killed i they did not comply. Several
members o the sta quit their jobs ater this incident,
too araid to return to work.
And in December 2009, a man blew himsel up at a
university graduation ceremony in the Somali capital,
Mogadishu, killing medical students who had studied
hard to help pull their country rom suering and
despair wrought by two decades o civil war. This was
only the second batch o medical graduates to emerge
in the last twenty years, depriving the Somali people o
desperately needed doctors.
These our incidents rom our dierent conicts
in 2009 represent the tip o the iceberg: attacks on
health-care acilities, health-care personnel and medi-
cal vehicles, and impediments to the wounded and
the sick reaching health-care services have become
common in conicts and upheavals all over the world.
And they provoke ar-reaching secondary conse-
quences as health-care proessionals ee their posts,
hospitals close, and vaccination campaigns come to a
halt. These knock-on eects leave entire communities
without access to adequate services. Violence, both
actual and threatened, against patients and health-
care workers and acilities is one o the most crucial yet
overlooked humanitarian issues o today.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
5/245
ChristopherMorris/VII
Rr Ds dr
Providing assistance to the wounded, regardless o
the side on which they ought, is the idea that gave
birth to the International Red Cross and Red Crescent
Movement over 150 years ago on the blood-stained
battleeld o Solerino, Italy. Henry Dunant, a Swiss
businessman, witnessed the carnage o June 1859
and horried at the suering mobilized the local
townsolk to help the injured with no consideration asto whether they were rom the Austrian or the French
side. Tutti ratelli they are all brothers was the
rerain as the 40,000 soldiers who lay wounded or
dying were oered common decency as human beings:
some water to quench their thirst, a clean bandage to
dress a wound, a last word home so that a mother,
wie or daughter would know what became o her son,
husband or ather.
From these humble beginnings emerged internation-
al law to assert the right o combatants and civilians
alike to be spared urther suering during armed
conict and to receive assistance. To assure this in prac-
tice, health-care acilities and personnel, and medical
vehicles, had to be protected: attacks upon them are
orbidden as long as they retain a neutral unction and
treat all patients equally, irrespective o political, reli-
gious or ethnic afliation. Protective symbols such as
the red cross, red crescent and red crystal were intro-
duced to clearly identiy medical installations, vehicles
and personnel as protected entities. These provisions,enshrined in the our Geneva Conventions o 1949 and
their Additional Protocols and in customary interna-
tional law, match the right to receive health care with
an obligation on all parties to a conict to search or
and collect the wounded ater battle, and to acilitate
access to health-care acilities. Human rights law pro-
tects health care at all times, including during internal
disturbances. These laws are binding on all States and
parties to conicts around the world. But they are not
always respected.
In 2008, the ICRC launched a study to look at how
violence aects the delivery o health care in 16 coun-
tries where it is operational. Reports o incidents were
collected rom a variety o sources, including health
organizations, Red Cross and Red Crescent sta, and
the media. These were analysed to identiy the most
serious orms o violence, which are presented in the
ollowing pages. But while the statistics paint a bleak
picture o the widespread nature o the attacks on
patients, health-care workers and acilities, and on
medical vehicles, they all short o capturing the ull
scope o the problem, particularly in areas inacces-sible to aid organizations and reporters, such as many
regions o Pakistan and Aghanistan. Furthermore,
the statistics do not reect the indirect and multiplier
eects o these attacks as health-care acilities close
and sta leave. Thus, this publication rst looks at the
general disruption to health care that occurs during
conict and civil strie, beore looking more closely at
specic types o violence.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
6/246
PeterDiCampo/VIIMentorProgram
Abidjans Abobo SudHospital, normally a
2-bed acility, held over30 patients duringhe 2011 post-election
violence.
THE COMPOUNDED
COST OF VIOLENCE
V dsrs r srvs
w r dd s.
Armed conict and internal disturbances such as
violent protests and riots cause injuries among those
directly participating and those who get caught in the
way. Serious injuries require medical attention, yet itis precisely at these moments o greatest need that
health-care services are most vulnerable to disrup-
tion, intererence and attack. Violence, both actual
and threatened, aects the delivery o health care in
several ways.
First, active ghting in the vicinity o health-care
acilities prevents access to them by the wounded
and the sick, health-care sta, and vehicles carrying
essential medicines and medical equipment to re-
supply these acilities. Fighting can also disrupt the
ow o water and electricity, as well as uel supplies or
back-up generators. For instance, heavy ghting in the
Ivorian capital, Abidjan, in March 2011, prevented
ambulances rom collecting the wounded, and the
medical, humanitarian organization Mdecins Sans
Frontires (MSF) rom resupplying Abobo Sud Hospi-
tal, the only unctioning hospital in the northern hal
o the city. Dozens o wounded arrived at the hospital
each day by whatever means they could, and medical
stocks soon began to run low. The head o the MSF
team, Dr Salha Issouou, worried that i this continues
or a ew more days, the hospital will run out o anaes-thesia, sterile compresses, and surgical gloves.
Second, violence can set o the displacement o
civilians, including health-care personnel and theiramilies, to saer areas. Iraqs health ministry reported
that 18,000 o its 34,000 doctors ed the country
between 2003 and 2006. Libya has also been aected
by the exodus o health-care proessionals since unrest
began in early 2011 because a large percentage o the
medical workorce, particularly nurses, were migrant
workers. When oreign governments ordered their
nationals to evacuate the country in February, many
vital medical acilities, such as hospitals in Benghazi
and Misrata, were let critically understaed. The
shortage o personnel not only aects those wounded
in the ghting, but also Libyans suering rom chronic
illnesses that require regular care.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
7/247
AndrLiohn/ICRC
One o the frst victimso war is the health-caresystem itsel.Marco Baldan, the ICRCs chief war surgeon
SecuRing acceSS in the ightto eRaDicate polio
For over twenty years, major eorts have
been under way to eradicate the devastating
disease o poliomyelitis. Enormous progress
has been made in reducing the transmission
and number o cases worldwide, but violence
in a ew key countries is a major obstacle to its
total elimination. In two o the our countries
with endemic polio Pakistan and Aghani-
stan vaccination coverage is hampered by
ghting and/or a lack o security guarantees
that would enable vaccination teams to reach
all areas o polio transmission. Military oen-
sives also cause population displacements
that can spread the disease rom inected to
uninected areas: the province o Punjab in
Pakistan, which had been polio-ree or two
years, experienced an outbreak in 2008 ollow-ing the inux o people eeing violence in the
province o Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and in the
Federally Administered Tribal Areas. Hundreds
o thousands o children remain beyond reach
in parts o Aghanistan and Pakistan.
In 2007, the Aghan health ministry and the
World Health Organization asked the ICRC
to use its unique contacts with the armed
opposition in Aghanistan to negotiate sae
passage or polio vaccinators. Although some
areas remain inaccessible, the oppositions
agreement to this plan enabled the country-
wide vaccination campaigns to resume and
coverage has dramatically increased.
The main clinic in Misrata, Libya had to be evacuatedwhen it was taken over to be used as a military base.
Third, violence hampers the implementation o im-
portant preventive health-care programmes (such asvaccination campaigns), which might have implications
long into the uture. The ght to eradicate polio, or
example, has aced setbacks in countries like Aghani-
stan, Pakistan and the Democratic Republic o the
Congo, where the saety o vaccination teams is di-
cult to assure. Furthermore, conict causes the dis-
placement o people to areas that are oten beyond
the reach o regular health-care systems, just at the
moment when they are most vulnerable to disease.
These disruptions to health care caused by violence are
less visible and more difcult to measure than overt
attacks against health-care personnel and acilities.
But they are just as deadly or all the wounded and sick
who never manage to reach the help they require.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
8/248
VIOLENCE AGAINST HEALTH-CARE FACILITIES
V ds bombing, shelling, looting,
orced entry, shooting into, encircling or other
orceul intererence with the running o health-care
acilities (such as depriving them o electricity
and water).
hr s d hospitals,
laboratories, clinics, rst-aid posts, blood transusion
centres, and the medical and pharmaceutical
stores o these acilities.
KarimSahib/AFPPhoto
A doctor surveys the rubble let in the Adnan KhairallahHospital in Baghdad ater it was hit by a missile.
Attacks on health-care acilities during armed violence
and internal disturbances tend to all into our main
categories. The rst is the deliberate targeting o
such places to gain military advantage by depriving
opponents and those perceived to support them o
medical assistance or injuries sustained. Some attacks
might also be intended to terrorize a local population
by targeting a protected acility. Occasionally, attacks
have been mounted to rescue wounded comrades
detained while being treated in hospital: the attack
on Jinnah Hospital in Lahore, Pakistan, in June 2010
aimed to ree a wounded militant captured ater a
mosque bombing that killed over 80 worshippers.
Three gunmen dressed as police ofcers entered
the hospital and opened re indiscriminately, killing
medical personnel, visitors and security guards.
The second category o attack is also deliberate, but
this time or political, religious or ethnic reasons rather
than or military advantage per se. Such assaults
against health-care acilities include the burning
down o an Uzbek-run clinic in Kyrgyzstan during
ethnic violence in June 2010; the cordoning o and
military takeover o Salmaniya reerral hospital in
Bahrain in early 2011 ater it was perceived to support
the cause o anti-government protesters; and the
explosion at a hospital in Karachi in February 2010 that
targeted survivors o an earlier sectarian attack on a
bus carrying members o a minority Shiite sect.
The third type o attack is unintentional bombardment
or shelling collateral damage rom a missile or
mortar aimed at a military target. This occurs most
requently when military operations are carried out
in densely populated, urban areas. Those ring the
weapons are supposed to take all easible precautions
to distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate
targets, but conicts in Libya, Sri Lanka, Somalia, the
occupied Palestinian territory, Lebanon, Yemen and
Rwanda have all seen serious damage to health-care
acilities that was claimed to be in error. The risk to
health-care acilities rises with their proximity to
military installations. Although it is hard to believe,
the twelve shells that landed on Medina Hospital in
Mogadishu on 12 April 2011 were not intended or
the clearly marked hospital, but targeted ofcials o
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
9/249
the icRc hoSpital in Kigali: an iSlanD o humanity in a Sea o inhumanity
An extraordinary example o success in ensuring respect or the sanctity o a hospital, its personnel and patients, occurred in the Rwandan
capital, Kigali, during the 1994 genocide. As the organized slaughter o the Tutsi minority and those deemed to support them continued
relentlessly or three months, the ICRC and MSF teams saved ten thousand lives in a compound protected only by the Red Cross ag. They
ventured onto the streets to collect the wounded, with only their badge, their courage and the strength o their arguments to prevent
the wounded rom being torn rom the back o ambulances. The hospital was threatened several times, and was damaged by rocket re
more than once, but was never orcibly entered by those scouring the city or more victims. It even inspired some killers to stop: beore
eeing the city when they knew they were deeated, some militiamen brought a Tutsi nurse they had held or the last three months to the
hospital to release her. We have decided not to kill her despite the act that she is a Tutsi, they said to the head o the ICRCs delegation,
Philippe Gaillard. As a nurse she will be more useul in your hospital than dead.
DmitryKostyukov/AFPPhoto
Patients had to be moved tothe basement o this hospital ater thebuilding was partly destroyed.
the Somali Transitional Federal Government (TFG)
attending a high-level military event not ar away.
Miraculously, eleven o the shells did not explode,
but the one that did injured two guards and sowed
panic among patients and sta. Some shells did reach
their target, though, killing at least three people at
the TFGs military headquarters.
The ourth and perhaps most common orm o violence
committed against health-care acilities is the looting
o drugs and medical equipment. Occasionally, the
motive might be to obtain medical supplies or injured
combatants too araid to enter a acility, but purely
criminal motives are more common. Baghdad in 2003
saw the pillage o medical acilities and destruction
o inrastructure and supplies on an enormous scale,
which brought the whole medical system in Baghdadto virtual collapse. Hospitals were orced to close and
the wounded and dying let unattended.
t ss r s
Health-care acilities retain their protected status
as long as they are exclusively devoted to the care
o the wounded and the sick and are not used to
advance military goals. Unortunately, there have
been many occasions when the neutrality o a health-
care acility has been compromised through its use
to store weapons or launch attacks. For instance,
hospitals have been used as cover in inter-Palestinian
violence, putting patients and hospital sta in great
danger o being caught in the crossre. Reports rom
Libya suggest that the Ajdabyah Hospital was used
as cover or snipers. The presence o armed combat-
ants inside a medical acility or other than medical
reasons also compromises its protected status. In
August 2009, a group o armed insurgents entered a
clinic in the province o Paktika in Aghanistan, seek-
ing treatment or their wounded commander. They
exchanged gunre with army personnel outsideuntil a helicopter gunship red rockets into the clinic,
killing all but one o the insurgents and burning the
male ward to the ground.
What the laW SayS:
Health-care acilities shall be respected and protected at all times and
shall not be the object o attack.
Protective emblems such as the red cross, red crescent and red crystal
identiying medical units shall be respected in all circumstances.
Small arms are permitted in health-care acilities or the purpose o
sel-deence or deence o the wounded and the sick
(against bandits, or example). The presence o all other weapons
compromises the neutral status o a acility.
Health-care acilities lose their protection i they are used to commit
acts harmul to the enemy. Acts harmul to the enemy include the use o health-care acilities
to shelter able-bodied combatants, to store arms or ammunition,
as military observation posts or as a shield or military action.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
10/2410
They entered through
the parking lot,ordered us at gunpointto lie on the ground,then shot dead thepatient on the stretcherand let again as inothing had happened.Red Cross volunteer describing the executionof a patient on Red Cross premises
VIOLENCE AGAINST
THE WOUNDED
AND THE SICK
V ds killing, injuring, harassing and
intimidating patients or those trying to access health
care; blocking or interering with timely access
to care; the deliberate ailure to provide or denial o
assistance; discrimination in access to, and quality
o, care; and interruption o medical care.
t wdd d sk d all persons
whether military or civilian who are in need o
medical assistance and who rerain rom any act
o hostility. This includes maternity cases,
newborn babies and the inrm. AlejandroBringas/Reuters
One o the worst recorded cases o assault on the
wounded and the sick occurred in November 1991 in
the Croatian town o Vukovar. The same day that the
ICRC secured agreement on the neutral status o the
hospital, 300 patients and their relatives were orced
onto buses: the bodies o 200 were later ound in a
mass grave and 51 individuals are still missing today.
The execution o patients in ambulances or health-care
acilities has also occurred in Sierra Leone, Colombia,
Lebanon, the Democratic Republic o the Congo and
the occupied Palestinian territory, and in gang-related
violence in Mexico. It is also alleged to have occurredin Libya. In September and October 2000, tit-or-tat ex-
ecutions o patients in ICRC ambulances in Colombia,
rst by paramilitaries and then by rebels, led to the ICRC
suspending its role in the evacuation and transer o
patients until it received guarantees that its ambu-
lances and patients would be respected.
More common than these deplorable attacks are the
impediments placed in the way o wounded and sick
people having rapid access to health care. Sometimes
access is deliberately blocked, but most impediments
take the orm o road closures and checkpoint delays
or security reasons. No matter how valid the security
concerns, lengthy delays at checkpoints while vehicles
are searched and passengers questioned can cost
lives. And bypassing the queue can be perilous: stories
abound in Iraq and Aghanistan o vehicles being shot
at as they tried to circumvent the queue. Roads are
sometimes closed or hours on end during sweeping
operations or explosive devices or ollowing security
incidents, with sometimes dire consequences. A girl in-
jured by an explosion in Chahar Dara district o Kunduz
province in Aghanistan died soon ater arriving at hos-
pital on 3 February 2010: she had been carried on oot
or an hour because the military had closed the road.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
11/2411
Gunmen pulled over this ambulance to killa police commander who was beingtransported to hospital.
AsmaaWaguih/Reuters
Under international humanitarian law,no one may be let wilully without medicalassistance and care.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
12/2412
ZurabBurduli/ICRC
Wounded civilians are evacuated by erry romPuttumatalan to Trincomalee in Sri Lanka.
Sometimes the military and law enorcement agencies
want to arrest or detain a patient or questioning, which
is a perectly legitimate demand. But the detaining
authorities have an obligation to ensure the continuity
o medical care or the patient, something that is difcult
in contexts where detention acilities lack proper health-
care services. In Aghanistan and Pakistan, the local
authorities have been receptive to the ICRCs requests
to prioritize treatment over interrogation, permitting
the wounded to see a doctor beore being questioned.
But other contexts are more challenging: our o MSFs
patients were removed rom its Katanga health-care
centre in south Kivu in the Democratic Republic o theCongo by soldiers in March 2010, despite protests by
the MSF surgeons that their medical condition advised
against it.
In some contexts, the wounded and the sick ace
discrimination in access to, and quality o, health care.
Although prohibited by international humanitarian law
and human rights law, as well as contrary to medical
ethics, health-care personnel have reused to treat, or
given inerior treatment to patients on the basis o their
ethnicity, religion or political afliation. This occurred
during ethnic violence in Kyrgyzstan and Rwanda, dur-
ing periods o political tension such as in Zimbabwe
and Lebanon, and in countries where minorities are
oppressed, such as the Muslim Rohingyas in Myanmar.
In recent unrest in Bahrain, Syria and Yemen, protesters
have been too araid to use medical acilities or ear
that their wounds will identiy them and provoke
harsh reprisals.
One nal violation o the rights o the wounded and
the sick that requently occurs in armed conict but
is difcult to document is the ailure o combatants
to search or, assist, and evacuate the wounded. Theincident in Gaza described above, where checkpoint
soldiers ignored the cries o the wounded, the dying
and their distraught children, is not an isolated case.
In conicts all over the world, combatants overlook
their responsibility to care or civilians caught in the
crossre. Invariably, it is relatives and neighbours who
bring civilian casualties to hospital, not men and wom-
en wearing uniorms or bearing weapons. And these
relatives and neighbours are as vulnerable as any pa-
tient to attacks and discrimination on the way to and
in health-care acilities.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
13/2413
tReating eVeRyone,Without DiScRimination
In two o the worlds most dangerous places,
Somalia and Pakistan, the personnel in ICRC-
supported hospitals make no distinction
among patients according to the side on
which they ought. In the tense atmosphere o
Pakistan, it took one year o negotiations and
several setbacks to ensure the neutral status o
the hospital in Peshawar. In Somalias Medina
and Keysaney Hospitals, the personnel do not
ask patients questions about their clan or po-
litical allegiance. In October 2009, pamphlets
showing pictures o grenades and handguns
were thrown into the compound o MedinaHospital, warning the sta to stop treating the
enemy. But the hospital director, Mohammed
Yusu, said that the threat would not change
the way they worked. People need to under-
stand that health-care workers are neutral and
provide treatment to everyone, even the ones
writing the leaets and their relatives.
AndrLiohn/ICRC
Ater being attacked, Mohammed Yusu,
director o the Medina Hospital in Mogadishu,is now guarded 24 hours a day.
What the laW SayS:
The our Geneva Conventions o 1949 and their Additional Protocols o 1977
contain the ollowing rules:
The wounded and the sick, as well as the inrm, and expectant mothers,
shall be the object o particular protection and respect.
The wounded and the sick must be protected against ill-treatment and
pillage.
No one may be let wilully without medical assistance and care.
Whenever circumstances permit, and particularly ater ghting, each party
to a conict must, without delay, take all possible measures to search or,collect and evacuate the wounded and the sick without adverse distinction
between them.
The special role o the ICRC is recognized in acilitating the establishment
o neutralized zones to protect the wounded, the sick and civilians rom
the eects o war.
Parties to a conict have the rst obligation to care or the wounded and
the sick. Any care provided by the local population, humanitarian
organizations or other third parties does not relieve the parties o
their obligations.
Human rights law, in accordance with the Universal Declaration o Human
Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Interna-
tional Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and several other
conventions, afrms that:
Everyone has the right to lie. States must rerain rom deliberately
withholding or delaying health care to the wounded and the sick in
lie-threatening circumstances.
Whenever the use o orce is unavoidable, law enorcement ofcials must
ensure medical assistance to those aected as early as possible.
Everyone has a right to the highest attainable standard o physical and
mental health. States must provide at least essential primary health care.
Everyone has a right o access to essential health-care acilities and services
on a non-discriminatory basis. States must rerain rom arbitrarily denyingor limiting such access, or instance, against political opponents.
States must take active measures to enable and assist individuals to enjoy
their right to health.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
14/2414
VIOLENCE AGAINST
HEALTH-CARE PERSONNEL
V ds killing, injuring, kidnapping,
harassment, threats, intimidation, and robbery;
and arresting people or perorming their
medical duties.
hr rs d doctors,
nurses, paramedical sta including rst-aiders, and
support sta assigned to medical unctions;the administrative sta o health-care acilities;
and ambulance personnel.
Health-care personnel ace many challenges working
in situations o armed conict and other violence,
having to adapt standards o care to the resources
available and dealing with large inuxes o patients
requiring immediate lie-saving attention. Beyond
these proessional challenges oten lie grave dangers
associated with the nature o their work.
Iraq has been the site o some o the worst attacksagainst health-care proessionals. In 2008, the Iraqi
health ministry estimated that over 625 medical
personnel had been killed since 2003. Many doc-
tors were deliberately targeted in a spate o kill-
ings in 2007 that claimed the lives o physicians like
Ibrahim Mohammed Ajil, head o a Baghdad psychi-
atric hospital, who was shot dead on his way home by
men on a motorcycle. Hundreds more doctors have
received death threats or been kidnapped sometimes
or ransom, but sometimes or political or religious
reasons. Over hal the countrys doctors have ed
abroad; many o those who stay are orced to live
in the hospitals where they work, to avoid the risky
journey home each day.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
15/2415
A doctor cries or our o his colleagues a doctor,an ambulance driver and two nurses who were killed byan air strike on the road between Ajdabyah and Bregain Libya.
AndrLiohn/ICRC
Violence against health-care personnel is also common
in Aghanistan, where they are exposed to threats,
harassment and attacks. Dozens o health-care sta
have been abducted, sometimes or ransom payments
and other times or their skills, or treating wounded
ghters who ear arrest i seeking treatment in a
government clinic. During the long war in Sri Lanka,
doctors and other health-care personnel were threat-
ened and killed or treating the enemy. In December2008, hal o the doctors working in Vavuniya received
anonymous death threats in a letter posted rom
Colombo, which said that a Tamil doctor would die in
revenge or the death o a Sinhalese doctor in Batticaloa.
Although local health-care personnel bear the brunt o
the threats and assaults, the sta o oreign aid orga-
nizations have on occasion been specically targeted.
In December 1996, six expatriate sta members work-
ing in the ICRC eld hospital in Novye Atagi, Chechnya,
were assassinated, at point-blank range while in bed,
in a premeditated attack on the hospital premises.
A seventh delegate was shot and let or dead but
survived. The assassins had silencers on their guns
and clearly aimed to kill all the expatriate sta members,
but stopped when the alarm was raised. Four nurses,
a hospital administrator and a construction technician
were among the dead. The ICRC suspended operations
throughout Chechnya and handed over responsibility
or the hospital to the Chechen health ministry.
Perhaps the most dangerous job in the eld o health-
care during armed conict is that o the rst-aiders
and medics who go to the ront line to provide im-mediate lie-saving assistance to the injured and
evacuate them to saety. They risk being directly
targeted, caught in the crossre o an unnished
battle, or injured by unexploded ordnance scat-
tered around the area. Between 2004 and 2009, 57
volunteers rom the International Red Cross and Red
Crescent Movement were killed or wounded in the line
o duty. Such incidents are not limited to situations
o armed conict: in 2010, ear among health-care
workers in Mexico led them to strike to demand a halt
to violence. Health-care personnel in many parts o
the country are increasingly reluctant to treat victims
o gunshot wounds suspected o belonging to crim-
inal gangs or ear o being caught in the midst o
urther violence.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
16/2416
I have no doubtthat one missile wasaimed at us.
I do not know or certainwhether it was meantto kill us or warn usto keep away,but it was defnitelyaimed in our direction.Palestinian Red Crescent ambulancedriver Khaled Abu Saada
On occasion, health-care personnel have also been
arrested or carrying out their proessional responsi-
bilities to treat all in need regardless o who they are
and what they have done. Three doctors who had
been working in northern Sri Lanka were detained
in mid-2009; Red Crescent volunteers in Yemen were
detained on suspicion that they sympathized with
protesters during the unrest in early 2011; and in Bahrain,
47 doctors and nurses who treated protesters have been
detained in sweeping arrests o health workers that
ollowed the crackdown on protesters and ace trial in amilitary court on a range o other accusations.
Even during peacetime, health-care personnel in many
countries ace unacceptable threats rom patients
and their relatives related to the quality o health care
delivered. One study carried out in six Lebanese
hospitals in 2009 ound that 80 percent o the emer-
gency room sta had been verbally abused and
25 percent physically assaulted over the past
12 months. More than two-thirds o the perpetrators
were relatives or riends o patients. This tendency is
exacerbated during the heat o war: emergency rooms
and operating theatres were invaded by gun-toting
ghters in Somalia and Iraq, demanding that their
riend, relative or comrade be treated immediately.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
17/2417
SaeR acceSS oR health-caRe
WoRKeRS in colombiaThe remote village o Santa Cruz in south-eastern
Colombia is littered with landmines and other
explosive remnants o war. The only health-
care worker in this village risks her lie and
limbs every time she ventures rom the health-
care centre to conduct a home visit or make
a round o vaccinations with her cool box.
Everyone walks at their own risk here, she
says with a smile that hides her unease. She
is well aware o the repercussions or hersel
and or the whole community were she to puther oot in the wrong place. To improve her
saety and that o thousands like her all around
Colombia, the ICRCs weapons contamination
team trains health-care workers in techniques
to help them avoid driving over or stepping on
explosive devices. They learn what to look out
or and what to do when hit by, or in the midst
o, these deadly objects. The ICRC also talks to
all sides in the conict about the consequences
o these weapons or civilians.RogerArnold
RaulArboleda/AFPPhoto
Health-care personnel who give lie-saving assistance tothe injured are oten at risk themselves.
What the laW SayS:
Health-care personnel, whether military or civilian, may not be attacked
or harmed.
Health-care personnel shall not be hindered in the perormance o their
exclusively medical tasks.
Parties to a conict shall not harass or punish health-care personnel
or perorming activities compatible with medical ethics, nor shall theycompel them to perorm activities contrary to medical ethics or
to rerain rom perorming acts required by medical ethics.
Medical personnel may not be required to give priority to any person
except on medical grounds. Medical personnel decide, in accordance with
medical ethics, which patient receives priority.
The protection o medical personnel ceases when they commit, outside
their humanitarian unction, acts harmul to the enemy.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
18/2418
VIOLENCE AGAINST MEDICAL VEHICLES
V ds attacks upon, thet o and
intererence with medical vehicles.
md vs d ambulances, medical
ships or aircrat, whether civilian or military; and
vehicles transporting medical supplies or equipment.
AbrarTanoli/Reuters
The nal example o violence aecting the delivery
o health care concerns attacks against medicalvehicles. There is, o course, considerable overlap in
the law protecting health-care acilities, health-care
personnel and medical vehicles, and similarities in the
types o attack directed against them. Nevertheless,
the sheer number o attacks on medical vehicles, and
their more requent misuse to trick the enemy, war-
rants their discussion as a separate subject.
Circulating in the midst o conict to collect and
assist the wounded, ambulances sometimes come
under re, both accidental and deliberate. The Libyan
Red Crescent reported that over one our-day period
in May 2011, three o its ambulances were hit in three
separate incidents, resulting in the death o a nurse
and injuries to a patient and three volunteers. Another
volunteer was killed in Zlitan. Such a toll is reminiscent
o the conict in Lebanon in 2006, when on one day,
11 August, two ambulances came under attack in
separate incidents. One Lebanese Red Cross ambu-
lance that was attacked rom the air while transporting
supplies rom Tyr to Tibnine caught re, injuring the
paramedics aboard; another was shot at in the Mar-
jayoun region when coming to aid victims o an air at-
tack. A Lebanese Red Cross paramedic was shot dead
in the second incident.
Attacks on ambulances have also occurred in the oc-cupied Palestinian territory, Colombia, Mexico, Yemen,
Iraq and Libya, and in Nepal during the conict rom
1996 to 2006. Some o the deliberate attacks and
many o the impediments and delays imposed upon
ambulances in Libya, the occupied Palestinian terri-
tory, Aghanistan and Nepal were due to mistrust o
the ambulance service that stemmed rom its misuse
in the past. Not all misuse is intended to cause harm:
in Nepal, ambulance drivers complain o politicians
using ambulances as a private taxi service or o others
riding in them to avoid being inconvenienced by
roadblocks during general strikes that paralyse the
country. But some armed groups engage in perdy
the deliberate misuse o the medical mission to ool
the enemy. In Aghanistan, the armed opposition sent
ambulances packed with explosives across security
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
19/2419
By violating theneutrality o health-careservices, such actso deception endanger
medical personnelengaged in caring orthe injured and sickin hospitals, clinics andrural health posts.From the ICRC statement condemningthe use of an ambulance in the 7 April 2011attack in Afghanistan
ambulanceS in mexico: caught in the cRoSSiRe
Over the last ew years, drug-related gang violence has claimed thousands o lives across Mexico. As violence increases, so does the
demand or ambulance services. The Mexican Red Cross operates around 80 percent o all the emergency ambulances in the country and
sometimes nds itsel caught in the crossre between rival gangs or between the police and gangs, when trying to evacuate the victims.
There has never been direct aggression against the Mexican Red Cross, said the Sinaloa branch coordinator, Valentin Castilla Astrada.
The groups see us as an organization that wants to help, not as being or one side or another. Nevertheless, the ambulance crews live in
constant ear o being caught in the middle. We never know when something is going to happen to us, said the deputy coordinator o
the Ciudad Juarez branch o the Mexican Red Cross. We are really araid. Beore, we just had to worry about the sick or someone injured
in an accident. We worked in security. But now everything has changed. When a car approaches the scene we are scared that something
will happen. The ICRC is helping the Mexican Red Cross to review its current procedures and practices and introduce new ways to assure
the saety o these dedicated ambulance crews.
What the laW SayS:
Medical vehicles shall be respected and protected at all times and shall
not be the object o attack.
Medical units may not be used to launch attacks or to shield ghters
or other military objectives rom attack.
Medical vehicles cease to be protected when they are used, outside
their humanitarian unction, to commit acts harmul to the enemy.
Examples o acts harmul to the enemy include the transport o healthy
troops, arms or munitions, as well as the collection or transmission
o military intelligence.
Examples o acts not harmul to the enemy include the carrying o light
arms by medical personnel or use in sel-deence or arms that have
just been taken rom the wounded.
Isolated incidents implicating medical personnel, acilities or vehicles
in acts harmul to the enemy do not entitle armed actors to attack them
indiscriminately. A warning and reasonable time limit must be given
beore an attack is launched. An attack must also respect the principleso distinction and proportionality.
cordons. The ICRC publicly denounced this grave
violation o international humanitarian law ollowing
the 7 April 2011 ambulance attack on a police training
centre in Kandahar that killed twelve people. A Taliban
spokesman pledged to conduct an inquiry in response
and said that such attacks would not happen again.
In Libya, the ICRC is also receiving allegations o the
misuse o the red cross and red crescent emblems
to support military operations and the use o ambu-
lances to transport arms and armed combatants.
The abuse o trust that occurs through the misuse o
the protective emblems, and o protected acilities
and vehicles, can spiral into a vicious circle that under-
mines the whole purpose o creating neutral entities
in conict. When ambulances are misused, whetherto trick the enemy or or some other purpose, they
all under suspicion and are, at best, subjected to the
same delays and impediments as other vehicles or, at
worst, become the object o attack. In both instances,
they lose the advantage meant to preserve lie in
conict, to the detriment o the wounded and the
sick who require urgent medical attention.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
20/2420
WHAT THE ICRC DOES
AmnonGutman/ICRC
pRactical i nitiatiVeS> The ICRC negotiates ceaseres or sae passage with
parties to a conict to organize the collection o the
wounded and dead, access to health care, or preventive
health programmes such as vaccination campaigns. It
also negotiates a ast track or ambulances through
checkpoints in some contexts, such as the occupied
Palestinian territory.
> It reinorces the physical integrity o health-careacilities through the placement o sandbags, build-
ing o bunkers and application o bomb-blast ilm
to windows.
> The ICRC marks health-care acilities with a red cross
or red crescent emblem (ags, roo painting) and equips
health-care centres with signs barring weapons inside.
In some contexts, like Somalia, it establishes a system
or the collection and retrieval o weapons at the
hospital entrance. It also equips health-care personnel
with aprons to signiy their protected status.
> The ICRC takes the GPS (Global Positioning System)
coordinates o health-care acilities and provides these
to all parties to a conict.
legal i nitiatiVeS> The ICRC spreads knowledge o international human-
itarian law among military personnel, government
ofcials, non-State opposition groups, inuential mem-
bers o civil society, and the medical establishment.
It encourages States to incorporate international
humanitarian law into domestic legislation and enorce
respect or it. This includes laws to restrict use o the
red cross and red crescent emblems. It also spreads
knowledge o the rules protecting health-care acilitiesand o the obligations o weapon-bearers and medical
personnel to avoid compromising the neutrality o
these acilities.
> The ICRC appeals to all parties to a conict to prevent
obstruction o health care and respect and acilitate
the work o health-care personnel and volunteers.
> The ICRC engages in dialogue with all parties to a
conict regardless o whether they are considered
legitimate or not by the opposing side. It brings
allegations o violations o international humanitarian
law to the parties concerned and engages in
condential dialogue on measures to prevent such
violations in the uture.
The ICRC mounts emergency responses to outbreaks o conict around the world: this includes a range o
medical activities, rom collecting the wounded to war surgery. It also undertakes many initiatives behind
the scenes both immediate during conict and longer-term during peacetime to create an environment
o respect or the work o the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and or international
humanitarian law.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
21/2421
ThomasPizer/ICRC
PanchoDuda/ICRC
JuanCarlosSierra/Sem
anaNews
BorisHeger/ICRC
> It conducts rst-aid training or various groups
exposed to violence to enable them to stabilize patients
beore their arrival in a health-care acility. The ICRC
may also take this opportunity to discuss directly with
combatants the importance o respecting international
humanitarian law.
> In places where violence against health-care workers
and acilities is a requent occurrence, the ICRC runs
inormation campaigns such as a radio series with the
BBC Trust Fund in Aghanistan and a poster campaign
in the occupied Palestinian territory.
> The ICRC accompanies the sick and the wounded to
hospital i they ear discrimination.
> It mounts mobile health-care services in areas that
are diicult o access: such as the lying surgical
team in Darur that operated rom 2005 to 2009 or
the mobile clinics transported by canoe to remote
areas in Colombia.
> The ICRC conducts saer access campaigns with
the National Societies o countries acing conict and
other violence to increase awareness o ways to
minimize the danger when accessing potentially
dangerous areas. Work is also done on improving
local knowledge and public perception o the
National Societys role and unction.
> The ICRC addresses specic problems, such as
impediments to ambulances, with all those concerned.
For instance, to improve the reputation o, and increase
respect or, ambulance services in Nepal, the ICRC
holds periodic meetings with ambulance services, the
National Society, and State and non-State actors to ironout misunderstandings and to reiterate the roles and
responsibilities o ambulance drivers, political parties,
and the people manning checkpoints.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
22/2422
WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE
Violence, both real and threatened, against health-care workers, acilities and beneciaries must be recognized as one o the
most serious and widespread humanitarian concerns o today. As this booklet has shown, there is an urgent need to secure
the saety o the wounded and the sick, and o health-care personnel, health-care acilities and medical vehicles during armed
conict and other violence. More must be done to ensure that the wounded and the sick have timely access to health care
and that the acilities and personnel to treat them are available, adequately supplied with medicines and medical equipment,
and secure. Saeguarding health care cannot be addressed by the health-care community alone. Primary responsibility or it
lies with politicians and combatants.
1. bd r
The ICRC aims to mobilize support or this issue rom
within the International Red Cross and Red Crescent
Movement and among the health-care community,
medical aid organizations, military orces, and govern-
ments around the world. Working together to enhancerespect or the law, this community should cultivate
a culture o responsibility among all concerned to
saeguard health care.
2. Rr d d r r
In order to better understand and react to attacks on
patients, health-care workers and acilities, and medical
vehicles, reports o incidents should be more system-
atically collected and centralized with the data o other
organizations.
3. csd d rv d rs
The ICRC has undertaken many initiatives to improve
access to and saeguard health care in the various
contexts in which it is working. Experiences and best
practice need to be shared more widely within the
International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement
and broader health-care community to encourage
more and better initiatives on this ront.
4. esr s r
Hospitals and other health-care acilities in countries
aected by armed conict or other violence will beassisted in organizing the physical protection o the
premises and in developing procedures or noti-
ying others o their location and o the movements
o their vehicles.
5. sr ss r Rd crss d Rd
crs sf d vrs
The ICRC will encourage greater involvement o Red
Cross and Red Crescent sta and volunteers in collect-
ing data on, and responding to, threats to patients,
health-care sta, volunteers, health-care acilities and
medical vehicles.
t rs wrss s ss d r rv , icRc s sk sr r
w vs:
6. e w Ss
All States that have not yet introduced domestic legis-
lation to saeguard health care in situations o armed
conict and internal strie will be encouraged to do so.
This includes enacting and enorcing legislation on lim-
iting use o the red cross and red crescent emblems.
7. e w rd rs
All national armed orces that have not yet incor-
porated provisions into their standard operating
procedures with respect to saeguarding health care
will be encouraged to do so. These standard operating
procedures must address, among other issues, man-
agement o checkpoints to acilitate the passage o
medical vehicles and entry into health-care acilities.
8. e w S rd rs
Armed groups operating outside the purview o the
State will be engaged in dialogue on laws and practices
pertaining to saeguarding health care.
9. e w rss r
ss d srs
Increase dialogue with health ministries and health
associations to generate solidarity on this issue and
improve reporting on, and responses to, violence
against health-care workers, acilities and beneciaries.
10. er rs d rsAssist universities, other educational institutions and
think tanks to incorporate modules on the implications
o, and means to address, violence against patients and
health-care workers and acilities into courses in public
health, political science, law and security studies.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
23/24
Mission
The International Committee o the Red Cross (ICRC)
is an impartial, neutral and independent organization
whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect
the lives and dignity o victims o armed conict and
other situations o violence and to provide them with
assistance. The ICRC also endeavours to prevent suering
by promoting and strengthening humanitarian law and
universal humanitarian principles. Established in 1863,
the ICRC is at the origin o the Geneva Conventions and
the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement.
It directs and coordinates the international activities
conducted by the Movement in armed conicts and other
situations o violence.
8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case
24/24
0208.2
0113,50
0