Health care in danger: Making the case

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    1/24

    HEALTH CARE IN DANGERMAKING THE CASE

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    2/24

    International Committee of the Red Cross

    19, avenue de la Paix

    1202 Geneva, Switzerland

    T +41 22 734 60 01 F +41 22 733 20 57

    E-mail: [email protected] www.icrc.org

    ICRC, August 2011

    Front cover: Atef Safadi An ambulance flls with tear gas shot into it during a demonstration.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    3/24

    HEALTH CARE IN DANGERMAKING THE CASE

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    4/244

    A VITAL CONCERN OF

    THE INTERNATIONAL

    RED CROSS AND RED

    CRESCENT MOVEMENT

    During the aternoon o 7 January 2009, personnel

    rom the International Committee o the Red Cross

    (ICRC) and the Palestine Red Crescent Society made

    a shocking discovery in a house in the Zaytun neigh-

    bourhood o Gaza City: our young children crouched

    beside the lieless bodies o their mothers. The house

    had been shelled our days earlier, yet the ambulance

    teams had not been permitted to reach the victims. By

    the time they arrived, twelve corpses lay on the oor o

    the room and the children were too weak to stand. Sol-

    diers at a nearby checkpoint had oered no assistance

    to the injured and ordered the ambulances to turn back

    once they reached the devastating scene. The ambu-

    lance crews disobeyed and rescued the survivors.

    Less than one month later, in northern Sri Lanka, the

    Puthukkudiyiruppu hospital in the Vanni region was

    shelled, killing and wounding many o the 500 patients

    seeking treatment in the last unctioning hospital o

    the war-torn north. The hospital compound sustainedtwo direct hits and had to be evacuated. The patients

    were transerred to a community centre that had no

    potable water.

    In September o the same year, soldiers entered the

    Ghazi Mohammed Khan Hospital in the Wardak prov-

    ince o Aghanistan late one night, searching or a

    wounded enemy combatant. Unsuccessul in their

    search, they rounded up the sta and ordered them to

    report the presence o enemy ghters seeking treat-

    ment. When the sta reused, citing medical ethics,

    the soldiers threatened them at gunpoint, saying

    they would be killed i they did not comply. Several

    members o the sta quit their jobs ater this incident,

    too araid to return to work.

    And in December 2009, a man blew himsel up at a

    university graduation ceremony in the Somali capital,

    Mogadishu, killing medical students who had studied

    hard to help pull their country rom suering and

    despair wrought by two decades o civil war. This was

    only the second batch o medical graduates to emerge

    in the last twenty years, depriving the Somali people o

    desperately needed doctors.

    These our incidents rom our dierent conicts

    in 2009 represent the tip o the iceberg: attacks on

    health-care acilities, health-care personnel and medi-

    cal vehicles, and impediments to the wounded and

    the sick reaching health-care services have become

    common in conicts and upheavals all over the world.

    And they provoke ar-reaching secondary conse-

    quences as health-care proessionals ee their posts,

    hospitals close, and vaccination campaigns come to a

    halt. These knock-on eects leave entire communities

    without access to adequate services. Violence, both

    actual and threatened, against patients and health-

    care workers and acilities is one o the most crucial yet

    overlooked humanitarian issues o today.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    5/245

    ChristopherMorris/VII

    Rr Ds dr

    Providing assistance to the wounded, regardless o

    the side on which they ought, is the idea that gave

    birth to the International Red Cross and Red Crescent

    Movement over 150 years ago on the blood-stained

    battleeld o Solerino, Italy. Henry Dunant, a Swiss

    businessman, witnessed the carnage o June 1859

    and horried at the suering mobilized the local

    townsolk to help the injured with no consideration asto whether they were rom the Austrian or the French

    side. Tutti ratelli they are all brothers was the

    rerain as the 40,000 soldiers who lay wounded or

    dying were oered common decency as human beings:

    some water to quench their thirst, a clean bandage to

    dress a wound, a last word home so that a mother,

    wie or daughter would know what became o her son,

    husband or ather.

    From these humble beginnings emerged internation-

    al law to assert the right o combatants and civilians

    alike to be spared urther suering during armed

    conict and to receive assistance. To assure this in prac-

    tice, health-care acilities and personnel, and medical

    vehicles, had to be protected: attacks upon them are

    orbidden as long as they retain a neutral unction and

    treat all patients equally, irrespective o political, reli-

    gious or ethnic afliation. Protective symbols such as

    the red cross, red crescent and red crystal were intro-

    duced to clearly identiy medical installations, vehicles

    and personnel as protected entities. These provisions,enshrined in the our Geneva Conventions o 1949 and

    their Additional Protocols and in customary interna-

    tional law, match the right to receive health care with

    an obligation on all parties to a conict to search or

    and collect the wounded ater battle, and to acilitate

    access to health-care acilities. Human rights law pro-

    tects health care at all times, including during internal

    disturbances. These laws are binding on all States and

    parties to conicts around the world. But they are not

    always respected.

    In 2008, the ICRC launched a study to look at how

    violence aects the delivery o health care in 16 coun-

    tries where it is operational. Reports o incidents were

    collected rom a variety o sources, including health

    organizations, Red Cross and Red Crescent sta, and

    the media. These were analysed to identiy the most

    serious orms o violence, which are presented in the

    ollowing pages. But while the statistics paint a bleak

    picture o the widespread nature o the attacks on

    patients, health-care workers and acilities, and on

    medical vehicles, they all short o capturing the ull

    scope o the problem, particularly in areas inacces-sible to aid organizations and reporters, such as many

    regions o Pakistan and Aghanistan. Furthermore,

    the statistics do not reect the indirect and multiplier

    eects o these attacks as health-care acilities close

    and sta leave. Thus, this publication rst looks at the

    general disruption to health care that occurs during

    conict and civil strie, beore looking more closely at

    specic types o violence.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    6/246

    PeterDiCampo/VIIMentorProgram

    Abidjans Abobo SudHospital, normally a

    2-bed acility, held over30 patients duringhe 2011 post-election

    violence.

    THE COMPOUNDED

    COST OF VIOLENCE

    V dsrs r srvs

    w r dd s.

    Armed conict and internal disturbances such as

    violent protests and riots cause injuries among those

    directly participating and those who get caught in the

    way. Serious injuries require medical attention, yet itis precisely at these moments o greatest need that

    health-care services are most vulnerable to disrup-

    tion, intererence and attack. Violence, both actual

    and threatened, aects the delivery o health care in

    several ways.

    First, active ghting in the vicinity o health-care

    acilities prevents access to them by the wounded

    and the sick, health-care sta, and vehicles carrying

    essential medicines and medical equipment to re-

    supply these acilities. Fighting can also disrupt the

    ow o water and electricity, as well as uel supplies or

    back-up generators. For instance, heavy ghting in the

    Ivorian capital, Abidjan, in March 2011, prevented

    ambulances rom collecting the wounded, and the

    medical, humanitarian organization Mdecins Sans

    Frontires (MSF) rom resupplying Abobo Sud Hospi-

    tal, the only unctioning hospital in the northern hal

    o the city. Dozens o wounded arrived at the hospital

    each day by whatever means they could, and medical

    stocks soon began to run low. The head o the MSF

    team, Dr Salha Issouou, worried that i this continues

    or a ew more days, the hospital will run out o anaes-thesia, sterile compresses, and surgical gloves.

    Second, violence can set o the displacement o

    civilians, including health-care personnel and theiramilies, to saer areas. Iraqs health ministry reported

    that 18,000 o its 34,000 doctors ed the country

    between 2003 and 2006. Libya has also been aected

    by the exodus o health-care proessionals since unrest

    began in early 2011 because a large percentage o the

    medical workorce, particularly nurses, were migrant

    workers. When oreign governments ordered their

    nationals to evacuate the country in February, many

    vital medical acilities, such as hospitals in Benghazi

    and Misrata, were let critically understaed. The

    shortage o personnel not only aects those wounded

    in the ghting, but also Libyans suering rom chronic

    illnesses that require regular care.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    7/247

    AndrLiohn/ICRC

    One o the frst victimso war is the health-caresystem itsel.Marco Baldan, the ICRCs chief war surgeon

    SecuRing acceSS in the ightto eRaDicate polio

    For over twenty years, major eorts have

    been under way to eradicate the devastating

    disease o poliomyelitis. Enormous progress

    has been made in reducing the transmission

    and number o cases worldwide, but violence

    in a ew key countries is a major obstacle to its

    total elimination. In two o the our countries

    with endemic polio Pakistan and Aghani-

    stan vaccination coverage is hampered by

    ghting and/or a lack o security guarantees

    that would enable vaccination teams to reach

    all areas o polio transmission. Military oen-

    sives also cause population displacements

    that can spread the disease rom inected to

    uninected areas: the province o Punjab in

    Pakistan, which had been polio-ree or two

    years, experienced an outbreak in 2008 ollow-ing the inux o people eeing violence in the

    province o Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and in the

    Federally Administered Tribal Areas. Hundreds

    o thousands o children remain beyond reach

    in parts o Aghanistan and Pakistan.

    In 2007, the Aghan health ministry and the

    World Health Organization asked the ICRC

    to use its unique contacts with the armed

    opposition in Aghanistan to negotiate sae

    passage or polio vaccinators. Although some

    areas remain inaccessible, the oppositions

    agreement to this plan enabled the country-

    wide vaccination campaigns to resume and

    coverage has dramatically increased.

    The main clinic in Misrata, Libya had to be evacuatedwhen it was taken over to be used as a military base.

    Third, violence hampers the implementation o im-

    portant preventive health-care programmes (such asvaccination campaigns), which might have implications

    long into the uture. The ght to eradicate polio, or

    example, has aced setbacks in countries like Aghani-

    stan, Pakistan and the Democratic Republic o the

    Congo, where the saety o vaccination teams is di-

    cult to assure. Furthermore, conict causes the dis-

    placement o people to areas that are oten beyond

    the reach o regular health-care systems, just at the

    moment when they are most vulnerable to disease.

    These disruptions to health care caused by violence are

    less visible and more difcult to measure than overt

    attacks against health-care personnel and acilities.

    But they are just as deadly or all the wounded and sick

    who never manage to reach the help they require.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    8/248

    VIOLENCE AGAINST HEALTH-CARE FACILITIES

    V ds bombing, shelling, looting,

    orced entry, shooting into, encircling or other

    orceul intererence with the running o health-care

    acilities (such as depriving them o electricity

    and water).

    hr s d hospitals,

    laboratories, clinics, rst-aid posts, blood transusion

    centres, and the medical and pharmaceutical

    stores o these acilities.

    KarimSahib/AFPPhoto

    A doctor surveys the rubble let in the Adnan KhairallahHospital in Baghdad ater it was hit by a missile.

    Attacks on health-care acilities during armed violence

    and internal disturbances tend to all into our main

    categories. The rst is the deliberate targeting o

    such places to gain military advantage by depriving

    opponents and those perceived to support them o

    medical assistance or injuries sustained. Some attacks

    might also be intended to terrorize a local population

    by targeting a protected acility. Occasionally, attacks

    have been mounted to rescue wounded comrades

    detained while being treated in hospital: the attack

    on Jinnah Hospital in Lahore, Pakistan, in June 2010

    aimed to ree a wounded militant captured ater a

    mosque bombing that killed over 80 worshippers.

    Three gunmen dressed as police ofcers entered

    the hospital and opened re indiscriminately, killing

    medical personnel, visitors and security guards.

    The second category o attack is also deliberate, but

    this time or political, religious or ethnic reasons rather

    than or military advantage per se. Such assaults

    against health-care acilities include the burning

    down o an Uzbek-run clinic in Kyrgyzstan during

    ethnic violence in June 2010; the cordoning o and

    military takeover o Salmaniya reerral hospital in

    Bahrain in early 2011 ater it was perceived to support

    the cause o anti-government protesters; and the

    explosion at a hospital in Karachi in February 2010 that

    targeted survivors o an earlier sectarian attack on a

    bus carrying members o a minority Shiite sect.

    The third type o attack is unintentional bombardment

    or shelling collateral damage rom a missile or

    mortar aimed at a military target. This occurs most

    requently when military operations are carried out

    in densely populated, urban areas. Those ring the

    weapons are supposed to take all easible precautions

    to distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate

    targets, but conicts in Libya, Sri Lanka, Somalia, the

    occupied Palestinian territory, Lebanon, Yemen and

    Rwanda have all seen serious damage to health-care

    acilities that was claimed to be in error. The risk to

    health-care acilities rises with their proximity to

    military installations. Although it is hard to believe,

    the twelve shells that landed on Medina Hospital in

    Mogadishu on 12 April 2011 were not intended or

    the clearly marked hospital, but targeted ofcials o

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    9/249

    the icRc hoSpital in Kigali: an iSlanD o humanity in a Sea o inhumanity

    An extraordinary example o success in ensuring respect or the sanctity o a hospital, its personnel and patients, occurred in the Rwandan

    capital, Kigali, during the 1994 genocide. As the organized slaughter o the Tutsi minority and those deemed to support them continued

    relentlessly or three months, the ICRC and MSF teams saved ten thousand lives in a compound protected only by the Red Cross ag. They

    ventured onto the streets to collect the wounded, with only their badge, their courage and the strength o their arguments to prevent

    the wounded rom being torn rom the back o ambulances. The hospital was threatened several times, and was damaged by rocket re

    more than once, but was never orcibly entered by those scouring the city or more victims. It even inspired some killers to stop: beore

    eeing the city when they knew they were deeated, some militiamen brought a Tutsi nurse they had held or the last three months to the

    hospital to release her. We have decided not to kill her despite the act that she is a Tutsi, they said to the head o the ICRCs delegation,

    Philippe Gaillard. As a nurse she will be more useul in your hospital than dead.

    DmitryKostyukov/AFPPhoto

    Patients had to be moved tothe basement o this hospital ater thebuilding was partly destroyed.

    the Somali Transitional Federal Government (TFG)

    attending a high-level military event not ar away.

    Miraculously, eleven o the shells did not explode,

    but the one that did injured two guards and sowed

    panic among patients and sta. Some shells did reach

    their target, though, killing at least three people at

    the TFGs military headquarters.

    The ourth and perhaps most common orm o violence

    committed against health-care acilities is the looting

    o drugs and medical equipment. Occasionally, the

    motive might be to obtain medical supplies or injured

    combatants too araid to enter a acility, but purely

    criminal motives are more common. Baghdad in 2003

    saw the pillage o medical acilities and destruction

    o inrastructure and supplies on an enormous scale,

    which brought the whole medical system in Baghdadto virtual collapse. Hospitals were orced to close and

    the wounded and dying let unattended.

    t ss r s

    Health-care acilities retain their protected status

    as long as they are exclusively devoted to the care

    o the wounded and the sick and are not used to

    advance military goals. Unortunately, there have

    been many occasions when the neutrality o a health-

    care acility has been compromised through its use

    to store weapons or launch attacks. For instance,

    hospitals have been used as cover in inter-Palestinian

    violence, putting patients and hospital sta in great

    danger o being caught in the crossre. Reports rom

    Libya suggest that the Ajdabyah Hospital was used

    as cover or snipers. The presence o armed combat-

    ants inside a medical acility or other than medical

    reasons also compromises its protected status. In

    August 2009, a group o armed insurgents entered a

    clinic in the province o Paktika in Aghanistan, seek-

    ing treatment or their wounded commander. They

    exchanged gunre with army personnel outsideuntil a helicopter gunship red rockets into the clinic,

    killing all but one o the insurgents and burning the

    male ward to the ground.

    What the laW SayS:

    Health-care acilities shall be respected and protected at all times and

    shall not be the object o attack.

    Protective emblems such as the red cross, red crescent and red crystal

    identiying medical units shall be respected in all circumstances.

    Small arms are permitted in health-care acilities or the purpose o

    sel-deence or deence o the wounded and the sick

    (against bandits, or example). The presence o all other weapons

    compromises the neutral status o a acility.

    Health-care acilities lose their protection i they are used to commit

    acts harmul to the enemy. Acts harmul to the enemy include the use o health-care acilities

    to shelter able-bodied combatants, to store arms or ammunition,

    as military observation posts or as a shield or military action.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    10/2410

    They entered through

    the parking lot,ordered us at gunpointto lie on the ground,then shot dead thepatient on the stretcherand let again as inothing had happened.Red Cross volunteer describing the executionof a patient on Red Cross premises

    VIOLENCE AGAINST

    THE WOUNDED

    AND THE SICK

    V ds killing, injuring, harassing and

    intimidating patients or those trying to access health

    care; blocking or interering with timely access

    to care; the deliberate ailure to provide or denial o

    assistance; discrimination in access to, and quality

    o, care; and interruption o medical care.

    t wdd d sk d all persons

    whether military or civilian who are in need o

    medical assistance and who rerain rom any act

    o hostility. This includes maternity cases,

    newborn babies and the inrm. AlejandroBringas/Reuters

    One o the worst recorded cases o assault on the

    wounded and the sick occurred in November 1991 in

    the Croatian town o Vukovar. The same day that the

    ICRC secured agreement on the neutral status o the

    hospital, 300 patients and their relatives were orced

    onto buses: the bodies o 200 were later ound in a

    mass grave and 51 individuals are still missing today.

    The execution o patients in ambulances or health-care

    acilities has also occurred in Sierra Leone, Colombia,

    Lebanon, the Democratic Republic o the Congo and

    the occupied Palestinian territory, and in gang-related

    violence in Mexico. It is also alleged to have occurredin Libya. In September and October 2000, tit-or-tat ex-

    ecutions o patients in ICRC ambulances in Colombia,

    rst by paramilitaries and then by rebels, led to the ICRC

    suspending its role in the evacuation and transer o

    patients until it received guarantees that its ambu-

    lances and patients would be respected.

    More common than these deplorable attacks are the

    impediments placed in the way o wounded and sick

    people having rapid access to health care. Sometimes

    access is deliberately blocked, but most impediments

    take the orm o road closures and checkpoint delays

    or security reasons. No matter how valid the security

    concerns, lengthy delays at checkpoints while vehicles

    are searched and passengers questioned can cost

    lives. And bypassing the queue can be perilous: stories

    abound in Iraq and Aghanistan o vehicles being shot

    at as they tried to circumvent the queue. Roads are

    sometimes closed or hours on end during sweeping

    operations or explosive devices or ollowing security

    incidents, with sometimes dire consequences. A girl in-

    jured by an explosion in Chahar Dara district o Kunduz

    province in Aghanistan died soon ater arriving at hos-

    pital on 3 February 2010: she had been carried on oot

    or an hour because the military had closed the road.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    11/2411

    Gunmen pulled over this ambulance to killa police commander who was beingtransported to hospital.

    AsmaaWaguih/Reuters

    Under international humanitarian law,no one may be let wilully without medicalassistance and care.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    12/2412

    ZurabBurduli/ICRC

    Wounded civilians are evacuated by erry romPuttumatalan to Trincomalee in Sri Lanka.

    Sometimes the military and law enorcement agencies

    want to arrest or detain a patient or questioning, which

    is a perectly legitimate demand. But the detaining

    authorities have an obligation to ensure the continuity

    o medical care or the patient, something that is difcult

    in contexts where detention acilities lack proper health-

    care services. In Aghanistan and Pakistan, the local

    authorities have been receptive to the ICRCs requests

    to prioritize treatment over interrogation, permitting

    the wounded to see a doctor beore being questioned.

    But other contexts are more challenging: our o MSFs

    patients were removed rom its Katanga health-care

    centre in south Kivu in the Democratic Republic o theCongo by soldiers in March 2010, despite protests by

    the MSF surgeons that their medical condition advised

    against it.

    In some contexts, the wounded and the sick ace

    discrimination in access to, and quality o, health care.

    Although prohibited by international humanitarian law

    and human rights law, as well as contrary to medical

    ethics, health-care personnel have reused to treat, or

    given inerior treatment to patients on the basis o their

    ethnicity, religion or political afliation. This occurred

    during ethnic violence in Kyrgyzstan and Rwanda, dur-

    ing periods o political tension such as in Zimbabwe

    and Lebanon, and in countries where minorities are

    oppressed, such as the Muslim Rohingyas in Myanmar.

    In recent unrest in Bahrain, Syria and Yemen, protesters

    have been too araid to use medical acilities or ear

    that their wounds will identiy them and provoke

    harsh reprisals.

    One nal violation o the rights o the wounded and

    the sick that requently occurs in armed conict but

    is difcult to document is the ailure o combatants

    to search or, assist, and evacuate the wounded. Theincident in Gaza described above, where checkpoint

    soldiers ignored the cries o the wounded, the dying

    and their distraught children, is not an isolated case.

    In conicts all over the world, combatants overlook

    their responsibility to care or civilians caught in the

    crossre. Invariably, it is relatives and neighbours who

    bring civilian casualties to hospital, not men and wom-

    en wearing uniorms or bearing weapons. And these

    relatives and neighbours are as vulnerable as any pa-

    tient to attacks and discrimination on the way to and

    in health-care acilities.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    13/2413

    tReating eVeRyone,Without DiScRimination

    In two o the worlds most dangerous places,

    Somalia and Pakistan, the personnel in ICRC-

    supported hospitals make no distinction

    among patients according to the side on

    which they ought. In the tense atmosphere o

    Pakistan, it took one year o negotiations and

    several setbacks to ensure the neutral status o

    the hospital in Peshawar. In Somalias Medina

    and Keysaney Hospitals, the personnel do not

    ask patients questions about their clan or po-

    litical allegiance. In October 2009, pamphlets

    showing pictures o grenades and handguns

    were thrown into the compound o MedinaHospital, warning the sta to stop treating the

    enemy. But the hospital director, Mohammed

    Yusu, said that the threat would not change

    the way they worked. People need to under-

    stand that health-care workers are neutral and

    provide treatment to everyone, even the ones

    writing the leaets and their relatives.

    AndrLiohn/ICRC

    Ater being attacked, Mohammed Yusu,

    director o the Medina Hospital in Mogadishu,is now guarded 24 hours a day.

    What the laW SayS:

    The our Geneva Conventions o 1949 and their Additional Protocols o 1977

    contain the ollowing rules:

    The wounded and the sick, as well as the inrm, and expectant mothers,

    shall be the object o particular protection and respect.

    The wounded and the sick must be protected against ill-treatment and

    pillage.

    No one may be let wilully without medical assistance and care.

    Whenever circumstances permit, and particularly ater ghting, each party

    to a conict must, without delay, take all possible measures to search or,collect and evacuate the wounded and the sick without adverse distinction

    between them.

    The special role o the ICRC is recognized in acilitating the establishment

    o neutralized zones to protect the wounded, the sick and civilians rom

    the eects o war.

    Parties to a conict have the rst obligation to care or the wounded and

    the sick. Any care provided by the local population, humanitarian

    organizations or other third parties does not relieve the parties o

    their obligations.

    Human rights law, in accordance with the Universal Declaration o Human

    Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Interna-

    tional Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and several other

    conventions, afrms that:

    Everyone has the right to lie. States must rerain rom deliberately

    withholding or delaying health care to the wounded and the sick in

    lie-threatening circumstances.

    Whenever the use o orce is unavoidable, law enorcement ofcials must

    ensure medical assistance to those aected as early as possible.

    Everyone has a right to the highest attainable standard o physical and

    mental health. States must provide at least essential primary health care.

    Everyone has a right o access to essential health-care acilities and services

    on a non-discriminatory basis. States must rerain rom arbitrarily denyingor limiting such access, or instance, against political opponents.

    States must take active measures to enable and assist individuals to enjoy

    their right to health.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    14/2414

    VIOLENCE AGAINST

    HEALTH-CARE PERSONNEL

    V ds killing, injuring, kidnapping,

    harassment, threats, intimidation, and robbery;

    and arresting people or perorming their

    medical duties.

    hr rs d doctors,

    nurses, paramedical sta including rst-aiders, and

    support sta assigned to medical unctions;the administrative sta o health-care acilities;

    and ambulance personnel.

    Health-care personnel ace many challenges working

    in situations o armed conict and other violence,

    having to adapt standards o care to the resources

    available and dealing with large inuxes o patients

    requiring immediate lie-saving attention. Beyond

    these proessional challenges oten lie grave dangers

    associated with the nature o their work.

    Iraq has been the site o some o the worst attacksagainst health-care proessionals. In 2008, the Iraqi

    health ministry estimated that over 625 medical

    personnel had been killed since 2003. Many doc-

    tors were deliberately targeted in a spate o kill-

    ings in 2007 that claimed the lives o physicians like

    Ibrahim Mohammed Ajil, head o a Baghdad psychi-

    atric hospital, who was shot dead on his way home by

    men on a motorcycle. Hundreds more doctors have

    received death threats or been kidnapped sometimes

    or ransom, but sometimes or political or religious

    reasons. Over hal the countrys doctors have ed

    abroad; many o those who stay are orced to live

    in the hospitals where they work, to avoid the risky

    journey home each day.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    15/2415

    A doctor cries or our o his colleagues a doctor,an ambulance driver and two nurses who were killed byan air strike on the road between Ajdabyah and Bregain Libya.

    AndrLiohn/ICRC

    Violence against health-care personnel is also common

    in Aghanistan, where they are exposed to threats,

    harassment and attacks. Dozens o health-care sta

    have been abducted, sometimes or ransom payments

    and other times or their skills, or treating wounded

    ghters who ear arrest i seeking treatment in a

    government clinic. During the long war in Sri Lanka,

    doctors and other health-care personnel were threat-

    ened and killed or treating the enemy. In December2008, hal o the doctors working in Vavuniya received

    anonymous death threats in a letter posted rom

    Colombo, which said that a Tamil doctor would die in

    revenge or the death o a Sinhalese doctor in Batticaloa.

    Although local health-care personnel bear the brunt o

    the threats and assaults, the sta o oreign aid orga-

    nizations have on occasion been specically targeted.

    In December 1996, six expatriate sta members work-

    ing in the ICRC eld hospital in Novye Atagi, Chechnya,

    were assassinated, at point-blank range while in bed,

    in a premeditated attack on the hospital premises.

    A seventh delegate was shot and let or dead but

    survived. The assassins had silencers on their guns

    and clearly aimed to kill all the expatriate sta members,

    but stopped when the alarm was raised. Four nurses,

    a hospital administrator and a construction technician

    were among the dead. The ICRC suspended operations

    throughout Chechnya and handed over responsibility

    or the hospital to the Chechen health ministry.

    Perhaps the most dangerous job in the eld o health-

    care during armed conict is that o the rst-aiders

    and medics who go to the ront line to provide im-mediate lie-saving assistance to the injured and

    evacuate them to saety. They risk being directly

    targeted, caught in the crossre o an unnished

    battle, or injured by unexploded ordnance scat-

    tered around the area. Between 2004 and 2009, 57

    volunteers rom the International Red Cross and Red

    Crescent Movement were killed or wounded in the line

    o duty. Such incidents are not limited to situations

    o armed conict: in 2010, ear among health-care

    workers in Mexico led them to strike to demand a halt

    to violence. Health-care personnel in many parts o

    the country are increasingly reluctant to treat victims

    o gunshot wounds suspected o belonging to crim-

    inal gangs or ear o being caught in the midst o

    urther violence.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    16/2416

    I have no doubtthat one missile wasaimed at us.

    I do not know or certainwhether it was meantto kill us or warn usto keep away,but it was defnitelyaimed in our direction.Palestinian Red Crescent ambulancedriver Khaled Abu Saada

    On occasion, health-care personnel have also been

    arrested or carrying out their proessional responsi-

    bilities to treat all in need regardless o who they are

    and what they have done. Three doctors who had

    been working in northern Sri Lanka were detained

    in mid-2009; Red Crescent volunteers in Yemen were

    detained on suspicion that they sympathized with

    protesters during the unrest in early 2011; and in Bahrain,

    47 doctors and nurses who treated protesters have been

    detained in sweeping arrests o health workers that

    ollowed the crackdown on protesters and ace trial in amilitary court on a range o other accusations.

    Even during peacetime, health-care personnel in many

    countries ace unacceptable threats rom patients

    and their relatives related to the quality o health care

    delivered. One study carried out in six Lebanese

    hospitals in 2009 ound that 80 percent o the emer-

    gency room sta had been verbally abused and

    25 percent physically assaulted over the past

    12 months. More than two-thirds o the perpetrators

    were relatives or riends o patients. This tendency is

    exacerbated during the heat o war: emergency rooms

    and operating theatres were invaded by gun-toting

    ghters in Somalia and Iraq, demanding that their

    riend, relative or comrade be treated immediately.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    17/2417

    SaeR acceSS oR health-caRe

    WoRKeRS in colombiaThe remote village o Santa Cruz in south-eastern

    Colombia is littered with landmines and other

    explosive remnants o war. The only health-

    care worker in this village risks her lie and

    limbs every time she ventures rom the health-

    care centre to conduct a home visit or make

    a round o vaccinations with her cool box.

    Everyone walks at their own risk here, she

    says with a smile that hides her unease. She

    is well aware o the repercussions or hersel

    and or the whole community were she to puther oot in the wrong place. To improve her

    saety and that o thousands like her all around

    Colombia, the ICRCs weapons contamination

    team trains health-care workers in techniques

    to help them avoid driving over or stepping on

    explosive devices. They learn what to look out

    or and what to do when hit by, or in the midst

    o, these deadly objects. The ICRC also talks to

    all sides in the conict about the consequences

    o these weapons or civilians.RogerArnold

    RaulArboleda/AFPPhoto

    Health-care personnel who give lie-saving assistance tothe injured are oten at risk themselves.

    What the laW SayS:

    Health-care personnel, whether military or civilian, may not be attacked

    or harmed.

    Health-care personnel shall not be hindered in the perormance o their

    exclusively medical tasks.

    Parties to a conict shall not harass or punish health-care personnel

    or perorming activities compatible with medical ethics, nor shall theycompel them to perorm activities contrary to medical ethics or

    to rerain rom perorming acts required by medical ethics.

    Medical personnel may not be required to give priority to any person

    except on medical grounds. Medical personnel decide, in accordance with

    medical ethics, which patient receives priority.

    The protection o medical personnel ceases when they commit, outside

    their humanitarian unction, acts harmul to the enemy.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    18/2418

    VIOLENCE AGAINST MEDICAL VEHICLES

    V ds attacks upon, thet o and

    intererence with medical vehicles.

    md vs d ambulances, medical

    ships or aircrat, whether civilian or military; and

    vehicles transporting medical supplies or equipment.

    AbrarTanoli/Reuters

    The nal example o violence aecting the delivery

    o health care concerns attacks against medicalvehicles. There is, o course, considerable overlap in

    the law protecting health-care acilities, health-care

    personnel and medical vehicles, and similarities in the

    types o attack directed against them. Nevertheless,

    the sheer number o attacks on medical vehicles, and

    their more requent misuse to trick the enemy, war-

    rants their discussion as a separate subject.

    Circulating in the midst o conict to collect and

    assist the wounded, ambulances sometimes come

    under re, both accidental and deliberate. The Libyan

    Red Crescent reported that over one our-day period

    in May 2011, three o its ambulances were hit in three

    separate incidents, resulting in the death o a nurse

    and injuries to a patient and three volunteers. Another

    volunteer was killed in Zlitan. Such a toll is reminiscent

    o the conict in Lebanon in 2006, when on one day,

    11 August, two ambulances came under attack in

    separate incidents. One Lebanese Red Cross ambu-

    lance that was attacked rom the air while transporting

    supplies rom Tyr to Tibnine caught re, injuring the

    paramedics aboard; another was shot at in the Mar-

    jayoun region when coming to aid victims o an air at-

    tack. A Lebanese Red Cross paramedic was shot dead

    in the second incident.

    Attacks on ambulances have also occurred in the oc-cupied Palestinian territory, Colombia, Mexico, Yemen,

    Iraq and Libya, and in Nepal during the conict rom

    1996 to 2006. Some o the deliberate attacks and

    many o the impediments and delays imposed upon

    ambulances in Libya, the occupied Palestinian terri-

    tory, Aghanistan and Nepal were due to mistrust o

    the ambulance service that stemmed rom its misuse

    in the past. Not all misuse is intended to cause harm:

    in Nepal, ambulance drivers complain o politicians

    using ambulances as a private taxi service or o others

    riding in them to avoid being inconvenienced by

    roadblocks during general strikes that paralyse the

    country. But some armed groups engage in perdy

    the deliberate misuse o the medical mission to ool

    the enemy. In Aghanistan, the armed opposition sent

    ambulances packed with explosives across security

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    19/2419

    By violating theneutrality o health-careservices, such actso deception endanger

    medical personnelengaged in caring orthe injured and sickin hospitals, clinics andrural health posts.From the ICRC statement condemningthe use of an ambulance in the 7 April 2011attack in Afghanistan

    ambulanceS in mexico: caught in the cRoSSiRe

    Over the last ew years, drug-related gang violence has claimed thousands o lives across Mexico. As violence increases, so does the

    demand or ambulance services. The Mexican Red Cross operates around 80 percent o all the emergency ambulances in the country and

    sometimes nds itsel caught in the crossre between rival gangs or between the police and gangs, when trying to evacuate the victims.

    There has never been direct aggression against the Mexican Red Cross, said the Sinaloa branch coordinator, Valentin Castilla Astrada.

    The groups see us as an organization that wants to help, not as being or one side or another. Nevertheless, the ambulance crews live in

    constant ear o being caught in the middle. We never know when something is going to happen to us, said the deputy coordinator o

    the Ciudad Juarez branch o the Mexican Red Cross. We are really araid. Beore, we just had to worry about the sick or someone injured

    in an accident. We worked in security. But now everything has changed. When a car approaches the scene we are scared that something

    will happen. The ICRC is helping the Mexican Red Cross to review its current procedures and practices and introduce new ways to assure

    the saety o these dedicated ambulance crews.

    What the laW SayS:

    Medical vehicles shall be respected and protected at all times and shall

    not be the object o attack.

    Medical units may not be used to launch attacks or to shield ghters

    or other military objectives rom attack.

    Medical vehicles cease to be protected when they are used, outside

    their humanitarian unction, to commit acts harmul to the enemy.

    Examples o acts harmul to the enemy include the transport o healthy

    troops, arms or munitions, as well as the collection or transmission

    o military intelligence.

    Examples o acts not harmul to the enemy include the carrying o light

    arms by medical personnel or use in sel-deence or arms that have

    just been taken rom the wounded.

    Isolated incidents implicating medical personnel, acilities or vehicles

    in acts harmul to the enemy do not entitle armed actors to attack them

    indiscriminately. A warning and reasonable time limit must be given

    beore an attack is launched. An attack must also respect the principleso distinction and proportionality.

    cordons. The ICRC publicly denounced this grave

    violation o international humanitarian law ollowing

    the 7 April 2011 ambulance attack on a police training

    centre in Kandahar that killed twelve people. A Taliban

    spokesman pledged to conduct an inquiry in response

    and said that such attacks would not happen again.

    In Libya, the ICRC is also receiving allegations o the

    misuse o the red cross and red crescent emblems

    to support military operations and the use o ambu-

    lances to transport arms and armed combatants.

    The abuse o trust that occurs through the misuse o

    the protective emblems, and o protected acilities

    and vehicles, can spiral into a vicious circle that under-

    mines the whole purpose o creating neutral entities

    in conict. When ambulances are misused, whetherto trick the enemy or or some other purpose, they

    all under suspicion and are, at best, subjected to the

    same delays and impediments as other vehicles or, at

    worst, become the object o attack. In both instances,

    they lose the advantage meant to preserve lie in

    conict, to the detriment o the wounded and the

    sick who require urgent medical attention.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    20/2420

    WHAT THE ICRC DOES

    AmnonGutman/ICRC

    pRactical i nitiatiVeS> The ICRC negotiates ceaseres or sae passage with

    parties to a conict to organize the collection o the

    wounded and dead, access to health care, or preventive

    health programmes such as vaccination campaigns. It

    also negotiates a ast track or ambulances through

    checkpoints in some contexts, such as the occupied

    Palestinian territory.

    > It reinorces the physical integrity o health-careacilities through the placement o sandbags, build-

    ing o bunkers and application o bomb-blast ilm

    to windows.

    > The ICRC marks health-care acilities with a red cross

    or red crescent emblem (ags, roo painting) and equips

    health-care centres with signs barring weapons inside.

    In some contexts, like Somalia, it establishes a system

    or the collection and retrieval o weapons at the

    hospital entrance. It also equips health-care personnel

    with aprons to signiy their protected status.

    > The ICRC takes the GPS (Global Positioning System)

    coordinates o health-care acilities and provides these

    to all parties to a conict.

    legal i nitiatiVeS> The ICRC spreads knowledge o international human-

    itarian law among military personnel, government

    ofcials, non-State opposition groups, inuential mem-

    bers o civil society, and the medical establishment.

    It encourages States to incorporate international

    humanitarian law into domestic legislation and enorce

    respect or it. This includes laws to restrict use o the

    red cross and red crescent emblems. It also spreads

    knowledge o the rules protecting health-care acilitiesand o the obligations o weapon-bearers and medical

    personnel to avoid compromising the neutrality o

    these acilities.

    > The ICRC appeals to all parties to a conict to prevent

    obstruction o health care and respect and acilitate

    the work o health-care personnel and volunteers.

    > The ICRC engages in dialogue with all parties to a

    conict regardless o whether they are considered

    legitimate or not by the opposing side. It brings

    allegations o violations o international humanitarian

    law to the parties concerned and engages in

    condential dialogue on measures to prevent such

    violations in the uture.

    The ICRC mounts emergency responses to outbreaks o conict around the world: this includes a range o

    medical activities, rom collecting the wounded to war surgery. It also undertakes many initiatives behind

    the scenes both immediate during conict and longer-term during peacetime to create an environment

    o respect or the work o the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and or international

    humanitarian law.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    21/2421

    ThomasPizer/ICRC

    PanchoDuda/ICRC

    JuanCarlosSierra/Sem

    anaNews

    BorisHeger/ICRC

    > It conducts rst-aid training or various groups

    exposed to violence to enable them to stabilize patients

    beore their arrival in a health-care acility. The ICRC

    may also take this opportunity to discuss directly with

    combatants the importance o respecting international

    humanitarian law.

    > In places where violence against health-care workers

    and acilities is a requent occurrence, the ICRC runs

    inormation campaigns such as a radio series with the

    BBC Trust Fund in Aghanistan and a poster campaign

    in the occupied Palestinian territory.

    > The ICRC accompanies the sick and the wounded to

    hospital i they ear discrimination.

    > It mounts mobile health-care services in areas that

    are diicult o access: such as the lying surgical

    team in Darur that operated rom 2005 to 2009 or

    the mobile clinics transported by canoe to remote

    areas in Colombia.

    > The ICRC conducts saer access campaigns with

    the National Societies o countries acing conict and

    other violence to increase awareness o ways to

    minimize the danger when accessing potentially

    dangerous areas. Work is also done on improving

    local knowledge and public perception o the

    National Societys role and unction.

    > The ICRC addresses specic problems, such as

    impediments to ambulances, with all those concerned.

    For instance, to improve the reputation o, and increase

    respect or, ambulance services in Nepal, the ICRC

    holds periodic meetings with ambulance services, the

    National Society, and State and non-State actors to ironout misunderstandings and to reiterate the roles and

    responsibilities o ambulance drivers, political parties,

    and the people manning checkpoints.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    22/2422

    WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE

    Violence, both real and threatened, against health-care workers, acilities and beneciaries must be recognized as one o the

    most serious and widespread humanitarian concerns o today. As this booklet has shown, there is an urgent need to secure

    the saety o the wounded and the sick, and o health-care personnel, health-care acilities and medical vehicles during armed

    conict and other violence. More must be done to ensure that the wounded and the sick have timely access to health care

    and that the acilities and personnel to treat them are available, adequately supplied with medicines and medical equipment,

    and secure. Saeguarding health care cannot be addressed by the health-care community alone. Primary responsibility or it

    lies with politicians and combatants.

    1. bd r

    The ICRC aims to mobilize support or this issue rom

    within the International Red Cross and Red Crescent

    Movement and among the health-care community,

    medical aid organizations, military orces, and govern-

    ments around the world. Working together to enhancerespect or the law, this community should cultivate

    a culture o responsibility among all concerned to

    saeguard health care.

    2. Rr d d r r

    In order to better understand and react to attacks on

    patients, health-care workers and acilities, and medical

    vehicles, reports o incidents should be more system-

    atically collected and centralized with the data o other

    organizations.

    3. csd d rv d rs

    The ICRC has undertaken many initiatives to improve

    access to and saeguard health care in the various

    contexts in which it is working. Experiences and best

    practice need to be shared more widely within the

    International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement

    and broader health-care community to encourage

    more and better initiatives on this ront.

    4. esr s r

    Hospitals and other health-care acilities in countries

    aected by armed conict or other violence will beassisted in organizing the physical protection o the

    premises and in developing procedures or noti-

    ying others o their location and o the movements

    o their vehicles.

    5. sr ss r Rd crss d Rd

    crs sf d vrs

    The ICRC will encourage greater involvement o Red

    Cross and Red Crescent sta and volunteers in collect-

    ing data on, and responding to, threats to patients,

    health-care sta, volunteers, health-care acilities and

    medical vehicles.

    t rs wrss s ss d r rv , icRc s sk sr r

    w vs:

    6. e w Ss

    All States that have not yet introduced domestic legis-

    lation to saeguard health care in situations o armed

    conict and internal strie will be encouraged to do so.

    This includes enacting and enorcing legislation on lim-

    iting use o the red cross and red crescent emblems.

    7. e w rd rs

    All national armed orces that have not yet incor-

    porated provisions into their standard operating

    procedures with respect to saeguarding health care

    will be encouraged to do so. These standard operating

    procedures must address, among other issues, man-

    agement o checkpoints to acilitate the passage o

    medical vehicles and entry into health-care acilities.

    8. e w S rd rs

    Armed groups operating outside the purview o the

    State will be engaged in dialogue on laws and practices

    pertaining to saeguarding health care.

    9. e w rss r

    ss d srs

    Increase dialogue with health ministries and health

    associations to generate solidarity on this issue and

    improve reporting on, and responses to, violence

    against health-care workers, acilities and beneciaries.

    10. er rs d rsAssist universities, other educational institutions and

    think tanks to incorporate modules on the implications

    o, and means to address, violence against patients and

    health-care workers and acilities into courses in public

    health, political science, law and security studies.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    23/24

    Mission

    The International Committee o the Red Cross (ICRC)

    is an impartial, neutral and independent organization

    whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect

    the lives and dignity o victims o armed conict and

    other situations o violence and to provide them with

    assistance. The ICRC also endeavours to prevent suering

    by promoting and strengthening humanitarian law and

    universal humanitarian principles. Established in 1863,

    the ICRC is at the origin o the Geneva Conventions and

    the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement.

    It directs and coordinates the international activities

    conducted by the Movement in armed conicts and other

    situations o violence.

  • 8/6/2019 Health care in danger: Making the case

    24/24

    0208.2

    0113,50

    0