21
1 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda Heavy-Quarks with ALICE Some Highlights from the ALICE Physics Week in Prague March 2008 Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg / GSI Darmstadt

HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda 1 Heavy-Quarks with ALICE Some Highlights from the ALICE Physics Week in Prague March 2008 Kai Schweda, University

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Heavy-Quarks with ALICE

Some Highlights from the ALICE Physics Week in Prague March 2008

Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg / GSI Darmstadt

2 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Outline

Motivation

Total charm cross section with ALICE

B J/ + X feeddown

1st day Detector Performance in p+p

Summary

HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Quark Masses

1) Higgs mass: electro-weak symmetry breaking. (current quark mass)

2) QCD mass: Chiral symmetry breaking. (constituent quark mass)

Strong interactions do not

affect heavy-quark masses.

Important tool for studying properties of the hot/dense medium at RHIC and LHC.

Test pQCD predictions at RHIC and LHC.

Total quark mass (MeV)

X. Zhu, M. Bleicher, K.S., H. Stoecker, N. Xu et al., PLB 647 (2007) 366.

4 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Heavy Quark Production

1) Charm x 10

2) Beauty x 100

3) Heavy-quarks abundantly produced at LHC !STAR data: A. Suaide, P. Djawothoto QM2006;Calcs.: R. Vogt.

5 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

J/ Production

suppression,compared to scaled p+p

regeneration,enhancement

Low energy (SPS): few ccbar quarks in the system suppression of J/

High energy (LHC): many ccbar pairs in the system enhancement of J/

Signal of de-confinement + thermalization of light quarks !

(SPS)

P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, Nature 448 (2007) 302.

6 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Predictions for LHC

large ccbar production at

LHC

corona effects negligible

regeneration of J/

dominates

striking centrality

dependence

Signature for QGP

formation !

Initial conditions at LHC ?

A. Andronic et al., nucl-th/0701079.

cc

ηηddpdT

ddpNdpR

TNN

AA

TAA

TAA /

/)(

2

2

=

7 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Charm at the LHC:testing pQCD at s = 14 TeV

• Important test of pQCD in a new energy domain• D production not yet fully understood at Tevatron and RHIC• Need displaced vertex technique for precise heavy-flavor measurements

Tevatron data: CDF PRL91 (2003) 241804, RHIC data: Y. Zhang, QM2008,FONLL calcs. R. Vogt, Eur. Phys. J.ST 155 (2008) 213.

8 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Hadronic charm in ALICEHadronic charm in ALICE

TPC (tracking)

TOF (K/ id)

ITS (vertexing)

K

D0 KD+ K Ds KK D* D0 D0 K c Kp

understudy

9 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Plot: A. Shabetai

D0 + + K- Reconstruction

D0, c= 123 m

+

K-

10 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Charm cross section in pp

D0 KExpected sensitivity in comparison to pQCD:

1 year at nominal luminosity(109 pp events)

Detector configuration:ITS + TPC + TOF

~1 month

stat. err. vs # events

Slide: A. Dainese, INFN - Italy.

11 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Inner Tracking System (ITS)Silicon Pixel Detector (SPD):• ~10M channels• 240 sensitive vol. (60 ladders)

Silicon Drift Detector (SDD):• ~133k channels• 260 sensitive vol. (36 ladders)

Silicon Strip Detector (SSD):• ~2.6M channels• 1698 sensitive vol. (72 ladders)

SPDSSD

SDD

ITS total:2198 alignable sensitive volumes 13188 d.o.f.

Slide: A. Dainese, INFN - Italy.

12 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Effect of ITS misalignment on d0 resolution

• Impact parameter resol:

track = ascatter/pt bmeas cmisalign

• Effect studied with full simulation of exptected initial (full+) and residual (after realignment) misalignments

• See talk tomorrow• Effect on D0 measurement

studied (next slides)

nullresidualfullfull+

Slide: A. Dainese, INFN - Italy.

13 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Effect of misalignment on S/B and significance (S/S+B)

• Residual misalignment: negligible effect• “Full” misalignment: 15-20% worsening of statistical errors

14 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Kinematical distributions: prompt J/ versus secondary J/

• rapidity and transverse momentum(all distribution normalized to 1 m.b. event)

y

%8.40 /tot

b from /=

JJ

but pT dependent

Primary J/

Secondary J/

Slide: Giuseppe E Bruno, Università di Bari and INFN - Italy.

B J/ + X

15 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

• product of impact parameters d0xd0

Kinematical distributions: prompt J/ versus secondary J/

Primary J/

Secondary J/

Slide: Giuseppe E Bruno, Università di Bari and INFN - Italy,also: Wolfgang Sommer, Uni Frankfurt.

• Disentangle

primordial J/

from

B J/ decay

• Determine bbar

16 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

J/ e+ + e- Reconstruction

J/ e+ + e-

(BR = 6%)

Reconstruct

invariant mass

TRD identifies

electrons

4/18 SM

installed for first

p+p run

Identify

quarkonia

J/: c c : b b

17 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Summary

Heavy-quarks (c,b) carry important information on

de-confinement and light-quark thermalization

Measure yield, spectra, correlations and v2 of:

D0, D+, D*+, Ds, J/b,

to identify and characterize QGP !

ALICE is well suited for these studies

18 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Average Momentum Correlator – angular dependence

Enhanced correlations

Only FC produces correlations

at high Distinction of the baseline at

middle – flat to 0

Average Momentum Correlator

as a sensitive measure of

back to back correlations

Same eventMixed event

At full : <pt,1pt,2> = 199.5 +/- 6 (MeV/c)2

or pt~30 %

20 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

D Meson Pair Correlations : Some Results

= (D) – (Dbar)

• E791 : Eur. Phys. J. direct C1 (1999) 4• WA92 : Phys. Lett. B385 (1996) 487• NA32 : PLB257 (1991) 519 , PLB302 (1993) 112, PLB353 (1995) 547

Correlation variable studied:

103 /

N *

dN

/d(

)

•At low energies, D-Dbar production correlated!

•Pythia describes these correlations!

How about LHC energies?

p

p c

c D

DGeorgios Tsildeakis,HD.

21 HD lunch talk, 30 Apr 2008 Kai Schweda

Charm correlations

c-cbar are correlated

• Flavor creation: back to

back

• Gluon splitting: forward

• Flavor excitation: flat

Correlations vanish

frequent interactions

among partons !

probe light-quark

thermalization !