HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

  • Upload
    robin

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    1/17

    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH

    Self-Determination

    Theory

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    2/17

    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH

    Self-Determination Theory (SDT)

    Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the facilitation ofintrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist,55(1): 68-78.

    What are the essential nutriments for

    positive motivation and experience thatenhance performance and well-being?

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    3/17

    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH

    Three essential psychological needs:

    Perceived competence (self-efficacy) Autonomy (choice)

    Relatedness (social environment)

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    4/17

    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH

    Degrees of Motivation

    Amotivation

    NonintentionalNonvaluing

    Extrinsic

    ComplianceExternal

    rewards and

    punishments

    Introjected

    Self-controlInternal

    rewards and

    punishments

    Intrinsic

    Personallyimportant

    ValuedSatisfying

    not care feel like you

    were breaking

    the rules

    feel guilty feel

    unsatisfied

    If you didnt engage in behavior X, you would

    Low self-efficacy

    Low autonomy

    Low relatedness

    High self-efficacy

    High autonomy

    High relatedness

    Individuals would tend to have

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    5/17

    Good parent Attractive

    Good spouse/partner Disciplined

    Good community member Responsible

    Strong In control

    Youthful Respected at work

    Competent Athletic

    Respected at home Not hypocritical

    Spiritual Energetic

    Successful Considerate

    Popular Independent

    Connecting Values with Behaviors

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    6/17

    Values

    Behaviors

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    7/17

    Values

    Intrinsic motivation

    Behaviors

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    8/17UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH

    Eat for Life Study

    Tailoring on motivational predisposition 513 African American adults from HMOs in Atlanta and

    Detroit

    Three tailored newsletters

    Outcome: fruit and vegetable intake

    Moderator: preference for autonomy supportive vs.

    directive communication

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    9/17UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH

    Tailoring on Motivation

    Tina, based on your responses to our survey it sounds like you

    Intrinsic: have some meaningful reasons for wanting to eat better. Youve told usthat eating fruit and vegetables as part of a healthy diet is [something youve

    carefully thought about] and is [a key part of taking responsibility for your own

    health].

    Introjected: are often your own toughest critic when it comes to what you eat.Youve told us that you [wouldnt feel good about yourself/would feel guilty] if you

    did not eat more fruit and vegetables.

    Extrinsic: have strong relationships with other people who care about how you eat.Youve told us that eating more fruit and vegetables will help [prove to other

    people/show your family] that you are leading a healthier life.

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    10/17UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH

    Preference for autonomy support:

    In general, when it comes to my health I wouldrather an expert just tell me what I should do.

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    11/17

    F i g u r e 2 . I n t e r a c t i o n o f F & V C h a n g e * w i t h A u t o n o m y P r e f e r e n c e

    1 . 0 7

    0 . 4 3

    0 . 6

    0 . 6 4

    0

    0 . 2

    0 . 4

    0 . 6

    0 . 8

    1

    1 . 2

    C O N T R O L E X P E R I M E N T A L

    Ch an ein F In tae(Ser in s)

    H i g h

    A u t o n o m y

    < = 5

    L o w

    A u t o n o m y

    > = 6

    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH

    Preference for autonomy

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    12/17

    Sharing Pros

    If I share

    If I dont share

    Cons

    Ive done

    something good

    Ive done

    something bad

    Pros and Cons Matrix: Fruit Sharing

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    13/17

    Pros and Cons Matrix: Fruit Sharing

    Sharing Pros

    If I share

    If I dont share

    Cons

    Ive done

    something

    good

    I get more fruit

    I get less fruit

    Ive done

    something bad

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    14/17

    Pros and Cons Matrix: Cigarette Smoking

    Smoking Pros

    If I dont

    smoke

    If I smoke

    Cons

    I wont die

    Ill die

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    15/17

    Pros and Cons Matrix

    Smoking Pros

    If I dont

    smoke

    If I smoke

    Cons

    I wont die

    Ill die

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    16/17

    Pros and Cons Matrix

    Sex and

    speed

    No sex, no speed

    Smoking Pros

    If I dont

    smoke

    If I smoke

    Cons

    I wont die

    Ill die

  • 8/14/2019 HBHE600_2008_08_Self-Determination Theory

    17/17

    Pros and Cons Matrix

    Sharing Pros

    If I share

    If I dont share

    Cons

    I may hook

    up with

    Brittney

    I get more

    fruit

    I get less fruit

    I wont hook up

    with Brittney